Hydrogen Purification Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
- Filing has slowed since its 2022 peak. Annual filings ran from 100 in 2017 to a peak of 178 in 2022, then declined toward 15 in the partial 2026 count — a maturing rather than an expanding claim space.
- Concentration sits at the very top. The leader alone holds 485 records, and the top 5 assignees together account for 36.9% of all 3,999 records in scope — well ahead of the long tail below tenth place.
- Separation and inorganic chemistry classes dominate. B01D separation processes appear on 74.1% of records and C01B inorganic compounds on 48.4%, while ammonia-specific class C01C sits at just 5.4% — a narrow, likely under-claimed slice given ammonia's role as a carrier.
Filing growth compares 2021 (152 records) with 2024 (136) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,999 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent activity at the intersection of hydrogen purification — pressure swing adsorption, palladium membrane separation — and the practical constraints of carrier release streams: ammonia decomposition, nitrogen removal, recovery-rate and purity tradeoffs, adsorbent selection, cycle time, membrane flux and mechanical support. It spans 3,999 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026.
Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent filing years in any trend line understate actual activity. Family-level counts, used throughout this ranking, are the fairer unit of comparison because they neutralise continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Annual filing counts and IPC subclass distribution across the 3,999 records in scope, drawn directly from the search corpus.
Filings rose to a 2022 peak, then declined
Annual filings climbed from 100 in 2017 to a peak of 178 in 2022, then fell toward 15 in the partial 2026 year. Read the tail end cautiously: publication lag of roughly 18 months means 2025 and 2026 figures will rise as more filings surface, but the multi-year decline from the 2022 peak is a genuine signal that the core PSA and membrane claim space has filled in.
Separation and inorganic chemistry classes dominate
B01D (separation processes) appears on 74.1% of the 3,999 records and C01B (non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds) on 48.4% — the two backbone classes for adsorption and gas-separation hardware. Catalysis (B01J, 11.8%), hydrocarbon chemistry (C07C, 8.2%) and ammonia-specific C01C (5.4%) trail well behind, indicating that most claim activity still centres on generic separation equipment rather than carrier-specific chemistry.
Shares are the percentage of the 3,999 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Hydrogen Purification for Carrier Release Streams with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hydrogen purification for carrier release streams and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing and most-cited prior art
Pressure swing adsorption apparatus for hydrogen purification from decomposed ammonia gas
The apparatus uses a plurality of adsorption towers split between a pretreatment unit and a hydrogen purification unit, each packed with different adsorbents, to reach high-purity hydrogen from mixed gas produced after ammonia decomposition. The design is built to make the ammonia-removal adsorbent easy to replace and to minimise carryover into the purification stage.Filed by Korea Institute of Energy Research, published 2024 — squarely inside the ammonia-decomposition-to-hydrogen route this landscape tracks.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6389814B2 | Hydrocarbon combustion power generation system with CO2 sequestration | 401 |
| 2 | US6406523B1 | Rotary pressure swing adsorption apparatus | 353 |
| 3 | US5388643A | Coalbed methane recovery using pressure swing adsorption separation | 329 |
| 4 | US6170264B1 | Hydrocarbon combustion power generation system with CO2 sequestration | 319 |
| 5 | US4770676A | Recovery of methane from land fill gas | 253 |
| 6 | US5082473A | Extraction and concentration of a gas component | 250 |
| 7 | US4553981A | Enhanced hydrogen recovery from effluent gas streams | 248 |
| 8 | US20080282892A1 | Low mesopore adsorbent contactors for use in swing adsorption processes | 247 |
| 9 | US4784672A | Regeneration of adsorbents | 236 |
| 10 | US4801308A | Apparatus and process for pressure swing adsorption separation | 211 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of technical importance, not current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for strategy
Three findings that shape where to file, license or watch in this space.
Filing is concentrated but not closed
The leader holds 485 records and the top 5 combined account for 36.9% of all 3,999 records in scope, with the top 10 reaching 47.9%. That leaves more than half the field held by assignees outside the top 10 — a genuine long tail rather than a two-player market.
Growth has flattened since 2022
Filings rose from 100 in 2017 to a peak of 178 in 2022, then declined through the most recent years. Momentum data on individual assignees shows flat or zero year-over-year activity even among leaders, consistent with a technology entering a slower, consolidation phase rather than active expansion.
Ammonia-specific claims are a small slice
Despite ammonia decomposition being a named route in this search, the ammonia/nitrogen-compound class C01C appears on only 5.4% of records, versus 74.1% for generic separation processes (B01D). Carrier-specific chemistry claims are comparatively sparse against the bulk of general adsorption and membrane hardware.
Filing offices split across US, China and Europe
The United States leads with 832 filings, followed by China at 647 and the EPO at 635, with Canada, WIPO/PCT and India trailing. No single office dominates the way the top assignees dominate ownership, meaning freedom-to-operate checks need to span at least three major jurisdictions.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hydrogen purification for carrier release streams, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where it opens up
The assignee ranking covers 100 companies counted by record; ownership is front-loaded but the gaps below the leaders are wide enough to be workable.
One assignee sits well clear of the field
The top-ranked assignee holds 485 records, nearly three times the fifth-place count of 171 and roughly eight times tenth place at 61. That gap is the clearest evidence that core PSA and gas-separation equipment claims are held tightly by a small number of industrial gas incumbents.
Most of the field sits below the top 10
The top 10 assignees combined hold 47.9% of all 3,999 records, leaving the majority outside that group. That long tail includes research institutes and single-filing entrants working on ammonia-decomposition and carrier-specific variants rather than generic separation hardware.
Co-filing is limited and inventor-anchored
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the data, and the strongest links pair a single corporate assignee with a named inventor rather than two independent companies. Cross-company joint filing is rare in this space; most activity is filed solo.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 2 | 0% |
| Element 1 Corp | 1 | 0% |
| Praxair Technology, Inc. | 0 | — |
| ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company | 0 | — |
| BOC Group, Inc. (US) | 0 | — |
| Union Carbide Corporation | 0 | — |
| UOP LLC | 0 | -100% |
| L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Étude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this next
The landscape data points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or identifying open claim space.
Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's claim set
With one assignee holding 485 records and the top 5 covering 36.9% of all 3,999 records, any new PSA or membrane hardware filing should be checked against that concentrated core before drafting claims.
Run an FTO search in EurekaScope claims around ammonia-specific chemistry
C01C-classed ammonia and nitrogen-compound filings sit at only 5.4% of records against a 74.1% base for generic separation processes, suggesting room for carrier-specific adsorbent and cycle-control claims.
Explore white space in EurekaTrack momentum among mid-tier assignees
Several ranked assignees show flat or zero year-over-year filing activity in the most recent period; watching which of these resume filing can flag where investment is returning to the field.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
Filing is concentrated at the top: the leading assignee alone holds 485 of the 3,999 records in scope, and the top 5 assignees combined account for 36.9% of all records. These leaders are established industrial gas and chemical engineering firms with long-running pressure swing adsorption and gas-separation portfolios. Below the top 10, which together hold 47.9% of records, ownership spreads across a long tail of research institutes and single-filing entrants, so the field is not a closed two-player market despite the concentration at the very top.
The IPC composition shows B01D, the separation-processes class covering both PSA and membrane filtration equipment, on 74.1% of the 3,999 records, making it by far the dominant technical route in claim volume. C01B, non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds, appears on 48.4% of records and often overlaps with B01D filings on the same hardware. The data does not break PSA out separately from membrane separation at the class level, so a claim-by-claim review is needed to judge the split between the two within B01D.
Annual filings rose from 100 in 2017 to a peak of 178 in 2022, then declined toward 15 in the partial 2026 count. Part of that drop is a publication-lag artefact: patents typically publish roughly 18 months after filing, so the last one to two years of any trend line will always look lower than they eventually turn out to be. Even allowing for that lag, the multi-year decline from the 2022 peak suggests the core adsorption and membrane equipment claim space has filled in, pushing new filings toward narrower ammonia-specific and carrier-stream variants rather than broad separation hardware.
The clearest gap is ammonia-specific chemistry: C01C, the class for ammonia, cyanides and nitrogen compounds, appears on only 5.4% of the 3,999 records, far below the 74.1% carried by generic separation processes. Given that ammonia decomposition is a named route in this dataset's own search criteria, that low share points to under-claimed territory in adsorbent selection for nitrogen/ammonia co-removal, cycle-time control across multi-bed PSA systems handling carrier off-gas, and mechanical support design for membrane modules in these specific streams. Filers willing to draft claims tied to carrier-stream conditions rather than generic gas mixtures have more room to work with here.
The United States leads with 832 filings, ahead of China at 647 and the European Patent Office at 635. Canada, the WIPO/PCT route and India follow at lower volumes. Because no single office accounts for a majority of filings, a thorough freedom-to-operate or licensing review in this field needs to cover at least the US, China and EPO jurisdictions rather than relying on any one office as a proxy for the whole landscape.
Research Hydrogen Purification for Carrier Release Streams in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole hydrogen purification for carrier release streams corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.