Book a demo

Hydrogen Purification Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Hydrogen Purification Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/hydrogen-purification-for-carrier-release-streams-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Hydrogen & Fuel Cells
Hydrogen purification patents for carrier release streams: who leads and where filing has cooled
  • Filing has slowed since its 2022 peak. Annual filings ran from 100 in 2017 to a peak of 178 in 2022, then declined toward 15 in the partial 2026 count — a maturing rather than an expanding claim space.
  • Concentration sits at the very top. The leader alone holds 485 records, and the top 5 assignees together account for 36.9% of all 3,999 records in scope — well ahead of the long tail below tenth place.
  • Separation and inorganic chemistry classes dominate. B01D separation processes appear on 74.1% of records and C01B inorganic compounds on 48.4%, while ammonia-specific class C01C sits at just 5.4% — a narrow, likely under-claimed slice given ammonia's role as a carrier.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
3,999
Published Records
37%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-11%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (152 records) with 2024 (136) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,999 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent activity at the intersection of hydrogen purification — pressure swing adsorption, palladium membrane separation — and the practical constraints of carrier release streams: ammonia decomposition, nitrogen removal, recovery-rate and purity tradeoffs, adsorbent selection, cycle time, membrane flux and mechanical support. It spans 3,999 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026.

Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent filing years in any trend line understate actual activity. Family-level counts, used throughout this ranking, are the fairer unit of comparison because they neutralise continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1AIR PROD & CHEM INC485
  2. 2PRAXAIR TECH INC427
  3. 3EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO200
  4. 4BOC GROUP INC193
  5. 5UOP LLC171
  6. 6UNION CARBIDE CORP155
  7. 7LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE88
  8. 8LUMMUS TECHNOLOGY INC75
  9. 9IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LTD61
  10. 10EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY(US)61
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Purification for Carrier Release Streams covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Annual filing counts and IPC subclass distribution across the 3,999 records in scope, drawn directly from the search corpus.

Filings rose to a 2022 peak, then declined

Annual filings climbed from 100 in 2017 to a peak of 178 in 2022, then fell toward 15 in the partial 2026 year. Read the tail end cautiously: publication lag of roughly 18 months means 2025 and 2026 figures will rise as more filings surface, but the multi-year decline from the 2022 peak is a genuine signal that the core PSA and membrane claim space has filled in.

Filings rose to a 2022 peak, then declined050100150200100201720182019202020211782022202320242025152026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Separation and inorganic chemistry classes dominate

B01D (separation processes) appears on 74.1% of the 3,999 records and C01B (non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds) on 48.4% — the two backbone classes for adsorption and gas-separation hardware. Catalysis (B01J, 11.8%), hydrocarbon chemistry (C07C, 8.2%) and ammonia-specific C01C (5.4%) trail well behind, indicating that most claim activity still centres on generic separation equipment rather than carrier-specific chemistry.

Separation and inorganic chemistry classes dominateB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…2,96574.1%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…1,93648.4%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …47211.8%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds3278.2%C01C · Ammonia, cyanides & nitrogen c…2175.4%F25J · Gas liquefaction & separation2105.3%C10L · Fuels & firelighters2005.0%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining1283.2%Other1,04826.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 3,999 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Purification for Carrier Release Streams covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Hydrogen Purification for Carrier Release Streams with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hydrogen purification for carrier release streams and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
US20240100469A12024-03-28

Pressure swing adsorption apparatus for hydrogen purification from decomposed ammonia gas

KOREA INSTITUTE OF ENERGY RESEARCH

The apparatus uses a plurality of adsorption towers split between a pretreatment unit and a hydrogen purification unit, each packed with different adsorbents, to reach high-purity hydrogen from mixed gas produced after ammonia decomposition. The design is built to make the ammonia-removal adsorbent easy to replace and to minimise carryover into the purification stage.Filed by Korea Institute of Energy Research, published 2024 — squarely inside the ammonia-decomposition-to-hydrogen route this landscape tracks.

US20240100469A1 — patent drawing 1US20240100469A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6389814B2Hydrocarbon combustion power generation system with CO2 sequestration401
2US6406523B1Rotary pressure swing adsorption apparatus353
3US5388643ACoalbed methane recovery using pressure swing adsorption separation329
4US6170264B1Hydrocarbon combustion power generation system with CO2 sequestration319
5US4770676ARecovery of methane from land fill gas253
6US5082473AExtraction and concentration of a gas component250
7US4553981AEnhanced hydrogen recovery from effluent gas streams248
8US20080282892A1Low mesopore adsorbent contactors for use in swing adsorption processes247
9US4784672ARegeneration of adsorbents236
10US4801308AApparatus and process for pressure swing adsorption separation211

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of technical importance, not current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Purification for Carrier Release Streams covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for strategy

Three findings that shape where to file, license or watch in this space.

Concentration
36.9% of 3,999
top 5 share of all records

Filing is concentrated but not closed

The leader holds 485 records and the top 5 combined account for 36.9% of all 3,999 records in scope, with the top 10 reaching 47.9%. That leaves more than half the field held by assignees outside the top 10 — a genuine long tail rather than a two-player market.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Momentum
178 → 15
peak 2022 to partial 2026

Growth has flattened since 2022

Filings rose from 100 in 2017 to a peak of 178 in 2022, then declined through the most recent years. Momentum data on individual assignees shows flat or zero year-over-year activity even among leaders, consistent with a technology entering a slower, consolidation phase rather than active expansion.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Composition
5.4% of records
C01C ammonia-specific class

Ammonia-specific claims are a small slice

Despite ammonia decomposition being a named route in this search, the ammonia/nitrogen-compound class C01C appears on only 5.4% of records, versus 74.1% for generic separation processes (B01D). Carrier-specific chemistry claims are comparatively sparse against the bulk of general adsorption and membrane hardware.

IPC composition, 8 subclasses
Geography
832 US filings
leading receiving office

Filing offices split across US, China and Europe

The United States leads with 832 filings, followed by China at 647 and the EPO at 635, with Canada, WIPO/PCT and India trailing. No single office dominates the way the top assignees dominate ownership, meaning freedom-to-operate checks need to span at least three major jurisdictions.

Receiving offices
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hydrogen purification for carrier release streams, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Purification for Carrier Release Streams covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it opens up

The assignee ranking covers 100 companies counted by record; ownership is front-loaded but the gaps below the leaders are wide enough to be workable.

Leader
485 records
single top assignee

One assignee sits well clear of the field

The top-ranked assignee holds 485 records, nearly three times the fifth-place count of 171 and roughly eight times tenth place at 61. That gap is the clearest evidence that core PSA and gas-separation equipment claims are held tightly by a small number of industrial gas incumbents.

Assignee ranking
Long tail
52.1% of 3,999
outside the top 10

Most of the field sits below the top 10

The top 10 assignees combined hold 47.9% of all 3,999 records, leaving the majority outside that group. That long tail includes research institutes and single-filing entrants working on ammonia-decomposition and carrier-specific variants rather than generic separation hardware.

Concentration, top 10
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
documented joint filings

Co-filing is limited and inventor-anchored

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the data, and the strongest links pair a single corporate assignee with a named inventor rather than two independent companies. Cross-company joint filing is rare in this space; most activity is filed solo.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where filing density is comparatively low relative to the core separation-equipment claims.
Ammonia decomposition off-gas cleanupAdsorbent selection for nitrogen/ammonia co-removalCycle-time optimisation for multi-bed PSA on carrier streamsMechanical support structures for membrane modulesPurity-recovery tradeoff control logic
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.20%
Element 1 Corp10%
Praxair Technology, Inc.0
ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company0
BOC Group, Inc. (US)0
Union Carbide Corporation0
UOP LLC0-100%
L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Étude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Purification for Carrier Release Streams covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The landscape data points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or identifying open claim space.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's claim set

With one assignee holding 485 records and the top 5 covering 36.9% of all 3,999 records, any new PSA or membrane hardware filing should be checked against that concentrated core before drafting claims.

Run an FTO search in Eureka

Scope claims around ammonia-specific chemistry

C01C-classed ammonia and nitrogen-compound filings sit at only 5.4% of records against a 74.1% base for generic separation processes, suggesting room for carrier-specific adsorbent and cycle-control claims.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track momentum among mid-tier assignees

Several ranked assignees show flat or zero year-over-year filing activity in the most recent period; watching which of these resume filing can flag where investment is returning to the field.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Purification for Carrier Release Streams covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Purification for Carrier Release Streams covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Hydrogen Purification for Carrier Release Streams in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole hydrogen purification for carrier release streams corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.