Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (17 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 97 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Liquid-organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs) store hydrogen by chemically binding it to a liquid molecule and releasing it later through catalytic dehydrogenation. This landscape covers 97 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that claim dehydrogenation reactors, catalyst structures, carrier chemistries or the storage systems built around them. The scope is defined by a search combining LOHC/carrier dehydrogenation terms with hydrogen storage or containment terms, so it captures the release step specifically rather than hydrogen storage generally.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend view are still filling in and should not be read as a slowdown. The most recent complete year for growth comparisons is 2024.
Two views of the same 97-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filings rose from a standing start in 2017 to a peak of 24 in 2020, then declined; the 2021-to-2024 span shows a 41% drop (17 to 10), the last comparison period unaffected by publication lag. Years after 2024 will keep revising upward as later publications land.
C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) appears on 60.8% of the 97 records and B01J (catalysis) on 48.5%, confirming that most claims are about the chemistry and catalyst of release rather than the vessel. F17C (pressure vessels) and H01M (batteries and fuel cells) each cover 24.7%, marking the downstream storage and power-conversion side. Aircraft-specific classes B64C and B64D sit at 5.2% each — a small but present aviation-hydrogen thread. Shares add to more than 100% because records carry multiple classes.
Shares are the percentage of the 97 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hydrogen storage — liquid-organic hydrogen-carrier dehydrogenation patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaProvided is a catalyst structure for a liquid organic hydrogen carrier (LOHC) dehydrogenation reactor, including a support, a plurality of channels formed on the support so that the LOHC may flow through, and an LOHC dehydrogenation catalyst coated on the inner channel surfaces and in contact with the LOHC to carry out dehydrogenation. Hydrogen gas generated from the reaction is discharged along the channels, increasing the contact area between the LOHC and the catalyst.Filed by Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, published 2022-09-29 as US20220305469A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20090246575A1 | Hydrogen storage material and related system | 40 |
| 2 | US20160214858A1 | Multi-zone dehydrogenation reactor and ballasting system for storage and delivery of hydrogen | 35 |
| 3 | US20130142726A1 | Process For The Storage Delivery Of Hydrogen Using Catalyst | 29 |
| 4 | US20220250762A1 | vehicle | 26 |
| 5 | US20230001377A1 | Utralight hydrogen production reactor comprising high-efficiency composite | 20 |
| 6 | US7901491B2 | Hydrogen storage material and related system | 14 |
| 7 | US20220115682A1 | Carbon-neutral process for generating electricity | 13 |
| 8 | US20220349527A1 | Hydrogen storage device | 10 |
| 9 | US20210119237A1 | Polymer electrolyte membrane for medium and high temperature, preparation method thereof and high temperature… | 10 |
| 10 | WO2012014225A2 | An improved process for the storage delivery of hydrogen using catalyst | 10 |
Citation counts inside this corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — they signal influence on the field, not current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-outs from the dataset that matter more than the raw counts on their own.
Five assignees hold 55 of the 97 records in scope, with the leader alone contributing 15. Below tenth place — held with just 3 records — filing drops off into single-digit and single-filing entrants, which is where freedom-to-operate is easiest to establish.
24 records published in 2020 remains the high point of the series. The decline to 10 in 2024 is real, but 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag and should not be added to the trend line yet.
C01B and B01J together cover the carrier chemistry and catalytic mechanism side of the field, while F17C and H01M cover the storage vessel and downstream power conversion side at roughly a quarter of records each. Reactor and system integration claims are comparatively less crowded.
Only 9 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairs recur at just 4 shared records each. Most assignees file alone, which suggests LOHC dehydrogenation IP has developed largely inside single organisations rather than through joint ventures.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hydrogen storage — liquid-organic hydrogen-carrier dehydrogenation patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The landscape points to a concentrated top tier and a chemistry-heavy claim map — the next step is usually to test a specific filing idea against it.
Run a candidate claim against the leader's portfolio and the top-10 group's 78.4% share of records before committing drafting resources to core dehydrogenation chemistry.
Explore in EurekaB64C, B64D, C25B and H01M all sit under 25% of records — these overlaps with aircraft and fuel-cell claims are thinner than the core chemistry and worth monitoring for new entrants.
Explore in EurekaCurrent filing counts for 2025 and 2026 will rise as publication catches up; revisit the trend once those years are closer to complete before concluding the field has slowed.
Explore in EurekaOne assignee leads the field with 15 of the 97 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-ranked filer at 6. The ranking covers 35 companies total, and concentration is heavy at the top: the five leading assignees together hold 56.7% of all records. Below the top ten, filing counts drop to single digits and single filings, indicating a long tail of smaller entrants rather than a crowded second tier.
Filing peaked in 2020 at 24 records and has since declined, with the last fully comparable period (2021 to 2024) showing a 41% drop from 17 to 10 filings. However, because publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts are still incomplete and will rise as more applications publish. Treat any apparent slowdown in the most recent one to two years with caution until later data fills in.
The chemistry side dominates: C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) appears on 60.8% of the 97 records and B01J (catalysis) on 48.5%, meaning most claims target the carrier chemistry and catalytic mechanism rather than the hardware around it. Storage vessels (F17C) and battery/fuel-cell integration (H01M) each cover about a quarter of records. Aircraft-specific classes are present but small, each under 6% of records.
US20220305469A1, filed by Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology and published 2022-09-29, claims a catalyst structure for an LOHC dehydrogenation reactor: a support with channels through which the carrier liquid flows, coated internally with a dehydrogenation catalyst, arranged so the generated hydrogen gas is discharged along the channels to increase catalyst-carrier contact area. It is a reactor-internal geometry and coating claim rather than a claim over the carrier chemistry itself, so it constrains channel-and-coating reactor designs specifically rather than LOHC dehydrogenation broadly.
The clearest gaps sit in branches with comparatively low record counts relative to the core chemistry claims: aviation-specific carrier tank integration, electrolytic co-production pathways overlapping with C25B, and acyclic carbocyclic carrier variants under C07C, each present in under 10% of the 97 records. These areas have active filings but far less density than the C01B and B01J core, making them more open for a well-drafted first claim. Co-filing is also rare across the dataset, with only 9 co-assignee pairs found, suggesting collaborative filings are themselves an underused route.
Go past this page: query the whole hydrogen storage — liquid-organic hydrogen-carrier dehydrogenation patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.