Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape tracks 248 patent records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) terminology with claim language on conduction-versus-switching loss trade-offs, trench field-stop structures, short-circuit withstand time, reverse-conducting IGBT design and module packaging, classified under semiconductor device and power conversion IPC codes. It spans core device physics as well as the packaging and thermal-management claims that surround a working power module, giving a view of the field that goes beyond the silicon die itself.
The scope captures both incremental continuation filings from established power-semiconductor manufacturers and a large number of single-filing entrants, mostly Chinese universities and component suppliers, which is typical of a mature but still commercially active device category.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 248 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filings rose from 15 in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2023, passing through 17 at the 2022 midpoint before easing off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent years in this trend understate real filing activity and should not be read as a genuine drop-off yet.
H01L (semiconductor devices) appears in 99.2% of the 248 records in scope, confirming this is overwhelmingly a device-structure field rather than a systems or power-electronics-control one. H10W appears in 22.6% of records and H10D in 16.5%, with power conversion (H02M) present in only 3.2% — packaging adhesives and cleaning classes appear at low single-digit shares, marking them as peripheral rather than core claim territory.
Shares are the percentage of the 248 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about igbt chips and power modules and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA reverse conducting insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) includes a semiconductor substrate having a front side and a back side and a first conductivity region between the front and back sides. The first conductivity region includes a reduced lifetime zone, a first lifetime zone between the reduced lifetime zone and the front side, and an intermediate lifetime zone between the reduced lifetime zone and the back side, each with distinct carrier lifetimes engineered into the substrate.Filed by Infineon Technologies Austria AG, published 2009-07-07. Cited among the highest-influence records in this scope.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20050017290A1 | Insulated gate bipolar transistor with built-in freewheeling diode | 135 |
| 2 | JP2008072848A | Semiconductor device | 117 |
| 3 | US5661314A | Power transistor device having ultra deep increased concentration | 72 |
| 4 | US20070181927A1 | Charge balance insulated gate bipolar transistor | 71 |
| 5 | CN103383958A | 一种RC-IGBT器件及其制作方法 | 50 |
| 6 | US20150221756A1 | Semiconductor Device and Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor with Barrier Structure | 46 |
| 7 | US5766966A | Power transistor device having ultra deep increased concentration region | 43 |
| 8 | US20150076554A1 | Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor with Mesa Sections Between Cell Trench Structures and Method of Manufacturi… | 40 |
| 9 | US20150144988A1 | Semiconductor Device and Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor with Barrier Regions | 38 |
| 10 | US20170373141A1 | Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing semiconductor device | 33 |
Citation counts favour older documents simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on the field rather than of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Reading concentration, venue and technology-class data together points to a field that is commercially active but not closed off to new entrants in specific sub-areas.
The leading assignee holds 19 records, and the top 5 combined hold 65 of the 248 records in scope. That leaves nearly three-quarters of filings spread across a long tail of assignees, including many Chinese universities and component makers filing once or twice.
China accounts for 115 of the tracked records, ahead of the United States at 84 and well ahead of Europe, WIPO, the UK and India combined. Any freedom-to-operate or white-space read for this technology needs to weight Chinese filings, not just US and EPO families.
Filing volume rose from 15 records in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint at 17. The named leading assignees each show zero filings in the latest tracked year, though publication lag of roughly 18 months means the most recent year is always undercounted.
Almost every record in scope carries an H01L semiconductor-device classification, while power-conversion class H02M appears in only 3.2% of records. The bulk of patenting activity is about the die and module structure itself, leaving power-conversion-circuit integration comparatively open.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to igbt chips and power modules, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked list covers 100 companies across all 248 records — it is the full ranking the dataset returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut chosen for this page.
The top-ranked assignee holds 19 of the 248 records in scope, with the fifth-place assignee at 9 and tenth place at 7 — a gradual taper rather than a steep cliff from first to tenth.
Only 7 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest pair sharing 5 records and two others sharing 4 each. Joint filing is the exception here, not the norm, which points to mostly independent in-house development.
The top 10 assignees combined hold 41.1% of the 248 records in scope, meaning the remaining majority is spread across dozens of assignees, many with just one or two filings — a mix of established manufacturers and Chinese university labs.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| ABB Technology Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Infineon Technologies AG | 0 | — |
| Zhuzhou CRRC Times Semiconductor Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Sichuan University | 0 | — |
| Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | 0 | — |
| University of Electronic Science and Technology of China | 0 | — |
| Wuxi CSMC Semiconductor Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion. These are the natural next lines of inquiry.
With 41.1% of the 248 records held by just 10 assignees, a targeted FTO review of that group's claim scope is more efficient than screening the full ranked list.
Run an assignee claim comparisonPower-conversion integration and packaging chemistry classes show low record shares against a dense H01L core, which is where a narrowly drafted first claim has the best odds of clearing prior art.
Explore white-space claim draftingBecause publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures in this dataset will keep rising as more applications publish; re-pulling the trend periodically will sharpen the momentum read.
Set up ongoing filing alertsIn this 248-record dataset, the leading assignee holds 19 records, with the fifth-ranked assignee at 9 and the tenth at 7 — a gradual taper rather than one company dominating outright. The top 5 assignees combined account for 26.2% of all 248 records, and the top 10 account for 41.1%. That leaves a majority of filings spread across a long tail of manufacturers, component suppliers and university labs, so leadership in this field is real but not exclusive.
Filing volume rose from 15 records in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2023, passing through 17 at the 2022 midpoint, which reads as flat-to-declining rather than accelerating. However, publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years in any such trend are understated by definition. Treat a drop in the final one or two years as incomplete data rather than a confirmed slowdown until later filings publish.
China is the leading receiving office in this dataset with 115 of the tracked records, ahead of the United States at 84. Europe (EPO), WIPO/PCT, the United Kingdom and India each account for single-digit-to-low-double-digit counts. This distribution reflects where IGBT manufacturing and R&D investment is currently concentrated, and it means a China-inclusive search is essential for any freedom-to-operate work in this space.
US7557386B2, assigned to Infineon Technologies Austria AG and published in 2009, covers a reverse-conducting IGBT with a substrate engineered into distinct carrier-lifetime zones — a reduced-lifetime zone, a first lifetime zone near the front side, and an intermediate lifetime zone near the back side. It sits among the more heavily cited records in this dataset, indicating it has shaped subsequent claim drafting in reverse-conducting IGBT structures specifically. It does not block IGBT designs generally, only approaches that read on its specific carrier-lifetime zoning claims; alternative lifetime-control methods and non-reverse-conducting architectures fall outside its scope.
The technology composition shows H01L (core semiconductor device structure) present in 99.2% of the 248 records, while power-conversion classification H02M appears in only 3.2%, and packaging-adjacent classes like adhesives and cleaning sit below 2%. That gap suggests power-conversion circuit integration and module packaging chemistry are comparatively under-claimed relative to the die structure itself. A first claim aimed at, for example, thermal interface material composition or short-circuit withstand control circuitry is more likely to clear prior art than another trench field-stop structural variant.
Go past this page: query the whole igbt chips and power modules corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.