Impact and Hammer Crushing Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
Impact and Hammer Crushing Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
One leader, thin tail: the assignee ranking tops out at 12 records for the leader against just 1 for fifth place, across 9 ranked companies. Filing activity rose to a peak of 6 in 2022 before falling to 0 by 2024 — a -100% swing over that 2021-to-2024 span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as a continued decline.
- 1美卓奥图泰芬兰公司12
- 2HISE MASON R2
- 3DONELSON CONSTRUCTION CO LLC2
- 4诺德堡有限公司1
- 5REXNORD INC1
See the full impact and hammer crushing analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Frequently asked questions
Who holds the most patents in impact and hammer crushing?
Within this dataset the ranking is led by a single assignee with 12 records, well ahead of the fifth-place company at 1. That gap indicates one long-standing filer built a substantial position early, likely tied to the oldest and most-cited wear-liner patents in the set, while the rest of the ranking is a long tail of companies with a handful of filings each. Because the ranking counts patent families rather than raw publications, this reflects distinct inventions rather than continuation filings inflating the count.
What technology areas dominate impact and hammer crusher patents?
Crushing, grinding and pulverising equipment (IPC class B02C) covers 85.7% of the 21 records in scope, confirming that most patenting activity addresses the core mechanical crusher design rather than adjacent fields. Smaller secondary classes — ceramics and cement, polymer additives, and roads and pavements — each appear on about one in ten records, usually as a downstream application context rather than a distinct filing cluster. Powder metallurgy, microorganisms, polymer compositions and metal extraction each show up on only a single record, marking them as thin, exploratory intersections rather than established sub-fields.
Is patent filing in impact and hammer crushing growing or slowing?
Filing activity rose to a peak of 6 records in 2022, then fell to 0 by 2024, a -100% change over that three-year span. That decline should be read cautiously: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any filing trend are understated by definition and are not yet a reliable signal either way. What can be said is that the 2021–2024 window shows a real drop-off from the 2022 peak, not a plateau.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Impact and Hammer Crushing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.