Book a demo

Implantable Biosensor (Standalone) Patent Snapshot

Implantable Biosensor (Standalone) Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Implantable Biosensor (Standalone) Patent Snapshot in 2026

The standalone implantable biosensor space is a compact, moderately concentrated field dominated by Medtronic and a mix of academic and specialist firms, with the United States as the primary filing jurisdiction. The field peaked around 2019 and annual volume has since eased, though publication lag means recent-year counts remain incomplete.

21
Patent families in scope
36%
Top visible applicants share
-22%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Medtronic leads a fragmented field with a long academic tail

Medtronic ranks first in the applicant table, followed by Willow Lab and Optoelectronics Systems Consulting. The top five filers — Medtronic, Willow Lab, Optoelectronics Systems Consulting, University of Connecticut, and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center — together account for 36% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined patent records, signalling moderate concentration at the top with a wide, fragmented middle tier.

The gap between the leader and the second tier is notable but not overwhelming: Medtronic holds 13 patent records against Willow Lab’s 9 and Optoelectronics Systems Consulting’s 8. Below the top five, counts drop rapidly to single digits, confirming a long academic and start-up tail rather than an entrenched oligopoly.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Medtronic Inc13
2Willow Lab Inc9
3Optoelectronics Systems Consulting8
4University of Connecticut7
5Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center7
6International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)6
7Board of Regents of the University of Texas System6
8Pacesetter Inc4
9Sub Q Inc4
10Kotov4
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Mississippi State University3
12University of South Florida3
13Regents of the University of California3
14WL GORE & ASSOC INC3
15Sorenson James L2
16Hitchcock Robert W2
17Board of Regents for Oklahoma State University2
18BOARD OF REGENTS FOR THE OKLAHOMA AGRI & MECHANICA…2
19Sorenson Medical Inc2
20Kotov2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Medtronic’s position reflects a dual-route strategy spanning diagnostic sensing and electrotherapy, giving it broader claim coverage than narrower academic entrants. Academic institutions — University of Connecticut, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, University of Texas System, University of South Florida, and others — collectively represent a substantial share of activity, indicating that foundational science remains an active source of new filings.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and should be treated as underestimates of true activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Peak activity around 2019 with a dominant diagnostic sensing core

Two charts together reveal when the field was most active and which technology branches attract the most coverage. The trend line shows a lifecycle pattern with a clear peak, while the IPC composition confirms a heavily diagnostic-centric corpus with several sparse adjacent branches.

Annual filing trend

Filing activity built from 2017, reached its highest annual volume in 2019 with 5 patent records, and has since eased. The lifecycle evidence classifies the field as in decline from that peak. Years 2024–2026 show zero records, but this reflects publication lag rather than a true cessation of activity — recent filings have not yet entered the public record.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2019.12017420185201932020120215202222023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

A61B (Diagnosis and surgery) is visible in the IPC mix with 87 patent records, establishing it as the central technical route. C12Q (enzyme/DNA measurement) and G01N (material analysis and testing) each appear at 21 records, forming a secondary tier. A61N (electrotherapy) contributes 16 records. All remaining branches — including C12M, G01F, B22F, G01R, and H01Q — individually hold fewer than 10 records, marking them as sparse adjacencies.

Technology compositionA61B · Diagnosis & surgery leads with 87; C12Q · Measuring & testing involving enzymes/DNA 21.A61B · Diagnosis & surgery87C12Q · Measuring & testi…21G01N · Material analysis…21A61N · Electrotherapy & …16C12M · Bioreactors & enz…8G01F · Flow, level & vol…5B22F · Powder metallurgy3G01R · Electric & magnet…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US8914090B2Published 2014-12-16

Implantable biosensor and methods of use thereof

The University Of Connecticut

Disclosed herein is an analyte sensing device capable of continuously monitoring metabolic levels of a plurality of analytes. The device comprises an external unit, which, for example, could be worn around the wrist like a wristwatch or could be incorporated into a cell phone or PDA device, and an implantable sensor platform that is suitable, for example… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Implantable biosensor and methods of use thereof — patent drawingImplantable biosensor and methods of use thereof — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Implantable gas-containing biosensor and method fo…1,210
2Implantable gas-containing biosensor and method fo…902
3Implantable biosensor system, apparatus and method594
4Implantable Biosensor and Methods of Use Thereof520
5Implantable biosensor from stratified nanostructur…355
6Implantable biosensor system, apparatus and method246
7Implantable biosensor221
8Implantable biosensor211

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Medtronic

Medtronic Inc

Medtronic holds 13 patent records, the highest count in the corpus. Its technology emphasis is concentrated in A61B 5 (diagnostic sensing, 12 records) and A61N 1 (electrotherapy and radiation therapy, 11 records), indicating a strategy that spans sensing and therapeutic stimulation within implantable platforms. No momentum signal was returned for Medtronic in the recent-period data, consistent with the field’s post-peak lifecycle.

patent records: 13
Challenger · IBM

IBM (International Business Machines Corporation)

IBM holds 6 patent records and is flagged as a new entrant in the recent filing period, making it the only applicant with a positive momentum signal in the evidence. Its focus is concentrated in A61B 5 (diagnostic sensing, 6 records). IBM’s entry into implantable biosensing — likely driven by data-processing and miniaturization capabilities — represents an atypical new voice in a field otherwise dominated by medical-device and biotech specialists.

patent records: 6
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Willow Lab IncCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own implantable biosensor Patent Snapshot

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.