Book a demo

In-Mold Sensing Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

In-Mold Sensing Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/in-mold-sensing-and-process-monitoring-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Tooling & Dies
In-Mold Sensing and Process Monitoring Patents
  • No single filer dominates. the top 5 assignees combined hold only 5.3% of all 4,129 records in scope, and the top 10 just 9.4% — this is a fragmented field, not one locked up by a handful of players.
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 256 records and growth from 2021 (191) to 2024 (151) fell 21% over that span, though 2025-2026 figures are still filling in given an 18-month publication lag.
  • Temperature measurement dominates the claim space G01K accounts for 28.2% of all records — more than four times the next largest subclass — leaving flow, control and semiconductor-adjacent claims comparatively open.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
4,129
Published Records
5%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-21%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (191 records) with 2024 (151) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,129 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

In-mold sensing covers instrumented tooling that measures cavity pressure, temperature, flow and related process variables during molding, along with the sensor placement, wiring, connector survival and closed-loop control logic needed to make that data usable. This landscape draws on 4,129 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, spanning both the sensor hardware itself and the correlation and retrofit methods built around it. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years of activity are undercounted here.

The dataset spans applicants from consumer electronics, automotive, aerospace and medical device backgrounds, reflecting how broadly cavity and temperature sensing techniques have migrated beyond traditional injection-molding tooling into adjacent process-monitoring uses.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP55
  2. 2AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD48
  3. 3AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)41
  4. 4CANON KK39
  5. 5DENSO CORP36
  6. 6FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD36
  7. 7MITSUI MINING & SMELTING CO LTD35
  8. 8LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD33
  9. 9MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP32
  10. 10AVENT INC32
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Mold Sensing and Process Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 4,129 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 130 in 2017 to a peak of 256 in 2020, then eased to 151 by 2024 — a 21% decline across the 2021-2024 span. Treat 2025 and 2026 counts as partial; they will revise upward as publication catches up with filing.

Filing trend, 2017-2026075150225300130201720182019256202020212022202320242025392026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

G01K (temperature measurement) leads at 28.2% of all records, well ahead of A61B and H05B, which sit tied at 6.5% each. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares sum to well over 100% and should be read against the 4,129-record total, not against each other as a closed set.

IPC subclass compositionG01K · Temperature measurement1,16628.2%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery2706.5%H05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…2706.5%G01F · Flow, level & volume measuring2155.2%G01N · Material analysis & testing2145.2%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…1954.7%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement1884.6%H01L · Semiconductor devices1734.2%Other3,83792.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 4,129 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Mold Sensing and Process Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on In-Mold Sensing and Process Monitoring with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about in-mold sensing and process monitoring and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing

Representative Record
US20210072095A12021-03-11

Chip wiring layer temperature sensing circuit, temperature sensing method and chip thereof

ZHEJIANG JOHAR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

Discloses a chip wiring layer temperature sensing circuit built around a metal wiring layer temperature detection module, a pulse delay detection module and a temperature transition module. The metal interconnection structure of the chip's wiring layer is electrically connected to the pulse delay detection module, which includes a system high-speed clock generating a delay signal after a pulse; the resulting delay data is converted into a temperature reading by the transition module.Filed by Zhejiang Johar Technology Co., Ltd., published 2021-03-11 as US20210072095A1.

US20210072095A1 — patent drawing 1US20210072095A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US10085751B2Surgical stapler having temperature-based motor control959
2US4821674ARotatable substrate supporting mechanism with temperature sensing device for use in chemical vapor deposition…652
3US6798341B1Network based multiple sensor and control device with temperature sensing and control627
4US6297781B1Rearview mirror with integrated microwave receiver624
5US20050043907A1Network based multiple sensor and control device with temperature sensing and control543
6US6388399B1Network based electrical control system with distributed sensing and control531
7US5374315ARotatable substrate supporting mechanism with temperature sensing device for use in chemical vapor deposition…510
8US5462225AApparatus and method for controlling distribution of electrical energy to a space conditioning load455
9US4616705AMini-well temperature profiling process384
10US4442972AElectrically controlled programmable digital thermostat and method for regulating the operation of multistage…335

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence, not of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Mold Sensing and Process Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data suggests

Three read-throughs from the filing pattern, the class composition and the assignee spread.

Concentration
5.3% top 5
share of all 4,129 records

No dominant gatekeeper

The five most active filers together account for only 5.3% of all records in scope, and the top 10 for 9.4%. Compared with fields where a handful of firms hold a third or more of the filings, this is a genuinely fragmented landscape with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.

Top 5 = 219 of 4,129 records
Filing momentum
-21%
2021 to 2024 filing change

Past-peak but not dormant

Filing peaked in 2020 at 256 records and has since eased, with the complete-year window from 2021 (191) to 2024 (151) showing a 21% decline. That is a cooling of pace, not an exit — 151 records in a single year is still substantial activity for a sensing sub-field.

Peak year: 2020 at 256 records
Class density
28.2%
of records classed under G01K

Temperature measurement crowds the core

G01K claims sit on more than a quarter of all records, meaning core temperature-sensing claim space is densely occupied. Flow/level measurement (G01F, 5.2%), material analysis (G01N, 5.2%) and non-electric control (G05D, 4.7%) carry far less density, which is where new entrants have more room to stake claims.

G01K: 1,166 of 4,129 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to in-mold sensing and process monitoring, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Mold Sensing and Process Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked leaders span consumer electronics, automotive, aerospace and medical device backgrounds — no single industry vertical owns this space, and recent-year filing activity from the leading assignees has gone quiet across the board.

Leader
55 records
single top assignee

A modest lead, not a moat

The top-ranked assignee holds 55 records against a fifth-place count of 36 and a tenth-place count of 32 — a gentle slope, not a cliff. That pattern suggests accessible claim space rather than a portfolio thicket that would deter a new filer.

Fifth place: 36 records · Tenth place: 32 records
Momentum
0
latest-year filings, leading assignees

Recent activity has cooled across the leaders

Several of the most historically active assignees show zero filings in the latest year tracked. Combined with the 2021-2024 decline, this points to consolidation of existing portfolios rather than active new claim-staking by incumbents right now.

Consistent across the leading ranked assignees
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is rare and concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the ranking, and one aerospace pairing accounts for the bulk of shared filings. Most activity in this field is filed by a single entity rather than through joint development arrangements.

Strongest pair: 41 shared records
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core temperature-sensing claim space.
Connector survival under repeated thermal cyclingClosed-loop switchover logic for retrofit toolingCavity-pressure-to-defect correlation modellingWiring harness routing within mold insertsRetrofit sensor placement for legacy tooling
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Panasonic Holdings Corp0
Airbus Operations Ltd0
Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd.0
Airbus Operations SAS0
Canon Inc.0
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd0
Denso Corp0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Mold Sensing and Process Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a fragmented but densely-classed field. These are the natural next steps for a team deciding where to file or where to watch.

Map the white space claim by claim

Under-claimed branches like connector survival and retrofit switchover logic are named at a category level here; a claim-by-claim read of the thinnest subclasses is the next step before drafting.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the quiet leaders

Several top assignees show zero recent-year filings. Whether that reflects licensing strategy, abandonment or simply publication lag is worth confirming before assuming the space is open.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka

Stress-test the most-cited records

High citation counts here skew toward older filings. Before relying on any of them as a design-around reference, check current legal status and family scope.

Check patent status in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Mold Sensing and Process Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Mold Sensing and Process Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research In-Mold Sensing and Process Monitoring in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole in-mold sensing and process monitoring corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.