https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/in-vehicle-networking-and-automotive-ethernet-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Automotive Networking
In-Vehicle Networking and Automotive Ethernet Patents
  • Filing has cooled since its 2020 peak. 95 families published that year against 573 total, with the curve declining through the most recent full year — a maturing claim base rather than a growing one.
  • Three Sumitomo-linked entities co-file at unusual density. Sumitomo Electric, Auto Network Technology Research Institute and Sumitomo Wiring Systems each pair with the other two at a co-assignee strength of 50, the tightest cluster in the dataset.
  • Gateway and diagnostic claims concentrate in H04L and B60R. 517 of 573 families sit in H04L (digital transmission) and 250 in B60R (vehicle systems), while AI-adjacent filings under G06N number only 8 — a narrow, largely unclaimed edge.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
573
Published Records
70%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-36%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (36 records) with 2024 (23) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 573 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

In-vehicle networking spans the wiring, protocols and gateway logic that let electronic control units, sensors and infotainment systems exchange data inside a vehicle. This landscape tracks patent families filed against automotive Ethernet, in-vehicle network architectures and zonal network designs, cross-referenced against time-sensitive networking, EMC-on-twisted-pair, bandwidth growth, diagnostics and gateway claim language. The scope pulls from IPC classes covering digital transmission, vehicle accessories and traffic-control data handling.

The 573 families in scope span 2015 through mid-2026, with publication naturally lagging filing by around eighteen months, so the last one or two years understate real filing activity. The dataset skews toward gateway and diagnostic architecture claims rather than physical-layer Ethernet transceiver design, which shows up in the IPC composition below.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP OF AMERICA175
  2. 2TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK70
  3. 3SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD57
  4. 4SUMITOMO WIRING SYSTEMS LTD50
  5. 5AUTONETWORKS TECH LTD50
  6. 6PLAXIDITYX LTD48
  7. 7HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD24
  8. 8KIA CORPORATION21
  9. 9ASTEMO LTD18
  10. 10HUAWEI TECH CO LTD17
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Vehicle Networking and Automotive Ethernet covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 573-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A peak behind us, not ahead

Filings ran at 71 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 95 in 2020, and had fallen back to a midpoint of 26 by 2022 before tapering further toward the most recent partial year. That shape reads as a technology whose core architecture claims were staked out early, with activity now concentrated in refinement rather than expansion.

A peak behind us, not ahead0255075100712017201820199520202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Digital transmission and vehicle systems dominate

H04L (digital information transmission) appears in 517 of 573 families and B60R (vehicle parts and accessories) in 250, confirming that most claims describe network protocol and in-vehicle system integration rather than pure hardware. G06F (data processing) at 124 and H04W (wireless networks) at 58 trail well behind, and G06N (AI-based computing) appears in only 8 families — a thin layer suggesting AI-driven network management is still largely unclaimed.

Digital transmission and vehicle systems dominateH04L · Digital information transmissi…51790.2%B60R · Vehicles, parts & accessories25043.6%G06F · Electric digital data processi…12421.6%H04W · Wireless communication networks5810.1%G07C · Time/attendance & checking dev…264.5%B60W · Hybrid/joint vehicle control173.0%H04J · Multiplex communication152.6%G06N · Computing based on AI models81.4%Other6511.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 573 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Vehicle Networking and Automotive Ethernet covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on In-Vehicle Networking and Automotive Ethernet with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about in-vehicle networking and automotive ethernet and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Filing
US20210061194A12021-03-04

In-vehicle network system, electronic control unit, and gateway device

HITACHI ASTEMO, LTD.

An in-vehicle network system includes a control unit, a plurality of gateway devices, and sensors collecting ambient vehicle information. Each sensor communicates with the control unit through at least one gateway device. The control unit determines an operation mode for each sensor and, where a gateway device does not need to relay a sensor under that mode, transitions the unneeded gateway into a low-power state.Filed by HITACHI ASTEMO, LTD., published 2021-03-04 as US20210061194A1.

US20210061194A1 — patent drawing 1US20210061194A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6484082B1In-vehicle network management using virtual networks210
2EP2892199A1Global automotive safety system150
3US20140114497A1In-Vehicle Network System121
4US20150191135A1Bus watchman113
5US20190312892A1Onboard cybersecurity diagnostic system for vehicle, electronic control unit, and operating method thereof82
6US20150191136A1Hosted watchman81
7US20170192770A1Gateway device, in-vehicle network system, and firmware update method80
8US20150071115A1Data Logging or Stimulation in Automotive Ethernet Networks Using the Vehicle Infrastructure77
9US20200053112A1Vehicle anomaly detection server, vehicle anomaly detection system, and vehicle anomaly detection method76
10EP1158718A2In-vehicle network management using virtual networks74

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of what the field builds on, not of what is currently most valuable.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Vehicle Networking and Automotive Ethernet covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data signals for R&D and IP strategy

Three read-throughs from the filing pattern, citation structure and co-assignee behaviour in this dataset.

Filing Trajectory
95 → 26
peak (2020) vs. 2022 filings

Core architecture claims were staked early

The gap between the 2020 peak and the 2022 midpoint of 26 filings suggests the foundational gateway and network-management architectures were claimed in the late 2010s. New entrants now face a denser prior-art floor for basic in-vehicle network topology claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Citation Structure
210 citations
top-cited record, US6484082B1

Virtual network management anchors the field

US6484082B1, covering in-vehicle network management using virtual networks, carries the highest citation count in the corpus at 210, well ahead of the next tier. High citation counts here reflect foundational status within this searched set, not current commercial relevance.

Most-cited records table
Assignee Clustering
50
co-assignee pair strength, top cluster

Sumitomo group entities file as a bloc

Sumitomo Electric, Auto Network Technology Research Institute and Sumitomo Wiring Systems each co-file with the other two at a strength of 50 — the strongest pairing in the dataset — pointing to a coordinated filing strategy across a corporate group rather than independent activity.

Co-assignee pairs, n=10
Technology Gaps
8 families
G06N (AI-based computing)

AI-driven network management is barely claimed

Against 517 H04L families, only 8 fall under G06N. Adaptive or learning-based bandwidth allocation and fault prediction for in-vehicle networks remain thinly claimed relative to the rest of the space.

IPC composition
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to in-vehicle networking and automotive ethernet, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Vehicle Networking and Automotive Ethernet covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where momentum has stalled

Recent-year momentum across the leading assignees shows a field where even the most active filers have slowed, not just newcomers.

Coordinated Group
50 / 50 / 50
co-assignee pair strengths

Sumitomo Electric, Auto Network Technology Research Institute, Sumitomo Wiring Systems

These three entities form the tightest filing cluster in the dataset, each pairing with the other two at equal strength — evidence of a shared corporate filing programme around in-vehicle wiring and network architecture.

Recent momentum: 1 filing in the latest year, 0% YoY for each
Slowing Incumbents
-100% YoY
Panasonic (US IP), Toyota, PlaxidityX

Zero filings in the latest tracked year

Panasonic's US IP entity, Toyota and PlaxidityX all show zero filings in the most recent year against activity the year prior, a full drop-off that, combined with publication lag, may understate near-term activity but still marks a visible pause.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Receiving Office Spread
236 / 162 / 56
US / EPO / Japan filings

US and European offices lead filing volume

The United States receives 236 filings and the EPO 162, with Japan at 56 and China close behind at 55 — a filing footprint weighted toward US and European markets relative to the broader automotive patent landscape.

Receiving office counts
🔍
Under-claimed technical branches
Sub-areas with comparatively thin filing density relative to the core gateway and transmission claims.
AI-based bandwidth allocation for zonal architecturesLearning-based fault prediction on in-vehicle busesEMC mitigation on unshielded twisted pairTime-sensitive networking scheduling for mixed-criticality trafficWireless-wired gateway handoff diagnostics
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.10%
Auto Network Technology Research Institute, Inc.10%
Sumitomo Wiring Systems, Ltd.10%
Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America0-100%
Toyota Motor Corporation0-100%
PLAXIDITYX LTD0-100%
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0
Hyundai Motor Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Vehicle Networking and Automotive Ethernet covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing and citation patterns here point to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for a filing opening.

Map the Sumitomo cluster's full claim scope

The tightest co-assignee grouping in this dataset warrants a closer read of exactly which network-management and wiring-harness claims each entity holds versus shares.

Explore assignee claim maps

Probe the G06N gap for a filing angle

With only 8 AI-related families against 517 in digital transmission, adaptive network management claims sit largely open — worth a freedom-to-operate check before drafting.

Run a white space search

Track post-2022 filings as they publish

Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, the apparent decline since 2020 should be revisited once 2024-2025 filings finish publishing.

Set up a filing alert
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Vehicle Networking and Automotive Ethernet covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about automotive networking patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on In-Vehicle Networking and Automotive Ethernet covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research In-Vehicle Networking and Automotive Ethernet in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole in-vehicle networking and automotive ethernet corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.