Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (36 records) with 2024 (23) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 573 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
In-vehicle networking spans the wiring, protocols and gateway logic that let electronic control units, sensors and infotainment systems exchange data inside a vehicle. This landscape tracks patent families filed against automotive Ethernet, in-vehicle network architectures and zonal network designs, cross-referenced against time-sensitive networking, EMC-on-twisted-pair, bandwidth growth, diagnostics and gateway claim language. The scope pulls from IPC classes covering digital transmission, vehicle accessories and traffic-control data handling.
The 573 families in scope span 2015 through mid-2026, with publication naturally lagging filing by around eighteen months, so the last one or two years understate real filing activity. The dataset skews toward gateway and diagnostic architecture claims rather than physical-layer Ethernet transceiver design, which shows up in the IPC composition below.
Two views of the same 573-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filings ran at 71 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 95 in 2020, and had fallen back to a midpoint of 26 by 2022 before tapering further toward the most recent partial year. That shape reads as a technology whose core architecture claims were staked out early, with activity now concentrated in refinement rather than expansion.
H04L (digital information transmission) appears in 517 of 573 families and B60R (vehicle parts and accessories) in 250, confirming that most claims describe network protocol and in-vehicle system integration rather than pure hardware. G06F (data processing) at 124 and H04W (wireless networks) at 58 trail well behind, and G06N (AI-based computing) appears in only 8 families — a thin layer suggesting AI-driven network management is still largely unclaimed.
Shares are the percentage of the 573 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about in-vehicle networking and automotive ethernet and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaAn in-vehicle network system includes a control unit, a plurality of gateway devices, and sensors collecting ambient vehicle information. Each sensor communicates with the control unit through at least one gateway device. The control unit determines an operation mode for each sensor and, where a gateway device does not need to relay a sensor under that mode, transitions the unneeded gateway into a low-power state.Filed by HITACHI ASTEMO, LTD., published 2021-03-04 as US20210061194A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6484082B1 | In-vehicle network management using virtual networks | 210 |
| 2 | EP2892199A1 | Global automotive safety system | 150 |
| 3 | US20140114497A1 | In-Vehicle Network System | 121 |
| 4 | US20150191135A1 | Bus watchman | 113 |
| 5 | US20190312892A1 | Onboard cybersecurity diagnostic system for vehicle, electronic control unit, and operating method thereof | 82 |
| 6 | US20150191136A1 | Hosted watchman | 81 |
| 7 | US20170192770A1 | Gateway device, in-vehicle network system, and firmware update method | 80 |
| 8 | US20150071115A1 | Data Logging or Stimulation in Automotive Ethernet Networks Using the Vehicle Infrastructure | 77 |
| 9 | US20200053112A1 | Vehicle anomaly detection server, vehicle anomaly detection system, and vehicle anomaly detection method | 76 |
| 10 | EP1158718A2 | In-vehicle network management using virtual networks | 74 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of what the field builds on, not of what is currently most valuable.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the filing pattern, citation structure and co-assignee behaviour in this dataset.
The gap between the 2020 peak and the 2022 midpoint of 26 filings suggests the foundational gateway and network-management architectures were claimed in the late 2010s. New entrants now face a denser prior-art floor for basic in-vehicle network topology claims.
US6484082B1, covering in-vehicle network management using virtual networks, carries the highest citation count in the corpus at 210, well ahead of the next tier. High citation counts here reflect foundational status within this searched set, not current commercial relevance.
Sumitomo Electric, Auto Network Technology Research Institute and Sumitomo Wiring Systems each co-file with the other two at a strength of 50 — the strongest pairing in the dataset — pointing to a coordinated filing strategy across a corporate group rather than independent activity.
Against 517 H04L families, only 8 fall under G06N. Adaptive or learning-based bandwidth allocation and fault prediction for in-vehicle networks remain thinly claimed relative to the rest of the space.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to in-vehicle networking and automotive ethernet, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum across the leading assignees shows a field where even the most active filers have slowed, not just newcomers.
These three entities form the tightest filing cluster in the dataset, each pairing with the other two at equal strength — evidence of a shared corporate filing programme around in-vehicle wiring and network architecture.
Panasonic's US IP entity, Toyota and PlaxidityX all show zero filings in the most recent year against activity the year prior, a full drop-off that, combined with publication lag, may understate near-term activity but still marks a visible pause.
The United States receives 236 filings and the EPO 162, with Japan at 56 and China close behind at 55 — a filing footprint weighted toward US and European markets relative to the broader automotive patent landscape.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | 1 | 0% |
| Auto Network Technology Research Institute, Inc. | 1 | 0% |
| Sumitomo Wiring Systems, Ltd. | 1 | 0% |
| Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America | 0 | -100% |
| Toyota Motor Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| PLAXIDITYX LTD | 0 | -100% |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Hyundai Motor Company | 0 | — |
The filing and citation patterns here point to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for a filing opening.
The tightest co-assignee grouping in this dataset warrants a closer read of exactly which network-management and wiring-harness claims each entity holds versus shares.
Explore assignee claim mapsWith only 8 AI-related families against 517 in digital transmission, adaptive network management claims sit largely open — worth a freedom-to-operate check before drafting.
Run a white space searchGiven the roughly 18-month publication lag, the apparent decline since 2020 should be revisited once 2024-2025 filings finish publishing.
Set up a filing alertThis landscape identifies 573 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that match claim language around automotive Ethernet, in-vehicle network architecture and zonal network design. The count uses patent families rather than raw document counts, which avoids inflating the total through continuations or parallel filings in multiple jurisdictions. Coverage spans IPC classes for digital transmission, vehicle accessories and related traffic-data handling, so the true underlying activity is somewhat broader than any single search string can capture.
The trend has declined from a peak of 95 families in 2020 to a midpoint of 26 by 2022, with further tapering since. That pattern suggests the foundational architecture claims — network topology, gateway management, basic diagnostics — were largely staked out in the late 2010s. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any such trend will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be, so this is a directional read rather than a final one.
The dataset shows a tight filing cluster among three related entities — Sumitomo Electric, Auto Network Technology Research Institute and Sumitomo Wiring Systems — which co-assign patents with each other at the highest pairing strength recorded, 50. Other named assignees, including Panasonic's US IP entity, Toyota and PlaxidityX, show activity in prior years but zero filings in the most recent tracked year. This points to a field where a small coordinated group carries much of the recent filing volume.
The IPC composition shows heavy concentration in H04L (517 families) and B60R (250 families), against only 8 families in G06N, the AI-computing class. That gap implies adaptive or learning-based approaches to bandwidth allocation, fault prediction and gateway scheduling on in-vehicle networks are comparatively under-claimed. Time-sensitive networking scheduling for mixed-criticality traffic and EMC mitigation specific to unshielded twisted-pair Ethernet also show thinner density relative to core gateway and transmission claims.
US6484082B1, covering in-vehicle network management using virtual networks, holds the highest citation count in this corpus at 210. That figure measures how often later filings in the searched set reference it, which tends to favour older, foundational patents simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations. It is a useful signal of influence on how the field's vocabulary and architecture developed, but it should not be read as a measure of the patent's current commercial weight or remaining term value.
Go past this page: query the whole in-vehicle networking and automotive ethernet corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.