https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/industrial-automation-and-scada-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Industrial Automation & SCADA
Industrial Automation and SCADA System Patents
  • Filing has cooled after a 2022 peak. 81 families in 2022 versus 31 in 2017, with the two most recent full years trailing off — a maturing, not growing, claim space.
  • Control engineering still dominates the IPC mix. G05B appears in 827 of 880 families, far ahead of data processing (G06F, 249) and transmission (H04L, 179), showing HMI and redundancy claims still anchor to core control hardware.
  • Momentum has gone quiet at the top. Even the most active recent filer is down 40% year-on-year, and several long-standing assignees show zero filings in the latest year — a sign the leaders are consolidating rather than expanding position.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
880
Published Records
59%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-51%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (76 records) with 2024 (37) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 880 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 880 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine SCADA, industrial automation and distributed control system claims with human-machine interface, data historian, alarm management, redundancy or cyber security language, filtered to control-systems and networked-data IPC classes. It is a view of how vendors have claimed the software and interface layer sitting on top of industrial control hardware, not of the control hardware itself.

Filing activity concentrates heavily in the United States and Europe, with China, WIPO/PCT and India as secondary filing routes. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years in any chart will read lower than the underlying filing activity actually was.

Annual filing trend, 2017-2026
  1. 1ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC316
  2. 2FISHER ROSEMOUNT SYST INC86
  3. 3ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG46
  4. 4SIEMENS AG40
  5. 5HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC34
  6. 6NORDSON CORP21
  7. 7FIELDBUS FOUND19
  8. 8BEIJER ELECTRONICS AB11
  9. 9TMEIC CORP9
  10. 10GENERAL ELECTRIC CO9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Automation and SCADA Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 880 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

Filings rose to a 2022 peak, then declined

Annual filings climbed from 31 in 2017 to a peak of 81 in 2022, then fell back toward the single digits by 2026 (a partial year). Because the most recent years are undercounted due to publication lag, the true decline is likely less steep than the raw chart shows — but the plateau after 2022 is real.

Filings rose to a 2022 peak, then declined0255075100312017201820192020202181202220232024202582026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Control engineering, not IT, still carries the claims

G05B (control and regulating systems) touches 827 of 880 families — nearly the entire dataset — while G06F (data processing) and H04L (digital transmission) sit well behind at 249 and 179. G06Q (business/admin processing) and G06N (AI-based computing) are minority classes, at 83 and 27 respectively, suggesting AI-driven SCADA analytics is still a small slice of a much larger control-systems claim base.

Control engineering, not IT, still carries the claimsG05B · Control & regulating systems82794.0%G06F · Electric digital data processi…24928.3%H04L · Digital information transmissi…17920.3%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…839.4%G06N · Computing based on AI models273.1%B05C · Coating apparatus212.4%H02J · Power supply & grid systems202.3%H04J · Multiplex communication202.3%Other15417.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 880 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Automation and SCADA Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Industrial Automation and SCADA Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about industrial automation and scada systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior art to know

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative filing
US20160033952A12016-02-04

US20160033952A1 — System and method for testing a distributed control system of an industrial plant

ABB SCHWEIZ AG

A system for testing a distributed control system of an industrial plant is provided. The distributed control system includes at least two industrial control devices and at least one data communication device. The system includes at least one engineering computer that includes an engineering data storage unit for storing engineering data of at least one part of the distributed control system, and at least one human machine interface for manipulating the engineering data. The system also includes at least one remote data processing server connected to the at least one engineering computer via a remote data connection and including an emulating virtual machine on which a soft emulator is installed.Filed by ABB Schweiz AG, published 2016-02-04.

US20160033952A1 — patent drawing 1US20160033952A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited patents in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5769527AComputer controlled lighting system with distributed control resources550
2US6167464AMobile human/machine interface for use with industrial control systems for controlling the operation of proce…333
3US5682476ADistributed control system having central control providing operating power to wireless transceiver connected…302
4US20030182396A1Internet based distributed control system237
5US5793963AApparatus for providing non-redundant secondary access to field devices in a distributed control system230
6US6236334B1Distributed control system for controlling material flow having wireless transceiver connected to industrial …213
7US6505247B1Industrial automation system and method for efficiently transferring time-sensitive and quality-sensitive data203
8US20140336785A1Using cloud-based data for virtualization of an industrial environment199
9US20160274558A1Cloud-based analytics for industrial automation194
10EP2660667A2Cloud gateway for industrial automation information and control systems180

Citation counts favour older filings that have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; treat them as a measure of historical influence on the field, not of present-day importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Automation and SCADA Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about where this field stands

Four read-throughs from the trend, IPC and citation data, useful for deciding where filing effort is worth spending.

Filing momentum
81 in 2022 → 8 in 2026
peak year vs latest partial year

The claim space is plateauing, not growing

Filings rose steadily from 2017 through 2022 then fell back sharply. Even allowing for publication lag understating the last two years, the pattern is a maturing space rather than an expanding one — new entrants face a denser prior-art floor for a shrinking rate of return in fresh filings.

Based on annual filing counts, 2017-2026.
Technology concentration
827 of 880 in G05B
records tagged to control & regulating systems

Control engineering still gates the field

Almost every family in this dataset touches G05B, meaning HMI, historian and redundancy claims are almost always anchored to a control-systems architecture claim. Filers working purely in the data or networking layer (G06F, H04L) without a control-systems tie are the minority.

IPC subclass counts across 880 families.
AI overlap
27 in G06N
records touching AI-based computing

AI-driven SCADA analytics remains a small slice

Only 27 of 880 families sit in G06N, versus 827 in G05B. AI-based anomaly detection, predictive alarm management and similar analytics layers are present but far from saturated relative to core control claims.

IPC subclass counts across 880 families.
Citation influence
Top cite: 550
citations on the most-cited record

Foundational HMI and redundancy patents still anchor prior art

The most-cited records in this corpus date from the distributed-control and wireless-redundancy era and are cited far more heavily than recent filings — a sign that foundational architecture claims, not recent software layers, remain the reference point examiners and drafters work against.

Citation counts within this searched corpus.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to industrial automation and scada systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Automation and SCADA Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and how actively

Recent-year momentum is muted across the assignees tracked here: the most active recent filer is down sharply year-on-year, and several long-established names show no filings at all in the latest year — a pattern more consistent with defensive maintenance of existing claim positions than active expansion.

Momentum leader
6 filings, -40% YoY
latest-year filings

Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. (Rockwell Automation)

The only assignee tracked with meaningful latest-year output, but even this leader's filing rate fell 40% year-on-year, suggesting the pace set in the peak years is not being sustained.

Latest full/partial year filing count.
Zero-momentum incumbents
0 in latest year
across several tracked assignees

Long-standing names have gone quiet

Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. (Fisher-Rosemount Systems), Siemens AG (Siemens), Honeywell International Inc. (Honeywell International) and ABB Switzerland Ltd. (ABB Switzerland) all show no filings in the latest tracked year, several after a -100% year-on-year drop, pointing to portfolios that are being held rather than grown.

Recent-year momentum by assignee.
Collaboration density
4 co-assignee pairs
across the full dataset

Co-filing is rare and mostly internal

Only four co-assignee pairs appear across 880 families, and the strongest links are between a parent company and its own subsidiary or named inventor rather than cross-company joint filings — this is a field of solo corporate filers, not alliances.

Co-assignee pair counts, strongest pairs shown.
🔍
Sub-areas with lighter filing density
Based on the IPC composition, these branches carry far fewer families than core control-systems claims and may offer more open claim space.
AI-based predictive alarm management (G06N overlap)power-grid integration for SCADA redundancy (H02J)multiplex communication for field-device networks (H04J)coating-process automation interfaces (B05C)business-process analytics layered on historian data (G06Q)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.6-40%
Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.0
Siemens AG0-100%
Honeywell International Inc.0
ABB Switzerland Ltd.0
Nordson Corporation0
Fieldbus Foundation0
ABB Technology Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Automation and SCADA Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

The trend and IPC data point to a field that is dense at the core and thin at the edges. Two directions are worth a closer look before committing filing budget.

Stress-test a claim against the cited core

The highest-cited records in this corpus date from the early distributed-control and wireless-redundancy era. Any new HMI, historian or redundancy claim should be checked against that foundational layer before assuming it is novel.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Probe the lighter IPC branches

AI-based analytics (G06N) and power-grid integration (H02J) carry far fewer families than core control claims (G05B). That gap is either genuine white space or an area nobody has found commercially worth claiming yet — worth checking before filing.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Automation and SCADA Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Automation and SCADA Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Industrial Automation and SCADA Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole industrial automation and scada systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.