Book a demo

Industrial Automation Technology Patent Landscape 2026

Industrial Automation Technology Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Industrial Automation Technology Patent Landscape in 2026

Fisher-Rosemount Systems commands a dominant position in industrial automation IP, with the top five filers collectively holding 42% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output. The field peaked in 2018 and annual volume has eased substantially since, though the underlying technology mix is broadening into AI, robotics, and wireless networking.

7,602
Patent families in scope
42%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-51%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Fisher-Rosemount leads a concentrated field with a clear tier gap

Fisher-Rosemount Systems holds the top position with 5,111 patent records, more than twice the output of the second-ranked applicant, Omron Corporation (2,366 patent records). Honeywell International, Mitsubishi Electric, and Siemens round out a strong top five.

The top five filers account for 42% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling a concentrated market where a small set of incumbents define the prior-art landscape. A secondary tier — Rockwell Automation, Yokogawa, Rosemount, Fisher Controls, and ABB — is active but materially smaller, creating a measurable gap between the first and second tiers.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Fisher-Rosemount Systems Inc.5,111
2Omron Corporation2,366
3Honeywell International Inc.1,518
4Mitsubishi Electric Corporation1,356
5Siemens AG1,303
6Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc.1,257
7Yokogawa Electric Corporation1,201
8Rosemount Inc.1,048
9Fisher Controls International LLC1,000
10ABB (Switzerland) AG861
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11LG Electronics Inc.625
12Toshiba Corporation596
13Hitachi Ltd.592
14Applied Materials Inc.501
15Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLC457
16Schneider Electric Systems USA Inc.371
17General Electric Company270
18ABB Research Ltd.253
19Advanced Micro Devices Inc.240
20Tokyo Electron Ltd.237
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Fisher-Rosemount’s lead, built primarily on process-control and diagnostics IP, implies that any entrant or challenger must either design around a dense portfolio or seek differentiation in adjacent branches where the leaders are relatively sparse.

Patent records covering the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and should be treated as incomplete; apparent filing decreases after 2023 do not reflect actual R&D activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2018; technology mix is diversifying beyond core control systems

The two charts below show annual filing volume from 2017 onward and the distribution of IPC technology classes across the corpus. Together they reveal a maturing control-systems core and a broadening perimeter of emerging branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 1,072 in 2017 to a peak of 1,323 in 2018, then declined steadily to 570 in 2023. Figures for 2024 onward are materially under-counted due to publication lag and should not be read as a continued decline in R&D investment.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,323 in 2018.1,07220171,32320181,25120191,303202079820217182022570202335620241912025202026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G05B (Control and regulating systems) dominates with 18,660 records, establishing it as the foundational class. G06F (Electric digital data processing, 5,830) and H04L (Digital information transmission, 2,745) form a substantial secondary layer, while B25J (Manipulators and robots, 1,974), G06Q (Business and admin data processing, 1,446), and G06N (AI models, 1,231) represent growing adjacent branches.

Technology compositionG05B · Control & regulating systems leads with 18,660; G06F · Electric digital data processing 5,830.G05B · Control & regulat…18,660G06F · Electric digital …5,830H04L · Digital informati…2,745B25J · Manipulators & ro…1,974G06Q · Business, commerc…1,446G06N · Computing based o…1,231H01L · Semiconductor dev…769G05D · Control of non-el…662↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250244750A1Published 2025-07-31

Highly-versatile field devices and communication n…

FISHER-ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC.

A highly versatile process control or factory automation field device is configured with an interface and communication connection structure that enables the field device to operate as a data server that communicates with and supports multiple different applications or clients, either directly or indirectly, while simultaneously performing standard process… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Highly-versatile field devices and communication n… — patent drawingHighly-versatile field devices and communication n… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Method for collecting data using compact internetw…1,419
2Wireless communication1,289
3Methods and systems for data collection, learning,…960
4Monitoring system for an industrial process using …770
5Object-oriented computer program, system, and meth…760
6Diagnostic expert in a process control system742
7System for remotely accessing an industrial contro…739
8Platform for facilitating development of intellige…721

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the portfolio structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural observations shape how an engineering team or strategy team should read this landscape: the life-cycle stage, the degree of concentration, the collaboration ecosystem, and the geographic filing footprint.

Decline

Past-peak field with easing annual volume

Annual filings peaked in 2018 and have eased back since, placing the field in a declining phase on recent annual metrics. The multi-year corpus of 7,602 patent families represents deep prior-art coverage in core control-systems classes. Teams entering today should budget significant prior-art search effort and focus differentiation on branches that remain relatively sparse.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

Top five hold 42% of the top-100 filers’ output

Fisher-Rosemount’s 5,111-record lead is more than double the second-place Omron Corporation at 2,366 records. This concentration means IP freedom-to-operate analysis is essential before committing R&D resources. The secondary tier — Rockwell Automation, Yokogawa, ABB — is active but separated from the leader by a clear gap, leaving room for a focused challenger in specialised sub-domains.

High concentration
Collaboration

Co-filing is modest and largely within corporate families

The most active co-filing pairs are Fisher-Rosemount Systems with R. Stahl Schaltgeraete (11 joint records) and with CSI Technologies (11 joint records), followed by LG Electronics with SNU R&DB Foundation (10 records). Siemens co-files with both Siemens Corp and Robert Bosch, while Yokogawa Electric partners with Dresser and NTT Communications. Cross-industry collaboration links are present but limited in scale, suggesting the ecosystem remains relatively siloed.

Limited cross-industry co-filing
Geography

US-centric filing with broad secondary European coverage

The United States leads with 8,003 patent records, followed by the EPO (4,852) and WIPO PCT (1,993). The United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia form a secondary English-language cluster. Japan sits at 626 records and China at 261, reflecting the Western-origin of the leading assignees. Teams seeking protection in Asian manufacturing markets may find the current coverage thinner relative to the technology’s deployment footprint.

US-EPO dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Fisher-Rosemount Systems Inc.R. Stahl Schaltgeraete GmbH11
Fisher-Rosemount Systems Inc.CSI Technologies Inc.11
LG Electronics Inc.Seoul National University R&DB Foundation10
Siemens AGSIEMENS CORP8
Yokogawa Electric CorporationDresser Inc.8
Rosemount Inc.Micro Motion Inc.4
Siemens AGSiemens Corporate Research Inc.4
Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc.Rockwell Automation Asia Pacific Business Center Pte. Ltd.4
Yokogawa Electric CorporationNTT Communications Corporation4
Siemens AGRobert Bosch GmbH3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights derived from applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, jurisdiction distribution, and lifecycle evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Fisher-Rosemount dominates process control; Rockwell Automation is the sole top-tier filer showing recent growth

The applicant ranking reveals two distinct strategic profiles: established process-automation incumbents with large but declining recent filings, and one challenger posting positive momentum against the field-wide trend.

Leader · Fisher-Rosemount Systems

Fisher-Rosemount Systems

With 5,111 patent records, Fisher-Rosemount Systems holds a commanding lead built overwhelmingly on G05B19 (programmable control, 2,694 records) and G05B23 (condition monitoring and diagnostics, 1,519 records), with a secondary position in G06F9 (digital data processing, 622 records). Recent filing momentum shows a 48% decline versus the prior period, consistent with the field-wide trend rather than any strategic retreat.

families: 5,111
Challenger · Rockwell Automation Technologies

Rockwell Automation Technologies

Rockwell Automation Technologies ranks sixth with 1,257 patent records and is the only top-eight applicant showing positive recent momentum, up 35% versus the prior period. Its focus is concentrated in G05B19 (programmable control, 508 records), G05B23 (condition monitoring, 106 records), and G05B15 (program-controlled systems, 53 records), signalling a disciplined strategy in core industrial control rather than diversification.

families: 1,257
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked data for all top-100 applicants, their technology emphasis, and filing trajectories.
Siemens AGYokogawa Electric Corporation+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Fisher-Rosemount Systems Inc.184▼ -48%
Omron Corporation74▼ -83%
Honeywell International Inc.53▼ -69%
Rosemount Inc.8▼ -58%
Fisher Controls International LLC5▼ -76%
Siemens AG39▼ -71%
LG Electronics Inc.38▼ -87%
Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc.54▲ +35%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards draw on patent-record rankings and recent-period filing momentum.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches in robotics, AI, and wireless networking

Several IPC classes appear in the corpus at materially lower shares relative to the dominant G05B class. These branches are observations of relative sparsity; they are presented as adjacent areas worth watching rather than validated commercial opportunities.

B25J · Manipulators and robots

B25J accounts for 1,974 patent records — about 5% of the top-100 filers’ combined output — despite robotics being a core enabler of next-generation factory automation. LG Electronics stands out as the primary incumbent here (B25J9: 457, B25J11: 402, B25J19: 344 records), while most process-control leaders show negligible B25J coverage. For teams with robotic-arm integration or collaborative-robot expertise, this relative sparsity among the dominant process-control players offers a realistic entry path, particularly in human-robot collaboration sub-classes.

Search this in Eureka →

G06N · Computing based on AI models

G06N covers AI and machine-learning computing models and appears at 1,231 patent records — roughly 3% of the top-100 filers’ combined output. Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLC shows the heaviest emphasis here (G06N3: 391 records) among the tracked players, while most traditional automation incumbents have limited G06N depth. Given the increasing deployment of machine-learning for predictive maintenance and process optimisation, this branch has plausible technical value; the entry path is clearest for teams integrating edge-AI or neural-network inferencing into existing automation architectures.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level gap analysis across all IPC classes in the corpus.
H04L · Digital information transmissionG06Q · Business, commerce and admin data processing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches identified by relative share within the top-100 filers’ combined patent-record output.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerG05B 19 · Control & regulating systemsG05B 23 · Control & regulating systemsG05B 13 · Control & regulating systemsG05B 15 · Control & regulating systemsG06F 9 · Electric digital data processing
Fisher-Rosemount Systems Inc.Strong · 2,694Strong · 1,519Emerging · 265Emerging · 465Moderate · 622
Honeywell International Inc.Strong · 829Strong · 429Emerging · 69Emerging · 107Emerging · 111
Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLCStrong · 460Strong · 438Strong · 306AbsentAbsent
Omron CorporationStrong · 943Emerging · 170AbsentAbsentEmerging · 68
Rosemount Inc.Strong · 398Strong · 262Emerging · 52Moderate · 81Absent
Siemens AGStrong · 507Moderate · 177AbsentEmerging · 26Emerging · 54
Fisher Controls International LLCStrong · 417Strong · 288AbsentEmerging · 40Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own industrial automation patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.