Book a demo

Industrial Cooling Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Industrial Cooling Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/industrial-cooling-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Industrial Cooling
Industrial Cooling Patents: Who Leads and Where Filings Are Headed
  • 22.6% concentration at the top. The top five assignees hold 483 of 2,139 records in scope, with a long tail of single- and low-filing entrants behind them.
  • Filing has held roughly flat, not fallen. 2021 to 2024 (the last complete year) moved from 73 to 69 filings, a -5% change — read the 2025-26 dip as publication lag, not a slowdown.
  • Water treatment outweighs mechanical refrigeration. C02F water and wastewater treatment claims 16.5% of records, ahead of F25B refrigeration and heat pumps at 13.5%, signalling where chemistry, not hardware, is doing the claiming.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,139
Published Records
23%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-5%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (73 records) with 2024 (69) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,139 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape draws on 2,139 published records matched on industrial cooling terms alongside sensing and thermal-load language such as temperature sensor, heat flux and working fluid. The scope spans 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with the most recent year necessarily partial because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

Records here cluster less around compressors and coils than the phrase "industrial cooling" might suggest. Water and wastewater treatment chemistry, corrosion and scale-monitoring sensors, and heat-exchanger detail claims all sit inside scope, which is why the assignee list is dominated by chemical and process names rather than pure HVAC OEMs.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO114
  2. 2ROHM & HAAS CO114
  3. 3ECOLAB USA INC103
  4. 4ABELL FOUNDATION INC83
  5. 5SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO69
  6. 6PRIME DATUM INC66
  7. 7NALCO CO66
  8. 8CRYSTAL LAGOONS (CURACAO) BV55
  9. 9BRISA INT LLC51
  10. 10SOLVCOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC38
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Cooling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 2,139-record set: how filing volume has moved year on year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings ran from 54 in 2017 to a peak of 92 in 2025, with 2021 (73) to 2024 (69) — the last complete year on the books — down a modest 5%. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as still filling in rather than as evidence of decline.

Filing trend, 2017-202602550751005420172018201920202021202220232024922025402026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) leads at 16.5% of the 2,139 records, followed by F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps) at 13.5% and C09K (materials for miscellaneous applications) at 11.3%. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares sum to more than 100%; they describe claim density, not a partition of the field.

IPC subclass compositionC02F · Water & wastewater treatment35416.5%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps28913.5%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…24111.3%A01N · Biocides / agrochemicals22410.5%G01N · Material analysis & testing2119.9%F28F · Heat-exchanger details1959.1%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1687.9%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds1476.9%Other2,665124.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,139 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Cooling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Industrial Cooling Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about industrial cooling patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative record
US20140177673A12014-06-26

Method and apparatus for estimating fouling factor and/or inverse soluble scale thickness in heat transfer equipment

SOLENIS TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.

Scale deposition on a heat transfer surface in a liquid system such as a heat exchanger is estimated by directing a small portion of the liquid flow through a test cell built around a sensor projecting through a conduit wall. The sensor is a conductive block with an embedded heater and a heated wetted test surface flush with the conduit's inside wall, containing two temperature sensors at different distances from the heated surface and heater; the periphery is designed to limit heat flow outward, concentrating the heat signal on the flow-side measurement.Filed by Solenis Technologies, L.P.; illustrates the sensor-and-inference approach to fouling detection that recurs across the C02F and F28F classes in this dataset.

US20140177673A1 — patent drawing 1US20140177673A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4783314AFluorescent tracers – chemical treatment monitors334
2US6123145ASynthetic jet actuators for cooling heated bodies and environments267
3US20050042151A1Nonwoven composites and related products and processes251
4US5734098AMethod to monitor and control chemical treatment of petroleum, petrochemical and processes with on-line quart…226
5US6457654B1Micromachined synthetic jet actuators and applications thereof210
6US5988522ASynthetic jet actuators for modifiying the direction of fluid flows167
7US5957413AModifications of fluid flow about bodies and surfaces with synthetic jet actuators146
8US20140244051A1Direct drive fan system with variable process control134
9US20060197053A1Absorption cycle utilizing ionic liquid as working fluid129
10US20110241549A1Light generator systems and methods128

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; read them as a signal of influence, not of current technical relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Cooling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the field

Three read-throughs from the concentration, composition and citation data, aimed at where to file and where not to.

Concentration
22.6%
of 2,139 records held by the top 5 assignees

Leadership is real but not dominant

The leader holds 114 records and fifth place holds 69, for a combined 483 out of 2,139 records in scope — 22.6%. That is enough to shape prior art in core claim areas without closing the field: the top 10 combined reach 35.5%, meaning nearly two-thirds of records sit outside the ranked leaders' immediate portfolios.

Read against the assignee ranking, not the raw filer count.
Technology mix
16.5% vs 13.5%
C02F share vs F25B share of records

Chemistry claims more ground than hardware

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) sits ahead of F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps) in share of records, with C09K materials and A01N biocides close behind at 11.3% and 10.5%. For a field named "industrial cooling", the density of chemical-treatment and sensing classes signals that scale, fouling and corrosion control carry as much claim weight as the mechanical cooling loop itself.

Class shares sum past 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Citation pattern
334 citations
on the most-cited record in the set

Influence skews old, not necessarily current

The most-cited records in this set date from the fluorescent-tracer and synthetic-jet-actuator era; their citation counts reflect decades of accumulation inside a searched corpus rather than present-day relevance. New filers should treat these as foundational prior art to design around, not as a map of where activity is happening now.

Citation counts inside a corpus favour older publications by construction.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to industrial cooling patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Cooling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has slowed

The ranked leaders combine chemical-treatment majors with a long tail of single-country filers; recent-year activity has thinned even among the top names, consistent with publication lag rather than genuine exit.

Leader
114
records

A chemical-treatment incumbent sets the pace

The top-ranked assignee holds 114 records, well ahead of fifth place at 69 and tenth place at 38 — a steep early drop-off that flattens quickly across the rest of the ranked field.

Ranking covers 100 companies, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.
Momentum
0-1
records in the latest year among named leaders

Recent-year filings have gone quiet at the top

Several of the most historically active assignees show zero or one record in the latest year tracked. That pattern is consistent with an 18-month publication lag hiding recent filings rather than leaders exiting the space outright.

Do not read this as a slowdown without checking the multi-year trend.
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is sparse and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest of them link a single major filer to named individual inventors or a closely related corporate affiliate — evidence of internal R&D structure more than cross-company joint development.

Co-filing density is low across the field generally.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches with thin claim density relative to the core water-treatment and refrigeration classes
fouling-sensor calibration methodsworking-fluid corrosion inhibitorsheat-flux-based fault detectionbiocide dosing control loopsmicrobalance-based scale monitoring
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Brisa International LLC1
Rohm and Haas Company0
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company0
Ecolab USA Inc.0
Abell Foundation Inc.0
Nalco Company0
Saudi Arabian Oil Co. (Saudi Aramco)0
PRIME DATUM INC0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Cooling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

Three practical next steps for a team deciding where to file or where to watch.

Check claim density before drafting

Run the specific sensor or chemistry approach you are considering against the C02F, F28F and G01N classes before committing claim language — density there is high enough that narrow, specific claims will fare better than broad ones.

Explore IPC composition in Eureka

Watch the 2025-26 filings as they publish

The apparent peak at 92 in 2025 and the dip into 2026 are both artefacts of publication lag; re-check this trend once records from the last 18 months have fully published before drawing conclusions about momentum.

Track filing trends in Eureka

Map the white space chips against your portfolio

The under-claimed sub-areas identified here are starting points, not conclusions — validate each against your own prior-art search before assuming open claim space.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Cooling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on industrial cooling patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Cooling Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Industrial Cooling Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole industrial cooling patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.