https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/industrial-energy-efficiency-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Industrial Energy Efficiency
Industrial energy efficiency patents: who is filing, and where the field is still open
  • 55.6% of records sit with five companies. the top five combined account for 90 of 162 records in scope, so freedom-to-operate work should start with them, not a long tail.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2019 peak. 18 records that year versus 11 in the most recent full-year window, with 2021→2024 down 18% — though 2025-26 counts are still filling in due to publication lag.
  • Separation and heat-exchange claims dominate. B01D and F28F lead the eight-subclass spread, while G06Q's 13.0% share shows how much of this field is now energy-management software, not hardware.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
162
Published Records
56%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-18%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (11 records) with 2024 (9) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 162 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape covers 162 published records matching claims and abstracts on industrial energy efficiency, specific energy use, process emissions and process heat controls, filed between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off. The scope spans separation and gas-processing hardware, heat-exchanger and refrigeration equipment, and the software layer that increasingly wraps around them — energy-management data processing under G06Q and G06F.

Filing activity peaked in 2019 and has since eased, though the most recent one to two years are understated because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months. Concentration is high enough that a handful of assignees define the claim space, while a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants works the margins around them.

Filing volume by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO24
  2. 2UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING23
  3. 3JELLY DROPS LTD17
  4. 4VELOCYS INC15
  5. 5JTURBO ENG & TECH LLC11
  6. 6PRAXAIR TECH INC11
  7. 7SNAMPROGETTI SPA9
  8. 8THE UNIV OF BRITISH COLUMBIA6
  9. 9HI EFF UTILITY RESCUE LLC5
  10. 10ARORA RAVI5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Energy Efficiency Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 162-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A 2019 peak, then a cooling filing rate

Annual filings ran from 16 in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2019, then eased to 11 by 2026 (partial year). The 2021-to-2024 window, the most recent stretch that can be read as complete, shows an 18% decline (11 to 9) — a real but modest pullback, not a collapse, and not a trend that should be extended into 2025-26 given publication lag.

A 2019 peak, then a cooling filing rate051015201620172018182019202020212022202320242025112026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Separation and heat exchange lead an eight-way spread

B01D separation processes lead at 19.1% of the 162 records, followed by F28F heat-exchanger details and G06Q business/data-processing classes tied at 13.0% each. F25B refrigeration and heat pumps sit at 11.7%, with C01B, F25J, B60H and G06F each in the 7-10% range — evidence that no single hardware category owns this field, and that software-side energy management claims (G06Q, G06F) already sit alongside the equipment classes rather than trailing them.

Separation and heat exchange lead an eight-way spreadB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…3119.1%F28F · Heat-exchanger details2113.0%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…2113.0%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps1911.7%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…169.9%F25J · Gas liquefaction & separation169.9%B60H · Vehicle heating & A/C159.3%G06F · Electric digital data processi…127.4%Other175108.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 162 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Energy Efficiency Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Industrial Energy Efficiency Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about industrial energy efficiency patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key filings

The most-cited records in this dataset

Representative filing
US20220258094A12022-08-18

Energy efficient VPSA system with direct drive high speed centrifugal compressors

PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC.

The invention relates to a method and system for improving PSA/VPSA plant energy efficiency during times of reduced production demand and capital efficiency through optimizing feed, vacuum, and centrifugal product compressors to achieve lower energy consumption and lower unit gas product production cost. The system employs a high speed direct drive centrifugal product compressor to achieve desired production at significantly lower energy consumption, using lower flow and lower adsorption top pressure in the lower production range.Filed by Praxair Technology, Inc., published 2022-08-18 as US20220258094A1.

US20220258094A1 — patent drawing 1US20220258094A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20170248381A1Radiative cooling structures and systems105
2WO2017151514A1Radiative cooling structures and systems76
3US20070085227A1Multi-phase contacting process using microchannel technology75
4US20060016215A1Distillation process using microchannel technology71
5US7610775B2Distillation process using microchannel technology65
6US7305850B2Distillation process using microchannel technology64
7US20060016216A1Distillation process using microchannel technology60
8US20190086164A1Radiative cooling structures and systems46
9US20100332275A1System, method, and media for trading of energy efficiency42
10WO2007028158A2Energy and chemical species utility management system38

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Energy Efficiency Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the concentration, trend and citation data above.

Concentration
55.6%
of 162 records held by top 5

Five companies define the claim space

With the top five assignees holding 90 of 162 records and the top ten reaching 126 (77.8%), most of the useful prior art for a freedom-to-operate check sits with a short list of firms rather than spread thin across the full 91-company ranking.

Start FTO review with the leaders, not the tail.
Momentum
-18%
2021 to 2024 filing change

A cooling filing rate, not a stalled one

The 18% decline from 11 filings in 2021 to 9 in 2024 is a real pullback from the 2019 peak of 18, but it is a modest one. Treat 2025-26 figures as provisional: publication lag of roughly 18 months means the true recent-year count is still arriving.

Re-check trend figures again after the next data refresh.
Composition
13.0%
of records in G06Q data-processing class

Software claims already sit alongside hardware

G06Q business/data-processing claims match F28F heat-exchanger claims in share at 13.0% of the 162 records. Energy-management software is not a peripheral add-on here — it occupies as much claim space as core heat-exchange hardware.

Screen software-side claims with the same rigor as equipment claims.
Citation signal
105 citations
on the leading record, US20170248381A1

Citation leaders are older, radiative-cooling filings

The most-cited records in this set date to the mid-2000s and mid-2010s and concentrate on radiative cooling structures and microchannel distillation — a reminder that citation counts favour age and do not indicate what is commercially active now.

Use citation rank as an influence signal, not a currency signal.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to industrial energy efficiency patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Energy Efficiency Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where it thins out

The ranking covers 91 companies counted by record share — the full set the data endpoint returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.

Leader
24
records held

A clear leader, then a steep drop-off

The top-ranked assignee holds 24 records, well ahead of fifth place at 11 and tenth place at 5 — a steep early drop that flattens into a long tail of few-filing entrants across the remaining ranked companies.

Watch the leader's claim boundaries first.
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships found

Co-assignee activity is university-anchored

The strongest co-assignee pair in this dataset links two university research bodies at 21 shared records; the next-strongest pairs link named inventors at single digits. Co-filing here reads as research partnership, not joint commercial ventures.

Check inventor-level pairs before assuming corporate joint filing.
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several ranked leaders

Several top-ranked filers show zero recent activity

A number of assignees holding meaningful historical shares — including university bodies and specialist process-technology firms — show no filings in the latest year, one falling 100% year-over-year. That is consistent with the field's broader cooling trend rather than any single firm's retreat.

Recent silence may reflect publication lag, not exit.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is thin relative to the core separation, heat-exchange and refrigeration classes.
Radiative cooling structure integrationDirect-drive centrifugal compressor turndown controlCross-class energy-metric data processing (G06Q + F28F)Microchannel process intensification for distillationVPSA/PSA plant capacity-modulation control logic
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
University of Wyoming0
The Regents of the University of Colorado0
JELLY DROPS LTD0-100%
Velocys, Inc.0
Praxair Technology, Inc.0
JTURBO ENG & TECH LLC0
Snamprogetti S.p.A.0
The University of British Columbia0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Energy Efficiency Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or monitoring.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the leaders

With 77.8% of records held by the top ten assignees, a targeted FTO review of that group covers most of the practical risk in this field.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Test claim language in the under-claimed branches

Cross-class combinations like energy-metric data processing paired with heat-exchange hardware show thinner filing density than the core classes.

Draft and stress-test claims in Eureka

Track the leader's recent filings for direction changes

Several top assignees show zero activity in the latest year; distinguishing genuine pullback from publication lag needs ongoing monitoring.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Energy Efficiency Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Energy Efficiency Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Industrial Energy Efficiency Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole industrial energy efficiency patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.