Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (11 records) with 2024 (9) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 162 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape covers 162 published records matching claims and abstracts on industrial energy efficiency, specific energy use, process emissions and process heat controls, filed between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off. The scope spans separation and gas-processing hardware, heat-exchanger and refrigeration equipment, and the software layer that increasingly wraps around them — energy-management data processing under G06Q and G06F.
Filing activity peaked in 2019 and has since eased, though the most recent one to two years are understated because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months. Concentration is high enough that a handful of assignees define the claim space, while a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants works the margins around them.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 162-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Annual filings ran from 16 in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2019, then eased to 11 by 2026 (partial year). The 2021-to-2024 window, the most recent stretch that can be read as complete, shows an 18% decline (11 to 9) — a real but modest pullback, not a collapse, and not a trend that should be extended into 2025-26 given publication lag.
B01D separation processes lead at 19.1% of the 162 records, followed by F28F heat-exchanger details and G06Q business/data-processing classes tied at 13.0% each. F25B refrigeration and heat pumps sit at 11.7%, with C01B, F25J, B60H and G06F each in the 7-10% range — evidence that no single hardware category owns this field, and that software-side energy management claims (G06Q, G06F) already sit alongside the equipment classes rather than trailing them.
Shares are the percentage of the 162 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about industrial energy efficiency patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe invention relates to a method and system for improving PSA/VPSA plant energy efficiency during times of reduced production demand and capital efficiency through optimizing feed, vacuum, and centrifugal product compressors to achieve lower energy consumption and lower unit gas product production cost. The system employs a high speed direct drive centrifugal product compressor to achieve desired production at significantly lower energy consumption, using lower flow and lower adsorption top pressure in the lower production range.Filed by Praxair Technology, Inc., published 2022-08-18 as US20220258094A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20170248381A1 | Radiative cooling structures and systems | 105 |
| 2 | WO2017151514A1 | Radiative cooling structures and systems | 76 |
| 3 | US20070085227A1 | Multi-phase contacting process using microchannel technology | 75 |
| 4 | US20060016215A1 | Distillation process using microchannel technology | 71 |
| 5 | US7610775B2 | Distillation process using microchannel technology | 65 |
| 6 | US7305850B2 | Distillation process using microchannel technology | 64 |
| 7 | US20060016216A1 | Distillation process using microchannel technology | 60 |
| 8 | US20190086164A1 | Radiative cooling structures and systems | 46 |
| 9 | US20100332275A1 | System, method, and media for trading of energy efficiency | 42 |
| 10 | WO2007028158A2 | Energy and chemical species utility management system | 38 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the concentration, trend and citation data above.
With the top five assignees holding 90 of 162 records and the top ten reaching 126 (77.8%), most of the useful prior art for a freedom-to-operate check sits with a short list of firms rather than spread thin across the full 91-company ranking.
The 18% decline from 11 filings in 2021 to 9 in 2024 is a real pullback from the 2019 peak of 18, but it is a modest one. Treat 2025-26 figures as provisional: publication lag of roughly 18 months means the true recent-year count is still arriving.
G06Q business/data-processing claims match F28F heat-exchanger claims in share at 13.0% of the 162 records. Energy-management software is not a peripheral add-on here — it occupies as much claim space as core heat-exchange hardware.
The most-cited records in this set date to the mid-2000s and mid-2010s and concentrate on radiative cooling structures and microchannel distillation — a reminder that citation counts favour age and do not indicate what is commercially active now.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to industrial energy efficiency patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranking covers 91 companies counted by record share — the full set the data endpoint returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.
The top-ranked assignee holds 24 records, well ahead of fifth place at 11 and tenth place at 5 — a steep early drop that flattens into a long tail of few-filing entrants across the remaining ranked companies.
The strongest co-assignee pair in this dataset links two university research bodies at 21 shared records; the next-strongest pairs link named inventors at single digits. Co-filing here reads as research partnership, not joint commercial ventures.
A number of assignees holding meaningful historical shares — including university bodies and specialist process-technology firms — show no filings in the latest year, one falling 100% year-over-year. That is consistent with the field's broader cooling trend rather than any single firm's retreat.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| University of Wyoming | 0 | — |
| The Regents of the University of Colorado | 0 | — |
| JELLY DROPS LTD | 0 | -100% |
| Velocys, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Praxair Technology, Inc. | 0 | — |
| JTURBO ENG & TECH LLC | 0 | — |
| Snamprogetti S.p.A. | 0 | — |
| The University of British Columbia | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or monitoring.
With 77.8% of records held by the top ten assignees, a targeted FTO review of that group covers most of the practical risk in this field.
Explore assignee claims in EurekaCross-class combinations like energy-metric data processing paired with heat-exchange hardware show thinner filing density than the core classes.
Draft and stress-test claims in EurekaSeveral top assignees show zero activity in the latest year; distinguishing genuine pullback from publication lag needs ongoing monitoring.
Set up monitoring in EurekaThe ranking covers 91 companies, with a clear leader holding 24 records and a steep drop-off to fifth place at 11 and tenth place at 5. The top five assignees together account for 90 of the 162 records in scope (55.6%), and the top ten reach 126 records (77.8%), so a small group of filers defines most of the accessible claim space. Beyond that group the field flattens into a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants, which is typical for a technology area with both large industrial players and university research groups active in it.
Filing peaked at 18 records in 2019 and has since eased, with the most recent complete comparison period, 2021 to 2024, showing an 18% decline from 11 to 9 filings. That is a real but moderate pullback rather than a collapse. Figures for 2025 and 2026 should be read with caution: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any patent dataset understate true filing activity.
The 162 records in this dataset span separation processes (B01D, 19.1% of records), heat-exchanger details (F28F, 13.0%), refrigeration and heat pumps (F25B, 11.7%), gas liquefaction and separation (F25J, 9.9%), and non-metallic inorganic compound processing (C01B, 9.9%), among others. Notably, business and data-processing claims (G06Q) also sit at 13.0%, on par with heat-exchanger hardware, reflecting how much of this field now involves energy-management software layered on top of physical equipment. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the record total.
US20220258094A1, assigned to Praxair Technology, Inc. and published in 2022, covers a PSA/VPSA plant energy-efficiency method that uses a high-speed direct-drive centrifugal product compressor to reduce energy consumption during turndown, particularly at lower flow and lower adsorption top pressure. It blocks the specific combination of direct-drive centrifugal compression with that turndown control logic for feed, vacuum and product compressors in PSA/VPSA gas separation plants. Work using different compressor architectures, different pressure-swing control strategies, or applications outside PSA/VPSA gas separation would sit outside its literal claim scope, though a full clearance opinion would need to check the granted claim set directly.
The technology composition data shows claim density concentrated in separation (B01D), heat exchange (F28F) and refrigeration (F25B), while cross-class combinations — such as energy-metric data processing paired with process-heat hardware, or radiative cooling structure integration — appear thinner. Several previously active assignees, including university research bodies, show no filings in the latest year, which may open room for new entrants in adjacent control-logic and compressor-turndown claims. Any whitespace read should be paired with a citation check, since the highest-cited records in this set date back a decade or more and may still anchor broad foundational claims.
Go past this page: query the whole industrial energy efficiency patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.