Book a demo

Industrial Heat Pump Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Industrial Heat Pump Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/industrial-heat-pumps-for-process-heat-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Process Heat
Industrial Heat Pump Patents for Process Heat
  • 57.3% of the field sits with five filers. Top 5 combined account for 125 of 218 records in scope, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants behind them.
  • Refrigerant chemistry, not hardware, dominates the claims. C09K materials for miscellaneous applications appear in 58.7% of records — ahead of F25B refrigeration and heat pump hardware at 56.9%.
  • Filing activity peaked in 2019 and has not recovered. From 10 records at the 2019 peak, the trend flattens through a 2022 midpoint of zero, before the usual publication lag understates the most recent years.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
218
Published Records
57%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+300%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the industrial heat pump patent record shows

Industrial heat pumps for process heat sit at the intersection of two claim traditions: refrigerant and working-fluid chemistry filed under C09K, and heat pump and refrigeration hardware filed under F25B. The search captures 218 published records spanning 2015 to the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from applicants ranging from established refrigerant chemical suppliers to university labs and single-invention filers.

Filing is concentrated: the ranked leader alone accounts for 52 records, and the top five combined hold 57.3% of the 218 records in scope. China is the largest receiving office by a wide margin, ahead of the United States, EPO, WIPO and Japan, which points to where enforcement and freedom-to-operate diligence matters most.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015-2026
  1. 1THE CHEMOURS CO FC LLC52
  2. 2TIANJIN UNIV28
  3. 3EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO25
  4. 4UNIVERSITY OF MARIBOR11
  5. 5HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC9
  6. 6SOLSTICE ADVANCED MATERIALS US INC9
  7. 7CAUSEWAY ENERGIES LLC4
  8. 8ZHONGYUAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE3
  9. 9CONTINUAL ENERGY INC3
  10. 10KARMAN IND INC3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Heat Pumps for Process Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 218 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings ran from 5 records in 2017 to a peak of 10 in 2019, then flattened, with the 2022 midpoint at zero. The final year or two is always understated because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the recent flat line should not yet be read as the field closing.

Filing trend, 2017-20260358105201720181020192020202120222023202410202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C09K materials claims (58.7% of records) and F25B refrigeration/heat pump hardware claims (56.9%) are the two dominant subclasses and frequently co-occur on the same record. Domestic heating (F24D, 8.7%), water heaters (F24H, 5.5%) and steam plant classes (F01K, F22B, each under 5%) trail well behind, marking them as adjacent rather than core claim territory.

IPC subclass compositionC09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…12858.7%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps12456.9%F24D · Domestic heating systems198.7%F24H · Fluid heaters & water heaters125.5%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants94.1%F24F · Air conditioning & ventilation94.1%F02G · Hot-gas & external-combustion …62.8%F22B · Steam generation & boilers62.8%Other5424.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 218 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Heat Pumps for Process Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Industrial Heat Pumps for Process Heat with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about industrial heat pumps for process heat and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a recent representative filing

Representative recent filing
US20250362063A12025-11-27

US20250362063A1 — Systems and methods for a high temperature heat pump

KARMAN INDUSTRIES INC.

A high temperature heat pump apparatus is disclosed. The apparatus can include a first compression stage including a first evaporator that evaporates a first working fluid to form a first vapor, a first compressor that compresses the first vapor to increase the pressure of the first vapor, and a condenser that condenses the first vapor having increased pressure to deliver heat. The apparatus can include a second compression stage including a second evaporator that evaporates a second working fluid using the heat from the condenser of the first compression stage, where the second evaporator evaporates the second working fluid to form a second vapor, and a second compressor that compresses…Filed by Karman Industries Inc., published 2025-11-27 — a two-stage cascade architecture using separate working fluids per stage.

US20250362063A1 — patent drawing 1US20250362063A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6913076B1High temperature heat pump45
2CN101135503A一种带有涡流管的高温热泵系统41
3JP2015143359AAzeotropic mixture-like composition, heat transmission composition, detergent, high temperature heat pump dev…35
4US20130104575A1Use of compositions comprising 1,1,1,2,3-pentafluoropropane and optionally z-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-2-butene …35
5CN102261703A采用热管热回收和超声强化再生的转轮除湿空调系统32
6US20160137895A1Use of alkyl perfluoroalkene ethers and mixtures thereof in high temperature heat pumps30
7CN102297525A太阳能-沼液余热回收式热泵高温厌氧发酵加温系统与运行控制方法24
8US20130160478A1Use of e-1,1,1,4,4,5,5,5-octafluoro-2-pentene and optionally 1,1,1,2,3-pentafluoropropane in high temperature…23
9WO2014197290A1Use of alkyl perfluoroalkene ethers and mixtures thereof in high temperature heat pumps21
10US20130298581A1Producing heating using working fluids comprising z-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-2-butene21

Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of time in the corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Heat Pumps for Process Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns in the data change how a freedom-to-operate or whitespace review should be scoped for this field.

Concentration
57.3% / top 5
share of 218 records

A small group holds the core chemistry and cycle claims

With the leader alone at 52 records and the top five combined at 125 of 218, most of the occupied claim space sits with a handful of refrigerant and hardware specialists. New entrants filing in C09K or F25B should expect dense prior art from these filers specifically, not the field in general.

Top 10 combined reach 67.4% of records, so the drop-off past fifth place is real but not steep.
Technology mix
58.7% C09K
of 218 records

Chemistry claims lead hardware claims

C09K materials claims edge out F25B refrigeration hardware claims (56.9%), and the two overlap heavily on the same filings. This suggests refrigerant selection and blend composition, not compressor or cycle architecture, is the more heavily claimed axis of differentiation.

Domestic heating and water-heater subclasses each sit under 9%, marking clearer adjacent ground.
Momentum
Peak 2019, flat since
filing trend 2017-2026

Activity has not grown past its 2019 peak

Filing volume reached 10 records in 2019 and has not returned to that level; the 2022 midpoint sits at zero. Recent-year momentum by the leading assignees also reads flat to declining, though the most recent one to two years are understated by publication lag.

A flat trend after a peak can mean either a maturing claim space or reduced R&D investment — the geography split (heavy China filing) suggests the former is more likely regionally.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to industrial heat pumps for process heat, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyThe Chemours Company FC, LLC3
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyKONTOMARIS KONSTANTINOS1

Only two co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, both linked to the same corporate family — most records here are filed by a single assignee rather than through joint development.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Heat Pumps for Process Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The ranked leader holds 52 records against a fifth-place figure of 9 and a tenth-place figure of 3 — a steep drop that separates a handful of established filers from a long tail of occasional entrants.

Leader
52 records
vs. 9 at fifth place

One filer dominates the leaderboard

The top-ranked assignee's count is more than five times the fifth-place figure, indicating a filer with a sustained, multi-year program rather than a single burst of activity. Recent-year momentum data shows this cooling to zero in the latest year, consistent with the field-wide publication-lag effect rather than a change in strategy.

76 companies appear in the full ranking returned by the dataset.
Chemical suppliers
Multiple ranked filers
refrigerant chemistry lineage

Refrigerant chemical suppliers anchor the top tier

Several of the highest-ranked assignees trace to established refrigerant and specialty-chemical suppliers, consistent with C09K materials claims being the largest single subclass in the dataset. Their filings concentrate on working-fluid composition and blend claims rather than mechanical cycle design.

The strongest co-assignee pair links two entities from the same corporate lineage.
Long tail
Tenth place = 3 records
of 218 total

Most ranked assignees file only a handful of records

Past the top ten, filing counts drop to single digits and then singles — university labs, regional manufacturers and newer entrants like Karman Industries appear with one or a few records each. This is where technically narrow, defensible claims are more likely to still be open.

China is the dominant receiving office (99 records), ahead of the US, EPO, WIPO and Japan combined filings in this set.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with thin filing density relative to the core chemistry and hardware claims
cascade multi-stage cycle integrationsteam-generating heat pump retrofit (F22B overlap)low-GWP blend selection for supply temperatures above 150°Chot-gas external-combustion hybrid cyclesair-source integration with existing gas boiler plantwater-heater scale COP optimisation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company0
The Chemours Company FC, LLC0
Tianjin University0
Honeywell International Inc.0-100%
University of Maribor0
CAUSEWAY ENERGIES LLC0
Pan Ge0
Beijing Lianliyuan Technology Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Heat Pumps for Process Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top five

With 57.3% of records held by five filers, any new refrigerant blend or cascade cycle claim should be checked against this group's granted claims first, not the field as a whole.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Watch the China filing concentration

China accounts for 99 of the receiving-office filings in this set, well ahead of the US, EPO, WIPO and Japan. Regional filing strategy and enforcement exposure should be weighted accordingly.

Explore regional filing detail in Eureka

Track whether the 2019 peak was a one-off

Filing has not returned to its 2019 level and the 2022 midpoint sits at zero; because the most recent one to two years are understated by publication lag, this trend is worth revisiting as later data lands.

Set an alert on this technology in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Heat Pumps for Process Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on industrial heat pump patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Heat Pumps for Process Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Industrial Heat Pumps for Process Heat in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole industrial heat pumps for process heat corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.