Book a demo

OPC UA Gateway Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

OPC UA Gateway Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/industrial-iot-opc-ua-gateway-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Industrial IoT Patent Landscape
OPC UA Gateway Patents: Who Leads Industrial IoT Interoperability
Get a prior-art report on your approach
80
Published Records
65%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-11%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (9 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 80 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Landscape Overview

What the OPC UA gateway patent record actually shows

An OPC UA gateway sits at the junction between factory-floor protocols and IT-side data pipelines, translating machine data into a vendor-neutral address space. That translation function is exactly where patent claims cluster: the corpus in scope — 80 published records spanning 2015 to the 2026 cut-off — is dominated by transmission and protocol-mapping claims rather than control-loop claims. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so recent years understate real activity.

Filing has already passed its most visible peak: 2019 produced the highest count so far, and the 2021-2024 window shows a modest decline rather than acceleration. That pattern, combined with concentration among a handful of large industrial and technology filers, points to a field where the core gateway architecture is well staked out and later entrants are filing on narrower implementation details.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC12
  2. 2ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG12
  3. 3PHOENIX CONTACT GMBH & CO KG10
  4. 4SIEMENS AG9
  5. 5HUAWEI TECH CO LTD9
  6. 6MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP6
  7. 7MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC6
  8. 8MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC R&D CENTRE EUROPE BV4
  9. 9AJAY KUMAR GARG ENG COLLEGE2
  10. 10INSTR TECH & ECONOMY INST P R CHINA2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial IoT: OPC UA Gateway Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 80-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend: a 2019 peak, then a gentle pull-back

Annual counts rise from 2 records in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2019, then ease through the early 2020s; the -11% change measured from 9 records in 2021 to 8 in 2024 is the most recent complete-year comparison available. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publications catch up to filing dates.

Filing trend: a 2019 peak, then a gentle pull-back03691222017201811201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition: transmission claims dominate

H04L (digital information transmission) appears on 76.3% of all 80 records, far ahead of G05B control systems at 25.0%. Smaller shares in G06F, H04W, G06N, G01F, B01D and C07K show the gateway concept reaching into computing, wireless, AI-based and even measurement or materials contexts, but each of those remains a minority claim pattern rather than a parallel filing track.

Technology composition: transmission claims dominateH04L · Digital information transmissi…6176.3%G05B · Control & regulating systems2025.0%G06F · Electric digital data processi…78.8%H04W · Wireless communication networks56.3%G06N · Computing based on AI models33.8%G01F · Flow, level & volume measuring22.5%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…11.3%C07K · Peptides & proteins11.3%Other22.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 80 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial IoT: OPC UA Gateway Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Industrial IoT: OPC UA Gateway Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about industrial iot: opc ua gateway patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
EP3883214B12023-09-06

EP3883214B1 — Method for implementing an industrial communication gateway

MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC R&D CENTRE EUROPE B.V.

Filed by Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe and granted in 2023, this record describes a method for implementing an industrial communication gateway — the kind of claim structure typical of the mid-2020s wave, where the architecture is settled and the invention sits in implementation detail.Grant date and assignee are shown in the table; treat the abstract summary here as descriptive, not as a claim analysis.

EP3883214B1 — patent drawing 1EP3883214B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited OPC UA gateway records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20170163444A1Apparatus and method for using an internet of things edge secure gateway72
2US20180309831A1Internet of things pub-sub data publisher66
3CN109765866A一种基于OPC UA的工业网络系统及其数据处理方法40
4US20200210869A1Gateway and method for transforming a description of an industrial process equipment into a data information …37
5CN105530240A多种工业协议向OPC UA地址空间自动映射的方法27
6CN112688865A一种图形化在线建模的OPC UA网关的设计方法25
7US20190068400A1Edge server and method of operating an edge server23
8WO2017186260A1Edge server and method of operating an edge server23
9US10178177B2Apparatus and method for using an internet of things edge secure gateway12
10US20160294617A1Method for configuring a web services gateway and web services gateway10

Citation counts reflect influence inside this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of prior-art density, not of which invention is currently most valuable.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial IoT: OPC UA Gateway Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the data means for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision

Three figures from this dataset carry direct implications for anyone deciding whether, and where, to file next in OPC UA gateway technology.

Concentration
65.0% / top 5
of all 80 records

The top of the field is crowded, the rest is thin

Five assignees hold 65.0% of the 80 records in scope, and the top 10 push that to 90.0%. That leaves little room in the core architecture claims; new entrants are more likely to find open ground in narrower implementation or integration claims than in the gateway concept itself.

Based on the 24-company ranked list returned for this dataset.
Technology mix
76.3% H04L
of all 80 records

Claims are won and lost on data transmission, not control logic

Three in four records carry an H04L classification against one in four for G05B control systems. Drafting a gateway patent as a control-system invention, rather than a transmission/protocol-mapping invention, is filing against the grain of where examiners and prior art actually sit.

IPC shares sum to more than 100% because records carry multiple classes.
Filing pace
-11%
2021 to 2024

A field past its filing peak, not one accelerating

Annual filings peaked at 11 in 2019 and the last complete comparison, 2021's 9 records against 2024's 8, shows an -11% pull-back. That is consistent with a technology whose core claim space is largely staked, not one where competitors are racing to file.

2025-2026 figures will rise as publications catch up to filing dates.
Collaboration
3 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is rare and concentrated in one relationship

Only three co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest link — between Mitsubishi Electric and its European R&D centre — accounts for four joint records. Most filers in this field patent alone rather than through joint ventures.

Counts reflect co-assignee pairings identified in the ranked dataset.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to industrial iot: opc ua gateway patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial IoT: OPC UA Gateway Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is filing strategy, freedom-to-operate, or competitive tracking.

Map claim language against the H04L cluster

With 76.3% of records in digital transmission classes, a claim-by-claim read of that cluster in Eureka will show which protocol-mapping approaches are already blocked and which implementation variants remain open.

Explore the H04L cluster in Eureka

Track the concentrated leaders for new filings

With 90.0% of records held by the top 10 of 24 ranked assignees, setting alerts on that group in Eureka surfaces new filings before they broaden into adjacent IPC classes.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka

Check the minority IPC branches for white space

Classes like G06N, G01F and B01D each cover a handful of records; running a focused prior-art search on those branches in Eureka can confirm whether they are genuinely open or simply under-indexed.

Search adjacent branches in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial IoT: OPC UA Gateway Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about OPC UA gateway patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial IoT: OPC UA Gateway Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Industrial IoT: OPC UA Gateway Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole industrial iot: opc ua gateway patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.