Industrial IoT Platform Patent Landscape 2026
Industrial IoT Platform Patent Landscape in 2026
The Industrial IoT Platform patent space is highly concentrated, with two Strong Force entities together holding the plurality of activity among the largest filers, and additive manufacturing emerging as the dominant technical route. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2021 peak and recent years remain understated by publication lag.
Strong Force entities lead a sharply concentrated field
Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC ranks first among applicants, followed closely by Strong Force TX Portfolio 2018 LLC in second place and General Electric Co in third. The top five filers collectively account for 57% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signaling a field controlled by a small cluster of portfolio-holding entities.
The tier gap between the top two Strong Force entities and the rest of the field is pronounced: the third-ranked applicant, General Electric Co, holds roughly half the patent records of the second-ranked entity, and all applicants outside the top four hold three or fewer records apiece. This creates a two-tier structure with a dominant bloc and a long tail of individual and small-firm filers.
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC | 16 | |
| 2 | Strong Force TX Portfolio 2018 LLC | 13 | |
| 3 | General Electric Co | 8 | |
| 4 | Skyphos Industries Inc | 7 | |
| 5 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC | 4 | |
| 6 | Illinois Tool Works Inc | 3 | |
| 7 | Arbor Systems LLC | 3 | |
| 8 | Multiphasic Corp | 2 | |
| 9 | Intrepid Automation Inc | 2 | |
| 10 | Shivani R | 1 |
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Enovix Corp | 1 | |
| 12 | Rahul Kumar Misra | 1 | |
| 13 | Inner Mongolia Power Machinery Research Institute | 1 | |
| 14 | DIA& CO INC | 1 | |
| 15 | Kitagawa NorthTech Inc | 1 | |
| 16 | Dr. K P Yuvaraj | 1 | |
| 17 | He Caiyun | 1 | |
| 18 | Manoj S Pillai | 1 | |
| 19 | S Vanitha | 1 | |
| 20 | Nokia Technologies Oy | 1 |
The leading positions of two related portfolio entities — rather than operating manufacturers — suggests that a significant share of this space is held for licensing or assertion purposes, which has direct implications for freedom-to-operate analysis and technology acquisition strategy.
Data for the most recent 18–24 months is subject to publication lag and will understate true activity; counts for 2024 and 2025 should be treated as preliminary. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
A 2021 activity peak followed by sustained mid-level filings, anchored in additive manufacturing
Two charts frame the competitive dynamics: the annual filing trend captures the field’s growth trajectory, while the technology composition chart reveals which IPC branches are drawing the most patent activity.
Annual filing trend
Annual filings surged to a peak of 18 records in 2021, then settled to 12–13 per year in 2022–2023. The apparent drop in 2024 and 2025 reflects publication lag rather than a real decline and should not be read as a trend reversal. The three-year recent window is 30% above the prior three-year window, confirming net multi-year growth despite the easing from the 2021 peak.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
Additive manufacturing (B33Y) is the single largest branch by a wide margin, followed by shaping of plastics (B29C) and business/commerce data processing (G06Q). Digital information transmission (H04L), welding and brazing (B23K), AI-based computing (G06N), and robotics (B25J) form a secondary tier. The concentration of activity in manufacturing-process classes, rather than pure connectivity or platform software classes, reflects the dominant technical framing of this particular corpus.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
Management platform for additive manufacturing pro…
Systems and methods for managing an additive manufacturing production line include an additive manufacturing machine having a first sensor and an auxiliary equipment having a second sensor. A server includes security protocols, a workflow module, an industrial Internet of things (IIoT) module and a machine learning module. The workflow module, IIoT module… (excerpt from the patent abstract)
| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smart device | 123 |
| 2 | Systems, methods, kits, and apparatuses for edge-d… | 120 |
| 3 | Systems and methods for controlling rights related… | 119 |
| 4 | Smart device | 111 |
| 5 | Robotic Fleet Configuration Method for Additive Ma… | 101 |
| 6 | Market orchestration system for facilitating elect… | 71 |
| 7 | Systems and methods for selecting and distributing… | 59 |
| 8 | Smart device | 33 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions
The combination of portfolio-entity dominance, a manufacturing-process technology mix, and a growth-stage lifecycle creates a distinctive set of considerations for teams evaluating where to invest or where to design around.
Growth stage, past its 2021 peak on an annual basis
The field carries a Growth lifecycle designation: the recent three-year filing window sits 30% above the prior three-year window, confirming expansion on a multi-year basis. However, annual volume peaked in 2021 and has since eased, so the space is no longer in its steepest acceleration phase. Teams entering now face an established but not yet mature competitive landscape, with room to define differentiated positions before consolidation.
Growth · past 2021 peakTwo portfolio entities hold the dominant bloc
The top five filers account for 57% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, and the top two are related portfolio-holding entities rather than product companies. This means freedom-to-operate risk is concentrated in a small set of assertion-oriented holders. Engineers should map their implementation against the Strong Force VCN and Strong Force TX portfolios early in any product development cycle. General Electric Co, Baker Hughes, and Illinois Tool Works represent the primary operating-company presence in the top tier.
High concentration · portfolio riskNo co-applicant activity detected in this corpus
Evidence on collaboration is pending — no co-applicant filings were identified within this scoped dataset. The absence of joint filings may reflect the portfolio-entity nature of the dominant holders, which typically file unilaterally, or may indicate that ecosystem partnerships in this space are commercialized through licensing rather than joint patent ownership. This is worth monitoring as the field matures.
No co-filing detectedUS-centric, with EPO and PCT as the primary secondary routes
The United States leads jurisdictions with 26 patent records, followed by Europe via EPO and WIPO PCT each with 11. Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, and Singapore each hold a smaller share of records. The US-heavy profile is consistent with the dominance of US-domiciled portfolio entities. For R&D teams targeting non-US markets, the relatively lighter coverage in China, India, and Southeast Asia may offer more operational freedom, though PCT filings indicate international protection intent.
US-led · EPO & PCT secondaryGo beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.
Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.
Strong Force VCN leads on volume; General Electric anchors the operating-company tier
The applicant ranking is led by two related portfolio entities, with operating companies General Electric, Baker Hughes, and Illinois Tool Works forming the active industrial bloc. Momentum data highlights new entrants alongside one filer showing a sharp recent decline.
Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC
The top-ranked filer with 16 patent records, Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC is a new entrant with all recent activity concentrated in the latest filing window. Its technology emphasis spans additive manufacturing (B33Y), robotics and manipulators (B25J), and business/commerce data processing (G06Q), reflecting a broad platform-level coverage strategy. As a portfolio entity, its filings are oriented toward licensing rather than product deployment.
patent records: 16General Electric Co
Ranked third with 8 patent records, General Electric Co is the leading operating-company filer in this corpus. Its technology focus is tightly clustered around laser and beam welding (B23K26), additive manufacturing (B33Y), and control and regulating systems (G05B19), indicating an industrial-process integration strategy rather than a pure platform play. GE’s presence anchors the manufacturing-execution dimension of this space and offers a contrast to the portfolio-entity holders above it.
patent records: 8| Applicant | Recent (3 yrs) | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC | 16 | ▲ new entrant |
| Strong Force TX Portfolio 2018 LLC | 2 | ▼ -82% |
| Skyphos Industries Inc | 6 | ▲ new entrant |
| Intrepid Automation Inc | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring
Several IPC branches appear in the corpus with moderate record counts relative to the dominant additive manufacturing cluster, representing areas where coverage is present but not yet dense. These are observations of relative sparsity; the technical and commercial value of each should be validated against specific use-case requirements before treating them as investment targets.
G06N · AI-Based Computing for Industrial IoT
With 17 patent records and a 5% share of the corpus, AI-based computing (G06N) is present but notably sparse given its centrality to modern industrial platform architectures. Anomaly detection, predictive maintenance, and edge inference are high-value IPC sub-areas where the current filing density leaves room for differentiated positions. Entry paths include targeting specific industrial verticals — such as process manufacturing or energy — where AI-driven control logic is not yet well-covered by existing filers.
Search this in Eureka →G05B · Control & Regulating Systems
Control and regulating systems (G05B) holds 14 patent records at a 4% share, making it one of the lower-density branches despite being foundational to any industrial IoT deployment. General Electric and Illinois Tool Works have filed in this area, but coverage remains thin relative to the broader market need for closed-loop industrial control integration with IoT data streams. Teams with expertise in programmable logic controllers or industrial automation protocols may find this branch underserved relative to its deployment importance.
Search this in Eureka →How leading applicants differ by technology route
Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.
| Player | B33Y 50 · Additive manufacturing (3D printing) | B29C 64 · Shaping of plastics | B33Y 10 · Additive manufacturing (3D printing) | H04L 9 · Digital information transmission | B23K 26 · Welding, soldering & brazing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Force TX Portfolio 2018 LLC | Strong · 13 | Strong · 13 | Absent | Strong · 13 | Absent |
| Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC | Strong · 16 | Moderate · 8 | Emerging · 2 | Moderate · 6 | Absent |
| General Electric Co | Strong · 8 | Absent | Moderate · 2 | Absent | Strong · 8 |
| Skyphos Industries Inc | Moderate · 3 | Strong · 7 | Strong · 7 | Absent | Absent |
| Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC | Strong · 4 | Strong · 4 | Strong · 3 | Absent | Absent |
| Multiphasic Corp | Moderate · 1 | Strong · 2 | Strong · 2 | Absent | Moderate · 1 |
| Intrepid Automation Inc | Strong · 2 | Strong · 2 | Absent | Absent | Absent |
Frequently asked questions
The scoped corpus contains 67 patent families. These are the foundation for lifecycle, trend, and jurisdiction analysis in this report.
Strong Force VCN Portfolio 2019 LLC leads with 16 patent records, ahead of Strong Force TX Portfolio 2018 LLC at 13 and General Electric Co at 8. Both Strong Force entities are portfolio holders rather than product manufacturers.
The field is classified as Growth stage. The recent three-year filing window is 30% above the prior three-year window, confirming multi-year expansion. Annual volume peaked in 2021 and has since eased, so the field is past its steepest growth phase but not yet mature.
Additive manufacturing (B33Y) is the largest branch by record count, followed by shaping of plastics (B29C) and business/commerce data processing (G06Q). Digital information transmission (H04L), welding and brazing (B23K), and AI-based computing (G06N) form a secondary tier.
The United States leads with 26 patent records, followed by Europe via EPO and WIPO PCT each with 11. Australia and China each hold 5 records. The US-heavy profile reflects the dominance of US-domiciled portfolio entities at the top of the ranking.
AI-based computing (G06N) at 17 records and control and regulating systems (G05B) at 14 records are the most notable under-served branches relative to their technical importance in industrial IoT deployments. Digital information transmission (H04L) and robotics (B25J) also remain comparatively sparse given their role in platform architectures.
Map your own Industrial IoT Platform patent landscape
Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.