Book a demo

Industrial Robot Machine Vision Patent Landscape 2026

Industrial Robot Machine Vision Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Industrial Robot Machine Vision Patent Landscape in 2026

The industrial robot machine vision field holds 1,064 patent families and is still expanding on a multi-year basis, with the recent three-year window outpacing the prior period by 63%, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak. ABB leads a moderately fragmented field where the top five filers hold 19% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output, and the United States is the dominant filing jurisdiction.

1,064
Patent families in scope
19%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+63%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

ABB leads a moderately fragmented field with no dominant monopoly

ABB (Schweiz) AG holds the top position with 40 patent families, followed by MacDonald Dettwiler & Associates (25), Intuitive Surgical Operations (24), Intrinsic Innovation (23), and Ocado Innovation (21). The ranking spans automation incumbents, surgical robotics specialists, and logistics-focused entrants.

The top five filers account for 19% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating moderate concentration. The gap between ABB’s 40 families and the fifth-ranked Ocado’s 21 families is meaningful but not prohibitive, leaving room for challengers to close the distance with sustained investment.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1ABB (Schweiz) AG40
2MACDONALD DETTWILER & ASSOC INC25
3Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc24
4Intrinsic Innovation LLC23
5Ocado Innovation Ltd21
6Mitsubishi Electric Corporation19
7Omron Corporation18
8The Boeing Company18
9Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories Inc16
10Samsung Electronics Co Ltd16
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Mujin Inc15
12Outrider Technologies Inc14
13Ebots Inc14
14Miso Robotics Inc12
15Mako Surgical Corp12
16Dexterity Inc11
17Porter Burke E Machinery Co10
18Seiko Epson Corporation9
193M Innovative Properties Company9
20Fastbrick IP Pty Ltd9
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

ABB’s lead reflects deep integration across manipulator control and vision-guided robotics. The presence of specialized players such as Intuitive Surgical and Ocado Innovation signals that machine vision value is accruing to vertically focused applications — surgical robotics and automated warehousing — alongside the generalist robotics platforms.

Data for 20242026 should be treated as a lower bound due to typical patent publication lag of 18–24 months; the true filing volume for those years is likely higher than currently indexed. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth remains positive despite a post-2023 moderation in annual volume

The filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal both the pace of investment and where that investment is concentrated across IPC classes.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose from 56 families in 2017 to a peak of 177 in 2023, reflecting sustained field expansion. The apparent decline in 2024 (140) and 2025 (124) — and the very low 2026 count of 27 — is largely an artifact of publication lag and should not be read as a reversal of trend. The three-year recent window still sits 63% above the prior comparable window.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 177 in 2023.562017852018101201990202010220211622022177202314020241242025272026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B25J (Manipulators & Robots) dominates with 1,261 patent records, confirming that machine vision patents in this space are overwhelmingly anchored to manipulator systems. Secondary clusters in G06T (Image Data Processing, 197), G05B (Control & Regulating Systems, 148), and G06V (Image/Video Recognition, 148) highlight growing investment in the software and perception layers. Smaller but notable clusters exist in A61B (Diagnosis & Surgery, 79), B65G (Conveying & Material Handling, 78), and G06K (Data Recognition, 78), reflecting vertical application pull.

Technology compositionB25J · Manipulators & robots leads with 1,261; G06T · Image data processing & generation 197.B25J · Manipulators & ro…1,261G06T · Image data proces…197G05B · Control & regulat…148G06V · Image/video recog…148A61B · Diagnosis & surgery79B65G · Conveying & mater…78G06K · Data recognition …78G06N · Computing based o…67↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250262760A1Published 2025-08-21

Learning visual pose estimation for robotic operat…

Fanuc Corporation

A method and system for robotic skill learning using visual pose estimation. A robot arm performing a task, such as an assembly or workpiece positioning operation, has a camera mounted thereon. The camera provides training images of an operation scene from a variety of positions and under a variety of lighting conditions. For each image, a relative pose of… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Learning visual pose estimation for robotic operat… — patent drawingLearning visual pose estimation for robotic operat… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Detection and reconstruction of an environment to …512
2Adaptive vision-based controller323
3Tele-autonomous system and method employing time/p…319
4Object Pickup Strategies for a Robotic Device262
5Adaptive tracking vision and guidance system254
6Real-Time Determination of Object Metrics for Traj…248
7Methods and systems for recognizing machine-readab…222
8Vision system for distinguishing touching parts209

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D strategy

The combination of moderate concentration, a clear multi-year growth arc, and broad IPC coverage signals an active field where late movers can still establish meaningful positions in adjacent application domains.

Growth

Growth stage — multi-year expansion with a 2023 peak

The field is classified as Growth: recent three-year filings exceed the prior three-year window by 63%, confirming that overall investment is still rising. Annual volume peaked in 2023 at 177 families and has eased since, though 2024–2025 figures are understated by publication lag. Entrants can still capture meaningful positions, but the window for low-cost entry is narrowing as incumbents accumulate portfolios.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a clear leadership tier

The top five filers hold 19% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output — meaningful but far from monopolistic. ABB’s lead of 40 patent families versus Ocado’s fifth-place 21 families shows a roughly gap at the top. Below the top five, the field fragments quickly across logistics, surgical, aerospace, and food-processing specialists, suggesting vertical niches remain contestable.

Moderate fragmentation
Collaboration

Limited co-filing activity — one documented partnership

Only one co-applicant relationship is evidenced in the corpus: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Kyoto University co-filed one patent family together. The near-absence of co-filing suggests that most R&D in this field is conducted within single-organization programs, reducing technology-transfer risk but also limiting cross-disciplinary leverage. Organizations considering alliance strategies face a relatively open partnership landscape.

Low co-filing
Geography

US-dominant filing with China as the secondary arena

The United States accounts for 530 patent records, the largest single jurisdiction, followed by China (241), Europe via EPO (159), WIPO/PCT (125), and India (107). The strong US position reflects the concentration of leading applicants such as ABB, MacDonald Dettwiler, Intuitive Surgical, Intrinsic Innovation, and Ocado in the North American market. China’s 241 records signal growing domestic filings, and the EPO and PCT routes show applicants protecting innovations across multiple markets.

US-led, China rising
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Mitsubishi Electric CorporationKyoto University1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Cards draw on lifecycle, collaboration, jurisdiction, and applicant ranking evidence from the corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

ABB anchors the field; Ocado and Mitsubishi Electric research labs are the fastest-rising challengers

The top applicants split between established automation platforms and vertically focused specialists; momentum data reveals that several newer entrants are building portfolios rapidly from a low base.

Leader · ABB (Schweiz) AG

ABB (Schweiz) AG

ABB leads with 40 patent families, concentrated heavily in B25J 9 (Manipulators & Robots, 28 families) and complemented by G05B 19 (Control & Regulating Systems, 8 families) and B25J 19 (Manipulators & Robots, 6 families). This profile confirms ABB’s focus on integrated robot control and vision-guided manipulation rather than pure image-processing software. Recent momentum shows a –20% trend versus the prior period, suggesting the current portfolio is maturing rather than accelerating.

families: 40
Challenger · Ocado Innovation Ltd

Ocado Innovation Ltd

Ocado Innovation holds 21 patent families and is classified as a new entrant by momentum data, with 18 of those families filed in the recent period — making it the fastest-rising applicant in the corpus by recent-period volume. Its technology focus sits almost entirely within B25J 9 (Manipulators & Robots, 19 families), reflecting its warehouse automation use case. The new-entrant momentum from a warehousing-native organization signals that logistics automation is becoming a primary driver of machine vision innovation alongside traditional industrial automation.

families: 21
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 100 applicants, including technology focus maps and momentum scores.
Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories IncIntrinsic Innovation LLC+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
ABB (Schweiz) AG8▼ -20%
MacDonald Dettwiler & Associates Inc6▼ -50%
Intuitive Surgical Operations Inc11▲ +10%
Ocado Innovation Ltd18▲ new entrant
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation7▲ new entrant
The Boeing Company3▲ new entrant
Omron Corporation4▲ new entrant
Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories Inc10▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards combine applicant ranking, technology focus, and recent filing momentum from the evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served IPC branches adjacent to the core manipulator domain

While B25J dominates the corpus, several adjacent IPC classes show activity levels that are low relative to their technical proximity to machine vision-guided robotics, and may represent areas where new filings face less prior-art density.

G06V · Image/Video Recognition

G06V holds 148 patent records — meaningful in absolute terms but representing only 5% of the IPC distribution, despite image and video recognition being central to robot perception. Given the rapid advance of deep-learning-based visual recognition and its direct applicability to bin-picking, defect detection, and scene understanding, this branch carries genuine technical value. Organizations with computer-vision software competencies could establish differentiated positions here without competing head-on in the crowded B25J manipulator space.

Search this in Eureka →

B65G · Conveying & Material Handling

B65G accounts for 78 patent records (3% of IPC distribution), yet conveying and material handling is a primary commercial application of robot machine vision in logistics and manufacturing. The relative sparsity compared to the manipulator core suggests that vision-guided conveying systems — sortation, palletizing, and intralogistics — remain under-patented relative to their market deployment. Applicants active in warehouse automation or smart factory integration would find a less-contested prior-art landscape in this branch.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches ranked by sparsity, technical adjacency, and entry-path assessment.
A61B · Diagnosis & Surgery (surgical vision guidance)G05B · Control & Regulating Systems (vision-in-the-loop control)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. White-space branches are derived from lower-share IPC classes adjacent to the dominant B25J cluster.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerB25J 9 · Manipulators & robotsB25J 19 · Manipulators & robotsB25J 13 · Manipulators & robotsB25J 15 · Manipulators & robotsG06T 7 · Image data processing & generation
MacDonald Dettwiler & Associates IncStrong · 19Strong · 22Moderate · 5Moderate · 10Absent
Samsung Electronics Co LtdStrong · 16Strong · 9AbsentAbsentStrong · 13
ABB (Schweiz) AGStrong · 28Moderate · 6AbsentAbsentAbsent
Intuitive Surgical Operations IncStrong · 24AbsentAbsentModerate · 5Absent
Zane Robotics LtdStrong · 15AbsentModerate · 5AbsentStrong · 8
Omron CorporationStrong · 15Moderate · 6Moderate · 5AbsentAbsent
Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories IncStrong · 16AbsentAbsentAbsentModerate · 8
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own robot machine vision patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.