https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/industrial-waste-heat-recovery-technology-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · HVAC & Thermal Systems
Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Patents: Who's Filing, and Where the Field Has Stalled
  • Filing has cooled since 2017. The peak year of 139 filings has not been matched since, with the 2022 midpoint at 117 and a clear downward drift into the most recent partial year.
  • China now dominates the filing map. China's receiving-office count (724) is nearly double that of the United States (392), reshaping where freedom-to-operate work needs to start.
  • Momentum has gone quiet at the top. Several of the historically largest assignees, including Ormat, UTC Power and GE, show zero filings in the latest tracked year, suggesting consolidation or a pause rather than continued build-out.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,014
Published Records
16%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+7%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (94 records) with 2024 (101) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,014 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the filing record shows

Industrial waste heat recovery spans steam and thermal power plant design, external-combustion engine architectures, and heat-exchange hardware, reflected in a dataset dominated by F01K (steam & thermal power plants) with more than 1,600 records. Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems, recuperators and heat recovery steam generators sit at the technical centre of the corpus, with turbines, refrigeration/heat pump cycles and exhaust treatment forming a dense set of adjacent claim territories. The 2,014 patent families tracked here span 2015 through the middle of 2026, giving a decade-long view of how claim density has built up and where it has since plateaued.

Filing activity peaked in 2017 and has not recovered since; by the 2022 midpoint, annual output was already below peak, and the most recent full years point to a shrinking, not expanding, pipeline. That pattern matters for anyone assessing whether to file now: it does not mean the technology is exhausted, but it does mean incumbents have already staked out the obvious combinations, and new claims need to differentiate sharply from a decade of prior art.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
  1. 1TURBODEN SPA74
  2. 2ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES INC68
  3. 3SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO66
  4. 4ICE THERMAL HARVESTING LLC64
  5. 5NUOVO PIGNONE SPA49
  6. 6UNITED TECH CORP47
  7. 7GENERAL ELECTRIC CO42
  8. 8UTC POWER CORP41
  9. 9HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC31
  10. 10TIANJIN UNIV26
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the technical scope of waste heat recovery.

A decade of rise and plateau

Annual filings rose to a peak of 139 in 2017, held near that level through the early 2020s (117 at the 2022 midpoint), and have since trended down to 17 in the most recent, still-partial year. Given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication, the last one to two years will read as understated until later filings surface.

A decade of rise and plateau03875113150139201720182019202020212022202320242025172026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Where the claim density sits

F01K (steam & thermal power plants) accounts for the largest share of records by a wide margin, with F02G (hot-gas and external-combustion engines) and F28D (heat-exchange apparatus) forming the next tier. Turbines (F01D), refrigeration/heat pump cycles (F25B), exhaust treatment (F01N), boilers (F22B) and miscellaneous motor mechanisms (F03G) round out a technology map that is broad but concentrated in a handful of core subclasses.

Where the claim density sitsF01K · Steam & thermal power plants1,63681.2%F02G · Hot-gas & external-combustion …45122.4%F28D · Heat-exchange apparatus41920.8%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines32216.0%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps1618.0%F01N · Exhaust silencers & treatment1487.3%F22B · Steam generation & boilers1487.3%F03G · Spring/weight & misc. motors1437.1%Other1,65982.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,014 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Technology Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about industrial waste heat recovery technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records, and one representative filing

Representative filing
US20190234343A12019-08-01

US20190234343A1 — Organic Rankine cycle waste heat recovery system having two loops

INTERNATIONAL ENGINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC

An Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Waste Heat Recovery (WHR) System has an LT working fluid loop and an HT working fluid loop. The working fluid loops may each have a pump, one or more heat exchanger boilers, an expander, and a condenser. A recuperator is arranged within the LT working fluid loop between the pump and the first heat exchanger boiler. The recuperator is also arranged within the HT working fluid loop between the expander and the pump, or within the LT working fluid loop between the expander and the condenser. One of the heat exchanger boilers in the LT loop may be a charge air cooler heat exchanger, and may receive charge air mixed with recirculating exhaust gas. The LT loop may inFiled by International Engine Intellectual Property Company, LLC — a dual-loop ORC architecture with recuperator placement claimed across both the low-temperature and high-temperature loops.

US20190234343A1 — patent drawing 1US20190234343A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20100263380A1Cascaded organic rankine cycle (ORC) system using waste heat from a reciprocating engine198
2US20120001436A1Power generator using a wind turbine, a hydrodynamic retarder and an organic rankine cycle drive151
3US5497624AMethod of and apparatus for producing power using steam143
4US20090000299A1System and method for recovering waste heat134
5US7428816B2Working fluids for thermal energy conversion of waste heat from fuel cells using Rankine cycle systems128
6US7174716B2Organic rankine cycle waste heat applications128
7US7225621B2Organic working fluids117
8US20100071368A1Multi-level organic rankine cycle power system109
9US7942001B2Cascaded organic rankine cycles for waste heat utilization108
10US6986251B2Organic rankine cycle system for use with a reciprocating engine106

Citation counts accumulate over time, so this list favours older filings; treat it as a map of foundational architectures rather than of current competitive priority.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Read together, the trend line, the IPC map and the citation table point to a mature but not closed field: dense in its core, thinner at the edges.

Filing trend
139 → 17
peak (2017) to latest year

The wave has passed, not disappeared

A near-decade of sustained filing built a dense prior-art base around ORC and steam-cycle waste heat recovery. The drop-off since 2017 reflects consolidation of the obvious architectures more than loss of interest — publication lag means the last one to two years are still filling in.

Use this to time filings against a settled, not rising, baseline.
Geography
724 vs 392
China vs. US receiving-office filings

China has become the primary filing venue

China's filing count nearly doubles that of the United States, with Europe, WIPO/PCT and South Korea forming a second tier. Freedom-to-operate and white-space searches that stop at US and EP records will miss the largest single share of the corpus.

Prioritise Chinese-language prior art review before scoping new claims.
Technology mix
1,636 records
F01K steam & thermal power plants

Core claim space is steam-cycle architecture

F01K alone accounts for more than three-quarters of subclass hits, with F02G and F28D forming a dense secondary layer around external-combustion engines and heat exchangers. Refrigeration/heat pump (F25B) and exhaust-treatment (F01N) integration are comparatively thin.

Thinner subclasses are where differentiated claims are more likely to clear.
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

Named-inventor partnerships cluster around a few firms

Co-assignee activity is limited and concentrated — the strongest pairing links Ormat Industries with a long-time named inventor, and UTC Power shows a similar single-inventor pattern. This is a field built more on internal R&D than on joint filings.

Licensing-in from named inventors may be a faster route than co-development deals.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to industrial waste heat recovery technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it's open

Filing activity concentrates around a small set of long-established thermal and turbomachinery specialists, several of which have gone quiet in the most recent tracked year — a signal worth checking against non-patent sources before assuming a gap is permanent.

Momentum
0 in latest year
across multiple top assignees

Historic leaders have paused filing

Ormat, UTC Power, GE, Turboden and Saudi Aramco all show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, with ICE Thermal Harvesting recording a full year-on-year drop. This could reflect a genuine slowdown, a shift to trade secrecy, or simply publication lag masking filings not yet visible.

Confirm against company disclosures before reading this as strategic retreat.
Concentration
2,014 families
total tracked, single ranking

A long tail beneath a short list of specialists

The assignee ranking is dominated by a handful of engine, turbine and thermal-cycle firms, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants beneath them. That shape is typical of a technology where the core architectures are settled and most new activity is incremental.

New entrants are more likely to succeed by combining, not replacing, core cycle designs.
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest linked to named inventors

Partnerships are narrow and inventor-anchored

The strongest co-assignee relationships pair a single company with a specific named inventor across several filings, rather than reflecting broad multi-company alliances. Joint development deals appear to be the exception, not the norm, in this corpus.

Watch named inventors moving between firms as a proxy for technology transfer.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with comparatively thin filing density relative to the core steam/ORC cluster — worth a closer freedom-to-operate look before assuming they're occupied.
Low-grade heat conversion below 100°CRecuperator integration with exhaust treatment (F01N overlap)Heat pump-assisted ORC hybrid cyclesWorking-fluid selection for sub-critical low-temperature loopsWaste heat utilization in modular/skid-mounted units
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Turboden S.p.A.0
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)0
Ormat Industries Ltd.0
ICE THERMAL HARVESTING LLC0-100%
UTC Power Corporation0
General Electric Company0
Nuovo Pignone S.r.l.0
United Technologies Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate clearance, competitive tracking, or scoping a new filing.

Run a claims-level FTO check in China first

With 724 China-based filings against 392 in the US, a freedom-to-operate review that starts and stops with US/EP art will miss the largest single jurisdiction in this corpus.

Explore China filings in Eureka →

Track the quiet incumbents for re-entry signals

Several long-standing assignees show zero recent filings; monitoring their non-patent activity (product launches, M&A) can flag a return to filing before it shows up in the public record.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka →

Scope new claims around the thinner subclasses

F25B, F01N and F03G carry far fewer records than F01K, F02G and F28D — a narrower but more open space for differentiated claims.

Search IPC subclasses in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Industrial Waste Heat Recovery Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole industrial waste heat recovery technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.