Book a demo

Infrared Imaging Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Infrared Imaging Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/infrared-and-thermal-imaging-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Infrared & Thermal Imaging
Infrared and thermal imaging patents: who holds the core claims and where filing has slowed
  • Filing has cooled since its 2020 peak. Activity ran from 26 families in 2017 to a high of 50 in 2020, then eased through the 2022 midpoint of 30 — a flat-to-declining trend once the most recent, still-incomplete year is set aside.
  • Claims cluster in radiation measurement and video pictorial communication. G01J and H04N each carry well over 500 record hits, more than three times the semiconductor-device (H01L) count, showing where detector and readout claims concentrate.
  • The US anchors filing activity by a wide margin. 403 records were filed at the USPTO against 120 at the EPO, 118 via WIPO/PCT and 78 in China — a filing footprint worth checking before choosing where to protect new work.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
260
Published Records
-46%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
100
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What the infrared and thermal imaging patent record shows

Infrared and thermal imaging patenting spans detector physics, on-chip correction algorithms and packaging engineering rather than a single technology. This dataset covers 260 published families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 under a search built around microbolometer detector arrays, non-uniformity correction, vacuum packaging and athermal optics — the specific engineering problems that separate a working thermal camera from a lab prototype. The IPC composition confirms the split: G01J (radiation and light measurement) and H04N (pictorial communication) each dominate the record set, with H01L semiconductor-device claims a distant third.

Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2020, and has since flattened or declined — a pattern consistent with a field where core detector architectures are largely settled and newer activity shifts toward downstream processing and packaging refinements. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend understate true filing volume and should be read with that caveat.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1TELEDYNE FLIR LLC224
  2. 2RAYTHEON CO44
  3. 3HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC43
  4. 4TELEDYNE FLIR COMMERICAL SYST INC29
  5. 5ELBIT SYST ELECTRO OPTICS ELOP27
  6. 6FLUKE CORP19
  7. 7OPGAL18
  8. 8DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLC16
  9. 9FLIR SYST AB16
  10. 10BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION ANDELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC15
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Infrared and Thermal Imaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 260-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the field's sub-domains.

A peak-and-plateau filing curve

Filings climbed from 26 in 2017 to a peak of 50 in 2020, then eased back toward 30 by 2022. Read together with the 18-month publication lag, the apparent decline into the most recent years is partly an artefact of incomplete data rather than a confirmed drop in filing.

A peak-and-plateau filing curve013253850262017201820195020202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Detection and video processing dominate the classification mix

G01J (radiation/light measurement) and H04N (pictorial communication) each register well above 500 hits, roughly three times the H01L semiconductor-device count of 191. Smaller but present classes — G02B optics, G06T image processing, G01N material analysis, H10N solid-state devices and G01S positioning — mark the adjacent branches where claim density is thinner.

Detection and video processing dominate the classification mixG01J · Radiation & light measurement63132.5%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…58330.0%H01L · Semiconductor devices1919.8%G02B · Optical elements & systems653.3%G06T · Image data processing & genera…492.5%G01N · Material analysis & testing462.4%H10N · Other electric solid-state dev…462.4%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning231.2%Other30815.9%

Shares are the percentage of 1,942 class assignments (one record can carry several), not of the record count.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Infrared and Thermal Imaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Infrared and Thermal Imaging with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about infrared and thermal imaging and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records and what they cover

Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5550373AFabry-Perot micro filter-detector572
2US6028309AMethods and circuitry for correcting temperature-induced errors in microbolometer focal plane array344
3US20040119020A1Multi-mode optical imager263
4US4751571AComposite visible/thermal-infrared imaging apparatus246
5US20140139643A1Imager with array of multiple infrared imaging modules220
6US6252229B1Sealed-cavity microstructure and microbolometer and associated fabrication methods212
7US4679068AComposite visible/thermal-infrared imaging system195
8US20130342691A1Infant monitoring systems and methods using thermal imaging188
9US5811808AInfrared imaging system employing on-focal plane nonuniformity correction169
10US4717830ACorrelated sampling amplifier165

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more years to accumulate citations; treat them as a signal of influence on subsequent filers, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Infrared and Thermal Imaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three read-outs from the underlying data that matter more to a filing decision than the raw counts alone.

Filing Momentum
50 in 2020 → 30 by 2022
peak-to-midpoint filings

The field has passed its filing peak

Year-over-year momentum tables show the largest tracked assignees at 0 filings in the latest year, including a -100% YoY reading for Teledyne FLIR Commercial Systems. Combined with the overall peak-and-decline curve, this points to a field where core architectures are established and new filing is more selective.

Recent-year counts are understated by the ~18-month publication lag.
Jurisdiction Spread
403 US · 120 EP · 118 PCT · 78 CN
records by receiving office

US filing leads by a wide margin

The United States receives more than three times the filings of China and roughly 3.4 times the EPO count, with WIPO/PCT filings close behind Europe. A filing strategy weighted toward the US, with PCT as the international bridge, matches where the existing claim density already sits.

Based on 260 published families across six receiving offices.
Classification Density
631 G01J vs 191 H01L
record hits by IPC subclass

Detector measurement claims outweigh semiconductor-device claims

G01J and H04N each carry more record hits than H01L, G02B, G06T, G01N, H10N and G01S combined would suggest individually — meaning correction, calibration and video-signal claims are as densely occupied as the underlying detector hardware itself.

IPC counts are drawn from the 260-family corpus; a single record can carry multiple subclass tags.
Citation Concentration
572 citations, top record
most-cited family

A handful of older filings anchor the citation graph

The top five most-cited records span roughly two decades of filing, from a 1980s composite imaging patent to a 2014 multi-module imager, indicating that foundational optical and calibration concepts continue to be cited by newer filings rather than being fully superseded.

Citation leadership favours older records simply by virtue of accumulation time.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to infrared and thermal imaging, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Infrared and Thermal Imaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where the gate still sits open

Assignee activity in this dataset concentrates around a small set of established imaging and defense-electronics firms, with recent-year momentum flat across nearly all of them.

Assignee Cluster
0 filings, latest year
across leading assignees

Momentum has stalled at the top

Teledyne FLIR, Honeywell International, Raytheon, Elbit Systems Electro-Optics Elop and Indigo Systems all show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, with Teledyne FLIR Commercial Systems recording a -100% year-over-year change. This is consistent with the overall filing plateau rather than any single company's retreat.

Recent-year figures are subject to the publication lag.
Co-Filing Pattern
8 shared filings, top pairs
co-assignee strength

Inventor-assignee pairs cluster around one firm

Of 10 identified co-assignee pairs, the strongest three all connect Teledyne FLIR's corporate entity to individual named inventors at a strength of 8 shared filings each — a pattern typical of a stable in-house R&D team rather than cross-company joint development.

Based on 10 total co-assignee pairs identified in the corpus.
Long Tail
260 families total
corpus size

A long tail sits behind the named leaders

With 260 families spread across the ranking, and only a small number of assignees showing repeated multi-year activity, single-filing entrants make up a substantial share of the record — a sign that entry barriers around core detector claims have not deterred smaller or one-off filers from pursuing adjacent applications.

Ranking includes all 260 published families in the search corpus.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas show thinner representation in the IPC composition relative to the core detector and video-signal classes.
Athermal lens compensation mechanismsWafer-level vacuum packaging sealsRadar-fused thermal positioning (G01S overlap)Material-analysis calibration targets (G01N overlap)Solid-state readout integration (H10N overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Teledyne FLIR LLC0
Honeywell International Inc.0
Raytheon Company0
Elbit Systems Electro-Optics Elop Ltd.0
INDIGO SYST CORP0
TELEDYNE FLIR COMMERICAL SYST INC0-100%
FLIR Commercial Systems, Inc.0
OPGAL0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Infrared and Thermal Imaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking or identifying open filing space.

Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited records

Before filing new detector or correction-algorithm claims, run a clearance check against the highest-citation records identified here, since these anchor much of the surrounding claim language.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Track assignee momentum beyond the snapshot

Zero recent-year filings across several leading assignees may reflect publication lag rather than a genuine pullback; a rolling view closer to the data cut-off will clarify whether the plateau is real.

Monitor filing activity in Eureka

Scope claims in the under-claimed branches

Athermal optics, vacuum packaging and cross-domain overlaps with radar positioning and material analysis show thinner claim density than the core detector classes and merit a closer look before drafting.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Infrared and Thermal Imaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about infrared and thermal imaging patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Infrared and Thermal Imaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Infrared and Thermal Imaging in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole infrared and thermal imaging corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.