Infrared Imaging Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Filing has cooled since its 2020 peak. Activity ran from 26 families in 2017 to a high of 50 in 2020, then eased through the 2022 midpoint of 30 — a flat-to-declining trend once the most recent, still-incomplete year is set aside.
- Claims cluster in radiation measurement and video pictorial communication. G01J and H04N each carry well over 500 record hits, more than three times the semiconductor-device (H01L) count, showing where detector and readout claims concentrate.
- The US anchors filing activity by a wide margin. 403 records were filed at the USPTO against 120 at the EPO, 118 via WIPO/PCT and 78 in China — a filing footprint worth checking before choosing where to protect new work.
What the infrared and thermal imaging patent record shows
Infrared and thermal imaging patenting spans detector physics, on-chip correction algorithms and packaging engineering rather than a single technology. This dataset covers 260 published families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 under a search built around microbolometer detector arrays, non-uniformity correction, vacuum packaging and athermal optics — the specific engineering problems that separate a working thermal camera from a lab prototype. The IPC composition confirms the split: G01J (radiation and light measurement) and H04N (pictorial communication) each dominate the record set, with H01L semiconductor-device claims a distant third.
Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2020, and has since flattened or declined — a pattern consistent with a field where core detector architectures are largely settled and newer activity shifts toward downstream processing and packaging refinements. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend understate true filing volume and should be read with that caveat.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 260-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the field's sub-domains.
A peak-and-plateau filing curve
Filings climbed from 26 in 2017 to a peak of 50 in 2020, then eased back toward 30 by 2022. Read together with the 18-month publication lag, the apparent decline into the most recent years is partly an artefact of incomplete data rather than a confirmed drop in filing.
Detection and video processing dominate the classification mix
G01J (radiation/light measurement) and H04N (pictorial communication) each register well above 500 hits, roughly three times the H01L semiconductor-device count of 191. Smaller but present classes — G02B optics, G06T image processing, G01N material analysis, H10N solid-state devices and G01S positioning — mark the adjacent branches where claim density is thinner.
Shares are the percentage of 1,942 class assignments (one record can carry several), not of the record count.
Go deeper on Infrared and Thermal Imaging with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about infrared and thermal imaging and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records and what they cover
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5550373A | Fabry-Perot micro filter-detector | 572 |
| 2 | US6028309A | Methods and circuitry for correcting temperature-induced errors in microbolometer focal plane array | 344 |
| 3 | US20040119020A1 | Multi-mode optical imager | 263 |
| 4 | US4751571A | Composite visible/thermal-infrared imaging apparatus | 246 |
| 5 | US20140139643A1 | Imager with array of multiple infrared imaging modules | 220 |
| 6 | US6252229B1 | Sealed-cavity microstructure and microbolometer and associated fabrication methods | 212 |
| 7 | US4679068A | Composite visible/thermal-infrared imaging system | 195 |
| 8 | US20130342691A1 | Infant monitoring systems and methods using thermal imaging | 188 |
| 9 | US5811808A | Infrared imaging system employing on-focal plane nonuniformity correction | 169 |
| 10 | US4717830A | Correlated sampling amplifier | 165 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more years to accumulate citations; treat them as a signal of influence on subsequent filers, not as a measure of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Three read-outs from the underlying data that matter more to a filing decision than the raw counts alone.
The field has passed its filing peak
Year-over-year momentum tables show the largest tracked assignees at 0 filings in the latest year, including a -100% YoY reading for Teledyne FLIR Commercial Systems. Combined with the overall peak-and-decline curve, this points to a field where core architectures are established and new filing is more selective.
US filing leads by a wide margin
The United States receives more than three times the filings of China and roughly 3.4 times the EPO count, with WIPO/PCT filings close behind Europe. A filing strategy weighted toward the US, with PCT as the international bridge, matches where the existing claim density already sits.
Detector measurement claims outweigh semiconductor-device claims
G01J and H04N each carry more record hits than H01L, G02B, G06T, G01N, H10N and G01S combined would suggest individually — meaning correction, calibration and video-signal claims are as densely occupied as the underlying detector hardware itself.
A handful of older filings anchor the citation graph
The top five most-cited records span roughly two decades of filing, from a 1980s composite imaging patent to a 2014 multi-module imager, indicating that foundational optical and calibration concepts continue to be cited by newer filings rather than being fully superseded.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to infrared and thermal imaging, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where the gate still sits open
Assignee activity in this dataset concentrates around a small set of established imaging and defense-electronics firms, with recent-year momentum flat across nearly all of them.
Momentum has stalled at the top
Teledyne FLIR, Honeywell International, Raytheon, Elbit Systems Electro-Optics Elop and Indigo Systems all show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, with Teledyne FLIR Commercial Systems recording a -100% year-over-year change. This is consistent with the overall filing plateau rather than any single company's retreat.
Inventor-assignee pairs cluster around one firm
Of 10 identified co-assignee pairs, the strongest three all connect Teledyne FLIR's corporate entity to individual named inventors at a strength of 8 shared filings each — a pattern typical of a stable in-house R&D team rather than cross-company joint development.
A long tail sits behind the named leaders
With 260 families spread across the ranking, and only a small number of assignees showing repeated multi-year activity, single-filing entrants make up a substantial share of the record — a sign that entry barriers around core detector claims have not deterred smaller or one-off filers from pursuing adjacent applications.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Teledyne FLIR LLC | 0 | — |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 0 | — |
| Raytheon Company | 0 | — |
| Elbit Systems Electro-Optics Elop Ltd. | 0 | — |
| INDIGO SYST CORP | 0 | — |
| TELEDYNE FLIR COMMERICAL SYST INC | 0 | -100% |
| FLIR Commercial Systems, Inc. | 0 | — |
| OPGAL | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking or identifying open filing space.
Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited records
Before filing new detector or correction-algorithm claims, run a clearance check against the highest-citation records identified here, since these anchor much of the surrounding claim language.
Explore prior art in EurekaTrack assignee momentum beyond the snapshot
Zero recent-year filings across several leading assignees may reflect publication lag rather than a genuine pullback; a rolling view closer to the data cut-off will clarify whether the plateau is real.
Monitor filing activity in EurekaScope claims in the under-claimed branches
Athermal optics, vacuum packaging and cross-domain overlaps with radar positioning and material analysis show thinner claim density than the core detector classes and merit a closer look before drafting.
Search white space in EurekaCommon questions about infrared and thermal imaging patents
The dataset's most active assignees include Teledyne FLIR, Honeywell International, Raytheon, Elbit Systems Electro-Optics Elop, and Indigo Systems, all of which show sustained multi-year filing histories in microbolometer and imaging-array technology. Recent-year momentum for these firms is flat, with several showing zero filings in the latest tracked year, though this partly reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication. Co-assignee data also shows Teledyne FLIR's corporate entity paired repeatedly with the same named inventors, suggesting a stable internal R&D team rather than external joint filings. Anyone benchmarking a portfolio in this space should treat these assignees as the baseline for freedom-to-operate checks.
Not on the evidence here: filings rose from 26 in 2017 to a peak of 50 in 2020, then declined toward 30 by the 2022 midpoint, and the trend continues flat to declining toward the most recent years. Some of that apparent drop-off is an artefact of publication lag, since recent filings take time to appear in the published record. Still, the shape of the curve — a clear rise-then-plateau rather than continued acceleration — suggests the field's core detector architectures are largely settled. New activity is more likely concentrated in refinement areas like calibration algorithms and packaging than in fundamentally new detector designs.
G01J (radiation and light measurement) and H04N (pictorial communication, covering video and TV signal processing) each carry the largest share of records in this corpus, each well above 500 hits. H01L, the semiconductor-device classification, trails at 191 — still substantial but a distant third. Smaller classes including G02B optics, G06T image processing, G01N material analysis, H10N solid-state devices and G01S positioning appear at lower volumes, marking narrower or more specialised sub-domains. A drafting or clearance search that only covers H01L would miss the majority of relevant claim activity in this field.
The IPC composition points to thinner claim density in athermal optics compensation, wafer-level vacuum packaging, and areas overlapping with radar-based positioning (G01S) or material-analysis calibration (G01N) compared to the heavily claimed G01J and H04N core. These are not unclaimed areas outright, but they carry markedly fewer records than the dominant detector and video-signal classes. A new filing targeting a specific mechanical or calibration problem within these overlaps is less likely to run into dense prior art than one targeting core microbolometer array design. Confirming this requires a targeted prior-art search rather than relying on the aggregate IPC counts alone.
The United States receives the largest share of filings in this dataset at 403 records, more than three times the counts for China (78) and comfortably ahead of the EPO (120) and WIPO/PCT (118). This concentration suggests the US is where competitors are most likely to already hold claims, making it the priority jurisdiction for both offensive filing and defensive clearance searches. Europe and the PCT route follow at similar volumes, indicating a secondary but still meaningful filing corridor. China's lower count relative to the US may reflect either less mature filing activity in this specific technical niche or scope not fully captured by the search terms used to build this corpus.
Research Infrared and Thermal Imaging in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole infrared and thermal imaging corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.