Book a demo

Inverter Based Resource Modelling Patents: Who Leads 2026

Inverter Based Resource Modelling Patents: Who Leads 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/inverter-based-resource-modelling-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Storage & Power Conversion
Inverter Based Resource Modelling Patents: Mapping Who Files and What Remains Open
  • Filing is concentrated in China. 11 of 12 receiving-office filings are Chinese, with a single Canadian filing from Quanta Technology representing the non-Chinese route into this space.
  • 2025 is the peak year so far, at 6 filings. with 2017 through most prior years showing no activity in scope — this is a field that has only recently started accumulating patent claims.
  • The leader holds only 2 records. against 17 ranked assignees total, so no single organisation has established a dominant claim position yet.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
12
Published Records
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
17
Active Filers Ranked
2025
Peak Filing Year

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Inverter based resource modelling covers the methods used to represent grid-connected inverters, converters and the plants built around them — black-box models, parameter identification, and the electromagnetic transient simulations used to validate that a model’s transient response matches the physical device closely enough for interconnection studies. This is where the claims sit at the intersection of power systems engineering and computational modelling: a patent here typically covers a method for identifying model parameters, a validation or benchmark test procedure, or a way of exporting a trained model between simulation platforms.

The scope here is narrow and recent by design. With 12 published records in scope and filing concentrated in the past few years, this is a field still being staked out rather than one with settled prior art — publication lag means the most recent year understates actual filing activity.

Filing activity by year
  1. 1YUNNAN POWER GRID CO LTD ELECTRIC POWER RES INST2
  2. 2STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA2
  3. 3ELECTRIC POWER RES INST CHINA SOUTHERN POWER GRID CO LTD2
  4. 4ZHUHAI POWER SUPPLY BUREAU GUANGDONG POWER GIRD CO1
  5. 5SHENYANG INST OF ENG1
  6. 6NORTH CHINA ELECTRICAL POWER RES INST1
  7. 7CHINA ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE CO LTD1
  8. 8SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIV1
  9. 9CHINA THREE GORGES UNIV1
  10. 10NARI TECH CO LTD1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Inverter Based Resource Modelling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The numbers below come directly from the records in scope: a small, recent corpus concentrated around power system and computing classes rather than spread evenly across the taxonomy.

A field just starting to accumulate filings

Activity in scope was flat at zero for most of the tracked period, then reached a peak of 6 filings in 2025. With fewer than four complete years of meaningful activity once publication lag is accounted for, no growth rate can be reliably stated — but the shape shows a technology area that only recently became patent-active.

A field just starting to accumulate filings023560201720182019202020212022202320246202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Power systems and digital processing dominate the classification mix

H02J (power supply and grid systems) appears on 66.7% of the 12 records in scope, followed by G06F (electric digital data processing) at 50.0% and G05B (control and regulating systems) at 33.3%. G06N (AI-based computing) reaches 25.0%, showing that a quarter of records already frame parameter identification or model validation as a machine-learning problem rather than a purely analytical one. F03D (wind motors) and G06Q (business data processing) each sit at 16.7%, and H02P (motor and generator control) at 8.3% — both signal adjacent claim territory rather than the core of the field.

Power systems and digital processing dominate the classification mixH02J · Power supply & grid systems866.7%G06F · Electric digital data processi…650.0%G05B · Control & regulating systems433.3%G06N · Computing based on AI models325.0%F03D · Wind motors (wind turbines)216.7%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…216.7%H02P · Control of motors & generators18.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 12 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Inverter Based Resource Modelling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Inverter Based Resource Modelling with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about inverter based resource modelling and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
CA3230547A12025-06-12

Inverter-based resource or plant modeling (CA3230547A1)

QUANTA TECHNOLOGY, LLC

Quanta Technology's filing discloses exporting a black-box model of an inverter-based resource or plant from one software platform for use by another. The method simulates instantaneous time-domain responses to conditions defined by a script, generates training data from those responses, and trains a machine learning model to reproduce the plant's behaviour for use in a second simulation environment.This is the only non-Chinese filing in the dataset's receiving-office mix and the clearest example of a cross-platform, ML-based black-box export method in scope.

View full filing
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN117526384A储能系统电磁暂态模型低电压穿越参数辨识方法及系统12
2CN116470522A一种SVG通用电磁暂态模型的控制参数识别方法及装置3
3CN118446087A一种基于自动编码器的电磁暂态模型参数辨识方法及系统1

Citation counts favour older records within this searched corpus and should be read as a signal of influence, not of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (3 of 3 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Inverter Based Resource Modelling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals

Three findings stand out once the ranking, the trend and the classification mix are read together.

Concentration
2 records
leader's filing count

No dominant filer yet

The leading assignee holds only 2 of the records in the ranking, with fifth place already down to 1. Across 17 ranked assignees, that is a flat distribution rather than a concentrated one — there is no single portfolio a new entrant needs to design around wholesale.

Assignee ranking, 17 companies
Geography
11 of 12
filings via China

A near-exclusively Chinese filing base, with one outside signal

Eleven of the twelve receiving-office filings are Chinese, dominated by grid-operator and research-institute assignees. The single Canadian filing, from Quanta Technology, is also the dataset's clearest black-box, ML-based modelling claim — worth watching as a marker of where non-Chinese activity may follow.

Receiving offices: China 11, Canada 1
Classification mix
25.0%
of records touch G06N (AI)

Parameter identification is drifting toward machine learning

A quarter of the 12 records in scope already classify under G06N, AI-based computing, alongside the more traditional H02J and G05B power-system classes. That overlap suggests newer filings are framing model validation and parameter identification as a learned-model problem rather than a purely deterministic one.

IPC composition, 12 records
Collaboration
9 pairs
co-assignee pairings

Filing partnerships exist but are shallow

Nine co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest pairing filing twice together and the rest only once. This points to occasional joint filing between grid operators and their research institutes rather than an established collaboration network.

Co-assignee pairs, 9 total
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to inverter based resource modelling, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Inverter Based Resource Modelling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the activity has stalled

The assignee base is led by Chinese grid operators and their affiliated research institutes, but recent-year momentum has dropped to zero across every named organisation with a prior filing history.

Leader
2 records
filings in scope

A narrow lead, not a moat

The top-ranked assignee holds 2 of the 12 records — enough to lead the ranking, not enough to foreclose the field. Fifth and tenth place each sit at 1 record, showing how flat the distribution is beyond the top spot.

Assignee ranking
Momentum
-100% YoY
across named leaders

Every tracked assignee shows zero latest-year filings

Organisations including State Grid, China Southern Power Grid's research institute, Yunnan Power Grid's research institute, Southwest Jiaotong University, Shenyang Institute of Engineering and Zhuhai Power Supply Bureau all show 0 filings in the latest year, a -100% year-on-year drop for those with a prior filing to compare against.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration pattern
2
strongest co-assignee pairing

Grid operators pair with their own research arms

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs China Southern Power Grid's research institute with Yunnan Power Grid's research institute, filing together twice. Other pairings, including State Grid with two of its provincial subsidiaries, appear only once each.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show low record counts relative to the core H02J/G06F classes and may still be open.
Wind-turbine-specific IBR benchmark testsCross-platform black-box model exportAI-based transient response matchingMotor/generator control parameter IDGrid-code interconnection compliance scripts
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
State Grid Corporation of China0-100%
China Southern Power Grid Research Institute Co., Ltd.0-100%
Yunnan Power Grid Co., Ltd. Electric Power Research Institute0-100%
Southwest Jiaotong University0
Shenyang Institute of Engineering0-100%
Zhuhai Power Supply Bureau, Guangdong Power Grid Co., Ltd.0-100%
Dalian University of Technology0
State Grid Qinghai Electric Power Company Electric Power Research Institute0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Inverter Based Resource Modelling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

This landscape is a starting point for a freedom-to-operate check or a deeper technology scan, not a substitute for one.

Check claim scope against CA3230547A1

Anyone building cross-platform black-box export tools for inverter-based resources should read this filing's claims in full before committing to a similar architecture.

Explore in Eureka

Track the AI-modelling overlap

The G06N overlap with H02J and G05B is still small at 25.0% of records; a targeted search on machine-learning-based parameter identification may surface earlier or narrower prior art than this broad query returns.

Run a deeper search in Eureka

Watch for non-Chinese filings

With 11 of 12 filings routed through China, a shift in receiving-office mix would be an early signal that the field is internationalising.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Inverter Based Resource Modelling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on inverter based resource modelling patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Inverter Based Resource Modelling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Inverter Based Resource Modelling in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole inverter based resource modelling corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.