Book a demo

Ion-Selective Water Sensor Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Ion-Selective Water Sensor Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/ion-selective-and-electrochemical-water-sensors-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Environmental Monitoring
Ion-Selective and Electrochemical Water Sensor Patents
  • Filing has cooled sharply. from 12 families in the 2021 peak to 1 in 2024, a 92% drop over that span, though 2025-26 counts are still filling in due to publication lag.
  • The field is moderately concentrated. the top 5 assignees hold 30.3% of all 261 records and the top 10 hold 44.8%, leaving a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • Almost everything sits under one IPC class. G01N material analysis & testing covers 95.4% of records, while water/wastewater treatment (C02F) and body-fluid devices (A61M) each sit under 4%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
261
Published Records
30%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-92%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
JP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (12 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 261 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 261 patent records published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine ion-selective electrode or electrochemical water sensor claims with technical qualifiers such as membrane selectivity, reference electrode drift, temperature compensation and matrix interference. That combination narrows the field to sensor engineering problems rather than the broader universe of electrochemistry patents, so the records here concentrate on the practical failure modes — drift, response time, electrode lifetime — that determine whether a sensor design survives field deployment.

Filings peaked in 2021 and have declined since, a pattern consistent with a technology whose core claim space has already been staked out by an earlier generation of instrument and clinical-diagnostics companies. Japan, the United States and Europe are the dominant receiving offices, reflecting where the founding assignees are based rather than where deployment is concentrated today.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1FUJIFILM HLDG CORP22
  2. 2KK TOSHIBA20
  3. 3HITACHI LTD16
  4. 4BECKMAN COULTER INC11
  5. 5ECOWATER SYST LLC10
  6. 6TECHNICON INSTRUMENTS CORP9
  7. 7BETZDEARBORN INC8
  8. 8PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP7
  9. 9THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY7
  10. 10ABBOTT LAB INC7
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ion-Selective and Electrochemical Water Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 261 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims fall into.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings ran near 9-12 per year through the late 2010s and into the 2021 peak, then fell to 1 by 2024 — a -92% move over that three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 as incomplete: publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so the true recent trend is understated.

Filing trend, 2017-20260369129201720182019202012202112202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

G01N (material analysis & testing) covers 95.4% of the 261 records, confirming this is fundamentally a measurement-and-testing landscape. Smaller but recurring clusters sit in diagnosis/surgery (A61B, 6.1%), separation processes (B01D, 4.6%) and body-fluid devices (A61M, 3.8%) — each a possible adjacent-use angle rather than a core claim area.

IPC subclass compositionG01N · Material analysis & testing24995.4%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery166.1%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…124.6%A61M · Devices for body fluids103.8%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment93.4%G12B · Instrument details (general)93.4%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds83.1%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions83.1%Other3011.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 261 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ion-Selective and Electrochemical Water Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Ion-Selective and Electrochemical Water Sensors with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ion-selective and electrochemical water sensors and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in the corpus

Representative filing
US5174872A1992-12-29

Metal-free buffer for ion selective electrode-based assays (US5174872A)

TECHNICON INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION

A heavy metal-free composition and its method of use in an ion selective electrode-based assay are disclosed. The composition includes a borate compound and an alkalinity adjusting compound, and is used to dilute and buffer a test sample while substantially reducing the effects of interferents on the ion selective electrode-based assay. It is especially useful for carbonate ion concentration testing in blood serum, blood plasma, urine or cerebrospinal fluid.Filed by Technicon Instruments Corporation, granted 1992 — one of the corpus's most-cited records and a useful lens on how buffer-composition claims were staked out around ion-selective assays.

US5174872A — patent drawing 1US5174872A — patent drawing 2
View full record →
Highest-citation patents in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5001417AApparatus for measuring electrolytes utilizing optical signals related to the concentration of the electrolyt…165
2US4340457AIon selective electrodes85
3US6780307B2Ion selective electrodes for direct organic drug analysis in saliva, sweat, and surface wipes50
4US5174872AMetal-free buffer for ion selective electrode-based assays50
5JP1977142584AIon selective electrode36
6US5629212AChloride monitoring apparatus33
7US20030121779A1Ion selective electrodes for direct organic drug analysis in saliva, sweat, and surface wipes32
8US5344547APolycrystalline ion selective electrode32
9US20070045128A1Chlorine dioxide sensor31
10US5102527ACalcium ion selective electrode31

Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of having had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; read them as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a measure of current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ion-Selective and Electrochemical Water Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say

Three read-throughs from the filing trend, the concentration figures and the IPC composition.

Momentum
-92%
2021 → 2024 filings

The peak has passed, on the data available so far

Filings fell from 12 in 2021 to 1 in 2024. That is the most recent year that can be read as complete; 2025 and 2026 will fill in as publications catch up, so this should be read as a marked slowdown from peak rather than a final verdict on where the field is headed.

Based on filing-year counts, 2017-2024
Concentration
30.3% / 44.8%
top 5 / top 10 share of 261 records

Moderate concentration, long tail beneath it

The top 5 ranked assignees hold 30.3% of all 261 records and the top 10 hold 44.8%, with the leader at 22 records. That leaves well over half the field spread across a long tail of smaller filers — room for a new entrant to build a position without displacing an entrenched leader.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies, counted in records
Technology mix
95.4%
records tagged G01N

One IPC class dominates; the rest are thin adjacencies

G01N (material analysis & testing) appears on 95.4% of the 261 records. Water/wastewater treatment (C02F) and instrument-detail claims (G12B) each sit near 3-4%, suggesting the field's growth options lie in these smaller adjacent classes rather than in G01N itself, which is already densely claimed.

IPC subclass shares, multi-label, sums exceed 100%
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ion-selective and electrochemical water sensors, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ion-Selective and Electrochemical Water Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked assignee list spans instrument makers, clinical-diagnostics firms and a handful of water-treatment and defence-affiliated filers. Recent-year momentum across the leading names is flat.

Leader
22 records
top-ranked assignee

A diagnostics-instrument incumbent sits at the top

The leading assignee holds 22 of the 261 records, well ahead of fifth place at 10 and tenth place at 7 — a gap consistent with an early, sustained filing programme rather than a recent surge.

Assignee ranking, leader vs. fifth and tenth place
Momentum
0 in latest year
across leading assignees

The historic leaders have gone quiet recently

Every one of the top-named assignees shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is partly a publication-lag artefact, but it also matches the broader filing decline and suggests the incumbents are not currently pressing new claims in this space.

Recent-year filing counts by assignee
Structure
8 pairs
co-assignee collaborations

Collaboration is limited and largely intra-group

Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, and the strongest ones link a parent company to its own subsidiaries or affiliated labs rather than cross-company joint filings. This points to a field where most development happens inside a single organisation rather than through formal partnerships.

Co-assignee pair counts
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches with thin representation relative to the field's core G01N claims — worth a freedom-to-operate check before committing resources.
Reference electrode drift compensationMatrix-interference correction algorithmsPolymer membrane formulations for selectivityBody-fluid ISE miniaturisationWastewater-specific electrode lifetime extension
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation0
Toshiba Corporation0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Beckman Coulter, Inc.0
EcoWater Systems LLC0
TECHNICON INSTRUMENTS CORP0
Abbott Laboratories0
BetzDearborn Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ion-Selective and Electrochemical Water Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and concentration figures point to where claim space is crowded and where it is thin. The next step is usually a closer read of the specific claims in the busiest classes.

Map the white space precisely

Run the under-claimed sub-areas — membrane formulation, drift compensation, matrix-interference correction — against the full claim text of the leading assignees' portfolios to confirm where a first claim would actually be novel.

Explore white space in Eureka →

Track the quiet incumbents

Zero recent filings from the historic leaders does not mean zero activity; it may mean filings are still working through publication lag. Set up monitoring on the leading assignees to catch new filings as they publish.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ion-Selective and Electrochemical Water Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ion-Selective and Electrochemical Water Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Ion-Selective and Electrochemical Water Sensors in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole ion-selective and electrochemical water sensors corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.