https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/irrigated-radiofrequency-ablation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Cardiac Electrophysiology
Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Patents: Mapping the Field
  • 44.9% concentration. The top five assignees hold 891 of the 1,985 records in scope — a field where a handful of catheter makers already occupy the core claim space.
  • Filings cooled after 2021. Filings fell from 93 in 2021 to 40 in 2024, a 57% drop over that three-year span, though 2025-2026 counts are still incomplete due to publication lag.
  • A61B dominates the classes. 92.9% of records sit in A61B (diagnosis & surgery), while adjacent classes like G16H (1.3%) and A61L (0.7%) barely register — a sign of where claim density has not yet built up.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,985
Published Records
45%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-57%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (93 records) with 2024 (40) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,985 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the irrigated RF ablation patent record shows

Irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheters combine contact-force sensing, irrigation flow control and impedance monitoring to create deeper, more consistent cardiac lesions while limiting steam-pop risk. The 1,985 records in this dataset span filings from 2015 through the current data cut-off, drawn from a search string built around contact force sensing, irrigation flow, lesion depth, steam pop, impedance drop and power titration — the operational levers that separate one catheter design from another. Patent families, not raw document counts, anchor the assignee ranking here, which neutralises the effect of aggressive continuation filing or multi-jurisdiction refiling by any single player.

Filing activity peaked in 2017 at 152 records and has since given ground to a smaller set of active filers, with receiving-office activity concentrated in the United States, Europe and WIPO's PCT track. The most-cited records in the corpus date back to foundational pulmonary-vein isolation and circumferential ablation patents from the early 2000s, underscoring how much of today's claim space still traces to that original architecture.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD361
  2. 2ST JUDE MEDICAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION DIVISION INC299
  3. 3ST JUDE MEDICAL CARDILOGY DIV INC92
  4. 4EPIX THERAPEUTICS INC76
  5. 5MEDTRONIC INC63
  6. 6OTSUKA MEDICAL DEVICES63
  7. 7BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC60
  8. 8AFFERA INC54
  9. 9WESTERN SYDNEY LOCAL HEALTH DISTRICT49
  10. 10ATRICURE INC48
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,985-record corpus: the filing trend over time, and the IPC subclasses that carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings peaked at 152 in 2017 and declined to 40 by 2024, a complete year that shows a 57% drop from the 93 filed in 2021. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent bars understate actual filing activity rather than confirming a further decline.

Filing trend, 2017-202605010015020015220171522018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

A61B (diagnosis & surgery) covers 92.9% of the 1,985 records, reflecting how most claims describe the ablation procedure or catheter mechanics themselves. A61M (devices for body fluids, 17.0%) and A61N (electrotherapy & radiation therapy, 15.5%) follow at a distance, while G16H (healthcare informatics, 1.3%), A61K (medicinal preparations, 1.1%) and A61L (sterilising & disinfecting, 0.7%) remain thinly claimed — records can carry more than one class, so these shares add up to more than 100%.

Technology composition by IPC subclassA61B · Diagnosis & surgery1,84492.9%A61M · Devices for body fluids33817.0%A61N · Electrotherapy & radiation the…30815.5%A61F · Implants & prostheses713.6%G16H · Healthcare informatics251.3%A61K · Medicinal preparations221.1%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting140.7%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…120.6%Other894.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,985 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about irrigated radiofrequency ablation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Record
WO2020225696A12020-11-12

WO2020225696A1 — Device, system and method to ablate cardiac tissue

BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD.

An ablation catheter system for drug refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The system includes an elongated body and an electrode assembly comprising a shell with an inner chamber and a wall defining proximal and distal portions, the distal wall having at least one aperture, plus a micro-element extending through the inner chamber with a distal end received in that aperture and coextensive with the outer wall surface. The system targets acute procedural pulmonary vein isolation success across a defined patient population.Filed by Biosense Webster (Israel) Ltd., published 2020-11-12.

WO2020225696A1 — patent drawing 1WO2020225696A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6012457ADevice and method for forming a circumferential conduction block in a pulmonary vein1,603
2US6024740ACircumferential ablation device assembly1,557
3US6117101ACircumferential ablation device assembly1,405
4US6905498B2Transmural ablation device with EKG sensor and pacing electrode1,326
5US6849073B2Apparatus and method for creating, maintaining, and controlling a virtual electrode used for the ablation of …1,126
6US6736810B2Apparatus and method for creating, maintaining, and controlling a virtual electrode used for the ablation of …1,126
7US6409722B1Apparatus and method for creating, maintaining, and controlling a virtual electrode used for the ablation of …1,103
8US6537272B2Apparatus and method for creating, maintaining, and controlling a virtual electrode used for the ablation of …1,026
9US6164283ADevice and method for forming a circumferential conduction block in a pulmonary vein850
10US7169144B2Apparatus and method for creating, maintaining, and controlling a virtual electrode used for the ablation of …763

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had more time to be cited within this searched corpus — read them as a signal of foundational influence, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three findings that shape where a new filing is likely to clear prior art, and where it will collide with an entrenched position.

Concentration
44.9%
of 1,985 records held by top 5

The core claim space is already occupied

The top five assignees hold 891 of the 1,985 records in scope, a 44.9% share concentrated in contact-force sensing and irrigation-flow control. New entrants working on the same mechanical architecture face a dense prior-art field around exactly the levers this search targeted.

Assignee ranking, top 5 combined
Filing momentum
-57%
2021 to 2024, complete years

Filing has cooled from its 2021 pace

Filings dropped from 93 in 2021 to 40 in 2024, the most recent year that can be treated as complete. That decline sits after the 2017 peak of 152, suggesting the field's foundational architecture is largely staked out even as refinement continues.

Filing growth, 2021-2024 window
Class composition
92.9%
of records in A61B

Claims cluster in procedure and mechanics

A61B alone touches 1,844 of the 1,985 records. Classes tied to informatics, sterilisation and pharmacology sit under 2% each, which is either unclaimed adjacent territory or simply outside what this search string was built to find.

IPC subclass shares, all records
Prior art depth
1,603 citations
on the most-cited record

Foundational patents still anchor the field

The most-cited records trace to circumferential ablation and pulmonary-vein isolation patents from the late 1990s and early 2000s. Their citation counts reflect corpus age as much as ongoing relevance, but freedom-to-operate work still has to clear them.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to irrigated radiofrequency ablation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity has stalled

The assignee ranking covers 100 companies counted in records — the full ranking the data endpoint returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut. Recent-year momentum figures point to a field where several leading filers have gone quiet rather than one where a new leader has emerged.

Leader
361
records

One filer well ahead of the field

The leading assignee holds 361 records, well clear of the fifth-place holder at 63 and the tenth-place holder at 48. That gap is the clearest sign that early architectural choices in irrigated catheter design became durable claim positions.

Assignee ranking, leader vs. fifth and tenth
Long tail
58.7%
top 10 of 1,985 records

Below the top ten, filings fragment quickly

The top ten assignees combine for 1,165 of the 1,985 records, or 58.7%. Past that point, the ranking spreads across the remaining 90 companies, each holding a comparatively small slice.

Assignee ranking, top 10 combined
Momentum
0 in latest year
across several leading assignees

Several top filers show no recent activity

Multiple assignees among the leading ranked group, including some with double-digit historical filing counts, show zero records in the latest year and year-over-year declines of -100%. Given publication lag, this is as likely to reflect filings still working through the pipeline as a genuine pullback.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where IPC share and citation density are both low relative to the core A61B cluster.
closed-loop power titration algorithmsreal-time lesion-depth feedbackirrigation-fluid sterility monitoringinformatics-linked ablation dosingsteam-pop predictive impedance models
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Biosense Webster (Israel) Ltd.0-100%
St. Jude Medical Atrial Fibrillation Division, Inc.0
St. Jude Medical Cardiology Division, Inc.0-100%
Otsuka Medical Devices Co., Ltd.0
Medtronic, Inc.0-100%
Affera, Inc.0
Epix Therapeutics, Inc.0-100%
Biosense Webster, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or competitive tracking.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the leader group

With 44.9% of records held by five assignees, any new irrigated catheter filing should be checked against their claim scope before drafting, particularly around contact-force and irrigation-flow mechanics.

Start a claim comparison in Eureka

Track the momentum shift among leading filers

Several top assignees show zero filings in the latest recorded year. Whether that is a genuine pullback or a publication-lag artefact matters for competitive planning, and is worth monitoring over the next reporting cycle.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Scope a filing in an under-claimed branch

Classes like G16H and A61L sit under 2% of records each. A claim built around ablation informatics or irrigation-fluid sterility has more room to clear prior art than one built around core catheter mechanics.

Explore whitespace scoping in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about irrigated RF ablation patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole irrigated radiofrequency ablation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.