Book a demo

Isolated Current Sensor Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Isolated Current Sensor Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/isolated-current-sensor-technology-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Electronics · Patent Landscape
Isolated current sensor patents: who is filing, where claim space is dense, and where it is still open
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown. Filings rose from 124 in 2017 to a peak of 256 in 2024, but the flat 2017-2022 midpoint of 220 shows this is a mature, cyclical field rather than one in a growth phase.
  • China and the US dominate filing venues. China (1,059) and the United States (896) together account for well over half of all receiving-office activity, ahead of Europe, WIPO, Japan and India combined.
  • Momentum has stalled across nearly every major assignee. Named leaders including Melexis, Schneider Electric, Infineon, State Grid and Allegro MicroSystems all show zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the 18-month publication lag rather than a real slowdown.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
3,294
Published Records
11%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+45%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Isolated current sensing spans Hall-effect, fluxgate and shunt-based measurement architectures used anywhere current must be measured without a direct electrical connection to the conductor. The corpus underlying this page draws on 3,294 patent families filed between 2017 and 2026 and classified chiefly under G01R (electric and magnetic measurement), with secondary claim activity in transformer and inductor design, protective circuitry, power conversion, semiconductor devices and printed-circuit assembly.

Publication typically lags filing by about eighteen months, so the drop-off visible in the most recent one or two years understates real filing activity rather than signalling an actual collapse in interest. Read the trend line with that lag in mind, particularly when judging any single assignee's most recent numbers.

Filings by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1MELEXIS TECHNOLOGIES SA83
  2. 2SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IND SAS73
  3. 3ALPS ALPINE CO LTD73
  4. 4INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG72
  5. 5STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA67
  6. 6ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS LLC61
  7. 7ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG44
  8. 8HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC42
  9. 9GENERAL ELECTRIC CO41
  10. 10SENTEC LTD34
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isolated Current Sensor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views matter here: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how that volume splits across the IPC subclasses that actually carry isolated current sensor claims.

A plateaued field with a defined peak

Annual filings climbed from 124 in 2017 to a peak of 256 in 2024. The 2022 midpoint of 220 sits close to that peak, meaning the growth phase was largely over by the early 2020s and recent years look flat to declining once the publication lag is accounted for.

A plateaued field with a defined peak075150225300124201720182019202020212022202325620242025182026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Claim activity concentrates in G01R, radiates into adjacent hardware

Virtually every record touches G01R (3,293 of 3,294), confirming this is the anchor classification for the field. Meaningful secondary volume sits in H01F (magnetic components, 160 records), H02H (protection circuitry, 104) and H02M (power conversion, 90), with smaller but non-trivial activity in semiconductor integration (H01L, 76), grid/power-supply systems (H02J, 75), PCB assembly (H05K, 65) and other solid-state devices (H10N, 54).

Claim activity concentrates in G01R, radiates into adjacent hardwareG01R · Electric & magnetic measurement3,293100.0%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…1604.9%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements1043.2%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)902.7%H01L · Semiconductor devices762.3%H02J · Power supply & grid systems752.3%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies652.0%H10N · Other electric solid-state dev…541.6%Other86426.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 3,294 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isolated Current Sensor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Isolated Current Sensor Technology Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about isolated current sensor technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art and a recent representative filing

Representative recent filing
US20230280376A12023-09-07

Chip type coil-based fluxgate current sensor (US20230280376A1)

NINGBO CRRC TIMES TRANSDUCER TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

Filed by Ningbo CRRC Times Transducer Technology and published 2023-09-07, this filing describes a chip-scale fluxgate sensor built from bonded high-resistance silicon wafers with an internal cavity and solenoid-style coil structures, paired with integral filtering, signal driving, voltage acquisition and amplification stages in a single sequenced module.Abstract condensed from the original filing.

US20230280376A1 — patent drawing 1US20230280376A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7557563B2Current sensor assembly326
2US20050156587A1Current sensor286
3US6544078B2Battery clamp with integrated current sensor196
4US20090039869A1Cascode Current Sensor For Discrete Power Semiconductor Devices191
5US6043640AMultimeter with current sensor175
6US6545456B1Hall effect current sensor package for sensing electrical current in an electrical conductor146
7US5432459ALeakage capacitance compensating current sensor for current supplied to medical device loads with unconnected…145
8US6411078B1Current sensor apparatus138
9US6624624B1Electrical current sensor134
10US6160441ASensors for measuring current passing through a load116

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had more time to be cited; treat this list as a map of influential prior art, not a ranking of current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isolated Current Sensor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the field

Three patterns stand out once filing counts, venues and IPC composition are read together.

Venue split
1,059 vs 896
China vs US filings

China leads by venue, but the US is close behind

China's 1,059 receiving-office filings edge out the United States' 896, with Europe (462), WIPO (219), Japan (168) and India (85) trailing well behind. A freedom-to-operate review that skips either of the top two jurisdictions misses the bulk of the corpus.

Receiving office counts, all years
Filing cycle
124 → 256 → 18
2017, 2024 peak, 2026 partial

The growth phase is behind this field, not ahead of it

Filings roughly doubled from 2017 to the 2024 peak, but the 2022 midpoint of 220 already sat close to that peak. That trajectory reads as a maturing claim landscape rather than an emerging one.

Annual filing counts
Collaboration
10 pairs
Co-assignee pairings

Grid-operator co-filing is concentrated, not widespread

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links all involve State Grid entities filing jointly with affiliated research institutes. Collaboration here looks institutional rather than cross-industry.

Strongest pair: 20 shared families
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to isolated current sensor technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isolated Current Sensor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Assignee landscape and where claim space is still open

Filing activity sits with a mix of automotive-semiconductor specialists, industrial electronics majors and Chinese grid-research institutes, but recent-year momentum has cooled across almost all of them.

Momentum
0 in latest year
Across most named leaders

Named leaders show zero latest-year filings

Melexis, Schneider Electric, Infineon, State Grid, Allegro MicroSystems and Alps Alpine all register zero filings in the most recent year, several with -100% YoY. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this is best read as pipeline-in-transit rather than genuine exit from the field.

Recent-year momentum data
Institutional filers
20 shared families
State Grid + affiliated institute

Grid-research institutes file as coordinated clusters

State Grid's strongest co-assignee link, with the China Electric Power Research Institute, produced 20 shared families; further pairings extend to its Wuhan branch and the State Grid Smart Grid Research Institute. This pattern suggests centrally coordinated filing programmes rather than incidental collaboration.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Prior art anchors
326 citations
Top-cited record

A small set of older US filings anchor the prior art

The most-cited records in this corpus date back well before the 2017-2026 filing window and concentrate on discrete current-sensor assemblies and cascode sensing for power semiconductors, meaning new filers are working against long-established reference points in core Hall-effect and shunt architectures.

Citation counts within corpus
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with comparatively thin direct claim density relative to core G01R sensing, based on IPC composition
Chip-scale fluxgate coil integrationSensor-on-PCB assembly for power modulesSolid-state sensing devices (H10N overlap)Grid-side protective circuit integrationSemiconductor-embedded current sensing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
MELEXIS TECHNOLOGIES SA0-100%
Schneider Electric Industries SAS0
Infineon Technologies AG0
State Grid Corporation of China0-100%
Allegro MicroSystems, LLC0-100%
Alps Alpine Co., Ltd.0
Aipo Research Co., Ltd.0
General Electric Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isolated Current Sensor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, R&D scoping or competitive tracking.

Check freedom to operate against the cited-art cluster

The most-cited records anchor core Hall-effect and shunt sensing claims; any new architecture should be checked against these before development spend, not after.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Watch for the publication-lag catch-up

Zero latest-year filings from major assignees likely reflect the 18-month lag rather than withdrawal; re-run assignee momentum in two to three quarters to confirm the real trend.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Scope claims in the under-claimed branches

Chip-scale fluxgate integration and sensor-embedded semiconductor packaging show thinner direct claim density than core G01R sensing and may offer more room to file.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isolated Current Sensor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about isolated current sensor patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isolated Current Sensor Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Isolated Current Sensor Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole isolated current sensor technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.