https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/isothermal-amplification-reagent-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Cell-Free Systems
Isothermal Amplification Reagent Systems: Patents Mapping RPA, LAMP and Point-of-Care Diagnostics
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 938 records, then fell 58% to 394 by 2024 - the last year the dataset treats as complete.
  • The ranked leaders hold a modest 16.8% share, with the top 5 of 11,168 records concentrated but no single assignee close to dominant.
  • C12Q enzyme/DNA assay claims cover 76.4% of records, while lateral-flow and multiplexing-adjacent classes like C40B sit under 5%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
11.2K
Published Records
17%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-58%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (938 records) with 2024 (394) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 11,168 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Isothermal amplification reagent systems - recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and related chemistries - let nucleic acid detection skip thermal cycling, which matters for field and point-of-care diagnostics. This landscape tracks 11,168 patent records published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine isothermal amplification methods with practical constraints: primer design, nonspecific amplification, reaction temperature tolerance, inhibitor resistance, multiplexing and lateral-flow readout. Those constraints are what separate a bench chemistry from a deployable assay, and they are the axis this dataset was built around.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line are still filling in - they should not be read as a fall-off in real filing activity.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1CELERA CORP450
  2. 2ILLUMINA CAMBRIDGE LTD412
  3. 3LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORP389
  4. 4SEQUENOM INC359
  5. 5MODERNATX INC268
  6. 6PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE268
  7. 7MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH262
  8. 8THE BROAD INST INC261
  9. 9BIO RAD LABORATORIES INC227
  10. 10ILLUMINA INC181
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isothermal Amplification Reagent Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 11,168 records: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A sharp rise, then a real pullback from peak

Filings ran from 595 in 2017 to a peak of 938 in 2021, then declined to 394 by 2024 - a 58% drop over that three-year span. That contraction lines up with the end of the pandemic-driven diagnostics surge; whether the field has genuinely cooled or is consolidating into fewer, larger filers is a separate question the assignee data starts to answer.

A sharp rise, then a real pullback from peak02505007501,000595201720182019202093820212022202320242025352026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Claim space concentrated in enzymatic assay chemistry

C12Q (measuring/testing involving enzymes or DNA) appears on 76.4% of the 11,168 records, far ahead of C12N genetic engineering at 28.9% and G01N material analysis at 18.8%. Device-adjacent classes - B01L lab apparatus at 8.9% and C40B combinatorial libraries at 4.2% - are comparatively thin, which is where hardware and library-format claims have more room.

Claim space concentrated in enzymatic assay chemistryC12Q · Measuring & testing involving …8,53676.4%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…3,23028.9%G01N · Material analysis & testing2,09818.8%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…1,22511.0%C07H · Sugars & nucleic acids1,0159.1%B01L · Lab apparatus9898.9%A61K · Medicinal preparations6866.1%C40B · Combinatorial chemistry librar…4734.2%Other3,85834.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 11,168 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isothermal Amplification Reagent Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Isothermal Amplification Reagent Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about isothermal amplification reagent systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
US20220073975A12022-03-10

US20220073975A1 - Isothermal amplification with electrical detection

ALVEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

The application describes amplifying and detecting a target nucleic acid using recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), optionally paired with a second isothermal reaction such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), run either alongside or on RPA amplification products, with detection based on measuring a modulated electrical signal rather than optical readout.Filed by Alveo Technologies - illustrates the trend toward electrical rather than fluorescent or lateral-flow readout for combined RPA/LAMP workflows.

US20220073975A1 — patent drawing 1US20220073975A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6168948B1Miniaturized genetic analysis systems and methods1,175
2US6379929B1Chip-based isothermal amplification devices and methods906
3US5422252ASimultaneous amplification of multiple targets840
4US5773258ANucleic acid amplification using a reversibly inactivated thermostable enzyme833
5EP0684315A1Strand displacement amplification using thermophilic enzymes774
6US5744311AStrand displacement amplification using thermophilic enzymes738
7US5648211AStrand displacement amplification using thermophilic enzymes667
8US5716825AIntegrated nucleic acid analysis system for MALDI-TOF MS655
9US5942391ANucleic acid amplification method: ramification-extension amplification method (RAM)650
10US5677152ANucleic acid amplification using a reersibly inactivated thermostable enzyme646

Citation counts accumulate over time, so older filings from the 1990s and early 2000s lead this list - they mark foundational method claims, not current filing activity.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isothermal Amplification Reagent Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three signals stand out once the ranking, the trend and the class composition are read together.

Concentration
16.8%
top 5 share of 11,168 records

No single gatekeeper, but a dense core

The top 5 assignees hold 1,878 of 11,168 records - meaningful but not a chokehold. Freedom-to-operate work here means clearing a cluster of similarly sized portfolios, not negotiating around one dominant holder.

Top 10 combined reach 27.6% of all records.
Momentum
-58%
2021 to 2024 filing change

Peak-era filers are pulling back

Filing fell from 938 in 2021 to 394 in 2024. Several of the most active academic and corporate assignees show double-digit YoY declines in the latest recorded year, consistent with a cooling rather than a still-accelerating field.

2025-2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag.
Composition
76.4%
records carrying C12Q

Claims cluster on the enzymatic core

Three-quarters of records touch C12Q enzyme/DNA assay claims, while lab-apparatus (B01L, 8.9%) and combinatorial-library (C40B, 4.2%) classes are comparatively open. That gap is where device-integration and multiplexed-format claims are less contested.

Shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to isothermal amplification reagent systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isothermal Amplification Reagent Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the collaboration sits

The ranking spans 100 companies counted by record share, with academic institutes and sequencing/diagnostics companies filing alongside each other rather than in separate lanes.

Leader
450
records, single leading assignee

A lead position without runaway share

The top-ranked assignee holds 450 records against a fifth-place figure of 268 and a tenth-place figure of 181 - a gradual taper rather than a cliff, typical of a field still open to new entrants.

Ranking covers 100 companies by record count.
Collaboration
233
strongest co-assignee pair

Academic-institute pairings dominate joint filings

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs two major US research institutes at 233 joint records, with two further institute pairings above 150. Corporate-academic co-filing is comparatively rare in the top pairs.

10 co-assignee pairs recorded overall.
Momentum
-67% to -100%
YoY change, leading assignees

Even active filers are slowing sharply

Several of the assignees with the largest historical portfolios show YoY declines of 67% or more in the latest recorded year, and some sequencing-era filers have dropped to zero. Watch whether this reflects genuine pullback or publication lag before reading it as exit.

Figures reflect the latest year in the dataset, subject to publication lag.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Based on where IPC density is thin relative to the core C12Q cluster.
Electrical/impedance-based amplicon detectionMultiplexed lateral-flow strip readoutInhibitor-tolerant reagent formulationsCombinatorial primer library designPortable reaction-temperature control hardware
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)2-67%
The Broad Institute, Inc.2-78%
Life Technologies Corporation10%
Illumina Cambridge Ltd.0-100%
Celera Corp0—
Sequenom, Inc.0-100%
President and Fellows of Harvard College0-100%
ModernaTX, Inc.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isothermal Amplification Reagent Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to two practical follow-ups: checking claim density in the thinner IPC classes, and tracking whether the post-2021 pullback continues once 2025-2026 filings finish publishing.

Model freedom-to-operate against the top-10 cluster

With 27.6% of records held by the ten largest assignees, a working FTO map needs to clear a cluster of similarly sized portfolios rather than one dominant holder.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Track device-integration claims as the pullback plays out

B01L and C40B classes remain comparatively thin against the C12Q core; monitoring new filings there over the next reporting cycle will show whether hardware-side claims are being staked out.

Set up a monitoring search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isothermal Amplification Reagent Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Isothermal Amplification Reagent Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Isothermal Amplification Reagent Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole isothermal amplification reagent systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.