Book a demo

Ultrasonic Metal Welding Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Ultrasonic Metal Welding Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/joining-welding-and-brazing-ultrasonic-metal-welding-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Manufacturing
Ultrasonic Metal Welding Patents: Filing Trends, Leaders and Open Claim Space

A data-driven look at ultrasonic metal welding patents: filing trends since 2017, IPC technology composition, leading assignees, top-cited prior art, and where white space remains for new claims.

1,214
Published Records
10%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-6%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (48 records) → 2024 (45); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 1,214 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the ultrasonic metal welding patent record actually shows

Ultrasonic metal welding sits at the intersection of joining process engineering and the electrification supply chain: battery tab welding, busbar connections and semiconductor lead bonding all depend on the same core mechanism of high-frequency vibration under clamping force. The dataset covers 1,214 published records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, drawn from a search string built on title, abstract, claims and IPC B23K. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity rather than signal a slowdown.

The record set is dominated by the core welding classification but carries a visible tail into plastics shaping, connectors, battery construction, semiconductor devices, laminates and powder metallurgy — evidence that the technique is being claimed as a downstream integration step almost as often as a standalone process.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1SCHUNK SONOSYST GMBH54
  2. 2KEPU ULTRASONIC ELECTRONICS TECHCAL20
  3. 3OHIO STATE INNOVATION FOUND17
  4. 4HONDA MOTOR CO LTD16
  5. 5SCHUNK ULTRASCHALLTECHN15
  6. 6BRANSON ULTRASONICS SHANGHAI15
  7. 7LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD14
  8. 8HUYS IND LTD14
  9. 9GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC14
  10. 10KK TOSHIBA14
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Joining, Welding & Brazing: Ultrasonic Metal Welding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,214-record set: filing activity by year, and where those records sit across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the subclass shares add up to more than 100% of the record total — that is expected and does not indicate double counting.

Filing activity, 2017-2026

Filings peaked in 2019 at 71 records and have since settled into a narrower band; 2021 to 2024 moved from 48 to 45 records, a -6% change over the three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional given the typical 18-month publication lag.

Filing activity, 2017-2026020406080512017201871201920202021202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

B23K (welding, soldering and brazing) accounts for 96.0% of the 1,214 records, confirming this is a core-process search. The next largest subclasses — B29C plastics shaping at 8.2%, H01R connectors at 7.5%, G01N testing at 6.9% and H01M batteries at 6.3% — mark the applied contexts where ultrasonic metal welding claims most often get filed alongside a second technical domain.

Technology composition by IPC subclassB23K · Welding, soldering & brazing1,16696.0%B29C · Shaping of plastics998.2%H01R · Connectors & current collectors917.5%G01N · Material analysis & testing846.9%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells776.3%H01L · Semiconductor devices584.8%B32B · Layered products & laminates463.8%B22F · Powder metallurgy443.6%Other76663.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,214 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Joining, Welding & Brazing: Ultrasonic Metal Welding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Joining, Welding & Brazing: Ultrasonic Metal Welding Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about joining, welding & brazing: ultrasonic metal welding patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A representative filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative recent filing
EP4238683A12023-09-06

Quick-change welding head assembly for ultrasonic metal welding machines (EP4238683A1)

Branson Ultraschall Niederlassung der Emerson Technologies GmbH & Co. OHG

This application relates to the technical field of ultrasonic metal welding, and discloses a quick-replace device for welding head of ultrasonic metal welding machine, which includes a fixing mechanism for fixedly connecting a framework and a movable mechanism for fixing an ultrasonic triplet. The movable mechanism is detachably mounted in the fixing mechanism and includes a mounting plate and a connecting assembly for fixing the ultrasonic triplet. The connecting assembly is arranged on the mounting plate, and the fixing mechanism includes a fixing block for fixedly connecting the framework, with a mounting groove defined in the fixing block.Filed by Branson Ultraschall (Emerson Technologies), published 2023-09-06 — illustrates a current claim strategy built around tool-change mechanics rather than the weld process itself.

EP4238683A1 — patent drawing 1EP4238683A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4712722AConcurrent ultrasonic weld evaluation system383
2US5811055ATorch mounted gas scavaging system for manual and robotic welding and cutting torches303
3WO1994016970A1Device247
4US5207371AMethod and apparatus for fabrication of three-dimensional metal articles by weld deposition244
5US6827250B2Methods for hermetically sealing microchip reservoir devices237
6US7132617B2Method and system for assessing quality of spot welds199
7US6171415B1Ultrasonic impact methods for treatment of welded structures167
8US6932876B1Ultrasonic impact machining of body surfaces to correct defects and strengthen work surfaces135
9US20030234239A1Method and system for assessing quality of spot welds126
10US20150041025A1Additive layer manufacturing120

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older records; use them as a signal of foundational status, not current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Joining, Welding & Brazing: Ultrasonic Metal Welding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and citation data mean for freedom to operate

The numbers point to a field with one clear scale leader, a wide ranked field behind it, and prior art concentrated in older mechanical and evaluation patents rather than in the newer battery-adjacent filings.

Concentration
10.0%
of all 1,214 records

One leader, then a long tail

The top 5 assignees combined hold 10.0% of all 1,214 records in scope, with the leader alone at 54 records — well above fifth place at 15. Beyond that the ranking flattens quickly: tenth place sits at 14 records, barely below fifth. Filing strategy in this field is not a two-company race; it is one strong filer surrounded by a broad, evenly spread field.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Growth
-6%
2021 to 2024

Flat, not falling, filing activity

Filings moved from 48 records in 2021 to 45 in 2024, a -6% change across the only span of years that can be treated as complete given publication lag. That is a plateau rather than a retreat, consistent with a mature core process still picking up secondary claims in battery and connector applications.

2021-2024, complete-year basis
Technology mix
96.0%
of records classed B23K

A core-process field with a growing applied edge

Nearly every record in scope sits in B23K welding/soldering/brazing, but secondary classes tell the real story: B29C, H01R, G01N and H01M together show the technique is increasingly claimed as part of battery, connector and testing systems rather than in isolation.

IPC subclass shares, record-level, sum exceeds 100%
Prior art
383 citations
top-cited record

Foundational art predates the current filing wave

The most-cited record in the dataset, a weld-evaluation patent, carries 383 citations — a figure driven by corpus age rather than current relevance. New filers should treat high citation counts as markers of foundational mechanical and inspection concepts, not as evidence those claims still constrain today's battery-tab or connector applications.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to joining, welding & brazing: ultrasonic metal welding patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare and narrowly clustered
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Ohio State Innovation Foundation10
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.GS Yuasa International Ltd.2
Nippon Steel CorporationNIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP2
Guangzhou Kepu Ultrasonic Electronics Technology Co., Ltd.Guangdong Kezhong Technology Co., Ltd.1

Only 4 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairing recurs at 10 shared records — evidence that most patenting here is done by single entities rather than through joint development structures.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Joining, Welding & Brazing: Ultrasonic Metal Welding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking, or identifying open claim space.

Map claims against the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 54 of 1,214 records, a claim-by-claim comparison against that portfolio is the fastest way to spot where a new filing would overlap versus where it would be genuinely novel.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Track the battery and connector crossover

H01M and H01R records already make up meaningful minority shares of the dataset; monitoring new filings in these crossover classes will surface competitive moves before they show up in core B23K searches alone.

Set up a monitoring workspace in Eureka

Stress-test a draft claim against cited prior art

Because the most-cited records date from earlier mechanical and evaluation patents, a new claim should be checked against both that older art and the denser recent B23K filings before drafting.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Joining, Welding & Brazing: Ultrasonic Metal Welding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about ultrasonic metal welding patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Joining, Welding & Brazing: Ultrasonic Metal Welding Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Joining, Welding & Brazing: Ultrasonic Metal Welding Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole joining, welding & brazing: ultrasonic metal welding patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.