Book a demo

Lane Keeping Assist Patent Landscape 2026

Lane Keeping Assist Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Lane Keeping Assist Patent Landscape in 2026

The Lane Keeping Assist patent corpus spans 6,814 patent families and is dominated by a small tier of automotive OEMs and technology firms, with the top five filers holding nearly half of the combined output of the hundred largest filers. Annual volume peaked in 2022 and has plateaued near that level, signalling a mature but still active field where differentiation is shifting toward AI perception and cross-domain integration.

6,814
Patent families in scope
49%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+13%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Toyota and NVIDIA lead a highly concentrated field

Toyota Motor Corporation heads Honda Motor Co., Ltd. sits third at 740 patent families, and Hyundai Motor Company fourth at 580 patent families.

The top five filers — Toyota, NVIDIA, Honda, Hyundai, and GM Global Technology Operations — together account for 49% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers, indicating a strongly concentrated field where a handful of players set the technology agenda. A second tier comprising HL Klemove Corp, LG Electronics, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, Denso, and Waymo collectively adds meaningful volume but remains well behind the leaders.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Toyota Motor Corporation1,011
2NVIDIA Corporation931
3Honda Motor Co., Ltd.740
4Hyundai Motor Company580
5GM Global Technology Operations LLC383
6HL Klemove Corp.319
7LG Electronics Inc.318
8State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company223
9Denso Corporation219
10Waymo LLC183
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Renault S.A.143
12Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.127
13Omron Corporation127
14Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd.120
15Ford Global Technologies LLC112
16Yinwang Intelligent Technologies Co., Ltd.93
17Magna Electronics Inc.91
18Atieva Inc. (Lucid Motors)85
19Robert Bosch GmbH81
20Volvo Car Corporation58
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Toyota’s emphasis on hybrid/joint vehicle control (B60W) and NVIDIA’s focus on image/video recognition (G06V) and AI models (G06N) reveal a structural split between traditional OEM control-systems approaches and silicon/software-stack strategies — a divergence that shapes where the next wave of differentiation is likely to occur.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; apparent softness in 20242026 data should not be interpreted as a sustained decline. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Volume plateaued near its 2022 peak; B60W dominates but perception branches are growing

Two charts together describe where this field has been and where its technical weight now sits: the annual filing trend reveals a maturing pace of innovation, while the technology composition shows the dominance of vehicle control logic alongside a sizeable and expanding cluster of perception and AI patents.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings rose from 568 in 2017 to a high of 1,034 in 2022, then moderated to 977 in 2023 and 774 in 2024; 2025 and 2026 figures are materially under-counted due to publication lag and should not be read as a continued decline. The multi-year window still shows positive growth of 13% over the prior period, consistent with a field at or near peak maturity rather than one in contraction.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,034 in 2022.568201750320187072019925202084120211,0342022977202377420244292025562026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B60W (hybrid/joint vehicle control) is by far the dominant branch, reflecting the core control-loop nature of lane keeping. G05D (control of non-electric variables), G06V (image/video recognition), and G08G (traffic control systems) form a substantial secondary cluster, confirming that perception pipelines and traffic-aware logic are now integral to lane keeping architectures. AI-oriented branches G06N and G06F add further depth, pointing to increasing integration of learned models into production systems.

Technology compositionB60W · Hybrid/joint vehicle control leads with 6,706; G05D · Control of non-electric variables 1,544.B60W · Hybrid/joint vehi…6,706G05D · Control of non-el…1,544G06V · Image/video recog…1,480G08G · Traffic control s…1,366B62D · Vehicles & legged…949G06F · Electric digital …682G06N · Computing based o…648G01C · Distance, navigat…623↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20190337513A1Published 2019-11-07

Lane keeping assist system and method for improvin…

Hl Klemove CORP.

A lane keeping assist system and method for increasing safety in preceding vehicle follower longitudinal control are disclosed. The lane keeping assist system for performing lane keeping using information about a lane and peripheral vehicle includes an image sensor configured to detect a forward lane and a preceding vehicle with respect to a host vehicle… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Lane keeping assist system and method for improvin… — patent drawingLane keeping assist system and method for improvin… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Systems and methods for safe and reliable autonomo…1,021
2System and method for responding to driver state923
3System and method for automatically steering a veh…681
4System And Method To Operate An Automated Vehicle626
5A Method and Apparatus for Collecting and Using Se…596
6Method and system for ensuring operation of limite…420
7Safety procedure analysis for obstacle avoidance i…388
8Autonomous vehicle routing during emergencies384

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural observations — maturity stage, competitive concentration, co-filing ecosystems, and geographic spread — each carry distinct implications for where new entrants and incumbents should direct resources.

Maturity

Field at plateau: incremental gains dominate, but perception sub-fields remain dynamic

Annual filings have plateaued near their 2022 peak, placing Lane Keeping Assist firmly in the maturity stage. Core vehicle-control IP is heavily occupied, making clean-sheet entry in B60W costly. However, the growing share of G06V and G06N filings suggests that perception-layer and AI-model innovations remain an active frontier where differentiation is still achievable.

Lifecycle: Maturity
Concentration

Top five hold 49% of the leading-100 filers’ combined output — entry barriers are high

With the top five filers accounting for 49% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, the field presents significant incumbency advantages in core control patents. New entrants face a dense prior-art landscape in B60W but encounter lower density in adjacent branches such as G05D, G06V, and G08G, where the patent count per technical sub-problem is proportionally lower relative to B60W.

High concentration
Collaboration

Hyundai–Kia co-filing dominates; Toyota builds a supplier web

Hyundai Motor Company and Kia Corporation are the most active co-filers with 453 joint patent families, forming the field’s largest collaborative unit by a wide margin. Toyota Motor Corporation maintains active co-filing relationships with Advics Co., Ltd. (38 families) and Denso Corporation (36 families), reflecting a supplier-integration strategy. Hyundai also co-files with Hyundai AutoEver, Kia, and Asia University, indicating both internal group alignment and academic outreach.

Ecosystem co-filing
Geography

US is the primary jurisdiction; China and Europe are meaningful secondary markets

The United States leads jurisdictional coverage with 4,419 patent records, confirming it as the primary filing and enforcement arena. China follows at 810, Europe (EPO) at 703, and Japan at 661, with Germany adding 557 as a stand-alone national office — reflecting the importance of the German OEM cluster. PCT filings via WIPO number 432, indicating active international prosecution strategies among the leading applicants.

US-centric, global spread
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Hyundai Motor CompanyKia Corporation453
Toyota Motor CorporationAdvics Co., Ltd.38
Toyota Motor CorporationDenso Corporation36
Hyundai Motor CompanyHyundai AutoEver Corp.14
Kia CorporationHyundai AutoEver Corp.13
Hyundai Motor CompanyKia Corporation12
Toyota Motor CorporationJTEKT Corporation6
Hyundai Motor CompanyHyundai Autoron Co., Ltd.6
Hyundai Motor CompanyAsia University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation6
Kia CorporationHyundai Autoron Co., Ltd.6

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards draw on applicant ranking, lifecycle assessment, co-filing data, and jurisdictional coverage from the Lane Keeping Assist corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Toyota leads on control-system depth; NVIDIA accelerates on AI perception

The top two applicants differ fundamentally in technical approach: Toyota Motor Corporation anchors its position in vehicle-control logic, while NVIDIA Corporation is building an AI-perception stack at rapid pace. Both trajectories are worth monitoring as the field’s next competitive frontier.

Leader · Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota leads the ranking with 1,011 patent families, concentrated in B60W hybrid/joint vehicle control across sub-classes B60W 30, B60W 50, and B60W 40. Recent-period filings are up 74% versus the prior three-year window, indicating Toyota is actively reinforcing its core control-system position rather than ceding ground despite the maturing market.

patent families: 1,011
Challenger · NVIDIA Corporation

NVIDIA Corporation

NVIDIA ranks second with 931 patent families and is the fastest-growing major filer at +78% in the recent period versus the prior three years. Its portfolio is concentrated in G06V image/video recognition and G06N AI models, reflecting a perception-and-inference platform strategy distinct from OEM control-loop approaches. At this trajectory, NVIDIA could close the gap with Toyota in the near term.

patent families: 931
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top-100 filers, including momentum scores and technology emphasis maps.
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Hyundai Motor Company+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
NVIDIA Corporation512▲ +78%
Toyota Motor Corporation246▲ +74%
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.246▼ -28%
Hyundai Motor Company171▲ +13%
GM Global Technology Operations LLC137▲ +117%
LG Electronics Inc.17▼ -92%
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company81▲ +42%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts from the applicant ranking and momentum figures from recent-versus-prior filing comparisons.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches where technical need and filing density diverge

Relative to the dominant B60W branch, several IPC classes show meaningful patent counts but proportionally lower density given the technical problems they address in lane keeping — flagging them as under-served adjacent areas worth investigating before committing R&D resources.

G05D · Control of non-electric variables

G05D holds 1,544 patent records — sizeable in absolute terms but representing only 8% of the corpus relative to B60W’s commanding share. Lane keeping applications in closed-loop lateral control and path-tracking algorithms that operate independently of powertrain state are technically well-motivated here. Entrants with control-theory or robotics backgrounds may find less incumbency pressure than in B60W, with a plausible entry path via cross-licensing or building on open autonomous-driving stacks.

Search this in Eureka →

G08G · Traffic control systems

G08G (traffic control systems) accounts for 1,366 patent records — 7% of the corpus — and represents the intersection of lane keeping with infrastructure-aware and V2X-informed lane management. This sub-area is technically valuable as regulatory mandates push ADAS systems toward connected-infrastructure awareness, yet it remains proportionally sparse relative to the core control-loop space. Suppliers with V2X or roadside-unit expertise face a realistic entry path as vehicle-to-infrastructure standards mature.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Explore all adjacent IPC branches with filing-density scores and representative prior-art gaps.
B62D · Vehicles & legged-robot locomotionG06F · Electric digital data processing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent-branch observations are based on relative patent-record counts within the Lane Keeping Assist corpus; lower share does not automatically indicate a commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerB60W 30 · Hybrid/joint vehicle controlB60W 50 · Hybrid/joint vehicle controlB60W 40 · Hybrid/joint vehicle controlB60W 60 · Hybrid/joint vehicle controlG05D 1 · Control of non-electric variables
Toyota Motor CorporationStrong · 564Strong · 357Moderate · 265Emerging · 97Moderate · 115
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Strong · 454Strong · 279Strong · 270Strong · 325Emerging · 51
Hyundai Motor CompanyStrong · 323Strong · 203Moderate · 155Strong · 184Moderate · 71
NVIDIA CorporationStrong · 165Moderate · 117Moderate · 85Strong · 302Strong · 246
GM Global Technology Operations LLCStrong · 227Strong · 125Strong · 117Moderate · 63Moderate · 83
LG Electronics Inc.AbsentStrong · 109Strong · 89Strong · 84Strong · 117
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own Lane Keeping Assist landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.