Laser Cleaning Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Laser Cleaning and Paint Removal Patents: Filing Trends and Leaders
29.3% concentration at the top. The top 5 assignees hold 150 of 512 records in scope — a leader well ahead of a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants. Annual filings rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 55 in 2022, then held at a still-elevated 36 in 2024 — a 44% increase over the 2021 figure of 25. 2025 and 2026 read lower only because publication has not caught up with filing; treat those two years as incomplete rather than as a decline.
- 1CAULDRON46
- 2ELECTRO SCI IND INC31
- 3THE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI28
- 4HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP25
- 5UNIV OF LIVERPOOL20
See the full laser cleaning and paint removal analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about laser cleaning patents
How many laser cleaning and paint removal patents have been filed?
This landscape covers 512 published records filed or published between 2015 and the mid-2026 data cut-off, filtered to documents that also address process-engineering concerns such as fluence thresholds, fume extraction or scanning strategy. Annual filings rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 55 in 2022, and stood at 36 in 2024, the most recent year that can be treated as complete. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
Who are the leading patent holders in laser cleaning technology?
The ranking spans 100 assignees counted in records, with the leading filer holding 46 records against 20 at fifth place and 11 at tenth. The top 5 assignees combined account for 150 records, or 29.3% of all 512 records in scope, and the top 10 account for 43.2%. That leaves a long tail of assignees with only a handful of filings each, so most of the field is not held by a single dominant player outside that leading group.
What is the difference between laser cleaning and laser paint removal patents in this dataset?
Both terms are search inputs into the same 512-record set rather than separate categories with their own counts; the underlying claims frequently overlap because the same fluence-control and scanning-strategy techniques apply to rust, paint and general surface contamination removal. The clearer technical split in the data is by IPC subclass: B23K-tagged records (44.1%) tend toward surface preparation for welding or joining, while B08B-tagged records (28.7%) skew toward general cleaning applications. A given record can, and often does, sit in both.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Laser Cleaning and Paint Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.