Book a demo

Laser Diode Degradation Monitoring Patent Snapshot

Laser Diode Degradation Monitoring Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Laser Diode Degradation Monitoring Patent Snapshot in 2026

The laser diode degradation monitoring field is a small, mature corpus led by a tight cluster of telecommunications and photonics incumbents, with Motorola and Fujitsu holding the top two positions. Activity has eased from its 2018 peak and the competitive structure is concentrated, leaving limited but identifiable adjacent branches for new entrants.

30
Patent families in scope
23%
Top visible applicants share
-27%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Motorola and Fujitsu lead a concentrated incumbent field

Motorola leads the applicant ranking followed closely by Fujitsu, PSC, Corning, and Hitachi rounding out the top five — together they account for the top-five filers’ share of the ranked applicants visible in this query in this corpus.

The top five filers hold 23% of the combined total among the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating moderate concentration at the top with a long tail of single-digit holders. The gap between the leader and the fifth-ranked applicant is narrow, suggesting competitive parity among the top tier rather than a single visible actor.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Motorola Inc10
2Fujitsu Ltd9
3PSC Inc7
4Corning Inc7
5Hitachi Ltd6
6Trumpf Photonic Components GmbH6
7Xieon Networks S.a.r.l.5
8Lumentum Operations LLC4
9Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Ltd4
10Robert Bosch GmbH4
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Finisar Corporation4
12Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte Ltd4
13GemFire Corporation4
14Lumentum Technology UK Ltd4
15Xerox Corporation4
16JDS Uniphase Corporation4
17Toshiba Corporation4
18Alcon Inc4
19Blue 425 LLC3
20Mitsubishi Electric Corporation3
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Incumbent positions held by Motorola, Fujitsu, and Hitachi reflect deep integration of degradation monitoring into broader laser and optical communications portfolios, making it difficult for new entrants to displace them on core H01S claims without differentiated technical approaches.

Filings from approximately 2023 onward are subject to standard patent publication lag and should be treated as under-counted; the apparent absence of 2024–2026 records does not represent a real cessation of activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume has eased from its 2018 peak; H01S dominates technology mix

Annual filing volume peaked in 2018 and has been easing since, consistent with a declining lifecycle stage. The technology composition is heavily weighted toward laser and stimulated-emission fundamentals, with several adjacent branches attracting comparatively modest coverage.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings reached their highest point in 2018 and have oscillated at lower levels since; the 2023 uptick to six records warrants watching, though 2024 and beyond are under-counted due to publication lag and should not be read as zero activity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 6 in 2018.52017620183201932020520212202262023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01S (Lasers and stimulated emission) is overwhelmingly visible in the technology mix; G02B, H01L, G11B, H04B, and G06K each carry meaningful but substantially smaller counts, highlighting where adjacent technical coverage thins out.

Technology compositionH01S · Lasers & stimulated emission leads with 160; G02B · Optical elements & systems 25.H01S · Lasers & stimulat…160G02B · Optical elements …25H01L · Semiconductor dev…25G11B · Information stora…23H04B · Transmission (gen…19G06K · Data recognition …15G01J · Radiation & light…5G01R · Electric & magnet…5↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US5920585APublished 1999-07-06

Laser diode package having an optical power monito…

Samsung Electronics CO., LTD.

A laser diode package having an optical power monitoring function includes a monitor diode for monitoring an optical power of the light emitted from a laser diode. In the laser diode package, an optical member has a projection window for advancing the light emitted from the laser diode to a desired direction and a reflection surface from which the light… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Laser diode package having an optical power monito… — patent drawingLaser diode package having an optical power monito… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Differentially pumped optical amplifer and mopa de…163
2Tunable external cavity laser151
3Multiwavelength actively mode-locked external cavi…149
4Optical measurement instrument for living body sem…99
5Semiconductor laser package with power monitoring …90
6Packaging of high power semiconductor lasers76
7Packaging of high power semiconductor lasers69
8Semiconductor laser package with power monitoring …57

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Motorola

Motorola Inc

Motorola holds the top position with 10 patent records, focused almost exclusively on H01S 5 (semiconductor lasers and stimulated emission), with minimal secondary coverage in H01L 23 and H01S 3. No momentum trend data is available for Motorola in the recent window, suggesting a stable but not actively growing portfolio in this specific topic.

patent records: 10
Challenger · Fujitsu

Fujitsu Ltd

Fujitsu holds 9 patent records and distinguishes itself through a broader secondary emphasis spanning H01S 5, G06K 1 (data recognition), and G11B 7 (optical information storage) — the widest multi-branch spread among top applicants. This breadth indicates Fujitsu’s degradation monitoring work is embedded in optical storage and scanning system contexts, not purely telecommunications.

patent records: 9
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
PSC IncCorning Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.