Book a demo

Laser Horticultural Lighting Patent Snapshot 2026

Laser Horticultural Lighting Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Laser Horticultural Lighting Patent Snapshot in 2026

With only 2 patent families in scope, laser horticultural lighting remains an extremely nascent field dominated entirely by a single filer, KYOCERA SLD LASER INC. Filing activity peaked in 2018 and no subsequent filings are recorded, indicating the field is at a very early and largely dormant stage.

2
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

One applicant holds the entire known portfolio

KYOCERA SLD LASER INC accounts for all 2 patent families in the current corpus, making this one of the most highly concentrated fields observable. No other applicant appears in the ranking.

The top five filers collectively represent 100% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total — though here the hundred-applicant cap is academic, as only one entity is ranked. There is no meaningful tier gap to analyze; the field is effectively a single-player space.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1KYOCERA SLD LASER INC2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

KYOCERA SLD LASER INC’s unchallenged position means any entrant would be building against an established, if small, prior-art foundation anchored in integrated laser lighting and LIDAR systems. The combination of laser illumination and sensing in the representative patents suggests the originating intent may have been dual-use rather than pure horticultural application.

All activity recorded dates to 2018; subsequent years show zero filings, which may partly reflect publication lag for very recent work, but the eight-year gap makes a structural absence the more likely explanation. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A single filing cohort in 2018 and no recorded follow-on activity

The annual trend and technology composition together reveal a field that produced its only recorded output in 2018 and has not attracted measurable follow-on filings. The IPC branch mix reflects integrated laser-and-sensing hardware rather than dedicated plant-growth photobiology.

Annual filing trend

All 2 patent families were filed in 2018; every other year from 2017 to 2026 registers zero. The most recent 18–24 months carry inherent publication lag, but given the unbroken zero-filing run from 2019 onward, lag alone does not explain the absence of activity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2018.02017220180201902020020210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

The corpus spans four IPC branches — F21K (light sources), F21V (lighting device components), G01S (radar, sonar and positioning), and H01S (lasers and stimulated emission) — each with 2 records. The equal distribution across branches indicates the patents are multi-classified, reflecting integrated laser-lighting-plus-LIDAR systems rather than horticulture-specific photon delivery.

Technology compositionF21K · Light sources (non-electric & LED) leads with 2; F21V · Lighting device components 2.F21K · Light sources (no…2F21V · Lighting device c…2G01S · Radar, sonar & po…2H01S · Lasers & stimulat…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20190179016A1Published 2019-06-13

Integrated laser lighting and lidar system

Kyocera Sld LASER, INC.

The present disclosure provides a mobile machine including a laser diode based lighting system having an integrated package holding at least a gallium and nitrogen containing laser diode and a wavelength conversion member. The gallium and nitrogen containing laser diode is configured to emit a first laser beam with a first peak wavelength. The wavelength… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Integrated laser lighting and lidar system — patent drawingIntegrated laser lighting and lidar system — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Integrated laser lighting and lidar system44
2Integrated laser lighting and LIDAR system22

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · KYOCERA SLD LASER INC

KYOCERA SLD LASER INC

KYOCERA SLD LASER INC holds all 2 patent families in the corpus, filed in 2018. Their technology emphasis spans F21K 9 (light sources), F21V 29 (lighting device components), and G01S 17 (radar, sonar and positioning), consistent with integrated laser-lighting-plus-LIDAR architectures. No momentum data is available, as no subsequent filings are recorded beyond the 2018 cohort.

patent families: 2
Challenger · evidence pending

No challenger identified

No second applicant appears in the ranking. The challenger position is vacant, reflecting the field’s nascent state. An entrant filing today would immediately become the second-largest documented holder in this application space.

patent families: 0
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
KYOCERA SLD LASER INCevidence pending+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.