Laser Induced Forward Transfer Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
Laser Induced Forward Transfer Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Claims
46.7% concentration at the top. The top 5 of 68 ranked assignees together hold 99 of the 212 records in scope, a level of concentration that narrows freedom-to-operate fast for new entrants working on dynamic release layer transfer. Publications rose from 10 in 2017 to a peak of 47 in 2019, then eased to 22 by 2021 and 17 by 2024 — a 23% decline over that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months; treat the tail of the chart as a floor, not a slowdown.
- 1STANDARD BIOTOOLS CANADA INC30
- 2FLUIDIGM CANADA INC24
- 3VUEREAL INC22
- 4GHOLAMREZA CHAJI12
- 5SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD11
See the full laser induced forward transfer analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on LIFT patenting
What is laser induced forward transfer used for in patents?
Laser induced forward transfer describes a family of techniques for moving discrete components, most often micro-LEDs or other semiconductor die, from a donor substrate to a target substrate using laser ablation of a dynamic release layer rather than mechanical contact. In the patent record, the dominant application is micro-display and semiconductor assembly, though the technique originated in ablation-transfer imaging and recording, which is still reflected in the most-cited older filings. Most recent filings claim either the transfer mechanism itself or the layer stack (support, release, adhesive) that makes selective transfer possible.
Who are the leading patent holders in laser induced forward transfer?
The ranked field covers 68 assignees, with the leader holding 30 of the 212 records in scope and the top 5 combined holding 99 records, or 46.7% of the field. That concentration falls off sharply after the top few positions: fifth place holds 11 records and tenth place holds 9, meaning most of the remaining 58 assignees hold only a handful of records each. Any competitive clearance exercise should prioritise the leader’s portfolio first given the size of that gap.
Is laser induced forward transfer patent filing increasing or decreasing?
Filing peaked in 2019 at 47 published records and has since eased, with the 2021-2024 window showing a 23% decline from 22 to 17 records. However, publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any such trend will always look lower than the true filing rate turns out to be. The honest reading is that the field has cooled from its 2019 high, not that it has gone quiet.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Laser Induced Forward Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.