Book a demo

Laser Powder Bed Fusion Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Laser Powder Bed Fusion Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/laser-processing-and-applications-laser-powder-bed-fusion-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Laser Powder Bed Fusion Patents: Filing Trends and Where Claims Concentrate

Laser powder bed fusion patent landscape: filing trends across 548 records, assignee concentration, IPC technology mix, receiving offices and key claims — data through 2026.

548
Published Records
23%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+90%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (50 records) → 2024 (95); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 548 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the laser powder bed fusion patent record shows

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) patent activity spans 548 published records from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, covering the melting, monitoring and control processes used to fuse metal powder layer by layer with a laser. The record set draws on claims tagged to powder metallurgy, additive manufacturing and welding/brazing IPC classes, reflecting a technology that sits at the intersection of metal-part manufacturing and precision laser control.

Filing activity accelerated through the early 2020s and the assignee base includes aerospace manufacturers, laser and additive-manufacturing equipment makers, and research institutions, with protection sought across six receiving offices spanning the US, Europe, China, the PCT route, India and Germany.

Records in scope: 548 (2015-01-01 to 2026-08-31)
  1. 1RTX CORP37
  2. 2LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NAT SECURITY LLC33
  3. 3GENERAL ELECTRIC CO20
  4. 4HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP19
  5. 5EDISON WELDING INSTITUTE INC17
  6. 6ARCAM AB15
  7. 7IPG PHOTONICS CORP14
  8. 8RAYTHEON CO13
  9. 9RENISHAW PLC12
  10. 10CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH12
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Laser Processing & Applications: Laser Powder Bed Fusion Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The dataset spans 548 published records from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, giving a filing curve and a technology-class breakdown that together show where laser powder bed fusion protection is concentrated and where it is still thin.

A decade of steady, then accelerating, filing

Annual filings rose from 32 in 2017 to a peak of 95 in 2024, including a 90% increase between 2021 (50) and 2024 (95). The 2025 and 2026 figures, including the 18 recorded so far in 2026, are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months — read the recent tail as a floor, not a peak.

A decade of steady, then accelerating, filing02550751003220172018201920202021202220239520242025182026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Powder metallurgy and additive manufacturing dominate the class mix

Powder metallurgy (B22F) and additive manufacturing (B33Y) each appear on roughly seven in ten of the 548 records, with welding/brazing (B23K) and alloys (C22C) as secondary but substantial classes. Because records can carry several IPC classes at once, these shares sum to well over 100% — the chart is a coverage map, not a pie chart of exclusive categories.

Powder metallurgy and additive manufacturing dominate the class mixB22F · Powder metallurgy39471.9%B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D pri…38369.9%B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing19936.3%B29C · Shaping of plastics14125.7%C22C · Alloys11420.8%G06F · Electric digital data processi…254.6%B28B · Shaping clay & cement products244.4%G01N · Material analysis & testing224.0%Other36165.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 548 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Laser Processing & Applications: Laser Powder Bed Fusion Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Laser Processing & Applications: Laser Powder Bed Fusion Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about laser processing & applications: laser powder bed fusion patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art and a representative recent filing

Representative recent filing
US12397376B22025-08-26

US12397376B2 — Off-axis laser beam measurement for laser powder bed fusion

RTX CORPORATION

Disclosed herein is a laser beam measurement system that includes a beam measurement device, a positioning apparatus, and a control system. The beam measurement device can include an imager and a plurality of optical elements configured to form an optical path to the imager within the beam measurement device. The positioning apparatus is configured to adjust a position of the beam measurement device relative to a build plate of a laser powder bed fusion system. The control system is configured to determine an intended measurement position to observe a laser beam profile of the laser powder bed fusion system, determine a target position of a beam measurement device to align with the intended position.Granted to RTX Corporation, 2025-08-26 — illustrates how beam-measurement claims are currently being drafted around positioning and control logic rather than the imaging sensor itself.

US12397376B2 — patent drawing 1US12397376B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20170120337A1Methods and Systems for Coherent Imaging and Feedback Control for Modification of Materials231
2US20160158889A1Control of solidification in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using a diode laser fiber array183
3US20150071809A1Powder distribution in additive manufacturing of three-dimensional articles178
4US20160167160A1Method for additive manufacturing163
5US20150174695A1Method for additive manufacturing126
6US20170341141A1Method for additive manufacturing66
7US20170348792A1Method for additive manufacturing63
8US20150174822A1Apparatus and method for adjusting and controlling the stacking-up layer manufacturing60
9US20180257141A1Methods for Fabricating Strain Wave Gear Flexsplines Using Metal Additive Manufacturing57
10US9505057B2Powder distribution in additive manufacturing of three-dimensional articles55

Citation counts favour older documents simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on the field's early technical direction, not as a ranking of current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Laser Processing & Applications: Laser Powder Bed Fusion Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the numbers mean for strategy

Four figures from this dataset carry direct implications for where to file, who to watch, and which branches still have room.

Concentration
23.0%
of 548 records held by top 5 filers

Leadership is real but not dominant

The leading filer holds 37 records out of 548, and the top 5 combined hold 23.0% of all records in scope. That leaves more than three-quarters of the field distributed across a long tail of smaller filers, including national labs and equipment makers.

Ranking covers 100 companies by family count
Growth
+90%
filing growth, 2021 to 2024

Momentum is accelerating, not plateauing

Complete-year filings rose from 50 in 2021 to a peak of 95 in 2024. The apparent dip in 2025-2026 reflects publication lag of roughly 18 months rather than declining filing activity.

2024 is the most recent complete year
Technology mix
71.9%
of records carry a B22F powder-metallurgy class

Process control claims dominate the field

Powder metallurgy and additive manufacturing classes each cover over two-thirds of the 548 records, while data-processing and testing classes sit under 5%, marking a clear gap between hardware claims and software/analytics claims.

Classes overlap; shares sum above 100%
Geography
209
records filed via the US receiving office

US leads, but filing is genuinely international

The US receiving office leads with 209 records, followed by EPO, China, WIPO PCT, India and Germany, showing protection strategies that span the major industrial patent offices rather than a single home jurisdiction.

Six receiving offices represented in this dataset
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to laser processing & applications: laser powder bed fusion patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-assignee activity is minimal
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLCSeurat Technologies, Inc.6
Mott CorporationMott Corporation1

Only two co-assignee pairs appear in this dataset, indicating that most laser powder bed fusion patents are filed by a single assignee rather than through joint filing arrangements.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Laser Processing & Applications: Laser Powder Bed Fusion Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The figures above establish the shape of the field. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means drilling into specific claim sets and specific competitors.

Check freedom to operate against the leading filers

With the top 10 ranked filers holding 35.0% of the 548 records in scope, a targeted claim comparison against those portfolios is the fastest way to find out whether a planned design overlaps existing coverage.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Draft into the under-claimed branches

Data-processing, testing and ceramics-adjacent classes each cover under 5% of records, well below the 70%+ carried by core powder and additive-manufacturing classes — a starting point for claim drafting with less prior art to design around.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the filing curve past its 2024 peak

Filings rose 90% from 2021 to 2024; watching how 2025-2026 fill in over the next 18 months of publication lag will show whether that momentum is holding or cooling.

Set up a filing alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Laser Processing & Applications: Laser Powder Bed Fusion Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Laser Processing & Applications: Laser Powder Bed Fusion Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Laser Processing & Applications: Laser Powder Bed Fusion Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole laser processing & applications: laser powder bed fusion patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.