Book a demo

Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/lead-frame-copper-alloy-strip-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Copper Processing
Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip Patents: Who Holds the Claims
  • 387 of 504 records sit in C22C alloy composition claims (76.8%), making bulk alloy chemistry the most heavily occupied filing ground in the field.
  • One leader at 154 filings sits far ahead of a fifth-place holder at 49 and a tenth-place holder at 13 — a steep drop-off rather than a gradual tail.
  • Filings fell 50% from 2021 to 2024 (8 to 4), the only span in the dataset treated as complete once publication lag is accounted for.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
504
Published Records
-50%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
66
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (8 records) with 2024 (4) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Lead frame copper alloy strip sits at the intersection of bulk metallurgy and semiconductor packaging: claims here cover the copper alloy composition itself, the thermomechanical treatment that sets its strength-conductivity balance, and the surface finishing — plating, etching, solder wettability — that lets the strip function as a lead frame. This landscape draws on 504 published records filed between 2015 and 2026, indexed against a search string built around alloy composition and the process attributes (stress relaxation, bendability, solder wettability, etching uniformity, silver spot plating) that distinguish a workable lead frame strip from a generic copper alloy.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity; 2024 is the last year in this dataset treated as complete.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1MITSUBISHI MATERIALS CORP154
  2. 2JX NIPPON MINING & METALS CORP69
  3. 3MITSUBISHI SHINDOH CO LTD68
  4. 4OLIN CORP49
  5. 5WIELAND WERKE AG49
  6. 6KOBE STEEL LTD33
  7. 7FURUKAWA ELECTRIC CO LTD30
  8. 8GBC METALS LLC29
  9. 9TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC17
  10. 10NINGBO POWERWAY ALLOY MATERIAL CO LTD13
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 504-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing activity, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 28 in 2018, then eased. The only span treated as complete — 2021 to 2024 — shows filings falling from 8 to 4, a 50% decline; years beyond 2024 are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates.

Filing activity, 2017-20260815233042017282018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

C22C (alloys) covers 76.8% of the 504 records and C22F (non-ferrous metal treatment) covers 56.7%, confirming that most claims target alloy composition and its heat-treatment history rather than downstream use. H01B (conductors), H01L (semiconductor devices) and H01R (connectors) mark the application layer, each present in under half of records; C25D (electroplating), H10W and B21B (rolling) are the smallest and most specific classes, each under 11% of records.

IPC subclass distributionC22C · Alloys38776.8%C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment28656.7%H01B · Cables, conductors & insulators20340.3%H01L · Semiconductor devices9819.4%H01R · Connectors & current collectors8617.1%C25D · Electroplating & electroforming5310.5%H10W418.1%B21B · Metal rolling326.3%Other11823.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 504 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about lead frame copper alloy strip and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative Record
US20170283910A12017-10-05

Conductive material for connection parts which has excellent minute slide wear resistance (US20170283910A1)

KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOBE SEIKO SHO (KOBE STEEL

A conductive material for connection parts includes a matrix, a Cu-Sn alloy covering layer with a Cu content of 20 to 70 at % and average thickness of 0.2 to 3.0 micrometres, and a Sn covering layer averaging 0.05 to 5.0 micrometres. The matrix is a copper alloy strip containing specified Cr and Zr, or specified Fe and P, or a Cu-Zn alloy strip with specified Zn content, with the Cu-Sn and Sn layers formed in that order on the matrix surface.Filed by Kobe Steel, published 2017-10-05.

US20170283910A1 — patent drawing 1US20170283910A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080224161A1Semiconductor Light Emitting Device and Multiple Lead Frame for Semiconductor Light Emitting Device89
2US20040079456A1Copper alloy containing cobalt, nickel and silicon85
3US6471792B1Stress relaxation resistant brass77
4US20080257581A1Terminal for engaging type connector58
5US7182823B2Copper alloy containing cobalt, nickel and silicon43
6WO2004005560A2Copper alloy containing cobalt, nickel, and silicon39
7US6132528AIron modified tin brass36
8US20080230269A1Crimp contact for an aluminum stranded wire, and cable end structure of an aluminum stranded wire having the …32
9US20060049493A1Lead frame and method of manufacturing the same30
10US5486244AProcess for improving the bend formability of copper alloys29

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later work, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Reading the composition and trend data together points to where claim space is full, where it is thinning, and where recent activity has gone quiet.

Composition
76.8% in C22C
of 504 records

Alloy composition claims dominate

More than three in four records touch C22C, meaning most viable compositional variations around copper-cobalt-nickel-silicon, copper-zirconium-chromium and similar systems are already staked out in some form. New entrants competing on bulk chemistry alone are filing into dense prior art.

Check C22C before drafting a composition claim.
Process
56.7% in C22F
of 504 records

Heat treatment is the second-most claimed layer

Non-ferrous metal treatment claims — ageing, annealing, rolling schedules that set the strength-conductivity balance — appear in over half of records, running close behind composition. A composition claim paired with a distinct treatment sequence is a more defensible combination than either alone.

Treatment sequences are a common companion claim, not a gap.
Momentum
-50% (2021→2024)
leader-level filings

Filing pace has cooled from a 2018 peak

Activity peaked at 28 filings in 2018 and the last complete span, 2021 to 2024, shows a 50% decline. Recent-year momentum figures for the field's most active assignees show zero filings in the latest year across several of them — read cautiously given publication lag, but consistent with a maturing rather than expanding filing base.

Treat 2025-2026 figures as incomplete, not as a stop in activity.
Surface layer
10.5% in C25D
of 504 records

Plating and finishing claims are comparatively thin

Electroplating and electroforming claims — the layer that governs solder wettability, silver spot plating and etching uniformity called out in the search itself — sit at just over one in ten records, far below the alloy and treatment layers.

Surface-finish claims see less crowding than the bulk alloy.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to lead frame copper alloy strip, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is thinning

The ranked list covers 66 companies, counted in records. It is not a top-50 or top-100 cut — it is the full ranking the dataset returns — and the gap between its leader and its middle tier is steep.

Leader
154 records
leader vs. 49 at fifth place

One filer sits well ahead of the field

The leading assignee holds 154 records against 49 at fifth place and 13 at tenth — a much steeper drop than a gradually declining tail, indicating one company has built a substantially larger portfolio than any single competitor.

Expect the leader's claims to anchor freedom-to-operate review.
Co-filing
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair: 59 shared records

Filing partnerships cluster around a few firms

Ten co-assignee pairings appear in the dataset, with the strongest pair sharing 59 records and two further pairs sharing 32 and 13. This points to sustained joint development between specific corporate pairs rather than one-off collaborations.

Co-filing patterns can flag licensing or joint-venture structures worth checking before approaching a target.
Geography
138 US, 129 EPO filings
of receiving offices tracked

Filing activity concentrates in the US and Europe

The United States (138) and the European Patent Office (129) receive the largest share of filings tracked here, ahead of Japan (64), Germany (24), Austria (22) and the WIPO PCT route (19), suggesting these are the jurisdictions where enforcement risk is highest for new entrants.

Clear US and EPO filings first when scoping freedom to operate.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with comparatively little filed claim density relative to the core alloy and treatment layers.
Silver spot plating uniformityEtching-rate control across strip widthCu-Sn interlayer thickness tuningMinute slide wear resistance coatingsStress relaxation at elevated service temperature
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Mitsubishi Materials Corporation0
Olin Corporation0
Mitsubishi Shindoh Co., Ltd.0
JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation0
Wieland-Werke AG0
Kobe Steel, Ltd.0
Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.0
Texas Instruments Incorporated0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to where claim space is dense and where it has room; the next step is applying that to a specific composition or process design.

Map a candidate composition against C22C prior art

Run a proposed alloy composition against the C22C and C22F claim set before drafting, given how densely both classes are already occupied.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Check freedom to operate in the US and EPO

Concentrate initial clearance work on the United States and EPO filings, the two largest receiving offices in this dataset, before extending to Japan or Germany.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Review the leader's portfolio structure

Examine how the leading assignee's 154 records are split across composition, treatment and surface-finish claims to understand where its strongest blocking positions sit.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on lead frame copper alloy strip patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Lead Frame Copper Alloy Strip in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole lead frame copper alloy strip corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.