https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/lead-frames-and-power-package-substrates-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Semiconductor Packaging
Lead Frame and Power Package Substrate Patents: Who Files, What They Claim
  • Filing has cooled since its 2017 peak. 122 records that year against 68 at the 2022 midpoint, with no sign of a second wave through the most recent full year.
  • Assignee momentum has gone flat across the board. Every major filer tracked in recent-year momentum — including Mitsubishi Electric, Texas Instruments, Hitachi, Toshiba, Panasonic and Micron — shows zero filings in the latest year.
  • H01L dominates, but adjacent classes are thin. 4,013 of 4,113 records sit in H01L, while electroplating (C25D, 112) and conductor/insulator claims (H01B, 77) barely register.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
4,113
Published Records
18%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-35%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (92 records) with 2024 (60) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,113 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Lead frames and power package substrates sit at the mechanical and thermal core of semiconductor packaging: the etched metal that carries current and heat away from a die, and the direct-bond-copper (DBC) substrates that do the same job in power modules. This dataset pulls records where the title or abstract names a lead frame, DBC substrate or power package substrate, and where claims touch thermal conductivity, solderability, etched lead frame geometry, warpage or creepage clearance — the properties that actually separate a working power package from a failed one.

The corpus spans 4,113 published families filed against IPC classes H01L23, C04B37 and H01L21 between 2015 and mid-2026. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend understate real activity — treat the tail as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP222
  2. 2TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC146
  3. 3KK TOSHIBA131
  4. 4HITACHI LTD122
  5. 5MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC113
  6. 6PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP106
  7. 7SEMICON COMPONENTS IND LLC89
  8. 8FURUKAWA ELECTRIC CO LTD87
  9. 9SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD78
  10. 10HITACHI CABLE LTD72
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frames and Power Package Substrates covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 4,113-family corpus: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A peak in 2017, then a plateau

Filings ran at 122 in 2017, the high point of the window tracked here, and had fallen to 68 by the 2022 midpoint — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than a growth curve. Nothing in the later years suggests a rebound, though the most recent year is partial and still filling in.

A peak in 2017, then a plateau0387511315012220172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H01L carries the field; adjacent classes are marginal

H01L (semiconductor devices) accounts for 4,013 of 4,113 records — effectively the entire corpus — with H10W (2,040) and H05K printed-circuit assemblies (298) as secondary clusters. C22C alloys (225), C09J adhesives (130), C25D electroplating (112) and H01B conductors (77) each cover a real but narrow slice, which is where claim density is lowest relative to the core.

H01L carries the field; adjacent classes are marginalH01L · Semiconductor devices4,01397.6%H10W2,04049.6%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies2987.2%H10P2626.4%C22C · Alloys2255.5%C09J · Adhesives1303.2%C25D · Electroplating & electroforming1122.7%H01B · Cables, conductors & insulators771.9%Other1,03925.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 4,113 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frames and Power Package Substrates covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Lead Frames and Power Package Substrates with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about lead frames and power package substrates and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Foundational Filings

The patents everyone else cites

Representative Filing
US5945259A1999-08-31

US5945259A — Method for lead frame etching

SAMSUNG AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES, LTD.

Filed by Samsung Aerospace Industries and granted in 1999, this patent describes a two-stage photoresist masking process for etching a lead frame: a first pattern defines the actual etch region and a second, wider pattern acts as a buffer, preventing the sharp-edged burrs that form at the lateral ends of etched lead frame material during conventional single-mask etching.Grant date 1999-08-31. One of the earliest detailed etch-geometry solutions in the corpus, and a reference point for how later filings describe edge-quality control.

US5945259A — patent drawing 1US5945259A — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4862245APackage semiconductor chip684
2US6229200B1Saw-singulated leadless plastic chip carrier585
3US6242281B1Saw-singulated leadless plastic chip carrier416
4US4707724ASemiconductor device and method of manufacturing thereof354
5US5221642ALead-on-chip integrated circuit fabrication method351
6US5604376APaddleless molded plastic semiconductor chip package342
7US6197615B1Method of producing lead frame having uneven surfaces335
8US5859471ASemiconductor device having tab tape lead frame with reinforced outer leads325
9US5406124AInsulating adhesive tape, and lead frame and semiconductor device employing the tape324
10US5744827AThree dimensional stack package device having exposed coupling lead portions and vertical interconnection ele…319

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this searched set — read them as markers of influence on the field's vocabulary, not as current-relevance rankings.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frames and Power Package Substrates covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Reading the Data

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting claims or scoping freedom-to-operate in this space.

Filing Volume
122 → 68 → 0
2017 peak, 2022 midpoint, latest year

The technology is occupied, not accelerating

A 2017 peak followed by a decline to the 2022 midpoint, with the latest tracked year showing no filings from any of the major assignees, points to a field where the core claim space filled up early rather than one still being actively staked out. New filings now compete against a decade of prior art on the same etch and substrate geometries.

Interpretation: dense filing history, not current momentum.
Technology Mix
4,013 / 4,113
records in H01L

Almost everything sits in one IPC subclass

H01L's near-total share means the differentiating claims in this field are mostly fought inside semiconductor-device classification itself, not in adjacent material or process classes. C22C alloys, C09J adhesives and C25D electroplating are present but small, which is where narrower, less-contested claim scope tends to survive examination.

Interpretation: look outside H01L for open claim territory.
Filing Geography
1,740 US / 1,211 JP
leading receiving offices

Filing is concentrated in the US and Japan

The United States and Japan together account for the large majority of receiving-office activity, with Europe, South Korea, China and WIPO trailing well behind. A filing strategy built only around US and Japanese offices will match where the existing art sits, but it also means those two offices carry the thickest prior-art search burden.

Interpretation: US and Japan are where prior art is deepest, not necessarily where gaps remain.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to lead frames and power package substrates, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frames and Power Package Substrates covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignee Landscape

Who holds the claims, and where their filing has gone quiet

The recent-year momentum data is unusually consistent: every tracked major assignee — spanning Japanese, Korean and US filers — shows zero filings in the latest year, including a documented -100% year-over-year drop for one filer. That is not a sign the field is dead, since publication lag means the most recent year is always undercounted, but it does mean no single assignee is currently expanding claim coverage faster than the others.

Momentum
0 in latest year
across all tracked major assignees

No current leader by recent filings

Mitsubishi Electric, Texas Instruments, Hitachi, Toshiba, Panasonic and Micron all show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Combined with publication lag, this reads as a pause in disclosed activity rather than confirmed exit from the space.

Watch for filings to resurface as the lag window closes.
Corporate Structure
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair filed together 11 times

Filings cluster inside corporate families

The strongest co-assignee pairing links a parent electronics group with its semiconductor-equipment subsidiary, filed together 11 times; a second pairing between a major conglomerate and its electronic-components arm appears 10 times. This is internal IP structuring, not cross-company collaboration.

Useful for tracing which subsidiary actually holds enforceable rights.
Historic Depth
684 citations
on the most-cited record

Foundational patents are decades old

The most-cited record in the corpus dates back to early chip-packaging methods, well before the 2015 filing window begins. Current filers are building on, and designing around, claim language that has been in force and cited for a long time.

Older art still defines the vocabulary examiners expect.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before you draft
Narrower IPC classes with real but thin coverage relative to the H01L core.
Etched lead frame burr/edge controlDBC substrate creepage clearance designElectroplated lead frame finishes (C25D)Adhesive die-attach for power substrates (C09J)Alloy composition for high-conductivity frames (C22C)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation0
Texas Instruments Incorporated0-100%
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Toshiba Corporation0
Panasonic Corporation (Japan)0
Micron Technology, Inc.0
Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.0
Hitachi Cable, Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frames and Power Package Substrates covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to specific next questions depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for filing room.

Check the thin IPC classes first

C25D, C09J, H01B and C22C carry real claims but a fraction of H01L's volume — a faster path to a defensible position than competing directly in the core class.

Explore white space in Eureka

Verify current assignee activity beyond the lag window

Zero recent filings from major assignees may reflect publication lag rather than withdrawal; a live search closes that 18-month gap.

Run a live assignee search

Trace subsidiary filing rights

Co-assignee pairs show IP held jointly across parent and subsidiary entities — worth confirming before assuming a single owner controls a family.

Map assignee structures in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frames and Power Package Substrates covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Common Questions

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lead Frames and Power Package Substrates covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Lead Frames and Power Package Substrates in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole lead frames and power package substrates corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.