Li-Ion Capacitor Manufacturing Patent Snapshot 2026
Li-Ion Capacitor Manufacturing is a concentrated, research-institution-led field with 28 patent families in scope, where the top five filers account for 80% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output. Annual filings peaked in 2023 and have since eased, signaling a field entering a post-peak phase with the United States as the dominant filing jurisdiction.
Florida State University leads a highly concentrated, research-driven field
Florida State University Research Foundation leads the applicant ranking with 7 patent families, followed by General Capacitor LLC with 5 and SPEL Technologies with 4. The top five filers collectively are visible in the field, accounting for 80% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total — a level of concentration more typical of early-stage or niche technology areas.
The tier gap between the leader and the rest is pronounced: the top three applicants hold the overwhelming majority of activity, while six additional applicants each hold only a single patent family. This steep drop-off indicates limited mid-tier competition and suggests that a small number of organizations have shaped most of the technical agenda.
| # | Applicant | Patent families | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida State University Research Foundation | 7 | |
| 2 | General Capacitor LLC | 5 | |
| 3 | SPEL Technologies Pte Ltd | 4 | |
| 4 | GODI India Private Limited | 3 | |
| 5 | IPR Holding AS | 1 | |
| 6 | Fundacion Centro de Investigacion Cooperativa de Energias Alternativas | 1 | |
| 7 | Hyundai Motor Company | 1 | |
| 8 | HARBIN UNIV OF SCI & TECH | 1 | |
| 9 | Tianjin University | 1 | |
| 10 | The Penn State Research Foundation | 1 |
The presence of universities and research foundations (Florida State, Penn State, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin University) as core filers — alongside specialist firms — implies that much of the foundational IP originates from academic labs, which may create licensing opportunities but also means commercial manufacturing know-how remains relatively under-protected.
Filings from the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and will likely appear higher once records are fully published; interpret the recent-period counts as minimums rather than final figures. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
A 2023 filing peak followed by easing volume; capacitor-cell integration is emerging
The two charts together show a field that accelerated through 2020–2023 before pulling back, with the technology mix concentrated in capacitor design but showing tentative diversification into battery-cell integration and surface engineering.
Annual filing trend
Annual filings grew from 2 families in 2017 to a peak of 7 in 2023, then dropped to 1 in 2024 and 2 in 2025. The 2024–2025 figures will increase as pending applications publish; the post-2023 figures should not yet be read as a confirmed sharp decline. The multi-window growth rate is negative (-31%), consistent with the field having passed its activity peak.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
H01G (Capacitors) is the overwhelmingly visible IPC class, reflecting the core electrochemical double-layer and hybrid capacitor architecture work. H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells) represents a secondary cluster, signaling work on electrode materials and cell integration that bridges capacitor and battery functionality. C23C (Coating and surface deposition) accounts for only a single record — making it the most sparsely covered adjacent branch.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
Method of negative electrode pre-lithiation for li…
The present invention is directed to a method for pre-lithiation of negative electrodes during lithium loaded electrode manufacturing for use in lithium-ion capacitors. There is provided a system and method of manufacture of LIC electrodes using thin lithium film having holes therein, and in particular, to the process of manufacturing lithium loaded… (excerpt from the patent abstract)


| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Method of negative electrode pre-lithiation for li… | 52 |
| 2 | 采用预锂化硬炭负极的锂离子电容器的制备方法 | 32 |
| 3 | Hybrid lithium-ion battery-capacitor (h-LIBC) ener… | 17 |
| 4 | Lithium-ion capacitor | 10 |
| 5 | Novel ultra-thin lithium-ion capacitor with ultra-… | 8 |
| 6 | Method of negative electrode pre-lithiation for li… | 6 |
| 7 | Ultra-thin lithium-ion capacitor with ultra-high p… | 4 |
| 8 | Method for pre-lithiating a lithium-ion capacitor | 3 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set
The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.
Florida State University Research Foundation
The largest holder with 7 patent families, concentrated entirely in H01G 11 (Capacitors). As the academic anchor of the General Capacitor LLC co-filing relationship (5 joint families), Florida State’s portfolio represents the primary foundational IP block in the field. Momentum data does not flag a recent surge, consistent with a maturing academic program rather than an accelerating commercial push.
families: 7General Capacitor LLC
The leading commercial applicant with 5 patent families, all in H01G 11 (Capacitors), and the primary industrial co-filer with Florida State University Research Foundation. General Capacitor’s focused, single-class portfolio suggests a deliberate manufacturing and device IP strategy rather than broad technology hedging. New entrants from GODI India (3 recent families, new entrant) and Nanocaps AS (2 recent families, new entrant) represent the most credible near-term challengers.
families: 5Frequently asked questions
The corpus contains 28 patent families in scope across all jurisdictions analyzed.
Florida State University Research Foundation leads with 7 patent families, followed by General Capacitor LLC with 5 and SPEL Technologies with 4.
Annual filings peaked in 2023 at 7 families and have eased since, placing the field in a post-peak lifecycle stage. The multi-year window growth rate is -31%. Figures for 2024–2025 remain subject to publication lag and will likely revise upward.
The United States is the visible jurisdiction with 17 patent records, followed by India with 5 and WIPO (PCT) with 3. Coverage in China, Europe (EPO), and Japan is limited to 1–2 records each.
C23C (Coating and surface deposition) has only 1 patent record — 3% of the corpus — making it the most sparsely covered adjacent branch. It is relevant to electrode and current-collector surface engineering in capacitor manufacturing.
Yes. The most active co-filing relationship is between General Capacitor LLC and Florida State University Research Foundation, with 5 jointly filed patent families. A secondary collaboration exists between Kia Corporation and Hyundai Motor Company, with 1 joint family, reflecting automotive-sector interest in the technology.
Built on Patsnap Open Platform
This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.