Book a demo

Li-Ion Electrode Coating Patent Landscape 2026

Li-Ion Electrode Coating Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Li-Ion Electrode Coating Patent Landscape in 2026

The li-ion electrode coating field spans 953 patent families and is in a mature, plateau phase with annual volume easing since its 2021 peak. GRST International leads with 56 patent families, but the top five filers hold only 19% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signaling a moderately fragmented competitive field with meaningful room for challengers.

953
Patent families in scope
19%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-3%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

GRST International leads a moderately fragmented field

GRST International leads the ranking with 56 patent families, followed by the Regents of the University of California at 48 and Arkema France at 40. The top five filers collectively hold 19% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating no single actor has locked up the space.

The tier gap between the leader (56 families) and the fifth-ranked BYD (29 families) is meaningful but not dominant. Academic and public-research institutions — including the University of California, Tsinghua University, and CNRS — sit alongside commercial players in the top ten, reflecting the field’s continued reliance on upstream science.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1GRST International Ltd56
2Regents of the University of California48
3Arkema France SA40
4I-TEN32
5BYD Co Ltd29
6A123 Systems LLC28
7Sila Nanotechnologies Inc25
8Ningde Amperex Technology Ltd (CATL)22
9Tsinghua University21
10Honeycomb Battery Co19
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)19
12BTR New Material Group Co Ltd19
13Arakawa Chemical Industries Ltd17
14Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Ltd17
15French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)17
16Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co Ltd17
17Robert Bosch GmbH16
18Sicona Battery Technologies Pty Ltd16
19Valence Technology Inc16
20Nissan Motor Co Ltd15
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

GRST International’s position at the top, combined with its deep focus on electrode and cell design (H01M4, H01M10), suggests a company systematically building a manufacturing-oriented IP moat. Meanwhile, the presence of specialty chemical firms such as Arkema France and material suppliers such as BTR New Material signals that coating chemistry remains an active front.

Filing counts for 20242026 are subject to publication lag and will rise as pending applications publish; treat the apparent recent softening as an artifact of that lag, not confirmed market cooling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity plateaued near 2021 peak; electrochemistry dominates the technology mix

The annual filing trend and the IPC technology composition together reveal a maturing, electrochemistry-centric field where adjacent chemistry and process branches remain thinly populated.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings built from 99 families in 2017 to a peak plateau around 2020–2021 (136–137 families), then eased to 128 in 2022 and 134 in 2023. The apparent drops in 2024–2026 reflect publication lag and should not be read as a structural decline. The multi-year trend from 2017 to the plateau represents meaningful growth in field activity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 137 in 2021.99201763201810320191362020137202113420221282023104202442202572026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) dominates the IPC mix by a wide margin, reflecting that most innovation is claimed at the cell level. Non-metallic inorganic compounds (C01B) and metal compounds (C01G) are the next largest classes, pointing to active materials chemistry as the second front. Process-oriented branches — coating and surface deposition (C23C), addition polymers (C08F), nanotechnology (B82Y), and chemical processes (B01J) — each hold small but distinct shares, indicating specialization opportunities.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 1,623; C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds 141.H01M · Batteries, cells …1,623C01B · Non-metallic elem…141C01G · Compounds of othe…112B01J · Chemical/physical…50B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…43C08F · Addition polymers…34C23C · Coating & surface…34H01G · Capacitors28↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20210210743A1Published 2021-07-08

Preparation method and product of lithium-ion batt…

Huazhong University Of Science And Technology

A preparation method of a lithium-ion battery electrode sheet includes: adding a powdered thermal decomposition additive, an active material, a binder, and a conductive agent into a solvent according to a predetermined ratio and a specific order, performing continuous stirring until the solvent is uniformly mixed, obtaining an electrode slurry, coating the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Preparation method and product of lithium-ion batt… — patent drawingPreparation method and product of lithium-ion batt… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Graphene foam-protected anode active materials for…360
2多位掺杂型磷酸铁锂正极材料制备方法及其应用159
3Lithium ion electrochemical cell106
4复合钛酸锂电极材料及其制备方法100
5锂离子电池正极材料氧化镍钴锰锂及其制备方法99
6Metal sulfide composite materials for batteries96
7Multi-phase, silicon-containing electrode for a li…94
8锂离子电池正极材料高密度球形镍钴锰酸锂的制备方法91

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural reads — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — frame where entry barriers are high, where partnerships are forming, and where filing activity is geographically anchored.

Maturity

Plateau maturity with annual volume easing from the 2021 peak

The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Mature, with annual filings having plateaued near their peak. Volume rose from 99 families in 2017 to a 2021 apex of 137, then eased gradually. For R&D teams, this signals that broad foundational claims are largely staked; value now comes from incremental differentiation in specific coating chemistries, process parameters, or novel active-material combinations.

Lifecycle: Mature
Concentration

Moderate fragmentation — top five hold 19% of the hundred largest filers’ share

No single applicant commands a dominant share: the gap between the leader (56 patent families) and the fifth-ranked filer (29 families) is real but not prohibitive. Academic institutions occupy three of the top eleven slots, suggesting that licensing or university spin-out routes remain viable entry paths alongside organic R&D. A challenger entering with a differentiated chemistry or process claim can realistically reach the second tier.

Concentration: Moderate
Collaboration

Two active co-filing pairs identified: Arkema–CNRS and Sila–Georgia Tech

The most active co-filing partnership is Arkema France with CNRS (4 joint families), combining a specialty fluoropolymer manufacturer with France’s national research institution — a logical pairing for binder and coating chemistry. The second pair, Sila Nanotechnologies with Georgia Tech Research Corporation (3 joint families), links a silicon-anode startup with a leading materials engineering university. Both collaborations suggest that industry–academia structures are the predominant co-development model in this space.

Collaboration: Active pairs
Geography

United States leads filings; Europe and China are substantial secondary offices

The United States is the lead filing jurisdiction, followed by Europe (EPO) and China. WIPO PCT filings are also meaningful, indicating applicants pursuing broad international coverage. India, Canada, and Australia represent smaller but present secondary markets. South Korea and Japan — home to major battery manufacturers — show comparatively modest filing counts at the patent-record level, which may reflect strategic choices to file domestically under national routes not captured here or a gap in local R&D investment in coating specifically.

Geography: US-led, global spread
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Arkema France SAFrench National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)4
Sila Nanotechnologies IncGeorgia Tech Research Corporation3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant rankings, lifecycle classification, collaboration pairs, and jurisdiction distribution in the evidence set.Explore insights →
Leaders

GRST International and the University of California lead; Arkema and Sila are the most active climbers

The top two filers are a Hong Kong-based electrode manufacturer and a major US public university, reflecting the dual commercial-academic nature of this landscape. Among active movers, Arkema France shows steady growth while Sila Nanotechnologies is emerging rapidly.

Leader · GRST International

GRST International

GRST International leads with 56 patent families, concentrated heavily in electrode design and cell-level claims (H01M4, H01M10) with a secondary focus on drying processes (F26B5), pointing to a manufacturing-process-oriented IP strategy. Momentum data for GRST is not included in the applicant momentum evidence set, so near-term trajectory is evidence pending.

families: 56
Challenger · Arkema France

Arkema France

Arkema France ranks third with 40 patent families, focused on electrode chemistry (H01M4, H01M10) and fluoropolymer addition chemistry (C08F214) — consistent with its role as a leading PVDF binder supplier. Its recent-period momentum shows a +7% trend versus the prior window, making it the only established top-three filer posting positive near-term growth. Its active co-filing with CNRS (4 joint families) further reinforces a chemistry-driven differentiation path.

families: 40
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore the complete ranked list of filers, their technology focus areas, and momentum trends across the full evidence set.
Sila Nanotechnologies IncBYD Co Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Regents of the University of California10▲ new entrant
Arkema France SA15▲ +7%
BYD Co Ltd3▲ new entrant
I-TEN8▼ -50%
A123 Systems LLC10▲ new entrant
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd (CATL)7▼ -53%
Sila Nanotechnologies Inc14▲ new entrant
Applied Materials Inc6▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards are based on applicant ranking by patent families; trajectory from applicant momentum data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in coating processes, nanotechnology, and catalysis

Relative to the dominant H01M electrochemistry core, several adjacent IPC branches are thinly populated. These observations point to areas where differentiated IP could be established, though each carries its own technical and commercial uncertainties.

B82Y · Nanotechnology applications

With 43 patent records, nanotechnology applications represent roughly 2% of the technology mix — sparse given the well-documented performance benefits of nanostructured coatings for rate capability and cycle life. The branch sits adjacent to active materials work already underway (C01B, C01G) and could serve as an entry point for players with expertise in nano-coating deposition or nanoparticle surface treatment. Sila Nanotechnologies’ secondary use of C23C16 hints at this direction, but broad nanotechnology-framed claims remain limited.

Search this in Eureka →

C23C · Coating & surface deposition

C23C (coating and surface deposition) accounts for only 34 patent records despite being the most directly process-relevant IPC class for electrode coating manufacture. Thin-film, atomic-layer deposition (ALD), and physical vapor deposition routes for electrode surface modification are technically feasible and commercially relevant for solid-state and high-voltage applications, yet IP here is sparse. An entrant with process engineering depth — particularly in ALD or CVD for coating uniformity at scale — would face a relatively open field in this branch.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level analysis identifying low-density IPC zones with plausible technical relevance to li-ion electrode coating.
B01J · Chemical/physical processes & catalysisC08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch sparsity is measured by patent-record count relative to the dominant H01M class; low count alone does not confirm commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across IPC branches

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 50 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsC01B 32 · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compoundsH01M 2 · Batteries, cells & fuel cells
GRST International LtdStrong · 59Moderate · 26Emerging · 10AbsentEmerging · 6
Regents of the University of CaliforniaStrong · 40Strong · 33AbsentAbsentAbsent
Arkema France SAStrong · 39Strong · 28AbsentAbsentAbsent
I-TENStrong · 30Strong · 28Moderate · 9AbsentAbsent
Applied Materials IncStrong · 25Strong · 18Moderate · 10AbsentModerate · 9
BYD Co LtdStrong · 32Strong · 24AbsentAbsentAbsent
A123 Systems LLCStrong · 28Strong · 27AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own electrode coating landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.