Book a demo

LiDAR Optical Coating Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

LiDAR Optical Coating Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/lidar-system-optical-coating-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Photonics & Optics
LiDAR System Optical Coating Patents: Filing Trends and Leading Claim Holders
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 47 families, then flattened through 2022 and has not returned to that level — the coating layer is not accelerating the way LiDAR system claims overall are.
  • G01S dominates at 251 of 252 records, meaning almost every coating claim is written as part of a ranging-system application, not filed as a standalone optics patent.
  • The most-cited record has 1,006 citations, an order of magnitude above the next-ranked document — a strong signal that one component-level claim is treated as foundational prior art across the field.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
252
Published Records
51%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-30%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families where LiDAR or laser-scanner claims intersect with anti-reflection coatings, narrow bandpass filters, protective optical coatings or beam-splitter coatings, filtered to the optics-relevant IPC classes G02B1/11, G02B5/28 and G01S7/481. It covers publications from 2015 through mid-2026, with 252 patent families in total.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent filing year in any trend line understates real activity — 2026 in particular should be read as incomplete, not as a genuine drop-off.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1MICROVISION INC63
  2. 2ROCKLEY PHOTONICS LTD20
  3. 3WAYMO LLC17
  4. 4SEYOND INC15
  5. 5LUMINAR LLC14
  6. 6BARAJA PTY LTD9
  7. 7KYOCERA SLD LASER INC8
  8. 8HRL LAB7
  9. 9XENOMATIX NV5
  10. 10BRIDGER PHOTONICS INC5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Optical Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 252 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which adjacent technical fields the coating claims are being filed alongside.

A 2020 peak that has not been retested

Filings rose from 11 in 2017 to a peak of 47 in 2020, then eased to 38 by the 2022 midpoint — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth. Read the final year or two as undercounted due to publication lag.

A 2020 peak that has not been retested013253850112017201820194720202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in ranging systems, thin in dedicated optics

G01S (radar, sonar & positioning) appears in 251 of 252 records, confirming that coating claims here are almost always drafted inside a system-level LiDAR filing. G02B (optical elements) appears in only 55, and H01S (lasers), G01C (navigation), G05D (control) and the lighting-related classes (F21K, F21V, G01J) each register in single digits to low tens — evidence that the coating itself is rarely the sole inventive focus of the application.

Concentrated in ranging systems, thin in dedicated opticsG01S · Radar, sonar & positioning25199.6%G02B · Optical elements & systems5521.8%H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission2911.5%G01C · Distance, navigation & gyrosco…197.5%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…104.0%F21K · Light sources (non-electric & …83.2%F21V · Lighting device components83.2%G01J · Radiation & light measurement72.8%Other4919.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 252 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Optical Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on LiDAR System Optical Coating with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about lidar system optical coating and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative filing
US20230034553A12023-02-02

US20230034553A1 — Light receiving module and lidar apparatus comprising the same (HL KLEMOVE CORP., 2023-02-02)

HL KLEMOVE CORP.

Discloses a light receiving module and LiDAR apparatus in which a reflective mirror sits between the receiving lens and detector. The mirror body has a reflective layer on the surface facing the incoming light, positioned to selectively reflect a portion of the light received by the lens before it reaches the detector.The claim scope centres on the mirror's reflective-layer placement relative to the receiving lens and detector, not on the coating chemistry itself.

US20230034553A1 — patent drawing 1US20230034553A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited patent families in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200284883A1Component for a lidar sensor system, lidar sensor system, lidar sensor device, method for a lidar sensor syst…1,006
2US10222474B1Lidar systems including a gallium and nitrogen containing laser light source179
3US20190107607A1Interlaced scan patterns for lidar system153
4US20190107606A1Lidar system with adjustable pulse period96
5US20190257924A1Receive path for lidar system93
6US11726184B2Component for a LIDAR sensor system, LIDAR sensor system, LIDAR sensor device, method for a LIDAR sensor syst…92
7US10802120B1Coherent pulsed lidar system83
8US20200076152A1Lidar system operating at 1200-1400 nm81
9WO2019165289A1Receive path for lidar system76
10US10401480B1Lidar receiver with multiple detectors for range-ambiguity mitigation74

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate references — treat this as a measure of influence within the searched corpus, not of present-day importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Optical Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the trend and citation data are read together.

Filing momentum
47 → 38
peak year (2020) vs. 2022

Growth has stalled, not accelerated

After climbing from 11 filings in 2017 to a 2020 peak of 47, volume eased rather than compounded. That flat trajectory suggests the core coating approaches were staked out early in this cycle, and later entrants are filing incremental variants rather than opening new ground.

Filing trend, 2017–2022
Citation concentration
1,006 citations
top-cited record vs. 179 for #2

One component claim anchors the field

The leading record's citation count is more than five times the second-ranked document. Anything drafted around lidar sensor-system components should be checked against it first, since it functions as a de facto reference point for examiners and competitors alike.

Most-cited records table
Classification pattern
251 of 252
records also classed under G01S

Coating claims travel inside system filings

Only 55 records carry a G02B optics classification, versus 251 under G01S. Drafting a coating claim as part of a full ranging-system application, rather than as a freestanding optics filing, is the dominant pattern in this corpus.

IPC composition
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to lidar system optical coating, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Optical Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity has cooled

Recent-year momentum across the named assignees in this dataset shows a common pattern for a maturing claim space: established filers pulling back rather than pushing further.

Momentum check
0 filings
latest year, multiple named assignees

Several leading filers show no latest-year activity

A number of the assignees with the deepest filing history in this corpus, including Luminar entities, Rockley Photonics, Waymo and Baraja, show zero filings in the most recent year, with some recording a full year-on-year drop. That is consistent with publication lag but also with a claim space where the obvious coating configurations have already been filed.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Geographic filing
158 US filings
of receiving-office totals

US filing dominates, Europe and PCT trail

The United States accounts for 158 of the receiving-office filings tracked here, against 36 at the EPO and 31 through WIPO/PCT. Filing a coating claim without a corresponding US application would be unusual for this field given where the bulk of protection currently sits.

Receiving offices
Concentration signal
252 families
total tracked

A long tail beneath the named leaders

With 252 total families and a small set of assignees showing repeat, multi-year filing, the rest of the corpus is made up of single or few-filing entrants. That structure — a handful of committed filers plus many one-off applicants — is typical of a component technology attached to a fast-moving system market.

Assignee ranking
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before drafting
These branches show thin representation relative to the core anti-reflection and bandpass-filter claims — worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming the space is open.
Multi-layer beam-splitter durability coatingsCoating claims tied to G01J radiation measurementAnti-reflection layers for gallium-nitride laser sourcesProtective coatings for rotating/scanning opticsBandpass filter stacks for F21K non-electric light sources
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Luminar LLC0
Luminar Technologies, Inc.0-100%
ROCKLEY PHOTONICS LTD0
Waymo LLC0-100%
Seyond (Innovusion) USA, Inc.0
Baraja Pty Ltd0
Sky Laser Diode Co., Ltd.0
HRL Laboratories, LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Optical Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The trend and assignee data point to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited record

Before drafting a new coating claim, run a design-around check against the highest-cited family in this corpus and its immediate citation network, since it functions as the field's reference point.

Explore in Eureka

Watch for a filing rebound as publication catches up

The apparent decline after 2020 is partly a publication-lag artefact. Re-check the 2024–2026 trend once later filings post to see whether momentum is genuinely flat or simply delayed.

Track filings in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed branches directly

The thin coverage in G01J, F21K and multi-layer beam-splitter durability claims suggests specific claim language that has not yet been tested against examiners in this space.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Optical Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on LiDAR optical coating patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Optical Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research LiDAR System Optical Coating in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole lidar system optical coating corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.