LiDAR Optical Coating Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing peaked in 2020 at 47 families, then flattened through 2022 and has not returned to that level — the coating layer is not accelerating the way LiDAR system claims overall are.
- G01S dominates at 251 of 252 records, meaning almost every coating claim is written as part of a ranging-system application, not filed as a standalone optics patent.
- The most-cited record has 1,006 citations, an order of magnitude above the next-ranked document — a strong signal that one component-level claim is treated as foundational prior art across the field.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent families where LiDAR or laser-scanner claims intersect with anti-reflection coatings, narrow bandpass filters, protective optical coatings or beam-splitter coatings, filtered to the optics-relevant IPC classes G02B1/11, G02B5/28 and G01S7/481. It covers publications from 2015 through mid-2026, with 252 patent families in total.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent filing year in any trend line understates real activity — 2026 in particular should be read as incomplete, not as a genuine drop-off.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 252 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which adjacent technical fields the coating claims are being filed alongside.
A 2020 peak that has not been retested
Filings rose from 11 in 2017 to a peak of 47 in 2020, then eased to 38 by the 2022 midpoint — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth. Read the final year or two as undercounted due to publication lag.
Concentrated in ranging systems, thin in dedicated optics
G01S (radar, sonar & positioning) appears in 251 of 252 records, confirming that coating claims here are almost always drafted inside a system-level LiDAR filing. G02B (optical elements) appears in only 55, and H01S (lasers), G01C (navigation), G05D (control) and the lighting-related classes (F21K, F21V, G01J) each register in single digits to low tens — evidence that the coating itself is rarely the sole inventive focus of the application.
Shares are the percentage of the 252 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on LiDAR System Optical Coating with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about lidar system optical coating and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records and a representative filing
US20230034553A1 — Light receiving module and lidar apparatus comprising the same (HL KLEMOVE CORP., 2023-02-02)
Discloses a light receiving module and LiDAR apparatus in which a reflective mirror sits between the receiving lens and detector. The mirror body has a reflective layer on the surface facing the incoming light, positioned to selectively reflect a portion of the light received by the lens before it reaches the detector.The claim scope centres on the mirror's reflective-layer placement relative to the receiving lens and detector, not on the coating chemistry itself.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20200284883A1 | Component for a lidar sensor system, lidar sensor system, lidar sensor device, method for a lidar sensor syst… | 1,006 |
| 2 | US10222474B1 | Lidar systems including a gallium and nitrogen containing laser light source | 179 |
| 3 | US20190107607A1 | Interlaced scan patterns for lidar system | 153 |
| 4 | US20190107606A1 | Lidar system with adjustable pulse period | 96 |
| 5 | US20190257924A1 | Receive path for lidar system | 93 |
| 6 | US11726184B2 | Component for a LIDAR sensor system, LIDAR sensor system, LIDAR sensor device, method for a LIDAR sensor syst… | 92 |
| 7 | US10802120B1 | Coherent pulsed lidar system | 83 |
| 8 | US20200076152A1 | Lidar system operating at 1200-1400 nm | 81 |
| 9 | WO2019165289A1 | Receive path for lidar system | 76 |
| 10 | US10401480B1 | Lidar receiver with multiple detectors for range-ambiguity mitigation | 74 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate references — treat this as a measure of influence within the searched corpus, not of present-day importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once the trend and citation data are read together.
Growth has stalled, not accelerated
After climbing from 11 filings in 2017 to a 2020 peak of 47, volume eased rather than compounded. That flat trajectory suggests the core coating approaches were staked out early in this cycle, and later entrants are filing incremental variants rather than opening new ground.
One component claim anchors the field
The leading record's citation count is more than five times the second-ranked document. Anything drafted around lidar sensor-system components should be checked against it first, since it functions as a de facto reference point for examiners and competitors alike.
Coating claims travel inside system filings
Only 55 records carry a G02B optics classification, versus 251 under G01S. Drafting a coating claim as part of a full ranging-system application, rather than as a freestanding optics filing, is the dominant pattern in this corpus.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to lidar system optical coating, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where activity has cooled
Recent-year momentum across the named assignees in this dataset shows a common pattern for a maturing claim space: established filers pulling back rather than pushing further.
Several leading filers show no latest-year activity
A number of the assignees with the deepest filing history in this corpus, including Luminar entities, Rockley Photonics, Waymo and Baraja, show zero filings in the most recent year, with some recording a full year-on-year drop. That is consistent with publication lag but also with a claim space where the obvious coating configurations have already been filed.
US filing dominates, Europe and PCT trail
The United States accounts for 158 of the receiving-office filings tracked here, against 36 at the EPO and 31 through WIPO/PCT. Filing a coating claim without a corresponding US application would be unusual for this field given where the bulk of protection currently sits.
A long tail beneath the named leaders
With 252 total families and a small set of assignees showing repeat, multi-year filing, the rest of the corpus is made up of single or few-filing entrants. That structure — a handful of committed filers plus many one-off applicants — is typical of a component technology attached to a fast-moving system market.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Luminar LLC | 0 | — |
| Luminar Technologies, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| ROCKLEY PHOTONICS LTD | 0 | — |
| Waymo LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Seyond (Innovusion) USA, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Baraja Pty Ltd | 0 | — |
| Sky Laser Diode Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| HRL Laboratories, LLC | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The trend and assignee data point to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.
Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited record
Before drafting a new coating claim, run a design-around check against the highest-cited family in this corpus and its immediate citation network, since it functions as the field's reference point.
Explore in EurekaWatch for a filing rebound as publication catches up
The apparent decline after 2020 is partly a publication-lag artefact. Re-check the 2024–2026 trend once later filings post to see whether momentum is genuinely flat or simply delayed.
Track filings in EurekaProbe the under-claimed branches directly
The thin coverage in G01J, F21K and multi-layer beam-splitter durability claims suggests specific claim language that has not yet been tested against examiners in this space.
Search white space in EurekaCommon questions on LiDAR optical coating patents
The assignee ranking in this dataset is led by a small set of firms with repeat, multi-year filing history, including Luminar-related entities, Waymo, Rockley Photonics and Baraja, though several of these show no filings in the most recent year. The rest of the 252 tracked families are spread across a long tail of single or few-filing applicants. Because the ranking is based on patent families rather than raw documents, it reflects distinct inventions rather than continuation filings inflating any one assignee's count.
Filing volume rose from 11 families in 2017 to a peak of 47 in 2020, then eased toward 38 by 2022 — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than continued growth. The final one to two years in any dataset like this are understated because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so the true 2024–2026 picture will only become clear once later filings post. On the evidence available now, this looks like a space where core approaches were staked out early rather than one still expanding.
G01S (radar, sonar and positioning) appears in 251 of the 252 records, meaning almost every coating claim in this corpus is drafted as part of a system-level LiDAR application. G02B (optical elements and systems) is the next most common at 55 records, followed by smaller counts in H01S (lasers), G01C (navigation and gyroscopes), G05D (control) and the lighting-related classes F21K, F21V and G01J. A comprehensive search should not stop at optics classes alone — it needs to follow the ranging-system classification too.
US20230034553A1, filed by HL KLEMOVE CORP., covers a light receiving module for LiDAR in which a reflective mirror sits between the receiving lens and detector, with a reflective layer positioned on the surface facing incoming light to selectively reflect part of that light toward the detector. Its scope centres on the mirror's placement and structural relationship to the lens and detector, not on any specific coating chemistry. Designs that route received light differently — for example without an intermediate selective-reflection mirror stage — sit outside its core claim structure, but any receive-path design using a comparable mirror-and-detector arrangement should be checked against it directly.
The IPC composition data points to several under-claimed branches: multi-layer beam-splitter durability coatings, coating claims tied to G01J radiation measurement (only 7 records), anti-reflection layers specifically for gallium-nitride laser sources, and protective coatings for rotating or scanning optical assemblies. These areas show thin representation relative to the dense core of anti-reflection and bandpass-filter claims, which suggests room for narrowly drafted claims rather than an assumption that the entire coating space is occupied.
Research LiDAR System Optical Coating in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole lidar system optical coating corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.