LiDAR System Photonic Integration Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026
- Filing activity has already peaked. 2022 was the high point at 13 families in this dataset, with the count falling back toward zero by the most recent year — treat the last year or two as undercounted given publication lag, not as a real drop-off.
- One filing dominates citation influence. US20170299697A1 carries 201 citations, more than four times the next most-cited record, meaning downstream designers are almost certainly building on claims traced back to a single photonic-integrated-circuit LiDAR filing.
- Optical hardware IPCs outweigh automotive-specific ones. G02B (optical elements), H01S (lasers) and G02F (optical modulation) together outnumber B60W (vehicle control), showing this corpus is claimed as photonics hardware first and automotive application second.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of LiDAR ranging and photonic integration: silicon photonic LiDAR chips, integrated FMCW architectures, and on-chip beam steering, isolated using IPC classes tied to optical waveguides and ranging by light. The corpus is small and recent by patent standards 55 families total, with the earliest activity visible from 2017 onward, which matches the timeline of silicon photonics maturing enough to carry ranging optics on a single die rather than in discrete free-space assemblies.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the apparent decline after 2022 should be read cautiously — filings from the last one to two years are still arriving in the record. The receiving-office split, weighted toward the United States and Europe with a smaller PCT and China presence, points to a field still filed close to where the core photonics IP originates rather than one yet chasing broad global coverage.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 55-family corpus: when the filings happened, and which IPC subclasses they were classified under.
Filings by year
Activity builds from 3 filings in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2022, then tapers toward the 2026 cut-off. The flat-to-declining shape after the midpoint suggests the initial wave of core photonic-LiDAR architecture claims has largely been filed, with newer entrants more likely filing narrower improvement claims than foundational ones.
IPC subclass distribution
G01S (radar, sonar and positioning) anchors the set as expected for a ranging technology, but G02B, H01S and G02F together show the bulk of the technical substance sits in optics and laser hardware rather than in signal processing or vehicle integration. A61B and B60W appear only as small application-side slivers.
Shares are the percentage of the 55 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on LiDAR System Photonic Integration with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about lidar system photonic integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited filings in this corpus
Multiple target lidar system
A light detection and ranging (LIDAR) system includes a LIDAR measurement unit, a reference measurement unit, and a phase cancellation unit. The LIDAR measurement unit estimates a time for which a laser beam travels. The reference measurement unit determines a phase of a laser source. The phase cancellation unit identifies phase noise and cancels the phase noise from the laser beam, at least partially based on the phase of the laser source and the time for which the laser beam travels. The denoised signal is used to determine the range between a laser source and a target.Filed by Aurora Operations, Inc., published 2022-03-10.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20170299697A1 | Light Detection and Ranging System with Photonic Integrated Circuit | 201 |
| 2 | US20190346568A1 | Optical Sensor Chip | 47 |
| 3 | US20210181310A1 | Chip-scale silicon-based hybrid-integrated lidar system | 45 |
| 4 | US20210018599A1 | Three-dimensional scanning lidar based on one-dimensional optical phased arrays | 42 |
| 5 | US10788582B2 | Optical sensor chip | 31 |
| 6 | US20200025926A1 | Optical Sensor System | 25 |
| 7 | US10191145B2 | Integrated optical system with optical phased array photonic integrated circuit | 24 |
| 8 | US20210055388A1 | Lidar adapter for use with lidar chip | 20 |
| 9 | CN111133590A | 微结构增强的吸收光敏器件 | 18 |
| 10 | US20210018603A1 | Integrated two-dimensional multi-beam lidar transmitter based on butler matrix | 16 |
Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus only and skew toward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations; they signal influence on the field's early architecture, not current commercial weight.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Reading filing volume, citation weight and IPC spread together points to where this field's claim space is dense and where it is thin.
One architecture patent anchors the field
US20170299697A1 is cited more than four times as often as the next record in this set, describing a LIDAR system built around a photonic integrated circuit. Anyone filing improvement claims on integrated-chip LiDAR architecture should expect this filing to sit in the prior art search regardless of which sub-approach they pursue.
The core wave has likely already been filed
Filing volume rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2022 before falling back. That shape is consistent with a first wave of foundational photonic-LiDAR architecture claims already being staked out, leaving later filers to compete on narrower refinements rather than base architecture.
This is an optics story more than an automotive one
Optical-elements classifications (G02B) outnumber vehicle-control classifications (B60W) by a wide margin. Filers positioning a LiDAR photonic-integration patent purely as an automotive feature are competing in a much smaller slice of this landscape than filers claiming the underlying photonics.
Filing is still concentrated near the source
The United States accounts for roughly half of the receiving-office activity tracked here, with Europe and the PCT route as secondary channels and China still a minor share. That pattern suggests the field has not yet moved into the broad multi-jurisdiction filing that typically follows commercial scale-up.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to lidar system photonic integration, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is active, and where the field is still open
The assignee list runs from a handful of dedicated photonic-LiDAR firms and research institutions down to a long tail of single-filing entrants, several with no filings recorded in the most recent year — a pattern typical of a field where the initial architecture claims have already been staked and momentum has cooled rather than accelerated.
Recent-year activity has gone quiet across the board
Every assignee surfaced in the recent-momentum data, including dedicated players like SiLC Technologies and academic groups such as Shanghai Jiao Tong University, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the broader post-2022 decline and with publication lag rather than a sign the field has been abandoned.
A small, still-forming field
At 55 families total, this is a compact landscape compared with mature optics categories. That size means individual filings, especially the highly cited ones, carry outsized weight in defining the prior art baseline that later filers must design around.
Universities sit alongside dedicated chip makers
The assignee set mixes university research groups with specialist photonic-LiDAR companies and individual inventors, rather than being dominated by a small number of large automotive or semiconductor conglomerates. That spread suggests the technology is still young enough that no single commercial player has locked down the space.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| SILC TECHNOLOGIES INC | 0 | — |
| Shanghai Jiao Tong University | 0 | — |
| SWANSON ERIC | 0 | — |
| Vaunt Inventions Equipment Co. | 0 | — |
| Wome Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Advanced Micro Wafer Pte. Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Scanora Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The filing and citation data point to a field with its foundational architecture claims largely staked but its refinement layer still open.
Map claim scope around the top-cited filing
Before drafting in chip-scale LiDAR architecture, run a full claim-scope comparison against US20170299697A1 and the other highly cited records to see exactly how much room sits above and around them.
Explore in EurekaTrack the quiet assignees for re-emergence
Several active assignees show zero filings in the most recent tracked year; given publication lag, renewed activity from any of them would be an early signal worth monitoring rather than dismissing.
Set up monitoring in EurekaStress-test the under-claimed branches
Sub-areas like hybrid laser integration and phased-array scanning show thinner filing density than the core ranging claims; a freedom-to-operate check there is cheaper now than after volume picks up.
Run a white space search in EurekaCommon questions on LiDAR photonic integration patents
It refers to placing the optical components of a LiDAR system, such as lasers, waveguides, splitters and detectors, onto a single chip using photonic integrated circuit fabrication rather than assembling them as discrete free-space optics. In this patent corpus that shows up as claims spanning G02B optical elements, H01S laser sources and G01S ranging, often in the same family. The appeal for filers is a smaller, cheaper, more manufacturable ranging unit, which is why the most-cited record in this dataset is built explicitly around a photonic integrated circuit architecture.
The assignee list in this dataset mixes dedicated photonic-LiDAR companies, university research groups and individual inventors, rather than being dominated by one or two large conglomerates. No single filer shows sustained high-volume activity through the most recent tracked year, and several previously active assignees show zero filings recently. That pattern is more consistent with a still-forming competitive field than with an established leader having pulled away.
Filings in this corpus rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2022, then declined toward the 2026 cut-off. Part of that apparent drop is a real slowdown consistent with the field's core architecture claims having already been filed, but part of it is a data artefact: patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any filing trend are understated until later applications work through examination and publish.
US20220075076A1, assigned to Aurora Operations, Inc., covers a LIDAR system that uses a phase cancellation unit to identify and remove phase noise from a laser beam based on a reference measurement of the laser source's phase, improving range determination accuracy. For someone designing a competing FMCW or coherent LiDAR system, this filing is most relevant if their noise-reduction approach also compares a reference phase measurement against the return signal; a design that removes phase noise through a materially different mechanism, such as digital post-processing without a dedicated reference measurement unit, would sit outside its specific claim structure. A full freedom-to-operate read of the granted claims, not just the abstract, is needed before relying on that distinction.
The IPC composition shows heavy claiming around core ranging (G01S) and general optical elements (G02B), but thinner coverage in specific sub-areas such as hybrid III-V/silicon laser integration, wavelength-division multiplexed beam steering, and chip-scale coherent detection front ends. These branches appear in the corpus but at lower density than the foundational architecture claims, suggesting room for narrower, well-drafted improvement patents rather than broad architecture claims, which are increasingly likely to run into the already-cited prior art.
Research LiDAR System Photonic Integration in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole lidar system photonic integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.