Book a demo

LiDAR System Photonic Integration Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026

LiDAR System Photonic Integration Patents: Who Leads, Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/lidar-system-photonic-integration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photonics & Optics · Patent Landscape
LiDAR System Photonic Integration Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Ground
  • Filing activity has already peaked. 2022 was the high point at 13 families in this dataset, with the count falling back toward zero by the most recent year — treat the last year or two as undercounted given publication lag, not as a real drop-off.
  • One filing dominates citation influence. US20170299697A1 carries 201 citations, more than four times the next most-cited record, meaning downstream designers are almost certainly building on claims traced back to a single photonic-integrated-circuit LiDAR filing.
  • Optical hardware IPCs outweigh automotive-specific ones. G02B (optical elements), H01S (lasers) and G02F (optical modulation) together outnumber B60W (vehicle control), showing this corpus is claimed as photonics hardware first and automotive application second.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
55
Published Records
71%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-80%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of LiDAR ranging and photonic integration: silicon photonic LiDAR chips, integrated FMCW architectures, and on-chip beam steering, isolated using IPC classes tied to optical waveguides and ranging by light. The corpus is small and recent by patent standards 55 families total, with the earliest activity visible from 2017 onward, which matches the timeline of silicon photonics maturing enough to carry ranging optics on a single die rather than in discrete free-space assemblies.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the apparent decline after 2022 should be read cautiously — filings from the last one to two years are still arriving in the record. The receiving-office split, weighted toward the United States and Europe with a smaller PCT and China presence, points to a field still filed close to where the core photonics IP originates rather than one yet chasing broad global coverage.

Filing activity by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1SILC TECHNOLOGIES INC17
  2. 2SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIV6
  3. 3PIXCEL INC6
  4. 4ADVANCED MICRO FOUNDRY PTE LTD5
  5. 5W&WSENS DEVICES INC5
  6. 6AURORA OPERATIONS INC5
  7. 7INTEL CORP4
  8. 8OPTAGON FOTONIKI IDIOTIKI KEFALAIOUCHIKI ETAIREIA2
  9. 9SCANTINEL PHOTONICS GMBH2
  10. 10CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 55-family corpus: when the filings happened, and which IPC subclasses they were classified under.

Filings by year

Activity builds from 3 filings in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2022, then tapers toward the 2026 cut-off. The flat-to-declining shape after the midpoint suggests the initial wave of core photonic-LiDAR architecture claims has largely been filed, with newer entrants more likely filing narrower improvement claims than foundational ones.

Filings by year048111532017201820192020202113202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

G01S (radar, sonar and positioning) anchors the set as expected for a ranging technology, but G02B, H01S and G02F together show the bulk of the technical substance sits in optics and laser hardware rather than in signal processing or vehicle integration. A61B and B60W appear only as small application-side slivers.

IPC subclass distributionG01S · Radar, sonar & positioning5090.9%G02B · Optical elements & systems3156.4%H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission1323.6%G02F · Optical control & modulation1120.0%G01B · Measuring length & dimensions916.4%H01L · Semiconductor devices916.4%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery59.1%B60W · Hybrid/joint vehicle control59.1%Other916.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 55 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on LiDAR System Photonic Integration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about lidar system photonic integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited filings in this corpus

Representative Filing
US20220075076A12022-03-10

Multiple target lidar system

AURORA OPERATIONS, INC.

A light detection and ranging (LIDAR) system includes a LIDAR measurement unit, a reference measurement unit, and a phase cancellation unit. The LIDAR measurement unit estimates a time for which a laser beam travels. The reference measurement unit determines a phase of a laser source. The phase cancellation unit identifies phase noise and cancels the phase noise from the laser beam, at least partially based on the phase of the laser source and the time for which the laser beam travels. The denoised signal is used to determine the range between a laser source and a target.Filed by Aurora Operations, Inc., published 2022-03-10.

US20220075076A1 — patent drawing 1US20220075076A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20170299697A1Light Detection and Ranging System with Photonic Integrated Circuit201
2US20190346568A1Optical Sensor Chip47
3US20210181310A1Chip-scale silicon-based hybrid-integrated lidar system45
4US20210018599A1Three-dimensional scanning lidar based on one-dimensional optical phased arrays42
5US10788582B2Optical sensor chip31
6US20200025926A1Optical Sensor System25
7US10191145B2Integrated optical system with optical phased array photonic integrated circuit24
8US20210055388A1Lidar adapter for use with lidar chip20
9CN111133590A微结构增强的吸收光敏器件18
10US20210018603A1Integrated two-dimensional multi-beam lidar transmitter based on butler matrix16

Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus only and skew toward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations; they signal influence on the field's early architecture, not current commercial weight.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Reading filing volume, citation weight and IPC spread together points to where this field's claim space is dense and where it is thin.

Citation concentration
201 citations
top-cited record

One architecture patent anchors the field

US20170299697A1 is cited more than four times as often as the next record in this set, describing a LIDAR system built around a photonic integrated circuit. Anyone filing improvement claims on integrated-chip LiDAR architecture should expect this filing to sit in the prior art search regardless of which sub-approach they pursue.

Citation data from the searched corpus.
Peak and plateau
13 filings
peak year, 2022

The core wave has likely already been filed

Filing volume rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2022 before falling back. That shape is consistent with a first wave of foundational photonic-LiDAR architecture claims already being staked out, leaving later filers to compete on narrower refinements rather than base architecture.

Trend counts by publication year; recent years are understated by filing-to-publication lag.
Technology mix
31 vs 5
G02B optics vs B60W vehicle control

This is an optics story more than an automotive one

Optical-elements classifications (G02B) outnumber vehicle-control classifications (B60W) by a wide margin. Filers positioning a LiDAR photonic-integration patent purely as an automotive feature are competing in a much smaller slice of this landscape than filers claiming the underlying photonics.

IPC subclass counts, this corpus.
Jurisdictional spread
27 US filings
of the tracked receiving offices

Filing is still concentrated near the source

The United States accounts for roughly half of the receiving-office activity tracked here, with Europe and the PCT route as secondary channels and China still a minor share. That pattern suggests the field has not yet moved into the broad multi-jurisdiction filing that typically follows commercial scale-up.

Receiving office counts, this corpus.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to lidar system photonic integration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where the field is still open

The assignee list runs from a handful of dedicated photonic-LiDAR firms and research institutions down to a long tail of single-filing entrants, several with no filings recorded in the most recent year — a pattern typical of a field where the initial architecture claims have already been staked and momentum has cooled rather than accelerated.

Momentum check
0 filings
latest year, most tracked assignees

Recent-year activity has gone quiet across the board

Every assignee surfaced in the recent-momentum data, including dedicated players like SiLC Technologies and academic groups such as Shanghai Jiao Tong University, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the broader post-2022 decline and with publication lag rather than a sign the field has been abandoned.

Recent-year filing counts by assignee.
Corpus size
55 families
total in this landscape

A small, still-forming field

At 55 families total, this is a compact landscape compared with mature optics categories. That size means individual filings, especially the highly cited ones, carry outsized weight in defining the prior art baseline that later filers must design around.

Total tracked patent families.
Institutional mix
Academic + corporate
assignee types present

Universities sit alongside dedicated chip makers

The assignee set mixes university research groups with specialist photonic-LiDAR companies and individual inventors, rather than being dominated by a small number of large automotive or semiconductor conglomerates. That spread suggests the technology is still young enough that no single commercial player has locked down the space.

Assignee composition, this corpus.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with thin filing density relative to the core ranging and beam-steering claims already staked out.
Phase-noise cancellation for FMCW LiDARWavelength-division multiplexed beam steeringHybrid III-V/silicon laser integration for chip-scale LiDAROne-dimensional optical phased array scanningChip-scale coherent detection front ends
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SILC TECHNOLOGIES INC0
Shanghai Jiao Tong University0
SWANSON ERIC0
Vaunt Inventions Equipment Co.0
Wome Technology Co., Ltd.0
Advanced Micro Wafer Pte. Ltd.0
Intel Corporation0
Scanora Optoelectronics Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing and citation data point to a field with its foundational architecture claims largely staked but its refinement layer still open.

Map claim scope around the top-cited filing

Before drafting in chip-scale LiDAR architecture, run a full claim-scope comparison against US20170299697A1 and the other highly cited records to see exactly how much room sits above and around them.

Explore in Eureka

Track the quiet assignees for re-emergence

Several active assignees show zero filings in the most recent tracked year; given publication lag, renewed activity from any of them would be an early signal worth monitoring rather than dismissing.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Stress-test the under-claimed branches

Sub-areas like hybrid laser integration and phased-array scanning show thinner filing density than the core ranging claims; a freedom-to-operate check there is cheaper now than after volume picks up.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on LiDAR photonic integration patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on LiDAR System Photonic Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research LiDAR System Photonic Integration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole lidar system photonic integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.