Book a demo

LiFi / Visible Light Communication Patent Snapshot

LiFi / Visible Light Communication Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
LiFi / Visible Light Communication Patent Snapshot in 2026

The in-scope corpus of 4 patent families is dominated by two filers — Avicena Tech Corp and the Regents of the University of California — who together account for all activity captured in this dataset. Filing activity peaked in 2017 and has since contracted, with the semiconductor device class (H01L) anchoring the entire technology composition.

4
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Two filers hold all ranked positions in a highly concentrated corpus

Avicena Tech Corp and the Regents of the University of California each hold 2 patent families in the ranked applicant list, placing them in a tied leadership position across the full scope of this dataset.

The top five filers account for 100% of the combined total of the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating extreme concentration with no meaningful second tier. There is no gap between leader and challenger — both filers are effectively co-equal at this scale.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Avicena Tech Corp2
2Regents of the University of California2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The shared leadership between a venture-backed fabless semiconductor company (Avicena Tech) and a major research university (University of California) suggests that this corner of the LiFi space sits at the boundary of applied R&D and early commercialization, rather than established volume production.

The most recent 18–24 months of data are subject to publication lag and should be interpreted cautiously; apparent absence of activity in 20222026 does not confirm that no filings occurred in that window. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2017 filing spike has not recurred; semiconductor devices define the technology mix

The annual trend and technology composition charts together reveal a corpus that fired early, centered on a narrow device-level IPC class, and has not broadened into adjacent branches.

Annual filing trend

Two patent families were filed in 2017 and two more in 2021; all other years in the dataset register zero. The lifecycle evidence flags annual volume as having eased from its 2017 peak. The absence of filings in 2022–2026 should be read alongside the publication-lag caveat before drawing conclusions about sustained inactivity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2017.22017020180201902020220210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

All 4 patent families map to H01L (Semiconductor devices), with 2 additionally classified under H10P. The composition is narrow, reflecting a device-physics focus — specifically tunnel junction architectures — rather than a systems or communications-protocol orientation.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 4; H10P 2.H01L · Semiconductor dev…4H10P2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20210104504A1Published 2021-04-08

Contact architectures for tunnel junction devices

The Regents Of The University Of California

A flip chip III-Nitride LED which utilizes a dielectric coating backed by a metallic reflector (e.g., aluminum or silver). High reflectivity and low resistance contacts for optoelectronic devices. Low ESD rating optoelectronic devices. A VCSEL comprising a tunnel junction for current and optical confinement. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Contact architectures for tunnel junction devices — patent drawingContact architectures for tunnel junction devices — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Contact architectures for tunnel junction devices13
2Contact architectures for tunnel junction devices2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Avicena Tech Corp

Avicena Tech Corp

Avicena Tech Corp holds 2 patent families focused on H01L 33 (semiconductor light-emitting devices), consistent with the company’s known microLED-based optical interconnect work. Applicant momentum data is not available for this corpus, so trajectory cannot be quantified from the evidence; however, the 2021 filing cluster aligns with the company’s known product-development timeline.

families: 2
Challenger · Regents of the University of California

Regents of the University of California

The Regents of the University of California also hold 2 patent families, but with a broader IPC spread covering H01L 25 (assemblies of semiconductor devices), H01L 33, and H10P 95, suggesting a more systems-oriented or heterogeneous-integration angle alongside device-level research. Applicant momentum figures are not available in the evidence.

families: 2
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Avicena Tech CorpRegents of the University of California+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.