Book a demo

Liquid Air Energy Storage Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Liquid Air Energy Storage Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/liquid-air-energy-storage-and-cold-recovery-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Updated 2026
Liquid air energy storage and cold recovery patents: mapping the leaders and the open ground
  • Concentrated at the top. The five leading assignees hold 66.9% of all 130 records in scope, and the top ten hold 87.7% — a field with a short, dominant leadership tier and a thin tail below it.
  • Filing has already peaked. Activity rose to 23 records in 2021 before flattening; the 2022 midpoint of 9 records and near-zero recent momentum among the leading assignees suggest the field is consolidating rather than expanding.
  • Two technology cores dominate. F01K (steam & thermal power plants) and F25J (gas liquefaction & separation) each cover 40.8% of the 130 records, meaning most claims sit at the thermodynamic cycle and the liquefaction process rather than at the storage vessel or grid interface.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
130
Published Records
67%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-78%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Liquid air energy storage (LAES) and cold recovery cover systems that liquefy air for storage and later expand it to generate power, recovering the cold produced during liquefaction to improve round-trip efficiency. The scope here spans 130 published records filed between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, capturing claims on cold storage media, recycle efficiency, liquefaction specific energy, boil-off management and integration with adjacent thermal or grid systems. Publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, so the most recent filing year is understated relative to earlier years.

The dataset draws on receiving offices across the United States, Europe, China, the United Kingdom, WIPO and India, giving a cross-jurisdictional view of where applicants have chosen to seek protection rather than a single-country snapshot.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1HIGHVIEW ENTERPRISES LTD41
  2. 2SCHWARZ HELMUT16
  3. 3SCHWARZ ANTON12
  4. 4SINATOV STANISLAV11
  5. 5MADA ENERGIE LLC7
  6. 6HELMUT SCHWARZ6
  7. 7MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC6
  8. 8ANTON SCHWARZ6
  9. 9INNOVATION GRP LTD5
  10. 10ENERGY TECH INST4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Liquid Air Energy Storage and Cold Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 130 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 23 in 2021, then declined toward a 2022 midpoint of 9 — a pattern of concentrated early activity rather than sustained growth. The 2026 figure is partial because publication lags filing.

Filing trend, 2017–20260613192512017201820192020232021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

F01K and F25J each appear in 40.8% of the 130 records, reflecting the field's core split between thermal power-cycle claims and gas liquefaction claims. F02C (gas-turbine plants, 28.5%) and the smaller shares in F17C, H02J, B01D and F03D show claim activity thinning out toward storage vessels, grid integration, separation and wind hybridisation.

IPC subclass distributionF01K · Steam & thermal power plants5340.8%F25J · Gas liquefaction & separation5340.8%F02C · Gas-turbine plants3728.5%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines2116.2%F17C · Pressure vessels & gas storage2116.2%H02J · Power supply & grid systems1410.8%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…118.5%F03D · Wind motors (wind turbines)75.4%Other5340.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 130 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Liquid Air Energy Storage and Cold Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Liquid Air Energy Storage and Cold Recovery with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about liquid air energy storage and cold recovery and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative recent filing
EP4679658A12026-01-14

EP4679658A1 — Liquid air energy storage system based on LNG cold energy utilisation

Cnooc Gas & Power Group

Filed by Cnooc Gas & Power Group and published 2026-01-14, this filing describes a liquid air energy storage system built around an LNG receiving station, a compression section, an energy storage section, a cold storage section and an energy release section. The design routes LNG cold energy through a first main heat exchanger into the compressor group, and links a second main heat exchanger, hydraulic turbine, air separator and liquid air storage tank in sequence for the storage side.Abstract condensed from the original filing language.

EP4679658A1 — patent drawing 1EP4679658A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090282840A1Energy storage and generation170
2WO2007096656A1A method of storing energy and a cryogenic energy storage system143
3GB2537126AHybrid energy storage system39
4US5494566ALubricating oil dewaxing with membrane separation of cold solvent35
5US20190063685A1Method for Liquid Air and Gas Energy Storage31
6US20170016577A1Liquid Air Energy Storage Systems, Devices, and Methods31
7US20180221807A1Method for Liquid Air Energy Storage with Fueled and Zero Carbon Emitting Power Output Augmentation28
8US20160178129A1Method of Storing Energy and a Cryogenic Energy Storage System27
9US20150218968A1Energy storage and recovery methods, systems, and devices26
10US20190063265A1Method for Liquid Air and Gas Energy Storage25

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Liquid Air Energy Storage and Cold Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Four read-outs from the dataset that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.

Concentration
66.9% of 130 records
held by the top 5 assignees

Leadership is narrow and largely inactive now

The leading assignee alone accounts for 41 records, with the fifth-ranked holder at 7 and the tenth at 4 — a steep drop-off. Recent-year momentum among the leading names is flat, which points to a field where the founding portfolios are largely built out rather than still being actively extended.

Source: assignee ranking, 45 companies
Filing trend
23 records in 2021
peak year, then flattening

Activity peaked and has not recovered

The climb from 1 record in 2017 to 23 in 2021 marks the field's build-out phase. The 2022 midpoint of 9 records and the drop-off since suggest interest has consolidated around the incumbents rather than attracting a fresh wave of filers.

Source: filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology mix
40.8% × 2 classes
F01K and F25J tied at the top

Claims cluster on the cycle and the liquefaction step

F01K and F25J each cover 40.8% of the 130 records, meaning most protected inventions concern how the thermal cycle is run or how air is liquefied and separated, not how the cold or the liquid air is stored downstream. F17C (pressure vessels & gas storage) sits well behind at 16.2%.

Source: IPC subclass distribution
Jurisdictions
32 US filings
leading receiving office

Filing is spread, not single-market

The United States leads with 32 filings, followed by Europe (18), China (15), the United Kingdom (13), WIPO (11) and India (8). That spread means freedom-to-operate work needs to check multiple offices rather than one dominant jurisdiction.

Source: receiving offices
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to liquid air energy storage and cold recovery, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Liquid Air Energy Storage and Cold Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claims, and where the gate sits

The ranking covers 45 companies across the 130 records in scope — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the full set the data returns.

Leader
41 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

One name dominates the count

The leading assignee's 41 records dwarf the fifth-place holder's 7, giving the field a single dominant portfolio rather than a cluster of comparable-sized competitors.

Source: assignee ranking
Mid tier
7 to 4 records
fifth to tenth place

A thin but real second tier

Positions five through ten hold between 7 and 4 records each, forming a modest secondary tier before the ranking tails into single-digit and single-filing entrants.

Source: assignee ranking
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships found

Collaboration is limited and family-linked

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links are between related individual names, suggesting most portfolios were built independently rather than through joint development.

Source: co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a first-mover claim
Sub-areas where the IPC composition shows thin coverage relative to the core cycle and liquefaction classes.
Cold storage medium selection for sub-zero packed bedsBoil-off gas recapture during liquid air storageGrid-side power electronics integration (H02J)Wind-hybrid liquefaction scheduling (F03D pairing)Membrane-based air separation pre-treatment (B01D)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Highview Enterprises Ltd0
SCHWARZ HELMUT0
SINATOV STANISLAV0
SCHWARZ ANTON0
MADA ENERGIE LLC0
Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC0
INNOVATIUM LLP0
HELMUT SCHWARZ0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Liquid Air Energy Storage and Cold Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy or identifying a filing gap.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top holders

With 87.7% of the 130 records held by the top ten assignees, any new filing in the core F01K or F25J classes should be checked against those portfolios first.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

Boil-off management, cold storage media and grid-side integration carry lower IPC shares than the core cycle classes, which may indicate room for a differentiated first claim.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track the flattening filing trend

With the peak year behind it and recent momentum near zero among leading assignees, watch for whether new entrants outside the current top ten begin filing.

Set up filing alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Liquid Air Energy Storage and Cold Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Liquid Air Energy Storage and Cold Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Liquid Air Energy Storage and Cold Recovery in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole liquid air energy storage and cold recovery corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.