Liquid Air Energy Storage Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Concentrated at the top. The five leading assignees hold 66.9% of all 130 records in scope, and the top ten hold 87.7% — a field with a short, dominant leadership tier and a thin tail below it.
- Filing has already peaked. Activity rose to 23 records in 2021 before flattening; the 2022 midpoint of 9 records and near-zero recent momentum among the leading assignees suggest the field is consolidating rather than expanding.
- Two technology cores dominate. F01K (steam & thermal power plants) and F25J (gas liquefaction & separation) each cover 40.8% of the 130 records, meaning most claims sit at the thermodynamic cycle and the liquefaction process rather than at the storage vessel or grid interface.
What this landscape covers
Liquid air energy storage (LAES) and cold recovery cover systems that liquefy air for storage and later expand it to generate power, recovering the cold produced during liquefaction to improve round-trip efficiency. The scope here spans 130 published records filed between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, capturing claims on cold storage media, recycle efficiency, liquefaction specific energy, boil-off management and integration with adjacent thermal or grid systems. Publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, so the most recent filing year is understated relative to earlier years.
The dataset draws on receiving offices across the United States, Europe, China, the United Kingdom, WIPO and India, giving a cross-jurisdictional view of where applicants have chosen to seek protection rather than a single-country snapshot.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 130 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Filing trend, 2017–2026
Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 23 in 2021, then declined toward a 2022 midpoint of 9 — a pattern of concentrated early activity rather than sustained growth. The 2026 figure is partial because publication lags filing.
IPC subclass distribution
F01K and F25J each appear in 40.8% of the 130 records, reflecting the field's core split between thermal power-cycle claims and gas liquefaction claims. F02C (gas-turbine plants, 28.5%) and the smaller shares in F17C, H02J, B01D and F03D show claim activity thinning out toward storage vessels, grid integration, separation and wind hybridisation.
Shares are the percentage of the 130 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Liquid Air Energy Storage and Cold Recovery with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about liquid air energy storage and cold recovery and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing and most-cited records
EP4679658A1 — Liquid air energy storage system based on LNG cold energy utilisation
Filed by Cnooc Gas & Power Group and published 2026-01-14, this filing describes a liquid air energy storage system built around an LNG receiving station, a compression section, an energy storage section, a cold storage section and an energy release section. The design routes LNG cold energy through a first main heat exchanger into the compressor group, and links a second main heat exchanger, hydraulic turbine, air separator and liquid air storage tank in sequence for the storage side.Abstract condensed from the original filing language.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20090282840A1 | Energy storage and generation | 170 |
| 2 | WO2007096656A1 | A method of storing energy and a cryogenic energy storage system | 143 |
| 3 | GB2537126A | Hybrid energy storage system | 39 |
| 4 | US5494566A | Lubricating oil dewaxing with membrane separation of cold solvent | 35 |
| 5 | US20190063685A1 | Method for Liquid Air and Gas Energy Storage | 31 |
| 6 | US20170016577A1 | Liquid Air Energy Storage Systems, Devices, and Methods | 31 |
| 7 | US20180221807A1 | Method for Liquid Air Energy Storage with Fueled and Zero Carbon Emitting Power Output Augmentation | 28 |
| 8 | US20160178129A1 | Method of Storing Energy and a Cryogenic Energy Storage System | 27 |
| 9 | US20150218968A1 | Energy storage and recovery methods, systems, and devices | 26 |
| 10 | US20190063265A1 | Method for Liquid Air and Gas Energy Storage | 25 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Four read-outs from the dataset that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.
Leadership is narrow and largely inactive now
The leading assignee alone accounts for 41 records, with the fifth-ranked holder at 7 and the tenth at 4 — a steep drop-off. Recent-year momentum among the leading names is flat, which points to a field where the founding portfolios are largely built out rather than still being actively extended.
Activity peaked and has not recovered
The climb from 1 record in 2017 to 23 in 2021 marks the field's build-out phase. The 2022 midpoint of 9 records and the drop-off since suggest interest has consolidated around the incumbents rather than attracting a fresh wave of filers.
Claims cluster on the cycle and the liquefaction step
F01K and F25J each cover 40.8% of the 130 records, meaning most protected inventions concern how the thermal cycle is run or how air is liquefied and separated, not how the cold or the liquid air is stored downstream. F17C (pressure vessels & gas storage) sits well behind at 16.2%.
Filing is spread, not single-market
The United States leads with 32 filings, followed by Europe (18), China (15), the United Kingdom (13), WIPO (11) and India (8). That spread means freedom-to-operate work needs to check multiple offices rather than one dominant jurisdiction.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to liquid air energy storage and cold recovery, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claims, and where the gate sits
The ranking covers 45 companies across the 130 records in scope — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the full set the data returns.
One name dominates the count
The leading assignee's 41 records dwarf the fifth-place holder's 7, giving the field a single dominant portfolio rather than a cluster of comparable-sized competitors.
A thin but real second tier
Positions five through ten hold between 7 and 4 records each, forming a modest secondary tier before the ranking tails into single-digit and single-filing entrants.
Collaboration is limited and family-linked
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links are between related individual names, suggesting most portfolios were built independently rather than through joint development.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Highview Enterprises Ltd | 0 | — |
| SCHWARZ HELMUT | 0 | — |
| SINATOV STANISLAV | 0 | — |
| SCHWARZ ANTON | 0 | — |
| MADA ENERGIE LLC | 0 | — |
| Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | 0 | — |
| INNOVATIUM LLP | 0 | — |
| HELMUT SCHWARZ | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy or identifying a filing gap.
Check freedom-to-operate against the top holders
With 87.7% of the 130 records held by the top ten assignees, any new filing in the core F01K or F25J classes should be checked against those portfolios first.
Explore assignee claims in EurekaTest the under-claimed branches
Boil-off management, cold storage media and grid-side integration carry lower IPC shares than the core cycle classes, which may indicate room for a differentiated first claim.
Run a white-space search in EurekaTrack the flattening filing trend
With the peak year behind it and recent momentum near zero among leading assignees, watch for whether new entrants outside the current top ten begin filing.
Set up filing alerts in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
The assignee ranking for this dataset covers 45 companies across 130 records, with a single leading assignee holding 41 records — far ahead of the fifth-ranked holder at 7. The top five assignees combined hold 66.9% of all 130 records, and the top ten hold 87.7%, so the field has a short, dominant leadership tier rather than a broad spread of comparable competitors. Anyone assessing competitive position should focus first on that top tier rather than the long tail below it.
Filing activity rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 23 records in 2021, then declined toward a midpoint of 9 records in 2022. Recent-year momentum among the leading assignees is at or near zero, which together with the post-2021 decline suggests the field has moved past its build-out phase. Because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, the very latest year in any such dataset will always look thinner than it eventually turns out to be, but the multi-year decline predates that lag effect.
The two largest IPC classes are F01K (steam and thermal power plants) and F25J (gas liquefaction and separation), each covering 40.8% of the 130 records in scope. F02C (gas-turbine plants) follows at 28.5%, with F01D and F17C both at 16.2% and smaller shares in H02J, B01D and F03D. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100%, and they show that most claims concentrate on the thermodynamic cycle and the liquefaction process rather than on storage vessels or grid-side integration.
The classes with the lowest coverage relative to the core cycle and liquefaction classes are H02J (power supply and grid systems) at 10.8%, B01D (separation processes) at 8.5%, and F03D (wind motors) at 5.4% of the 130 records. That pattern suggests grid-side integration, membrane-based separation pre-treatment, and wind-hybrid liquefaction scheduling are comparatively under-claimed relative to the dense cycle and liquefaction art. A first claim in one of these branches would face less prior art density than a claim filed directly against F01K or F25J.
EP4679658A1, filed by Cnooc Gas & Power Group and published 2026-01-14, describes a liquid air energy storage system that routes LNG cold energy through a first main heat exchanger into a compressor group, and links a second main heat exchanger, hydraulic turbine, air separator and liquid air storage tank in sequence on the storage side. It is a recent filing rather than a long-established one, so its practical blocking effect will depend on prosecution outcome and jurisdiction. Anyone designing a system that integrates LNG cold energy with liquid air storage should review its specific claim scope directly rather than relying on the abstract alone.
Research Liquid Air Energy Storage and Cold Recovery in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole liquid air energy storage and cold recovery corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.