Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape draws on 21,273 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine data center liquid cooling terminology with facility-level retrofit signals: coolant distribution units, rack power density, leak detection, and phased migration strategy. The search intentionally spans both dedicated liquid-cooling hardware and the air-cooling baseline it is displacing or supplementing, so the corpus captures retrofit-relevant claims rather than greenfield liquid-cooling design alone.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2026 figure in the trend line is necessarily incomplete and should not be read as a drop-off. Family-level counting is used throughout the assignee ranking so that continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction copies of the same invention are not double-counted.
Two views of the same 21,273-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Annual filings rose from 837 in 2017 to a peak of 1,387 in 2023, then held near that level through the 2022 midpoint of 1,330 before the partial 2026 count of 204. Read alongside the 18-month publication lag, this looks like a market that reached a filing plateau rather than one still building momentum.
G01M (testing machine & structure balance) touches 19.5% of all 21,273 records — the single largest class by a wide margin — ahead of F24F air conditioning & ventilation at 6.7% and B01D separation processes at 5.8%. Because a record can carry several IPC classes, these shares sum to more than 100%; the pattern still says something concrete: much of the claim activity around retrofit liquid cooling is instrumentation and validation work (sensing, leak testing, thermal measurement), not the cooling loop hardware itself.
Shares are the percentage of the 21,273 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about liquid cooling retrofit for existing data centers and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA refrigerant leak detection and mitigation system for HVAC systems that pairs a refrigerant gas sensor with a signal conditioner, alarm status indicator, and digital control processor. The processor and conditioner form a closed control loop that continuously recalibrates the sensor voltage to compensate for background refrigerant levels, ambient air changes, and sensor manufacturing tolerances.Filed by an individual inventor (Green, Kenneth Ray), granted 2022-05-10 — illustrative of how leak-detection claims in this space are not solely the province of large corporate assignees.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4922901A | Drug delivery articles utilizing electrical energy | 1,903 |
| 2 | US20060243944A1 | Compositions comprising a fluoroolefin | 697 |
| 3 | WO2006094303A2 | Compositions comprising a fluoroolefin | 683 |
| 4 | WO1998012965A1 | Assisted ventilation to match patient respiratory need | 564 |
| 5 | EP0358114A2 | Aerosol delivery articles utilizing electrical energy | 521 |
| 6 | US20150350914A1 | Ground and air vehicle electromagnetic signature detection and localization | 500 |
| 7 | US4927411A | Drive mechanism for disposable fluid infusion pumping cassette | 487 |
| 8 | US20090186571A1 | Air ventilation system | 478 |
| 9 | US20060243945A1 | Compositions comprising a fluoroolefin | 477 |
| 10 | US9999038B2 | Remote distributed antenna system | 467 |
Citation counts favour older filings inside any searched corpus — treat them as a measure of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Four read-outs from the concentration, trend, and classification figures above.
The leader holds 337 records out of 21,273, and the top 5 assignees combined reach only 6.9% of all records in scope. Tenth place still holds 165. This is a long-tail field: a new entrant is not walking into a two-company duopoly the way some adjacent hardware categories look.
Volume rose from 837 in 2017 to 1,387 in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint already at 1,330 — indicating the growth phase had largely finished before the peak year. Several of the largest tracked assignees show 0 filings or -100% year-on-year in the most recent period, consistent with a maturing rather than expanding filing base.
G01M (testing, machine & structure balance) appears in 19.5% of records, well ahead of F24F air conditioning and ventilation (6.7%) or F25B refrigeration and heat pumps (4.1%). Sensing, leak detection and thermal validation are where much of the current claim density sits, not the coolant distribution hardware itself.
The United States leads with 6,497 filings, followed by China (3,218), the European Patent Office (2,516), WIPO/PCT (1,737), Japan (1,487) and India (797). A retrofit strategy aimed at a single jurisdiction risks missing prior art or blocking claims filed through a different route entirely.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to liquid cooling retrofit for existing data centers, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders in this corpus span refrigerant chemistry, HVAC hardware, and general electronics conglomerates rather than a cluster of pure-play liquid-cooling specialists — a sign the retrofit problem is being attacked from several adjacent industries at once.
The top-ranked assignee holds 337 records against a 21,273-record corpus; by fifth place that figure is already down to 253, and tenth place holds 165. No single company's filing pattern reads as a moat that a new claim strategy has to route entirely around.
Several of the most active historical filers show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with year-on-year changes as steep as -100% or -50% among the assignees with the largest overall counts. This pattern is consistent with the plateau visible in the aggregate trend line rather than an isolated slowdown at one firm.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus, and the strongest of them link a chemicals-side assignee to named individual co-inventors rather than to a second corporate partner. Cross-company joint filing is not yet a defining feature of this field.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Qualcomm Inc | 1 | -50% |
| E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co | 0 | — |
| General Electric Co | 0 | -100% |
| Daikin Industries Ltd | 0 | — |
| The Chemours Co FC LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Ford Global Technologies LLC | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Electric Corp | 0 | — |
| ResMed Pty Ltd | 0 | -100% |
The aggregate view above answers whether the field is crowded; the next questions are about specific claims and specific competitors.
Run a proposed coolant distribution unit or leak-detection claim against the 21,273-record set to see which prior art it sits closest to before drafting.
Search this landscape in Eureka →Isolate which of the ranked assignees kept filing through the most recent partial year versus those that show a 0 or negative year-on-year figure.
Build an assignee watchlist in Eureka →Compare the under-claimed sub-areas above — phased migration sequencing, water loop retrofit interfaces — against your own product plan.
Explore white space in Eureka →This dataset tracks 21,273 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine data center liquid cooling terminology with retrofit-specific signals such as coolant distribution units, facility water loops, and leak detection. The count includes both dedicated liquid-cooling hardware filings and the air-cooling baseline claims that retrofit approaches interact with. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year in that range is understated and will rise as more applications publish.
The ranking covers 100 assignees, with the leader holding 337 records against the 21,273-record corpus. Concentration is low: the top 5 assignees combined account for only 6.9% of all records in scope, and the top 10 reach 11.8%. That spread means the field is being worked by a mix of refrigerant chemistry firms, HVAC hardware makers, and diversified electronics conglomerates rather than a small set of specialists holding a dominant position.
Filing volume rose from 837 records in 2017 to a peak of 1,387 in 2023, but the 2022 midpoint of 1,330 shows the growth curve had already flattened before that peak. Several of the largest tracked assignees show zero filings or year-on-year declines as steep as -100% in the most recent tracked year. Combined with the 18-month publication lag on the partial 2026 figure, the pattern reads as a maturing filing base rather than an accelerating one.
US11326798B2 claims a refrigerant leak detection and mitigation system that pairs a refrigerant gas sensor with a signal conditioner, alarm indicator, and digital control processor arranged in a closed control loop that continuously recalibrates for background gas levels and ambient conditions. It is a specific closed-loop recalibration architecture, not a claim over refrigerant leak sensing generally. Designs that detect leaks without that particular dynamic recalibration loop, or that use a different feedback architecture between sensor and controller, sit outside its literal claim scope, though a freedom-to-operate review should still check the full claim set and file history.
Relative to the dense instrumentation and testing classes — G01M alone touches 19.5% of the 21,273 records — narrower retrofit-specific mechanics show thinner coverage in this corpus: phased migration sequencing controls, cross-vendor coolant distribution unit interoperability, and mixed air/liquid rack density transition logic. These are candidate areas for a first-mover claim, though thin coverage in a keyword-based search should be confirmed with a targeted prior-art search before drafting, since it can also reflect classification or terminology gaps rather than true white space.
Go past this page: query the whole liquid cooling retrofit for existing data centers corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.