Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (2) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 64 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Liquid crystal polymer (LCP) composite reinforcement covers a specific engineering problem: how to use the self-orienting, thermotropic behaviour of LCP molecules to reinforce a host resin, either as discrete fiber, as an in-situ blended phase, or as a self-reinforced laminate where the matrix and reinforcement share a chemistry. The dataset behind this page spans 64 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026, concentrated in IPC classes for polymer compositions (C08L), additives (C08K) and condensation chemistry (C08G), with smaller but consistent activity in shaping (B29C), laminates (B32B) and printed-circuit substrates (H05K).
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-2026 figures in the trend chart understate actual filing activity for those years. Even accounting for that lag, the trajectory from a 2017 base of zero to a 2025 peak of six families describes a technology area with steady, low-volume interest rather than a filing boom.
Two views of the same 64-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of six in 2025, with a 2022 midpoint of only two families. That shape points to sporadic, project-driven filing rather than sustained R&D investment ramping up across the sector.
C08L (polymer compositions) appears in 60 of 64 records, making it close to a universal classification for this search. Processing- and application-specific classes such as B29C, B32B, C09K and H05K each cover a minority of records, which is where more specific, less crowded claim territory tends to sit.
Shares are the percentage of the 64 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about liquid crystal polymer composite reinforcement and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA polymer composition for forming in-situ composite molded articles is provided. The polymer composition comprises a polyphenylene sulfide matrix resin, a thermotropic liquid crystal polymer, and a non-crystalline polymer. The polymer composition may be melt injected or melt extruded to form in-situ composite molded articles having improved mechanical properties.Filed by Korea Institute of Science and Technology; granted 1994-01-04.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO1993001227A1 | Thermotropic liquid crystal segmented block copolymer | 233 |
| 2 | US5275877A | Self reinforced thermoplastic composite laminate | 170 |
| 3 | EP0217563A2 | Liquid crystal fiber-reinforced polymer composite and process for preparing same | 48 |
| 4 | WO2007015371A1 | Resin compositions, method of producing the same and molded article obtained therefrom | 43 |
| 5 | US5225488A | Mixing process for generating in-situ reinforced thermoplastics | 41 |
| 6 | US20090093575A1 | Resin compositions, method of producing the same and molded article obtained therefrom | 39 |
| 7 | US20030118836A1 | Fluoropolymer laminates and a process for manufacture thereof | 20 |
| 8 | CN102756478A | 热致性液晶聚合物/PET原位复合薄膜材料制备方法 | 15 |
| 9 | WO1992019676A1 | Mixing process for generating in-SITU reinforced thermoplastics | 14 |
| 10 | EP1911809A1 | Resin compositions, method of producing the same and molded article obtained therefrom | 12 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate references within the searched corpus; treat them as a measure of influence on the field's vocabulary, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once family counts, citations and jurisdictions are read together.
China's receiving office accounts for 27 of the tracked filings, more than Europe (11) and the United States (11) combined. Any freedom-to-operate check for this technology now has to start with the Chinese register, not treat it as a secondary market.
The two most-cited records in the corpus — a thermotropic block copolymer patent and a self-reinforced composite laminate patent — both date to 1993. New filings are still being written and cited against this early art, which suggests the core chemistry is settled and differentiation now happens at the formulation and processing margins.
The 2022 midpoint of two families sits well below the 2025 peak of six, meaning the increase did not build steadily — it stepped up late. That pattern is more consistent with a small number of active filers timing applications around specific product launches than with a broad wave of new entrants.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to liquid crystal polymer composite reinforcement, with the prior art for and against each one.
With only 64 families total and a strongest co-assignee pairing of four shared filings, this is a field of a handful of repeat filers plus a long tail of single-filing entrants — universities, research institutes and specialty compounders.
Kingfa Science and Technology and Zhuhai Wanton Engineering Plastics each show one filing in the most recent year and together hold the strongest co-assignee link in the dataset at four joint families — the clearest sign of an active, collaborative filing programme still running today.
University of Massachusetts, DuPont-Mitsui Fluorochemicals, Unitika and the University of Akron all appear in the historical record but show no filings in the latest tracked year. Their earlier grants remain part of the prior-art baseline even without continued prosecution.
Only three co-assignee pairings appear across the full corpus, and the strongest of them is a single commercial pairing rather than a university-industry link. Most families in this dataset are filed by a single assignee, which keeps freedom-to-operate mapping relatively straightforward.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Kingfa Science and Technology Co., Ltd. | 1 | — |
| Zhuhai Wanton Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd. | 1 | — |
| University of Massachusetts | 0 | — |
| DuPont-Mitsui Fluorochemicals Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Unitika Ltd. | 0 | — |
| University of Akron | 0 | — |
| Mazda Motor Corporation | 0 | — |
| Korea Institute of Science and Technology | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, R&D scoping or competitive tracking.
Before drafting new claims in this space, check how far the thermotropic block copolymer and self-reinforced laminate patents extend, since later filings are still built on that vocabulary.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaWith 27 of 64 filings routed through China's receiving office, ongoing monitoring should watch that register first rather than relying on PCT or EPO publication as a proxy.
Set up an assignee alert in EurekaIt describes methods for using thermotropic liquid crystal polymer (LCP) to reinforce another resin, either as a discrete fiber, as an in-situ blended microfibrillar phase, or as a self-reinforced laminate where matrix and reinforcement share the same LCP chemistry. Typical target applications include high-strength, low-weight moulded parts and flexible circuit substrates, which is why printed-circuit IPC classes appear alongside polymer chemistry classes in the patent data. The appeal is combining LCP's high strength and dimensional stability with easier processing than a fully aromatic LCP part would allow.
The dataset of 64 patent families shows a small set of active filers rather than one dominant leader. Kingfa Science and Technology and Zhuhai Wanton Engineering Plastics show the clearest recent activity, including the strongest co-assignee link in the corpus at four joint filings, while earlier filers such as the University of Massachusetts, DuPont-Mitsui Fluorochemicals, Unitika and the University of Akron contributed foundational patents but show no filings in the most recent year. This is a field with a long tail of single-filing universities, institutes and specialty compounders rather than concentrated ownership.
Not in a sustained way. Filings moved from zero in 2017 to a 2022 midpoint of two families, then to a peak of six in 2025, which is a small and uneven increase rather than compounding growth. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in the trend are likely undercounted, but even with that adjustment the pattern looks like episodic filing tied to specific projects rather than an expanding research wave.
C08L, covering polymer compositions, appears in 60 of the 64 tracked families and functions as the near-universal classification for this search. Additive chemistry (C08K) and condensation polymer chemistry (C08G) are the next most common, each appearing in about a quarter of records. Application- and processing-specific classes — B29C for shaping, B32B for laminates, C09K for materials, and H05K for circuit assemblies — cover a smaller share of the corpus and are where more specific, less contested claim language tends to be found.
US5276107A claims a polymer composition combining a polyphenylene sulfide matrix resin, a thermotropic liquid crystal polymer, and a non-crystalline polymer, processed by melt injection or melt extrusion into in-situ composite moulded articles. Anyone formulating a PPS/LCP in-situ blend with a third non-crystalline polymer component using standard melt processing should review this claim scope carefully before finalising a formulation. Because the patent dates to the early 1990s, its core term has expired in most jurisdictions, but the claim language still shapes how later filings in the same chemistry are drafted and distinguished.
Go past this page: query the whole liquid crystal polymer composite reinforcement corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.