Book a demo

Lithium-Air Battery Patent Landscape 2026

Lithium-Air Battery Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Lithium-Air Battery Patent Landscape in 2026

The lithium-air battery patent field is heavily concentrated, with Samsung Electronics holding the top position and the five largest filers collectively accounting for 39% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output. Annual filing volume peaked in 2018 and has since eased substantially, signalling a field moving past its peak growth phase even as cumulative activity across the multi-year window remains substantial.

4,111
Patent families in scope
39%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-40%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung Electronics leads a concentrated, Korean-dominated field

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd ranks first among all applicants, followed by LG Energy Solution Ltd and Honeycomb Battery Co. Korean and Korean-affiliated entities occupy four of the top five positions, establishing a clear regional dominance at the leading edge of the field.

The top five filers hold 39% of the hundred largest filers’ combined patent records, indicating a moderately high concentration. There is a visible tier gap between the top two players and the rest: LG Energy Solution’s count is roughly 77% of Samsung Electronics’, while the third-ranked Honeycomb Battery Co sits at about 41% of the leader’s level.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Samsung Electronics Co Ltd708
2LG Energy Solution Ltd545
3Honeycomb Battery Co288
4Samsung SDI Co Ltd270
5Hyundai Motor Co Ltd193
6Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited176
7Toyota Motor Corporation170
8Robert Bosch GmbH144
9Asahi Kasei Battery Separator Corporation91
10UChicago Argonne LLC87
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11LG Chem Ltd86
12Hanyang University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation81
13Blue Current Inc79
14Semicon Energy Lab Co Ltd78
15University of Michigan76
16Sionic Energy Inc75
17KOREA ADVANCED INST OF SCI & TECH66
18NOHMS Technologies Inc62
19SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY R&DB FOUNDATION61
20IBM Corporation51
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions—built primarily around core battery cell and electrode technology (H01M)—suggest that fundamental electrochemistry IP is largely controlled by established Korean conglomerates and their spin-offs, raising the barrier for new entrants attempting to compete on core cell architecture rather than peripheral subsystems.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and are likely undercounted; trend readings for 20242026 should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Volume peaked in 2018; core battery IP dominates the technology mix

The annual filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that reached maximum activity around 2018 and is now consolidating, with the vast majority of IP concentrated in core electrochemical classes rather than application or system-integration branches.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings climbed to a peak of 684 records in 2018, then declined to 354 by 2023. The 2024–2026 bars are subject to publication lag and should be read as provisional minimums rather than real declines. The multi-year recent-window growth figure of -40% reflects easing from the 2018 peak across the measured window.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 684 in 2018.539201768420186672019527202053820214172022354202326620241092025102026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells) accounts for the dominant share of classified records by a wide margin, confirming that IP activity is anchored in fundamental cell chemistry and electrode materials. Adjacent classes such as H01G (Capacitors), C01B (Non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds), and B60L (Electric vehicle propulsion) are present but represent a fraction of the H01M volume, pointing to relatively sparse coverage in system-integration and application-layer IP.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 6,209; H01G · Capacitors 445.H01M · Batteries, cells …6,209H01G · Capacitors445C01B · Non-metallic elem…346B60L · Electric vehicle …218H02J · Power supply & gr…199B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…149C01G · Compounds of othe…137H01B · Cables, conductor…133↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US9343787B2Published 2016-05-17

Lithium-air battery with sodium salt as mediator

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha

A lithium air battery is provided. The battery comprises: an anode compartment; a cathode compartment supplied with an O<sub>2 </sub>source; and a lithium ion conductive membrane separating the anode compartment from the cathode compartment. The anode compartment comprises an anode having lithium or a lithium alloy as active metal and a lithium ion… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Lithium-air battery with sodium salt as mediator — patent drawingLithium-air battery with sodium salt as mediator — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Metal-air accumulator with air electrode protectio…1,068
2Graphene foam-protected anode active materials for…360
3Coated electroactive materials315
4Conductive graphene polymer binder for electrochem…240
5Mesoporous carbon materials comprising bifunctiona…210
6Ultrapure synthetic carbon materials206
7Advanced Metal-Air Battery Having a Ceramic Membra…175
8Composite ionic conducting electrolytes162

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the landscape structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural observations—maturity, concentration, collaboration networks, and geographic reach—frame where risk and opportunity sit for an engineer evaluating entry or expansion in this space.

Decline

Past-peak: consolidation phase underway

Annual filings peaked in 2018 at 684 records and have eased consistently since. The lifecycle stage is characterised as Decline, driven by annual volume easing back from that peak. For R&D teams, this signals that broad foundational patenting has slowed and that differentiated, narrow claims in underserved sub-branches may offer more freedom-to-operate than broad platform filings.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

High at the top; mid-tier is fragmented

The top five filers hold 39% of the hundred largest filers’ combined patent records. Samsung Electronics alone holds 708 patent records, nearly 1.3× LG Energy Solution’s 545. Below the top two, the field fragments quickly—Honeycomb Battery Co at 288 and Samsung SDI at 270 represent a secondary tier, while ranks 5–20 span a wide range from 193 down to 51 records. This fragmented mid-tier leaves room for focused challengers in specific subsystems.

Top-5 share: 39%
Collaboration

Automotive-academic partnerships dominate co-filing

The most active co-filing pair is Hyundai Motor and Kia, with 134 shared records, reflecting tight integration within the Hyundai Motor Group. Samsung Electronics co-files with Samsung SDI (99 records), Mie University (30 records), Seoul National University R&DB Foundation (23 records), and MIT (20 records), demonstrating a hybrid industrial-academic strategy spanning Korea, Japan, and the US. LG Chem co-files with UNIST (12 records), and Hyundai also partners with Hanyang University and Yonsei University (12 records each).

Top pair: Hyundai–Kia (134)
Geography

US is the primary filing jurisdiction; Europe and China are secondary

The United States leads all jurisdictions with 2,434 patent records, followed by Europe via the EPO with 1,247 records and China with 720 records. WIPO PCT filings stand at 434, and South Korea—home of the dominant applicants—registers 381 records. Japan accounts for 138 records despite Toyota and other Japanese firms appearing in the applicant list. This US-centric filing pattern means that US freedom-to-operate analysis is the critical first step for any market entry.

Lead office: United States (2,434)
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Hyundai Motor Co LtdKia Corporation134
Samsung Electronics Co LtdSamsung SDI Co Ltd99
Samsung Electronics Co LtdMie University30
Samsung Electronics Co LtdSeoul National University R&DB Foundation23
Hyundai Motor Co LtdSeoul National University R&DB Foundation21
Samsung Electronics Co LtdMassachusetts Institute of Technology20
Kia CorporationSeoul National University R&DB Foundation13
LG Chem LtdUNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology)12
Hyundai Motor Co LtdHanyang University12
Hyundai Motor Co LtdYonsei University12

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration counts and jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung Electronics leads; Samsung SDI and CATL show rising momentum

The top two players both focus heavily on core H01M electrochemistry, but their recent filing trajectories diverge sharply. Mid-tier players with rising momentum—particularly Samsung SDI and CATL—represent the most active challengers in the current filing window.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd

Samsung Electronics holds 708 patent records, the largest position in the corpus, concentrated in H01M electrode, cell, and metal-air battery subclasses. Despite its commanding total, recent filing momentum has declined sharply at –80% versus the prior three-year period, suggesting the company has shifted focus or is allowing earlier filings to mature without equivalent replacement volume.

patent records: 708
Challenger · Samsung SDI

Samsung SDI Co Ltd

Samsung SDI ranks fourth overall with 270 patent records, focused on H01M cell and electrode technology similar to its parent ecosystem. In contrast to Samsung Electronics, Samsung SDI shows a strongly rising recent trajectory at +125% versus the prior period, making it the most dynamically growing major incumbent in the field and a player worth monitoring for claim scope expansion.

patent records: 270
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access the complete ranked list of 100 applicants with technology focus and filing momentum for each.
LG Energy Solution LtdHoneycomb Battery Co+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd43▼ -80%
LG Energy Solution Ltd112▼ -16%
Samsung SDI Co Ltd108▲ +125%
Hyundai Motor Co Ltd11▼ -84%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd84▲ +8%
Robert Bosch GmbH3▲ new entrant
NOHMS Technologies Inc41▼ -9%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player patent record counts are drawn from the top-100 applicant ranking; momentum reflects recent vs. prior three-year filing comparison.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches in EV integration, nanotechnology, and power systems

Several IPC classes adjacent to the dominant H01M core show relatively sparse coverage. These observations identify branches where patent density is low relative to the technical relevance of lithium-air chemistry to those application domains.

B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion

With 218 patent records, B60L represents a relatively thin layer of EV-integration IP despite lithium-air chemistry’s theoretical energy-density advantage for long-range vehicles. The technical connection is direct—battery system integration, battery management, and range extension are all plausible claim territories—and the low density suggests that most applicants have focused on cell-level rather than system-level IP. Engineers targeting EV OEM partnerships could find broader filing freedom here than in core H01M subclasses.

Search this in Eureka →

B82Y · Nanotechnology applications

B82Y carries 149 patent records, reflecting limited but non-trivial activity at the intersection of nanotechnology and lithium-air chemistry—particularly relevant for nanostructured air cathodes and catalyst materials. The class sits adjacent to both the dominant H01M core and the C01B inorganic compounds branch (346 records). Given that nanostructured carbon and metal-oxide catalysts are active research themes, the sparse IP density in B82Y relative to the underlying science suggests an under-exploited filing angle for materials-focused entrants.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all identified adjacent branches with filing density, representative applicants, and suggested search queries.
H02J · Power supply and grid systemsC01B · Non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch counts are at the patent-record level; a single document can be classified under multiple IPC codes.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology sub-route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 12 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 50 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 2 · Batteries, cells & fuel cells
Samsung Electronics Co LtdStrong · 491Strong · 433Strong · 391Moderate · 127Emerging · 76
LG Chem LtdStrong · 302Strong · 277Moderate · 82Emerging · 36Emerging · 40
LG Energy Solution LtdStrong · 214Strong · 246AbsentEmerging · 49Absent
Samsung SDI Co LtdStrong · 218Strong · 228AbsentEmerging · 44Emerging · 17
Nanotek Instruments IncStrong · 213Strong · 210AbsentAbsentEmerging · 19
Hyundai Motor Co LtdStrong · 155AbsentStrong · 182Emerging · 28Emerging · 14
Robert Bosch GmbHStrong · 88Strong · 90Strong · 76AbsentEmerging · 15
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own lithium-air battery patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.