Book a demo

Lithium-Ion Battery Current Collector Patent Landscape

Lithium-Ion Battery Current Collector Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Lithium-Ion Battery Current Collector Patent Landscape in 2026

JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation holds a commanding lead in this field, accounting for the largest single-applicant share among the top hundred filers. Overall annual filing volume has eased from its 2018 peak, placing the field in a declining phase, though a pocket of collaboration between Japanese industrial and research institutions signals continued targeted activity.

90
Patent families in scope
42%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-47%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

JX Nippon Mining & Metals leads a concentrated, Japan-and-China-anchored field

JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation sits at the top of the top five applicants together account for 42% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers, signalling a moderately concentrated competitive structure.

A clear tier gap separates the leading Japanese materials specialist from challengers. Kawasaki Heavy Industries and the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) each hold 10–11 patent records, followed by Tsinghua University and Zhuhai CosMX Battery, both at 8 patent records. Below that, no single filer reaches double digits, indicating a long, thin tail of smaller participants.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1JX NIPPON MINING & METALS CORP34
2Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.11
3National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)10
4Tsinghua University8
5Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co., Ltd.8
6South China University of Technology5
7APB Corporation5
8Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. (Foxconn)4
9Hefei Guoxuan High-Tech Power Energy Co., Ltd.4
10Gree Altairnano New Energy Inc.3
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11CoreShell Technologies Inc.3
12Hong Fu Jin Precision Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.3
13Huafu (Jiangsu) Lithium Battery New Technology Co., Ltd.2
14Taizhou Beilaisi E-Commerce Co., Ltd.2
15Nanjing Tech University2
16SHAANXI UNIV OF SCI & TECH2
17Qujing Faymo Technology Co., Ltd.2
18Zhejiang Godsend Power Technology Co., Ltd.2
19Shenzhen Faymo Technology Co., Ltd.2
20Kawasaki Motors, Ltd.2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

JX Nippon Mining & Metals’ focus on copper foil and related electrode substrate processing gives it a defensible material-science moat. Challengers such as Kawasaki Heavy Industries and AIST have built their positions through a joint fiber-electrode programme, while Chinese industrial filers like Zhuhai CosMX and Hefei Guoxuan represent the cell-maker perspective on collector design.

The most recent 18–24 months of data are subject to publication lag and will undercount actual recent filings; trend readings for 20242026 should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2018 filing peak followed by easing volume; electrode cell chemistry dominates the branch mix

The annual trend chart shows how activity evolved from a 2018 high and then eased back, while the technology composition chart reveals that H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) overwhelmingly defines the corpus, with a set of smaller adjacent branches filling out the remainder.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose sharply to a 2018 peak of 20 records, then trended down through the early 2020s before a partial recovery in 2023 (11 records). The 2024 and 2025 figures should be read as provisional given typical 18–24 month publication lag; they do not yet reflect the full volume of activity in those years.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 20 in 2018.420172020181620191520209202132022112023720245202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) accounts for the dominant share of IPC classifications, confirming that most innovation targets cell-level current collector design. The next-largest branches — H01G (capacitors), B21B (metal rolling), C22C (alloys), and C23C (coating and surface deposition) — each represent a far smaller slice, pointing to secondary innovation in manufacturing process and material composition.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 146; H01G · Capacitors 11.H01M · Batteries, cells …146H01G · Capacitors11B21B · Metal rolling8C22C · Alloys5C23C · Coating & surface…5B05C · Coating apparatus4B32B · Layered products …4C09D · Coatings, paints …4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20220407082A1Published 2022-12-22

Lithium ion battery current collector, production …

Apb Corporation

A lithium ion battery current collector which is used in a lithium ion battery in contact with an electrode active material at one principal surface, characterized in that the current collector is provided with a surface layer on the principal surface in contact with the electrode active material, and an uneven structure is provided on a surface in which… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Lithium ion battery current collector, production … — patent drawingLithium ion battery current collector, production … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Electrical storage device including fiber electrod…46
2Copper foil for lithium ion battery current collec…35
3Fiber electrode and fiber battery, method of fabri…33
4表面含有导电聚合物膜的锂离子电池集流体处理工艺32
5锂离子电池集流体预涂层及其制备方法23
6一种超轻锂离子电池集流体及其制备方法22
7锂离子电池集流体及其制备方法20
8Method for making lithium ion battery20

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The competitive and technological structure of this corpus has direct implications for teams considering entry, partnership, or differentiation strategies. Four dimensions — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — frame the key decision points.

Decline

Field is in decline from a 2018 peak

Annual filings have eased back from the 2018 peak of 20 records, placing the field in a declining lifecycle stage. This suggests that foundational current collector architectures are maturing and that incremental improvements are being absorbed into standard practice. R&D investment is most defensible in technically differentiated sub-segments rather than broad collector design.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

Top-five filers hold 42% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total

The top five applicants — JX Nippon Mining & Metals, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, AIST, Tsinghua University, and Zhuhai CosMX Battery — collectively represent 42% of the top-hundred filers’ combined patent records. This level of concentration means new entrants face established IP positions in the most direct technology paths. Differentiation through adjacent branches or novel materials is a more viable route than head-on replication.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Kawasaki Heavy Industries and AIST form the most active co-filing pair

The most active collaborative relationship in the corpus is between Kawasaki Heavy Industries and the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), with 13 joint patent records — by far the largest co-filing count. Tsinghua University and Foxconn have co-filed 3 records, and APB Corporation and Sanyo Chemical Industries have co-filed 2. These pairings suggest that fiber-electrode and all-polymer current collector research is being prosecuted through industry–academia partnerships rather than solo corporate programmes.

Industry–academia led
Geography

China leads jurisdiction filings; Japan and the US remain key secondary markets

China is the dominant filing jurisdiction with 79 patent records, reflecting both the scale of Chinese battery manufacturing and the presence of major Chinese university and cell-maker applicants. Europe (EPO) and the United States each receive meaningful coverage (17 and 14 records respectively), followed by Japan (12) and South Korea (8). Entrants seeking broad protection should prioritise these five jurisdictions; the remaining offices represent thinner coverage.

China-led, multi-market
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)13
Tsinghua UniversityFoxconn Technology Group3
APB CorporationSanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd.2
Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co., Ltd.Harbin Institute of Technology1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, lifecycle assessment, and jurisdiction filing distribution.Explore insights →
Leaders

JX Nippon Mining & Metals leads on copper foil; Kawasaki Heavy Industries challenges through fiber electrodes

The two dominant players approach current collector technology from distinct technical angles — one from advanced metal foil processing, the other from a novel fiber-based electrode architecture developed in partnership with a national research institute.

Leader · JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation

JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation

With 34 patent records, JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation holds the largest position in the corpus by a wide margin. Its technology emphasis centres on H01M 4 (electrode materials and structures) and B21B 1 (metal rolling processes), reflecting a strategy grounded in high-performance copper foil manufacturing — the material basis of most commercial current collectors. No momentum trend data is available for this filer in the evidence, suggesting an established rather than rapidly accelerating position.

patent records: 34
Challenger · Kawasaki Heavy Industries

Kawasaki Heavy Industries

Kawasaki Heavy Industries holds 11 patent records, all strongly concentrated in H01M 4, H01M 10, and H01M 2 — the same battery-cell classification cluster as its long-term co-filing partner AIST (10 patent records). The two organisations have filed 13 joint records together, indicating that Kawasaki’s position is built substantially through collaborative prosecution of fiber-electrode and structural battery technology rather than through an independent internal programme.

patent records: 11
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top filers, including Chinese cell makers, universities, and emerging entrants.
Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co., Ltd.Tsinghua University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
APB Corporation1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles combine applicant ranking counts with IPC technology emphasis and collaboration evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant electrode classification

Several IPC branches appear at low share relative to the dominant H01M class. These observations of relative sparsity, combined with plausible technical connections to current collector performance, identify areas where incremental IP exposure may be lower.

C23C · Coating & surface deposition

C23C accounts for only 5 patent records (2% share among the top branches), despite coating technologies being directly relevant to current collector surface engineering — for example, applying conductive carbon or corrosion-resistant layers to aluminium or copper foils. The low count suggests that thin-film and vapour-deposition approaches to collector modification are under-patented relative to their potential impact on interfacial resistance and cycle stability. Teams with thin-film deposition expertise could file in this branch with comparatively limited incumbent density.

Search this in Eureka →

B21B · Metal rolling

B21B (metal rolling) appears in 8 patent records, concentrated largely in JX Nippon Mining & Metals’ own portfolio. Outside that single applicant, the branch is sparse relative to the commercial importance of roll-to-roll copper and aluminium foil production processes. Innovations in ultra-thin rolling, texture control for adhesion, or roll-surface finishing for reduced collector thickness represent plausible entry points for materials and equipment suppliers that do not already face heavy incumbent coverage.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See detailed filing density analysis across all 28 IPC branches identified in the current collector corpus.
H01G · Capacitors (hybrid energy storage interface)C22C · Alloys (novel foil alloy compositions)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures reflect IPC classification counts at the patent-record level across the scoped corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 2 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 50 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 6 · Batteries, cells & fuel cells
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)Strong · 13Strong · 11Strong · 11Strong · 9Strong · 10
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.Strong · 13Strong · 11Strong · 11Strong · 9Strong · 10
JX Nippon Mining & Metals CorporationStrong · 34Moderate · 13AbsentAbsentAbsent
Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co., Ltd.Strong · 8Strong · 7AbsentAbsentAbsent
Tsinghua UniversityStrong · 4Strong · 3Moderate · 2AbsentAbsent
South China University of TechnologyStrong · 5Moderate · 2AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own current collector patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.