Book a demo

Lithium-Ion Battery State Estimation Patent Landscape

Lithium-Ion Battery State Estimation Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Lithium-Ion Battery State Estimation Patent Landscape in 2026

Lithium-ion battery state estimation is a concentrated, growth-stage field with 42 patent families in scope, dominated by Nucleus Scientific Inc, which holds a commanding lead over all other filers. The field expanded sharply from 2020 onward, and while annual volume has eased from its 2021 peak, the multi-year trajectory remains positive and the most recent periods are further understated by publication lag.

42
Patent families in scope
62%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+31%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Nucleus Scientific dominates a small but growing applicant pool

Nucleus Scientific Inc sits at the top of the top five filers together account for 62% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signaling a highly concentrated competitive structure.

Below Nucleus Scientific, a second tier of academic and institutional filers — including the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), the Université Libre de Bruxelles, Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, and the Regents of the University of California — each hold five to seven patent records. The gap between the leader and this tier is substantial, leaving meaningful room for challengers to build differentiated positions.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Nucleus Scientific Inc32
2French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)7
3Université Libre de Bruxelles5
4Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt5
5Regents of the University of California5
6Regents of the University of Michigan4
7Lafontaine Serge R2
8Indigo Technologies Inc2
9LG Energy Solution Ltd1
10Nanjing Forestry University1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11State Grid Sichuan Economic Research Institute1
12Harbin Panlian Electric Technology Co Ltd1
13China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)1
14Hohai University1
15Harbin Institute of Technology1
16Emuron Technologies Pvt Ltd1
17Jilin University1
18California Institute of Technology1
19Southwest Jiaotong University1
20Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Nucleus Scientific’s dominance, combined with the academic character of the second tier, suggests that the commercial patent space is still relatively open. Challengers with strong measurement or AI-based estimation approaches could establish positions without directly colliding with the leader’s core charging-system portfolio.

Filing counts for 2024 and 2025 are likely understated due to patent publication lag of 18–24 months and should not be read as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2021 activity surge with broad power-systems and measurement coverage

The filing trend and technology-branch mix together reveal when competitive attention intensified and where the technical work is concentrated across IPC classes.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible before 2020, then surged to 11 records in 2021 before easing. The multi-year window shows 31% recent growth over the prior period. Years 2024–2026 are understated by publication lag and should not be interpreted as a decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 11 in 2021.020171201802019220201120219202232023520249202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (power supply and grid systems) and H01M (batteries and cells) are the dominant branches, reflecting the field’s core focus on charging and electrochemical systems. G01R (electrical measurement) is the third-largest branch, confirming that measurement and sensing methods underpin most state-estimation approaches. Smaller branches — G06F (digital data processing) and G06N (AI models) — represent lower-volume but technically adjacent areas.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 42; H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells 39.H02J · Power supply & gr…42H01M · Batteries, cells …39G01R · Electric & magnet…34G06F · Electric digital …12G06N · Computing based o…8H04L · Digital informati…4G06K · Data recognition …3G01K · Temperature measu…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2023231356A1Published 2023-12-07

一种基于光纤光栅传感器的锂离子电池荷电状态估计方法

Shenzhen Institutes Of Advanced Technology

一种基于光纤光栅传感器的锂离子电池荷电状态估计方法,方法包括:选取型号已知的锂离子电池,基于设置在锂离子电池上的光纤布拉格光栅传感器,采集测试参数(S100);根据锂离子电池的型号信息,得到与型号信息对应的已知参数(S200);根据测试参数建立时间序列测试数据集,以及根据已知参数建立时间序列目标数据集,对时间序列测试数据集进行归一化处理,并基于上下界算法,删除时间序列测试数据集中不匹配的时间序列,得到处理好的时间序列测试数据集(S300);基于处理好的时间序列测试数据集训练动态时间规整模型,得到电池荷电状态估计模型,并根据电池荷电状态估计模型,得到电池荷电状态的估计数据(S400)。有效提高了电池荷电状态的估计精度。 (excerpt from the patent abstract)

一种基于光纤光栅传感器的锂离子电池荷电状态估计方法 — patent drawing一种基于光纤光栅传感器的锂离子电池荷电状态估计方法 — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Apparatus and Method for Rapidly Charging Batteries97
2为电池快速充电的设备和方法21
3Apparatus and method for rapidly charging batteries19
4Interval estimation for state-of-charge and temper…16
5基于比例积分H∞观测器的锂离子电池剩余电量估计方法11
6基于PINN的锂离子电池健康状态与剩余寿命联合估计方法8
7バッテリを急速充電するための装置および方法8
8一种锂电池SOC和SOH联合估计方法7

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural observations — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — shape where new entrants face friction and where room exists.

Growth

Growth stage, past 2021 peak

The field is classified as Growth stage: the recent three-year filing window sits well above the prior three-year window, reflecting 31% growth. Annual volume peaked in 2021 and has eased since, but the overall multi-year trajectory is still expanding. The most recent filing years carry additional undercount due to publication lag, so the field should not be read as maturing prematurely.

Growth · eased from 2021 peak
Concentration

One dominant commercial filer, a secondary academic tier

Nucleus Scientific Inc accounts for 32 of the top-ranked patent records, and the top five filers hold 62% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. The second tier is composed almost entirely of universities and public research bodies. This structure implies that a commercially focused challenger entering with novel estimation algorithms or sensor fusion methods faces limited direct competition at the patent level.

High concentration
Collaboration

Université Libre de Bruxelles and UC Berkeley co-file most actively, with TotalEnergies as industry partner

The most active co-filing pair is the Université Libre de Bruxelles and UC Berkeley (Campus) with 5 joint records. Both institutions also co-file with TotalEnergies SE (3 records each) and with TotalEnergies Ioniq Technologies (2 records each), forming a three-party academic-industry consortium. A separate pair, Serge R. Lafontaine and Nucleus Scientific, accounts for 2 collaborative records. The TotalEnergies-university axis is the clearest evidence of structured industry-academia co-development in this space.

Academic-industry consortia
Geography

China leads filing jurisdictions; Europe and US follow

China is the leading jurisdiction by patent records, followed by EPO (Europe), the United States, and Israel. PCT and national filings in New Zealand, Australia, Germany, Japan, and Singapore indicate that key applicants are pursuing broad international protection. The China lead reflects both domestic filers and foreign applicants seeking protection in the largest battery-manufacturing market.

China-led, globally spread
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Université Libre de BruxellesUniversity of California, Berkeley (Campus)5
Université Libre de BruxellesTotalEnergies SE3
University of California, Berkeley (Campus)TotalEnergies SE3
Université Libre de BruxellesTotalEnergies Ioniq Technologies2
University of California, Berkeley (Campus)TotalEnergies Ioniq Technologies2
Lafontaine Serge RNucleus Scientific Inc2
Université Libre de BruxellesRegents of the University of California1
University of California, Berkeley (Campus)Regents of the University of California1
TotalEnergies Ioniq TechnologiesRegents of the University of California1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Cards draw on lifecycle stage, applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, and jurisdiction distribution from the evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Nucleus Scientific leads on power-system IP; CEA enters with cell-focused portfolio

The two most prominent applicants differ in technical emphasis: Nucleus Scientific concentrates on charging and power-supply methods, while the CEA (French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission) has emerged as a new entrant with a cell-chemistry and battery-system focus.

Leader · Nucleus Scientific Inc

Nucleus Scientific Inc

Nucleus Scientific Inc holds 32 patent records, by far the largest position in this landscape. Its portfolio is concentrated in H02J 7 (power supply and charging systems, 34 sub-records) and H01M 10 (batteries and cells, 24), with a smaller G01R 31 (electrical measurement) component. This emphasis on charging-system IP — rather than purely algorithmic state estimation — differentiates the leader’s approach from the academic second tier.

patent records: 32
Challenger · French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)

CEA (French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission)

The CEA holds 7 patent records and is identified as a new entrant in the recent filing window, having added 5 records in the most recent period. Its technical focus is on H01M 10 (batteries and cells, 6), H02J 7 (power supply, 5), and H01M 50 (battery structural components, 4), suggesting a system-level rather than purely algorithmic approach. Its active collaboration with the Université Libre de Bruxelles and TotalEnergies signals a consortium-driven scaling strategy.

patent records: 7
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top filers, including Université Libre de Bruxelles, Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, and the Regents of the University of California.
Université Libre de BruxellesTechnische Hochschule Ingolstadt+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)5▲ new entrant
Regents of the University of Michigan4▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent-record counts from the applicant ranking and technology emphasis from IPC sub-class analysis.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in data processing, AI models, and connectivity

Several IPC branches appear at low frequency relative to the dominant power-system and measurement classes, indicating areas where patent density is sparse and technical approaches remain less developed.

G06N · AI and machine-learning models for state estimation

G06N accounts for only 8 patent records and 5% of the branch distribution among the hundred largest filers, despite the well-established relevance of neural networks, Gaussian processes, and physics-informed machine learning to battery state-of-charge and state-of-health estimation. Entry paths include physics-informed neural networks (PINN) for joint SOC/SOH estimation — a method referenced in top-cited documents — and Bayesian interval estimation, both of which remain sparsely covered at the patent level.

Search this in Eureka →

H04L · Secure and connected battery data transmission

H04L (digital information transmission) appears in only 4 patent records, making it the most sparsely covered branch with plausible near-term commercial relevance. As battery management systems migrate toward cloud-connected and fleet-level architectures, IP covering secure data communication protocols, over-the-air firmware updates, and real-time telemetry for state estimation represents an adjacent area with limited current coverage and a realistic entry path for firms with connectivity or cybersecurity expertise.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See sparse-branch analysis across all 13 IPC classes, including G06K, G01K, and G05B control-system routes.
G06K · Data recognition and presentationG01K · Temperature measurement for state estimation+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch sparsity is assessed relative to the distribution across the top 100 filers’ combined patent records.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH02J 7 · Power supply & grid systemsH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsG01R 31 · Electric & magnetic measurementG06N 3 · Computing based on AI modelsG06F 21 · Electric digital data processing
Nucleus Scientific IncStrong · 34Strong · 24Emerging · 2AbsentAbsent
Technische Hochschule IngolstadtAbsentStrong · 4Strong · 5Strong · 3Strong · 4
French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)Strong · 5Strong · 6AbsentAbsentAbsent
University of California, Berkeley (Campus)Strong · 3AbsentStrong · 2AbsentAbsent
Université Libre de BruxellesStrong · 3AbsentStrong · 2AbsentAbsent
Lafontaine Serge RStrong · 2Strong · 2AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own lithium-ion battery state estimation landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.