Lithium Metal Fast Charging Protocol Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
A data-led look at lithium metal battery fast charging protocol patents: who is filing, how concentrated the field is, where the technology claims cluster, and where white space remains through 2026.
Filing growth = 2021 (1 records) → 2024 (9); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 92 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
What this patent set covers
Lithium metal batteries promise higher energy density than conventional lithium-ion cells, but charging them quickly without triggering lithium plating or dendrite growth is a distinct engineering problem. This landscape covers 92 published records filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine lithium metal battery chemistry with fast or rapid charging control ��� everything from multi-step constant-current protocols to charge-control circuitry claimed under H01M and H02J.
The scope is narrow by design: it isolates charging-protocol claims rather than the much larger literature on lithium metal cell chemistry generally, so the counts below describe a specific, contested corner of battery IP rather than the whole battery field.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 92 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filing activity, 2017-2026
Filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 17 in 2025, with 2021-to-2024 growth of +800% marking the field's acceleration; 2026 figures are still partial and 2025-2026 counts will rise as later publications catch up.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
Where the claims sit
H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) covers 93.5% of the 92 records, confirming this is fundamentally a cell- and charge-management claim set; H02J (power supply & grid systems) reaches 22.8% and G01R (electric & magnetic measurement) 12.0%, pointing to a meaningful secondary cluster around charge-control circuitry and monitoring rather than chemistry alone.
Shares are the percentage of the 92 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Lithium Metal Battery Fast Charging Protocol Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about lithium metal battery fast charging protocol patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA representative recent filing
WO2026010810A1 — Fast charging protocol for lithium metal battery and apparatus
Discloses a multi-step constant current (MSCC) charging protocol with at least three charging steps of currents I1, I2 and I3 arranged so the middle step is either the highest or the lowest of the three. The battery charged under this stepped pattern is claimed to reach a cycle life at least 10% longer than one charged with a single constant-current protocol.Filed by Factorial Inc., published 2026-01-08 — one of the most recent filings in scope.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5986430A | Method for ultra-rapidly charging a rechargeable battery using multi-mode regulation in a vehicular rechargin… | 135 |
| 2 | JP2018129159A | Negative electrode for all-solid-state secondary battery and all-solid-state secondary battery | 88 |
| 3 | US20120068662A1 | Portable Battery Booster | 60 |
| 4 | CN110061190A | 液态金属基自愈合锂电负极及制备方法和锂离子电池 | 29 |
| 5 | US20160043585A1 | Rapid Charging Mobile Electronic Device Battery Case | 23 |
| 6 | US20170229894A1 | Portable Battery Booster | 21 |
| 7 | US9871392B2 | Portable battery booster | 21 |
| 8 | US20180212439A1 | Devices and methods comprising supercapacitor-emulating fast-charging batteries | 18 |
| 9 | US20210167620A1 | Adaptive charging protocol for fast charging of batteries and fast charging system implementing this protocol | 17 |
| 10 | CN110444767A | 一种用于一次/二次电池金属锂负极的三维集流体、金属锂负极以及一次/二次电池 | 17 |
Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to be cited; they signal influence within this corpus, not current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers imply for strategy
Four read-throughs from the concentration, growth and jurisdiction figures above.
Half the field sits with ten assignees
The top 10 ranked assignees combine for 46 of the 92 records in scope, exactly half. The top 5 alone hold 29 records, or 31.5% of the total — meaningful concentration, but well short of a closed field, since 60 ranked companies sit outside that top 10.
Acceleration is recent and steep
Filings moved from 1 in 2021 to 9 in 2024, an +800% rise over three years, with the peak so far at 17 in 2025. Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the true 2025-2026 filing volume is still being counted.
Filing activity is heavily China-centred
China receives 49 of the tracked filings, more than the United States (14), WIPO/PCT (9), Europe (7), South Korea (6) and Canada (2) combined. Anyone benchmarking freedom-to-operate needs to weight Chinese national filings, not just PCT and US families.
Circuitry claims are a real secondary cluster
H02J appears in 22.8% of the 92 records and G01R in 12.0%, both well behind H01M's 93.5% but large enough to matter: a sizeable share of filings claim charge-control hardware or measurement alongside the cell chemistry itself.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to lithium metal battery fast charging protocol patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Brookhaven Science Associates | THE RES FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIV OF NEW YORK | 6 |
| LG Energy Solution Ltd. | Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology | 2 |
| Brookhaven Science Associates | The Research Foundation for the State University of New York | 1 |
Co-assignee activity is limited to three pairs in this dataset, the strongest linking Brookhaven Science Associates with the Research Foundation for the State University of New York on 6 records — a university-national lab pairing rather than a corporate joint filing pattern.
Where to take this analysis
The figures above frame the field; deciding where to file, litigate or license requires drilling into specific claim language.
Map claim-level overlap
Run the multi-step current profile and charge-control circuitry claims from the top-10 assignees against a target product's charging curve to find literal or equivalents overlap before committing to a design.
Explore claims in EurekaTrack the 2025-2026 filings as they publish
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 peak and 2026 partial year will both revise upward; set an alert rather than treating current counts as final.
Set up monitoring in EurekaCheck the under-claimed branches
C01D, C08F, C08G, C08J and B82Y each sit at 4.3% or below of the 92 records — thin enough that a well-drafted claim in electrolyte-adjacent chemistry may face less prior art than a chemistry-only search would suggest.
Run a white-space search in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
The leader in this dataset holds 7 of the 92 records in scope, with the fifth-ranked assignee at 4 and the tenth-ranked at 3. The top 10 ranked assignees together account for 46 records, exactly half of the field, while the remaining names in the 70-company ranking each hold only a handful of filings. That pattern — a modestly concentrated top tier over a long tail — means no single company controls the space outright, but a newcomer should still check the top 10's claims first.
Filings rose from 1 in 2021 to 9 in 2024, a +800% increase over that three-year span, with the highest single-year count so far being 17 in 2025. Because patent publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures will keep revising upward as more applications publish, so the 2024 figure is the most reliable read on recent momentum. Treat any apparent flattening in the newest years as a data-lag artefact rather than a real slowdown.
H01M, the batteries, cells and fuel cells classification, covers 93.5% of the 92 records and is the dominant class by a wide margin. H02J, power supply and grid systems, appears in 22.8% of records, and G01R, electric and magnetic measurement, in 12.0%, indicating a real secondary cluster of charge-control circuitry and monitoring claims layered on top of the core cell chemistry. Smaller classes such as C01D and C08F each sit at 4.3% or below, reflecting thinner but present activity in electrolyte and polymer chemistry adjacent to the charging protocol itself.
China's receiving office accounts for 49 of the tracked filings, well ahead of the United States at 14, WIPO/PCT filings at 9, the European Patent Office at 7, South Korea at 6 and Canada at 2. That skew toward China suggests domestic filers are driving much of the recent volume, and any freedom-to-operate review should weight Chinese national-phase filings rather than relying on PCT or US-only searches. It also means a large share of the underlying claim language may only be available in Chinese-language source documents.
Several IPC subclasses adjacent to the core H01M claims — C01D, C08F, C08G, C08J and B82Y — each appear in only 4.3% or fewer of the 92 records, suggesting comparatively light claim density in electrolyte compound, polymer and nanomaterial angles on fast charging. That does not guarantee a clean path, since some of that thinness reflects narrower applicability rather than open opportunity, but it is a reasonable place to start a novelty search. Combined with the long tail below the top 10 assignees, it indicates the field is still young enough for new entrants to stake distinct claim territory.
Research Lithium Metal Battery Fast Charging Protocol Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole lithium metal battery fast charging protocol patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.