Book a demo

Lithium-Sulfur Battery Electrolyte Patent Landscape 2026

Lithium-Sulfur Battery Electrolyte Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Lithium-Sulfur Battery Electrolyte Patent Landscape in 2026

The lithium-sulfur battery electrolyte field is in a growth stage, with a 67% rise in filings over the recent window and Lyten holding a commanding lead at 39 patent families — nearly double its nearest rival. Activity is concentrated among a small set of corporate and university filers, with China dominating filings by jurisdiction and the core battery-cell IPC class absorbing the vast majority of coverage.

195
Patent families in scope
43%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+67%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Lyten leads a concentrated but rapidly expanding field

Lyten heads the top five filers account for 43% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, signaling meaningful but not extreme concentration.

A clear two-tier structure is visible: Lyten and LG Energy Solution sit well above the third-ranked Tsinghua University, which in turn leads a large second tier of academic institutions and smaller companies clustered in the single-digit range. The gap between the top two corporate filers and the rest suggests that first-mover advantage is already forming.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Lyten Inc.39
2LG Energy Solution Ltd.23
3Tsinghua University19
4Central South University13
5Beijing Institute of Technology6
6Beijing Qichen Zoukai Technology Co., Ltd.5
7China Jiliang University5
8University of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education5
9Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences4
10HUAZHONG UNIV OF SCI & TECH4
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Suzhou Dejia Energy Technology Co., Ltd.4
12CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORP4
13Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing Co., Ltd.4
14Chengdu New Keli Chemical Science Co., Ltd.3
15The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York3
16SHANGHAI INST OF CERAMIC CHEM & TECH CHINESE ACAD …3
17KUNMING UNIV OF SCI & TECH3
18Inner Mongolia University for the Nationalities3
19Hefei Guoxuan High-Tech Power Energy Co., Ltd.3
20Zhengzhou University2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Lyten’s position reflects a deliberate IP-accumulation strategy — its 39 families represent roughly 20% of all 195 patent families in scope. LG Energy Solution’s 23 families indicate sustained corporate investment, while the strong university presence (Tsinghua, Central South, Beijing Institute of Technology) signals that foundational research is still feeding the pipeline.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are likely under-counted due to publication lag; current totals for 20242025 should be interpreted as a floor rather than a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume expanding; battery-cell chemistry dominates the technology mix

Annual filing volumes and IPC composition together reveal both the pace of competitive entry and the degree to which the field remains anchored to core battery chemistry versus emerging adjacent disciplines.

Annual filing trend

Filings were moderate in 2017–2018, dipped in 2019–2020, then surged to 34 in both 2021 and 2022. The 2023 count of 27 and the 2024 count of 34 indicate sustained activity, while the low 2025 figure reflects publication lag rather than a real drop. The overall multi-year growth rate of 67% confirms a field in expansion.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 34 in 2021.1620171820181320191020203420213420222720233420249202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells) accounts for the overwhelming majority of records, confirming that electrolyte innovation is pursued almost exclusively through core battery-chemistry claims. Adjacent classes — man-made filament spinning (D01D), heterocyclic compounds (C07D), and woven fabrics (D03D) — each appear in only a handful of records, marking them as sparse but potentially differentiated entry points.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 216; D01D · Man-made filament spinning 4.H01M · Batteries, cells …216D01D · Man-made filament…4C07D · Heterocyclic comp…2D01F · Chemical filament…2D03D · Woven fabrics & w…2B01D · Separation proces…1B01J · Chemical/physical…1C01B · Non-metallic elem…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2024154740A1Published 2024-07-25

Lithium sulfur battery electrolyte solution and li…

Abri CO., LTD.

A lithium sulfur battery electrolyte solution according to the present invention comprises a first component, a second component, and an organic solvent, and when the first component is a lithium polysulfide, the second component is lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, and the concentration of lithium bis(fluorofulsonyl) imide is denoted by A, a relational… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Lithium sulfur battery electrolyte solution and li… — patent drawingLithium sulfur battery electrolyte solution and li… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Electrolyte additives for lithium sulfur rechargea…80
2Electrolyte additives for lithium-sulfur batteries52
3一种伪高浓度酯类锂硫电池电解液及锂硫电池45
4锂硫电池电解液及包含这种电解液的锂硫电池34
5Nonaqueous electrolyte secondary battery33
6锂硫电池电解液及其制备方法以及使用所述电解液的电池31
7Electrolyte additives for lithium sulfur rechargea…29
8一种稀释的混合锂盐的锂硫电池电解液23

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D strategy

The combination of a growth-stage lifecycle, a two-tier applicant structure, active university-industry collaboration, and strong. China-side filing activity together define the strategic landscape for new entrants and incumbents alike.

Growth

Growth stage with sustained filing momentum

The field is classified as Growth, with annual filings rising 67% over the recent window and no indication that volume has eased from its 2021 peak on a multi-year basis. This positions lithium-sulfur electrolyte IP as an area where early and sustained filing can still establish meaningful positions. New entrants have a narrowing but real window to stake claims before the field matures.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a pronounced leader gap

The top five filers hold 43% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, and Lyten alone accounts for a disproportionate share. LG Energy Solution is the only other entity in the 20+ family range. Below that, most applicants hold fewer than ten families, suggesting that the field remains accessible to entrants willing to build focused portfolios. The risk is that Lyten’s lead may be sufficient to restrict freedom to operate in core electrolyte formulation claims.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Tsinghua University anchors the most active co-filing network

The most active co-filing pairs all involve Tsinghua University: it co-filed four patent families each with Jiangsu Huadong Institute of Li-Ion Battery, Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing, and China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation, and two families with an Ordos carbon-neutrality research entity. Suzhou University also co-filed once with its Zhangjiagang Industrial Technology Research Institute. This pattern suggests that university-to-industry technology transfer, particularly through Tsinghua, is a primary mechanism for moving research into commercial IP.

University-industry links
Geography

China dominates filings; US and PCT offer secondary reach

China accounts for 124 patent records, the United States for 51, and WIPO (PCT) for 18, with the European Patent Office at 10. South Korea, Taiwan, and a handful of other jurisdictions each hold fewer than five records. The China-heavy profile reflects both the concentration of academic applicants and the commercial ambitions of Chinese battery manufacturers. For non-Chinese players, PCT and EPO filing routes remain the primary mechanism for multi-market protection.

China-dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Tsinghua UniversityJiangsu Huadong Institute of Li-Ion Battery Co., Ltd.4
Tsinghua UniversitySinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing Co., Ltd.4
Tsinghua UniversityChina Petroleum and Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)4
Tsinghua UniversityOrdos Carbon Neutrality Research and Application Co., Ltd.2
Soochow UniversitySoochow University Zhangjiagang Industrial Technology Research Institute1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a single family may be counted across multiple offices.Explore insights →
Leaders

Lyten leads on volume; LG Energy Solution holds the closest corporate challenge

Two corporate filers stand clearly above the field. Lyten is the dominant force by family count and momentum, while LG Energy Solution brings deep electrochemistry expertise from its broader battery portfolio.

Leader · Lyten

Lyten

Lyten holds 39 patent families — the largest portfolio in this space — concentrated entirely in the core H01M battery-cell and electrode subclasses (H01M 10 and H01M 4), with additional coverage in H01M 50 structural components. Its momentum is classified as a new entrant with a strongly ascending trajectory (36 families in the recent period), indicating that most of this portfolio was built rapidly and recently. This suggests an aggressive IP-capture strategy rather than an incremental build.

families: 39
Challenger · LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution holds 23 patent families focused on H01M 10 and H01M 4, reflecting its established position in commercial lithium-ion and next-generation cell chemistry. Its recent-period trend shows a 72% decline from prior levels, which may reflect portfolio consolidation or a strategic shift rather than reduced interest. As the only major Korean industrial filer in the top tier, it represents the primary established-manufacturer counterweight to Lyten’s startup-driven accumulation.

families: 23
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, momentum scores, and technology emphasis for all top filers in this space.
Tsinghua UniversityCentral South University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Lyten Inc.36▲ new entrant
LG Energy Solution Ltd.5▼ -72%
Tsinghua University11▲ new entrant
Beijing Institute of Technology4▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player portfolio counts are at the patent-family level; technology emphasis is drawn from IPC subclass assignments.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Sparse fiber and heterocyclic chemistry branches adjacent to the dominant class

Outside the dominant H01M battery-chemistry cluster, a small number of records appear in fiber-manufacturing and organic-chemistry IPC classes. These branches are underserved relative to the core and may represent areas where differentiated approaches have yet to attract sustained filing.

D01D · Man-made filament spinning

Only four patent records appear in this class, representing roughly 2% of the technology composition. The technical connection is plausible: electrospun or melt-spun fiber membranes and separators are relevant to electrolyte confinement in lithium-sulfur cells. The University of Pittsburgh’s applicant-tech profile already shows four D01D5 records alongside its battery-chemistry filings, suggesting a viable entry path via separator or gel-polymer electrolyte fabrication approaches. Any entrant would need to demonstrate clear novelty relative to the Pittsburgh work.

Search this in Eureka →

C07D · Heterocyclic compounds

Only two patent records appear in the heterocyclic-compounds class. Heterocyclic solvents and ionic-liquid electrolyte components — such as imidazolium or pyrrolidinium salts — are chemically relevant to lithium-sulfur electrolyte formulation, particularly for polysulfide suppression. The extremely low filing count in C07D suggests that this synthetic-chemistry angle has not yet attracted dedicated IP coverage from any major filer. Whether this reflects a deliberate gap or simply an absence of viable approaches requires further technical investigation; on the evidence available, it is an observation of sparsity rather than a confirmed opportunity.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all sparse IPC branches, their filing counts, and technically adjacent opportunity areas across the full corpus.
D01F · Chemical filament and fibre featuresD03D · Woven fabrics and weaving+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; low counts reflect relative filing sparsity within this corpus, not global filing volume across all of chemistry.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across IPC subclasses

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 50 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 2 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsD01D 5 · Man-made filament spinning
Lyten Inc.Strong · 39Strong · 38Moderate · 17AbsentAbsent
LG Energy Solution Ltd.Strong · 22Strong · 20AbsentAbsentAbsent
Tsinghua UniversityStrong · 19Emerging · 3AbsentAbsentAbsent
University of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth System of Higher EducationStrong · 5Strong · 3Moderate · 2Emerging · 1Strong · 4
Central South UniversityStrong · 13AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Beijing Institute of TechnologyStrong · 6AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Shenzhen Qichen New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Strong · 5AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own lithium-sulfur electrolyte landscape in minutes

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.