Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (375 records) with 2024 (265) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,140 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks patent families addressing lithium-sulfur battery reliability and durability — specifically cycle-life improvement, capacity retention and shuttle-effect suppression — across publications from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off. The search combines core lithium-sulfur battery terminology with the specific durability mechanisms that separate lab-scale demonstrations from commercially viable cells, since a lithium-sulfur cell that cannot hold capacity over hundreds of cycles has limited value regardless of its initial energy density.
3,140 patent families were identified. Families, rather than raw publications, are the unit used throughout this page because they neutralise the effect of continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates, giving a fairer read on how much distinct inventive activity actually exists.
The filing curve and the IPC breakdown together show a field that expanded quickly, plateaued, and now concentrates its claim activity in one core subclass.
Filings rose from 245 in 2017 to a peak of 375 in 2021, held near that level through 2022 at 371, and have since declined. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2026 figure of 23 understates actual recent filing activity rather than signalling that the field has stopped.
H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) covers 3,055 of the 3,140 records — effectively the entire corpus. The next-largest classes, H01G (capacitors, 229) and C01B (inorganic compounds, 203), are an order of magnitude smaller, and polymer-related classes (C08J, C08F, C08G) and nanotechnology (B82Y) are smaller still. That imbalance suggests most durability work is being claimed as core cell architecture rather than through adjacent materials or component classes.
Shares are the percentage of the 3,140 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about lithium-sulfur battery reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing covers use of a silica composition — a surface-modified colloidal silica dispersion or its evaporated product — in preparing a composite gel electrolyte for a lithium-sulfur battery, together with a polymer precursor composition, a preparation method, and the resulting electrochemical device.Filed by Evonik Operations GmbH, published 2026-01-22 — illustrating continued materials-supplier interest in quasi-solid-state electrolyte routes to durability.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20150364747A1 | Materials for solid state electrolytes and protective electrode coatings for lithium batteries | 400 |
| 2 | US20040214085A1 | Negative active material for rechargeable lithium battery, method of preparing same, and rechargeable lithium… | 258 |
| 3 | US20110076572A1 | Non-aqueous electrolytes for electrochemical cells | 150 |
| 4 | US20020192557A1 | Lithium-sulfur batteries | 141 |
| 5 | US20170133662A1 | Composite lithium metal anodes for lithium batteries with reduced volumetric fluctuation during cycling and d… | 133 |
| 6 | US20020106561A1 | Positive electrode for a lithium-sulfur battery and a lithium-sulfur battery including the positive electrode | 129 |
| 7 | US20150221935A1 | Sulfur based active material for a positive electrode | 116 |
| 8 | US20160064773A1 | Composite, method of preparing the composite, electrolyte comprising the composite, and lithium secondary bat… | 107 |
| 9 | US7250233B2 | Lithium-sulfur batteries | 107 |
| 10 | US20120082903A1 | Functionalized ionic liquid electrolytes for lithium ion batteries | 104 |
Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence within this searched corpus, not as a measure of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are set against publication timing and citation behaviour.
Filing volume was already flat between 2021 (375) and 2022 (371) before declining, and the 2026 figure of 23 is depressed by publication lag rather than a sudden stop in R&D. Read the last 18 months of any trend chart cautiously.
LG Energy Solution filed 5 families in the latest year (down 58% year-on-year) and CATL filed 2 (down 82%). Several previously prolific assignees — Samsung SDI, LG Chem, Samsung Electronics, Asahi Kasei — recorded zero filings in the same period, a pattern more consistent with a maturing claim landscape than with abandoned research.
97% of records sit in H01M, with capacitor (H01G), inorganic compound (C01B) and polymer classes (C08J, C08F, C08G) each covering well under 10% of the corpus. Durability improvements approached through polymer chemistry or nanostructured materials are comparatively under-claimed relative to core cell-architecture approaches.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to lithium-sulfur battery reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing activity concentrates among a small group of Korean and Chinese battery makers and their research partners, with a long tail of single-assignee and materials-supplier filings behind them.
The strongest co-assignee relationship in this dataset links Samsung SDI with Samsung Electronics (Korea) at 92 shared filings, well ahead of the LG Energy Solution / SNU R&DB Foundation pairing (19) and LG Chem / KAIST (16). These pairings point to durability work being run as joint corporate-research programmes rather than single-inventor filings.
LG Energy Solution and CATL are the only two assignees in this dataset with any filings in the latest year, at 5 and 2 respectively — and both show sharp year-on-year declines (-58% and -82%). No other tracked assignee filed in the most recent year.
The United States (1,133) and the European Patent Office (895) receive the largest share of filings, ahead of WIPO/PCT (316), China (165), Germany (150) and India (118). That split suggests applicants are prioritising protection in mature battery markets and treating PCT as a staging route rather than a final destination.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| LG Energy Solution | 5 | -58% |
| Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL) | 2 | -82% |
| Samsung SDI | 0 | — |
| LG Chem | 0 | — |
| Samsung Electronics (Korea) | 0 | — |
| Asahi Kasei | 0 | — |
| Leyden Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| NOHMs Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, partnership scouting or white-space filing.
The highest-citation filings in this corpus, including work on solid-state electrolyte materials and composite lithium metal anodes, are the ones most likely to have spawned dense continuation families worth clearing before committing to a similar approach.
Explore citation network in EurekaWith most historic leaders at zero filings in the latest year, LG Energy Solution and CATL are the two organisations whose current claim scope is most likely to shift the competitive picture in the next 18 months.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaCapacitor-hybrid, heterocyclic-compound and nanotechnology approaches to shuttle-effect suppression sit well outside the dense H01M core and warrant a dedicated prior-art scan before drafting.
Run a white-space search in EurekaCapacity fade in lithium-sulfur cells is driven mainly by the polysulfide shuttle effect, where soluble intermediate species migrate between electrodes and are progressively lost from the active material. Patent filings in this dataset address it through several routes: modified electrolyte formulations, protective coatings on electrodes, and physical barrier or interlayer structures designed to trap polysulfides near the cathode. The concentration of filings in H01M (batteries and cells) shows that most patented solutions treat this as a cell-architecture problem rather than a pure materials-chemistry one, though materials classes like C01B and C08J contribute a meaningful minority of the filings.
Based on recent-year filing counts, only two organisations in this dataset show any activity in the most recent year: LG Energy Solution with 5 filings and CATL with 2, though both are down sharply year-on-year (-58% and -82% respectively). Several assignees that were historically active, including Samsung SDI, LG Chem, Samsung Electronics and Asahi Kasei, recorded zero filings in the same period. This does not necessarily mean those organisations have stopped researching the technology, since publication lag of roughly 18 months means the most recent filing year is always undercounted at the time of any given data pull.
The filing trend peaked at 375 families in 2021, held roughly steady at 371 in 2022, and has declined since, reaching 23 by 2026. Some of that recent decline is a real slowdown and some is a publication-lag artefact, since applications filed in the last 18 months typically have not published yet. The plateau between 2021 and 2022, which happened before the sharpest drop, is a stronger signal of a maturing claim landscape than the raw 2025-2026 numbers alone.
The clearest white space sits outside the dominant H01M subclass, which covers 3,055 of the 3,140 records in this corpus. Capacitor-hybrid architectures (H01G, 229 records), heterocyclic sulfur-host chemistry (C07D, 58 records) and nanostructured interlayer materials (B82Y, 48 records) are all comparatively lightly claimed relative to core cell-architecture approaches. A first claim in one of these branches would likely combine a specific material system, such as a silica-based gel composite or a heterocyclic host compound, with a defined durability metric like capacity retention over a stated cycle count, rather than claiming a general cell structure.
WO2026017059A1, filed by Evonik Operations GmbH and published 2026-01-22, claims the use of a surface-modified colloidal silica composition, and a related polymer precursor composition, in preparing a composite gel electrolyte for quasi-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries. It is narrow in that it centres on a specific silica-based material and dispersion, so it does not block gel electrolytes built on different inorganic fillers or polymer chemistries. Anyone working on quasi-solid-state lithium-sulfur electrolytes should still review its claim scope closely, since silica-based colloidal dispersions are a common starting point for gel electrolyte formulation work.
Go past this page: query the whole lithium-sulfur battery reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.