https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/lithium-sulfur-battery-reliability-and-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Battery & Energy Storage · Patent Landscape
Lithium-Sulfur Battery Reliability and Durability Patents
  • Filing has cooled from its 2021 peak. 375 families published that year against 245 in 2017, with the 2026 count of 23 reflecting the usual 18-month publication lag rather than a real drop-off.
  • Korean groups dominate but momentum is fading even there. The two most active recent filers, LG Energy Solution and CATL, both posted double-digit percentage declines in year-on-year filing, while several long-standing leaders logged zero filings in the latest year.
  • Claim density sits almost entirely in one IPC subclass. H01M accounts for 3,055 of 3,140 records, meaning cross-class strategies in capacitors, polymer chemistry or nanotechnology remain comparatively lightly claimed.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
3,140
Published Records
42%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-29%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (375 records) with 2024 (265) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,140 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families addressing lithium-sulfur battery reliability and durability — specifically cycle-life improvement, capacity retention and shuttle-effect suppression — across publications from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off. The search combines core lithium-sulfur battery terminology with the specific durability mechanisms that separate lab-scale demonstrations from commercially viable cells, since a lithium-sulfur cell that cannot hold capacity over hundreds of cycles has limited value regardless of its initial energy density.

3,140 patent families were identified. Families, rather than raw publications, are the unit used throughout this page because they neutralise the effect of continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates, giving a fairer read on how much distinct inventive activity actually exists.

Filing activity by publication year, 2017–2026
  1. 1LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD567
  2. 2SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD332
  3. 3SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD160
  4. 4CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) LIMITED131
  5. 5ASAHI KASEI BATTERY SEPARATOR CORP128
  6. 6LYTEN INC116
  7. 7LG CHEM LTD80
  8. 8SIONIC ENERGY INC58
  9. 9RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA57
  10. 10CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD53
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The filing curve and the IPC breakdown together show a field that expanded quickly, plateaued, and now concentrates its claim activity in one core subclass.

A 2021 peak followed by a plateau, not a collapse

Filings rose from 245 in 2017 to a peak of 375 in 2021, held near that level through 2022 at 371, and have since declined. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2026 figure of 23 understates actual recent filing activity rather than signalling that the field has stopped.

A 2021 peak followed by a plateau, not a collapse0100200300400245201720182019202037520212022202320242025232026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H01M dominates; adjacent classes are thin

H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) covers 3,055 of the 3,140 records — effectively the entire corpus. The next-largest classes, H01G (capacitors, 229) and C01B (inorganic compounds, 203), are an order of magnitude smaller, and polymer-related classes (C08J, C08F, C08G) and nanotechnology (B82Y) are smaller still. That imbalance suggests most durability work is being claimed as core cell architecture rather than through adjacent materials or component classes.

H01M dominates; adjacent classes are thinH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells3,05597.3%H01G · Capacitors2297.3%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…2036.5%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions1033.3%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)672.1%C08G · Condensation polymers591.9%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds581.8%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications481.5%Other57118.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 3,140 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Reliability and Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about lithium-sulfur battery reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative recent filing

Representative recent filing
WO2026017059A12026-01-22

WO2026017059A1 — Composite gel electrolyte for quasi-solid-state lithium sulfur battery

EVONIK OPERATIONS GMBH

The filing covers use of a silica composition — a surface-modified colloidal silica dispersion or its evaporated product — in preparing a composite gel electrolyte for a lithium-sulfur battery, together with a polymer precursor composition, a preparation method, and the resulting electrochemical device.Filed by Evonik Operations GmbH, published 2026-01-22 — illustrating continued materials-supplier interest in quasi-solid-state electrolyte routes to durability.

WO2026017059A1 — patent drawing 1WO2026017059A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20150364747A1Materials for solid state electrolytes and protective electrode coatings for lithium batteries400
2US20040214085A1Negative active material for rechargeable lithium battery, method of preparing same, and rechargeable lithium…258
3US20110076572A1Non-aqueous electrolytes for electrochemical cells150
4US20020192557A1Lithium-sulfur batteries141
5US20170133662A1Composite lithium metal anodes for lithium batteries with reduced volumetric fluctuation during cycling and d…133
6US20020106561A1Positive electrode for a lithium-sulfur battery and a lithium-sulfur battery including the positive electrode129
7US20150221935A1Sulfur based active material for a positive electrode116
8US20160064773A1Composite, method of preparing the composite, electrolyte comprising the composite, and lithium secondary bat…107
9US7250233B2Lithium-sulfur batteries107
10US20120082903A1Functionalized ionic liquid electrolytes for lithium ion batteries104

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence within this searched corpus, not as a measure of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are set against publication timing and citation behaviour.

Filing momentum
375 → 23
peak year (2021) vs. latest year (2026, partial)

The plateau predates the visible drop

Filing volume was already flat between 2021 (375) and 2022 (371) before declining, and the 2026 figure of 23 is depressed by publication lag rather than a sudden stop in R&D. Read the last 18 months of any trend chart cautiously.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Assignee momentum
-58% / -82% YoY
LG Energy Solution / CATL, latest year

Even the active filers are pulling back

LG Energy Solution filed 5 families in the latest year (down 58% year-on-year) and CATL filed 2 (down 82%). Several previously prolific assignees — Samsung SDI, LG Chem, Samsung Electronics, Asahi Kasei — recorded zero filings in the same period, a pattern more consistent with a maturing claim landscape than with abandoned research.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Technology concentration
3,055 / 3,140
records classified under H01M

Claim activity is concentrated in one subclass

97% of records sit in H01M, with capacitor (H01G), inorganic compound (C01B) and polymer classes (C08J, C08F, C08G) each covering well under 10% of the corpus. Durability improvements approached through polymer chemistry or nanostructured materials are comparatively under-claimed relative to core cell-architecture approaches.

IPC subclass distribution
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to lithium-sulfur battery reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Filing activity concentrates among a small group of Korean and Chinese battery makers and their research partners, with a long tail of single-assignee and materials-supplier filings behind them.

Leading filer group
92 co-filings
Samsung SDI + Samsung Electronics (Korea)

Corporate-academic and intra-group pairs anchor the top of the table

The strongest co-assignee relationship in this dataset links Samsung SDI with Samsung Electronics (Korea) at 92 shared filings, well ahead of the LG Energy Solution / SNU R&DB Foundation pairing (19) and LG Chem / KAIST (16). These pairings point to durability work being run as joint corporate-research programmes rather than single-inventor filings.

Co-assignee pairs, n=10
Momentum leaders
5 filings, latest year
LG Energy Solution

LG Energy Solution and CATL remain the most active, but both are slowing

LG Energy Solution and CATL are the only two assignees in this dataset with any filings in the latest year, at 5 and 2 respectively — and both show sharp year-on-year declines (-58% and -82%). No other tracked assignee filed in the most recent year.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Receiving offices
1,133 US filings
leading office by volume

US and EPO dominate filing venue choice

The United States (1,133) and the European Patent Office (895) receive the largest share of filings, ahead of WIPO/PCT (316), China (165), Germany (150) and India (118). That split suggests applicants are prioritising protection in mature battery markets and treating PCT as a staging route rather than a final destination.

Receiving office distribution
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth scanning before filing
These sub-areas sit outside the dense H01M core and show comparatively thin coverage in this corpus.
Silica-based gel electrolyte compositesCapacitor-hybrid shuttle-suppression architecturesHeterocyclic sulfur-host compounds (C07D)Nanostructured interlayers (B82Y)Vinyl-polymer binder systems for cathode retention
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
LG Energy Solution5-58%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL)2-82%
Samsung SDI0
LG Chem0
Samsung Electronics (Korea)0
Asahi Kasei0
Leyden Inc.0-100%
NOHMs Technologies, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, partnership scouting or white-space filing.

Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited records

The highest-citation filings in this corpus, including work on solid-state electrolyte materials and composite lithium metal anodes, are the ones most likely to have spawned dense continuation families worth clearing before committing to a similar approach.

Explore citation network in Eureka

Track the assignees still filing

With most historic leaders at zero filings in the latest year, LG Energy Solution and CATL are the two organisations whose current claim scope is most likely to shift the competitive picture in the next 18 months.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka

Scope claims in under-claimed IPC branches

Capacitor-hybrid, heterocyclic-compound and nanotechnology approaches to shuttle-effect suppression sit well outside the dense H01M core and warrant a dedicated prior-art scan before drafting.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Lithium-Sulfur Battery Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole lithium-sulfur battery reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.