Book a demo

Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation Patents: Trends & Gaps 2026

Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation Patents: Trends & Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/lithium-sulfur-battery-simulation-and-modeling-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Battery & Energy Storage
Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation and Modeling Patents
  • Filing already peaked. 2021 recorded 10 families, the high point of the series; by the 2022 midpoint, filings had dropped back to 2, and the trend has stayed flat or declining since.
  • Measurement, not just chemistry, is where claims sit. G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) appears in 12 of 31 records — nearly as often as H01M battery-cell classifications — showing how much of this space is state-estimation and diagnostics rather than cell design.
  • No assignee is currently active. Every tracked assignee, from CATL to LG Energy Solution, shows zero filings in the latest year — a sign the field is either between filing cycles or awaiting the next commercialization push.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
31
Published Records
84%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-40%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (10 records) with 2024 (6) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 31 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of lithium-sulfur battery chemistry and the simulation, electrochemical modeling, and degradation-prediction methods used to characterize it — polysulfide shuttle modeling, capacity-fade prediction, and related state-estimation techniques. The scope is narrow by design: it captures documents that combine Li-S-specific chemistry terms with modeling or degradation-modeling language, rather than the broader universe of lithium-sulfur cell patents or generic battery management systems.

The dataset spans 2015 through the 2026 cut-off and totals 31 published families, drawn primarily from US, European, Indian, PCT and Chinese filings. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend line will understate actual filing activity.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) LIMITED14
  2. 2THE RGT UNIV OF MICHIGAN6
  3. 3SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD4
  4. 4LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD1
  5. 5ROBERT BOSCH GMBH1
  6. 6GS YUASA INT LTD1
  7. 7CHINA AVIATION LITHIUM BATTERY RES INST CO LTD1
  8. 8ABB E-MOBILITY BV1
  9. 9HADAL1
  10. 10MEDTRONIC INC1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 31-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A single peak, then decline

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 10 in 2021, then fell back to 2 by 2022 — the midpoint of the series. Combined with zero recorded activity from every tracked assignee in the latest year, the pattern reads as a filing wave that has already crested rather than a steadily building field.

A single peak, then decline03581022017201820192020102021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Measurement and power systems dominate the classification mix

H02J (power supply and grid systems) leads at 18 records, followed by H01M (batteries and cells) at 14 and G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) at 12. Smaller counts in B60L, G06F, A61B, A61N and G06K show the modeling work bleeding into EV propulsion control, computing, and even medical-device power management — evidence that electrochemical modeling IP is being claimed as a system- and measurement-layer capability, not purely as cell chemistry.

Measurement and power systems dominate the classification mixH02J · Power supply & grid systems1858.1%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells1445.2%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement1238.7%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion619.4%G06F · Electric digital data processi…39.7%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery13.2%A61N · Electrotherapy & radiation the…13.2%G06K · Data recognition & presentation13.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 31 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation and Modeling with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about lithium-sulfur battery simulation and modeling and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US20260126490A12026-05-07

Battery parameter estimation using reduced-order and/or full-order electrochemical models

LG ENERGY SOLUTION, LTD.

This disclosure relates to systems, methods, and techniques for estimating battery parameters using a battery analysis system. In certain embodiments, the system receives current data for a battery cell, preprocesses the data to reduce frequency and amplitude, and executes a shallow estimation function using a reduced-order electrochemical model to estimate battery parameters based on the preprocessed data. In some embodiments, a deep estimation function, which utilizes a full-order electrochemical model, may be utilized to further refine the battery parameter estimates if higher accuracy is desired.Filed by LG Energy Solution, published 2026-05-07 — the newest record in this dataset.

US20260126490A1 — patent drawing 1US20260126490A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20150349385A1Method and System for Predicting Useful Life of a Rechargeable Battery154
2US20180316204A1Method and apparatus to predict capacity fade rate of battery46
3CN114611319A锂硫电池电化学模型的构建方法、仿真方法及装置9
4US20240022092A1Method for charging power battery and battery management system8
5US20230335822A1Method for charging power battery and battery management system8
6US20220170993A1Method for determining the state of health of an electrical energy store, computer program product, and machi…8
7US10931128B2Method and apparatus to predict capacity fade rate of battery8
8US20230327464A1Method for charging power battery and battery management system6
9US20230271523A1Method for charging traction battery and battery management system5
10US20230296684A1Accelerated Battery Lifetime Simulations Using Adaptive Inter-Cycle Extrapolation Algorithm5

Citation counts favor older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — treat this as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, classification spread, and citation data are read together.

Filing Momentum
10 in 2021, 0 latest year
peak to current

The filing wave has crested

Activity rose steadily to a 2021 peak of 10 families, then declined to 2 by 2022. Every assignee tracked in the recent-momentum data — including CATL, LG Energy Solution, Samsung, Bosch and Medtronic — shows zero filings in the latest year.

Read alongside the 18-month publication lag, this likely understates 2025-2026 activity but does not erase the downward trend from the 2021 peak.
Classification Spread
18 H02J · 14 H01M · 12 G01R
top three IPC subclasses

Modeling claims lean on power-systems and measurement classes

H02J outranks H01M itself, and G01R is close behind — meaning a large share of this field's IP value sits in how battery state is measured and managed at the system level, not only in cell-level electrochemistry.

A freedom-to-operate review here needs to clear power-management and measurement claims, not just battery-chemistry ones.
Citation Concentration
154 citations, oldest record
top-cited filing

Influence sits with early, broad battery-life prediction patents

The most-cited record, US20150349385A1 on predicting useful battery life, carries 154 citations — far ahead of the next tier. Newer Li-S-specific modeling filings, including the Chinese electrochemical-model construction patent, sit in single digits.

High citation counts reflect age and breadth of applicability more than current strategic weight in Li-S-specific modeling.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to lithium-sulfur battery simulation and modeling, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee set spans battery cell makers, an automotive OEM-adjacent energy company, a medical device maker, and at least one university — but none show recent filing activity.

Assignee Mix
9 named organizations
across cell, auto, medical, academic

A cross-industry but thin assignee base

The tracked assignees range from battery majors such as CATL, LG Energy Solution and Samsung to Bosch, Medtronic, GS Yuasa, and a university research board (Michigan). This spread suggests the modeling techniques are seen as applicable well beyond a single cell manufacturer's roadmap.

No single assignee dominates the 31-family total, and the field lacks a clear volume leader.
Collaboration Signal
1 co-assignee pair
strongest link in dataset

Collaboration is rare, not structural

The only recorded co-assignee pairing links the University of Michigan's board of regents with LG Energy Solution, appearing once. Beyond this single pair, filings in this dataset are single-assignee, indicating modeling IP is mostly developed and held internally rather than co-filed.

A single joint filing is not enough evidence of an ongoing academic-industry partnership pattern.
Recent Activity
0 in latest year, all tracked assignees
momentum check

Momentum has stalled across the board

Every named assignee in the recent-momentum data, from CATL through Bosch, recorded zero filings in the most recent tracked year. Combined with the 2021 peak-then-decline trend, this points to a field that filed heavily in one window and has gone quiet since — at least in published data.

Given the 18-month publication lag, some of this apparent quiet may still resolve into 2025-2026 filings not yet published.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth watching
Sub-areas with thin representation in the current 31-family set, based on the IPC tail and abstract content
Polysulfide shuttle-specific state estimatorsDegradation modeling for implantable/medical cells (A61B, A61N overlap)Reduced-order model deployment on embedded BMS hardwareEV propulsion-integrated Li-S degradation control (B60L overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL)0
The Regents of the University of Michigan0
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (South Korea)0
Feiyi New Energy Co.0
Medtronic, Inc.0
Robert Bosch GmbH (Germany)0
GS Yuasa International Ltd.0
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing trend and classification data point to specific next steps for teams deciding where to file or invest.

Check freedom-to-operate against measurement claims

With G01R and H02J outweighing pure H01M cell-chemistry classifications, an FTO review limited to battery-chemistry patents will miss a large share of the relevant claim space.

Run a claims search in Eureka

Watch for a second filing wave

The 2021 peak followed by decline could reflect a completed research cycle or a lull before commercialization-driven refiling. Recent LG Energy Solution activity suggests the latter is still possible.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Explore the under-claimed medical and EV overlaps

Single-digit representation in A61B, A61N and B60L suggests these adjacent applications of Li-S degradation modeling remain open for focused filing.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Lithium-Sulfur Battery Simulation and Modeling in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole lithium-sulfur battery simulation and modeling corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.