Livestock & Dairy Tech Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
- 91.9% concentration. The top 5 of 100 ranked assignees hold 2,080 of 2,263 records in scope — this field is not open to casual entrants at the core claim classes.
- Filing has cooled from its 2019 peak. 178 records in 2019 against 45 in 2021 and 13 in 2024 (-71% over that span), though 2025-26 counts are still filling in under publication lag.
- Composition skews agrochemical, not mechanical. 79.7% of records sit in A01N biocides/agrochemicals and 69.1% in C07D heterocyclic compounds — the livestock/dairy framing pulls in a crop-protection chemistry corpus more than a farm-equipment one.
Filing growth compares 2021 (45 records) with 2024 (13) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,263 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape actually covers
Despite the livestock and dairy label, the records returned by this search string sit heavily in agrochemical and pesticide chemistry rather than barns, milking robots or feed systems. A01N (biocides/agrochemicals) and C07D (heterocyclic compounds) dominate the class composition, which tells a filer that the phrase “agricultural livestock” combined with plant-growth and field-sensor terms is picking up crop-protection chemistry filed by agrochemical majors, with animal-health and farm-equipment claims as a smaller, separate layer underneath.
The most-cited records in the set are insecticidal compound families rather than livestock-specific mechanical or biological-trait inventions, which reinforces that citation weight in this corpus sits with older agrochemical chemistry, not with recent livestock-technology claims.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend, receiving offices and technology composition
Three views of the same 2,263-record set: how filings moved year over year, where applicants sought protection, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filing trend: a 2019 peak, then a documented pull-back
Filings ran from 133 in 2017 to a peak of 178 in 2019, then declined to 45 by 2021 and 13 by 2024 — a -71% move over that three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year that can be read as complete; 2025 and 2026 will fill in further as publication catches up to filing, roughly an 18-month lag.
Technology composition: agrochemical chemistry dominates
A01N (biocides/agrochemicals) covers 79.7% of the 2,263 records and C07D (heterocyclic compounds) 69.1%. Pesticide-activity claims (A01P) and acyclic/carbocyclic compound claims (C07C) sit far behind at 17.7% and 13.9% respectively. Because records can carry more than one class, these figures are shares of the total record count, not of each other, and they sum to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 2,263 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Livestock & Dairy Technology Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about livestock & dairy technology patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records in the corpus
US7877970B1 — Biomass harvesting system
A biomass harvesting system for harvesting agricultural plant growth from agricultural fields, combining a power source, a biomass accumulator producing discrete units of accumulated biomass, and a windrower feeding biomass to the accumulator. The system adds a biomass quality analyzer, a dirt control system, and a ground cover residue monitor to determine an optimal quantity of biomass residue left on the field, with an active tracking mechanism coordinating the components.Filed by an individual inventor rather than a ranked assignee — a reminder that mechanical harvesting claims in this space are not all locked up by the chemistry majors.
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2008122375A2 | Insecticidal aryl isoxazoline derivatives | 436 |
| 2 | WO2012080376A1 | Insecticidal compounds | 204 |
| 3 | WO2008019760A1 | Insecticidal isoxazolines | 188 |
| 4 | WO2009112275A1 | Pesticidal condensed – ring ARYL compounds | 175 |
| 5 | WO2012107434A1 | Insecticidal compounds | 174 |
| 6 | WO2012035011A1 | Pesticidal arylpyrrolidines | 151 |
| 7 | US20120094837A1 | Novel Heterocyclic Compounds as Pesticides | 148 |
| 8 | WO2010012442A2 | Insecticidal benzenedicarboxamide derivative | 139 |
| 9 | EP2910126A1 | Active compound combinations having insecticidal properties | 137 |
| 10 | WO2019197468A1 | N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-5-(methylsulfonyl)-n-{1-[1-(pyrimidin-2-YL)-1h-1,2,4-triazol-5-YL]ethyl}benzamide deriv… | 136 |
Citation counts favour older filings inside this searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence within the set, not as a measure of which claims matter most today.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the concentration and composition numbers mean for a filer
The headline figures translate into three practical read-outs: how tight the top of the field is, how the technology mix differs from what the topic name suggests, and where citation weight actually sits.
The core claim space is effectively closed
With the leader alone holding 977 records and the next four bringing the top 5 to 2,080 of 2,263, freedom-to-operate work in the core A01N/C07D chemistry has to start from these portfolios, not from a broad market scan. Tenth place holds only 18 records, so the drop-off below the top 5 is steep.
Livestock framing, agrochemical substance
A search built around livestock and dairy terms combined with plant-growth and field-sensor language returns a corpus dominated by biocide and heterocyclic-compound chemistry rather than animal-health hardware. Anyone scoping a livestock-equipment or biosensor filing should not assume this set represents their competitive field.
Activity has pulled back from its 2019 peak
The three-year decline from 2021 to 2024 is the cleanest complete-year comparison available; 2019's 178-record peak has not been approached since. Read 2025-26 counts as provisional given the roughly 18-month publication lag, not as confirmation the decline continues.
Influence sits with older insecticidal chemistry
The most-cited records in the set are insecticidal compound and isoxazoline chemistry families rather than recent livestock-technology inventions. That is expected in a searched corpus — older filings accumulate citations simply by being available longer — and should not be read as a ranking of current technical importance.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to livestock & dairy technology patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
A concentrated top, then a long tail
One assignee holds 977 of 2,263 records outright; by tenth place the count is down to 18. Co-assignee pairs show that the largest portfolios are frequently filed jointly across related corporate entities, which is typical of how large agrochemical groups structure their IP.
One filer dominates the ranking outright
The leading assignee's 977 records against a fifth-place figure of 114 shows a drop-off of roughly an order of magnitude within the top five alone. Any competitive-clearance exercise in this space has to treat the leader's portfolio as the primary reference point.
Related entities file jointly at the top of the ranking
The strongest co-assignee pairing links two entities within the same corporate group at 38 shared records, with a second pairing from the same group at 29. This is consistent with a single group routing filings through multiple legal entities rather than genuine cross-company collaboration.
Even the leader's recent filing has slowed
The parent entity behind the largest portfolio filed only 2 records in the latest year, down 33% year over year, and several other top-ranked entities show zero records in the latest year — consistent with the broader 2021-2024 pull-back rather than a leader-specific retreat.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Bayer AG | 2 | -33% |
| Bayer CropScience LP | 0 | — |
| Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH | 0 | — |
| Syngenta Participations AG | 0 | — |
| Elanco Animal Health GmbH | 0 | — |
| Syntec Group Corporation | 0 | — |
| FISCHER REINER | 0 | — |
| MALSAM OLGA | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The numbers above establish the shape of the field. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on specific claims and specific competitors.
Run a claim-level clearance on the top 5 assignees
91.9% of records sit with five companies; a clearance search scoped narrowly to their A01N and C07D claims will surface conflicts faster than a broad keyword sweep of the full 2,263-record set.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaCheck the under-claimed branches against your own claim draft
Biomass quality analysis and ground-cover residue monitoring show mechanical/sensor claims with far less density than the chemistry classes — draft a first claim there and stress-test it against the representative filing.
Draft and test claims in EurekaRe-run the trend once 2025-26 data settles
Publication lag means the most recent two years understate real filing activity; revisit the -71% (2021-2024) figure once those years are closer to complete before drawing conclusions about ongoing decline.
Track filing trends in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
Very concentrated at the top: the five highest-ranked assignees hold 2,080 of the 2,263 records in scope, or 91.9%. The leading assignee alone accounts for 977 records, while the tenth-ranked assignee holds only 18, showing a steep drop-off rather than a gradual tail. For a company entering this space, that means the practical competitive set is a handful of firms, not a broad field of small players.
The search terms combine livestock/dairy language with plant-growth, field-sensor and crop-production terms, which pulls in agrochemical filings alongside animal-health ones. As a result, 79.7% of the 2,263 records sit in A01N (biocides/agrochemicals) and 69.1% in C07D (heterocyclic compounds), both far ahead of any animal-health-specific class. Anyone using this dataset to scope a purely mechanical or animal-health filing should treat the agrochemical share as background noise from the search construction, not as a competitive signal for that narrower niche.
Filings peaked at 178 records in 2019 and have since fallen, reaching 45 in 2021 and 13 in 2024 — a -71% change across that three-year window, which is the most recent span that can be treated as a complete comparison. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are still low, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than a confirmed further decline. Any statement about the trend continuing past 2024 should be treated as provisional until later data fills in.
The clearest openings sit outside the dominant A01N/C07D chemistry, in mechanical and sensor-based sub-areas such as biomass quality analysis, ground-cover residue monitoring and dirt/contaminant control during harvest — areas the representative filing US7877970B1 touches but which have not accumulated the dense citation and filing overlap seen in the chemistry classes. A first claim in these branches should specify the sensing or control mechanism precisely enough to sit clear of that one filing's combination of components, rather than claiming the broad concept of biomass quality monitoring.
The highest-cited record, WO2008122375A2 ("Insecticidal aryl isoxazoline derivatives"), has 436 citations within this corpus, and the next four most-cited records are also insecticidal or pesticidal compound families. High citation counts in this set reflect the age and availability of these agrochemical filings rather than their current technical importance, so they should be read as an influence signal within the searched corpus, not as a ranking of the most commercially significant livestock or dairy technology today.
Research Livestock & Dairy Technology Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole livestock & dairy technology patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.