Carbonated Concrete Curing Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
A patent landscape analysis of carbonated concrete curing technology: filing trends since 2015, leading assignees, IPC technology composition, and the most-cited foundational patents shaping this low-carbon cement field.
Filing growth = 2021 (29 records) → 2024 (8); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete.
What this landscape covers
Carbonated concrete curing uses CO2 uptake during the hardening process to lock carbon into the cement matrix while it sets, rather than relying solely on hydration. The 185 records in scope span 2015 through the current filing year and cover both the core curing method and adjacent claims on mix design, aggregate recovery and demolition-waste carbonation. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so recent-year counts understate actual filing activity.
The scope pulls from a search string built around carbonated concrete curing and hardening terms combined with cement, concrete and cementitious binder language, restricted to C04B classification where the claim language matches. That combination catches both dedicated curing-process filings and broader cement patents that carry a carbonation-curing claim.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 185-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims fall into.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings rose to a peak of 49 in 2023 before falling to 8 by 2024, a -72% move from the 2021 level of 29. Treat 2025 and 2026 as incomplete rather than as evidence of a continued decline, since publication lag has not yet caught up.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
IPC subclass composition
C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) covers 99.5% of the 185 records, as expected given the scope. The next-largest classes are B28B shaping (21.1%) and B28C mixing (6.5%), with smaller clusters in separation processes, scaffolding/formwork, grinding, building finishing and materials testing — each under 6% of records.
Shares are the percentage of the 185 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Low-Carbon Cement & Concrete: Carbonated Concrete Curing Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about low-carbon cement & concrete: carbonated concrete curing patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFoundational and representative filings
US20240262743A1 — Separation of hardened concrete paste from aggregate
Filed by HSustainability GmbH, this 2024 filing describes recovering hydrated concrete paste from waste concrete by fragmenting a wet feedstock — waste concrete, water and carbon dioxide — under electric-pulse fragmentation, then separating the fragmented material into a fine carbonated-paste fraction and a coarse fraction that is recycled back into fragmentation.The claim ties particle-size control (D10/D90 bounds) and a fine-fraction cut-off of 250 μm directly to the fragmentation and CO2-dosing steps, which is the detail a design-around has to clear.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5232496A | Process for producing improved building material and product thereof | 149 |
| 2 | US4362679A | Method of casting concrete | 111 |
| 3 | US20070266906A1 | Concrete with a Low Cement Content | 83 |
| 4 | US6454632B1 | Method of hardening and polishing concrete floors, walls, and the like | 55 |
| 5 | US20160046532A1 | Retrieving aggregates and powdery mineral material from demolition waste | 47 |
| 6 | WO2014154741A1 | Retrieving aggregates and powdery mineral material from demolition waste | 46 |
| 7 | JP1990137782A | Curing method for concrete part or concrete structure and apparatus therefor | 38 |
| 8 | US6155907A | Method for hardening and polishing concrete floors, walls, and the like | 37 |
| 9 | WO1979000473A1 | A method of casting concrete | 32 |
| 10 | EP0151164B1 | A method of accelerating the hardening of concrete | 24 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; they signal influence on later filers, not present-day importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about the field
Four read-outs from the assignee ranking, the filing trend and the classification split — useful for deciding who to watch and where filing pressure is lightest.
One filer well ahead of the pack
The leading assignee holds 46 records against 23 for the fifth-ranked filer, roughly double. Filing counts drop off quickly after the leader but the ranking still runs to 53 companies, meaning there is a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants rather than a tight oligopoly.
A sharp pullback from the 2023 peak
Filings peaked at 49 in 2023 then dropped to 8 by 2024, continuing a decline that started from 29 in 2021. Because 2025-26 filings are still being published, this should be read as a real slowdown through 2024, not as proof the field has stalled since.
Curing claims increasingly touch shaping
Beyond the core C04B classification that covers essentially the whole dataset, a fifth of records also carry a B28B shaping-and-forming class, and smaller clusters sit in mixing, separation and scaffolding. That overlap is where curing-process claims and product-form claims are most likely to collide.
A dense academic-industry cluster
Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the three strongest pairs all sharing a count of 23 and centred on the same university-and-materials-company grouping. That points to a coordinated research programme rather than incidental co-filing.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to low-carbon cement & concrete: carbonated concrete curing patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Universite Toulouse III Paul Sabatier | Ecole Normale Superieure de Cachan | 23 |
| Universite Toulouse III Paul Sabatier | Ecocem Materials Ltd | 23 |
| Universite Toulouse III Paul Sabatier | Institut National des Sciences Appliquees de Toulouse | 23 |
| Ecole Normale Superieure de Cachan | Ecocem Materials Ltd | 23 |
| Ecole Normale Superieure de Cachan | Institut National des Sciences Appliquees de Toulouse | 23 |
| Ecocem Materials Ltd | Institut National des Sciences Appliquees de Toulouse | 23 |
| Universite Toulouse III Paul Sabatier | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) | 21 |
| Ecole Normale Superieure de Cachan | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) | 21 |
The strongest co-assignee pairs all route through the same French university and materials-science partners, suggesting a single sustained research programme rather than scattered joint filings.
Where to take this analysis
The landscape points to a concentrated leader, a fast-cooling filing curve through 2024, and claim overlap spreading into shaping and separation processes. The next step is usually to test a specific claim or filing strategy against this evidence.
Check freedom-to-operate before filing
Run a candidate claim against the most-cited records and the leader's portfolio to see whether the curing method, particle-size control or CO2-dosing step you plan to claim is already occupied.
Screen a claim in EurekaTrack the leader and the co-filing cluster
Set up ongoing monitoring on the top assignee and the academic-industry group behind the strongest co-assignee pairs, since new filings from either would signal where the field moves next.
Set up monitoring in EurekaMap the under-claimed branches
Separation processes, scaffolding and materials testing each sit under 6% of records — worth a closer look before assuming that space is defensible.
Explore white space in EurekaCommon questions about carbonated concrete curing patents
Carbonated concrete curing uses carbon dioxide uptake during the hardening process to lock carbon into the concrete matrix, instead of relying only on water-based hydration. It offers a route to lower the net carbon footprint of concrete while potentially speeding up strength gain, which is why cement producers, materials-science spinouts and university groups have all filed in this space. Filing activity peaked in 2023 at 49 records in this dataset before pulling back sharply, so the technology has already moved past its earliest exploratory phase into more targeted claims on specific process steps and mix designs.
The assignee ranking behind this landscape covers 53 companies, and the leading filer holds 46 records — roughly double the fifth-ranked assignee's 23. Beyond the leader, the field includes a cluster of academic institutions and materials-science companies that co-file frequently, alongside a long tail of assignees with only a few filings each. That structure means one company sets much of the claim landscape, but there is still meaningful activity outside its portfolio worth tracking.
Filings dropped 72% between 2021 (29 records) and 2024 (8 records), which is a real and complete-year decline. However, patent publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in any dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as confirming a continued slowdown. The honest read is that filing activity cooled sharply through 2024; what happens after that is not yet visible in the published record.
Almost every record in this dataset — 99.5% of 185 records — falls under the C04B cement and refractories classification, which is expected given the scope. Within that, about a fifth of records (21.1%) also carry a B28B shaping-and-forming class, and smaller but notable clusters sit in B28C mixing, B01D separation processes, and E04G scaffolding and formwork. The overlap between curing-process claims and shaping or separation claims is where new filings are most likely to run into existing prior art.
US20240262743A1, assigned to HSustainability GmbH and filed in 2024, claims a specific method for separating hardened concrete paste from aggregate using electric-pulse fragmentation combined with a carbon dioxide-containing liquid feed. The claim ties particle-size bounds and a defined fine-fraction cut-off directly to the fragmentation and carbonation steps, which is the combination a design-around needs to clear. Anyone building a recycled-aggregate or demolition-waste carbonation process should check whether their particle-size control and CO2 dosing sequence falls inside that claimed combination before committing to a process design.
Research Low-Carbon Cement & Concrete: Carbonated Concrete Curing Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole low-carbon cement & concrete: carbonated concrete curing patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.