Book a demo

Carbonated Concrete Curing Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Carbonated Concrete Curing Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/low-carbon-cement-and-concrete-carbonated-concrete-curing-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Low-Carbon Cement & Concrete
Carbonated Concrete Curing Patents: Who Is Filing and Where the Claims Sit

A patent landscape analysis of carbonated concrete curing technology: filing trends since 2015, leading assignees, IPC technology composition, and the most-cited foundational patents shaping this low-carbon cement field.

185
Published Records
-72%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
53
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth = 2021 (29 records) → 2024 (8); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Carbonated concrete curing uses CO2 uptake during the hardening process to lock carbon into the cement matrix while it sets, rather than relying solely on hydration. The 185 records in scope span 2015 through the current filing year and cover both the core curing method and adjacent claims on mix design, aggregate recovery and demolition-waste carbonation. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so recent-year counts understate actual filing activity.

The scope pulls from a search string built around carbonated concrete curing and hardening terms combined with cement, concrete and cementitious binder language, restricted to C04B classification where the claim language matches. That combination catches both dedicated curing-process filings and broader cement patents that carry a carbonation-curing claim.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG46
  2. 2CENT NAT DE LA RECH SCI (C N R S)23
  3. 3ECOLE NORMALE SUPERIEURE DE CACHAN23
  4. 4UNIVERSITE TOULOUSE III PAUL SABATIER23
  5. 5INSTITUT NATIONAL DES SCIENCES APPLIQUEES DE TOULOUSE23
  6. 6ECOCEM MATERIALS LTD23
  7. 7SIKA TECH AG16
  8. 8CRH GRP SERVICES LTD11
  9. 9CARBICRETE INC10
  10. 10HSUSTAINABILITY GMBH8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Low-Carbon Cement & Concrete: Carbonated Concrete Curing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 185-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims fall into.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose to a peak of 49 in 2023 before falling to 8 by 2024, a -72% move from the 2021 level of 29. Treat 2025 and 2026 as incomplete rather than as evidence of a continued decline, since publication lag has not yet caught up.

Filing trend, 2017-202601325385002017201820192020202120224920232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

IPC subclass composition

C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) covers 99.5% of the 185 records, as expected given the scope. The next-largest classes are B28B shaping (21.1%) and B28C mixing (6.5%), with smaller clusters in separation processes, scaffolding/formwork, grinding, building finishing and materials testing — each under 6% of records.

IPC subclass compositionC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories18499.5%B28B · Shaping clay & cement products3921.1%B28C · Mortar & concrete mixing126.5%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…105.4%E04G · Scaffolding & formwork63.2%B24B · Grinding & polishing42.2%E04F · Building finishing42.2%G01N · Material analysis & testing42.2%Other73.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 185 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Low-Carbon Cement & Concrete: Carbonated Concrete Curing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Low-Carbon Cement & Concrete: Carbonated Concrete Curing Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about low-carbon cement & concrete: carbonated concrete curing patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Foundational and representative filings

Representative recent filing
US20240262743A12024-08-08

US20240262743A1 — Separation of hardened concrete paste from aggregate

HSUSTAINABILITY GMBH

Filed by HSustainability GmbH, this 2024 filing describes recovering hydrated concrete paste from waste concrete by fragmenting a wet feedstock — waste concrete, water and carbon dioxide — under electric-pulse fragmentation, then separating the fragmented material into a fine carbonated-paste fraction and a coarse fraction that is recycled back into fragmentation.The claim ties particle-size control (D10/D90 bounds) and a fine-fraction cut-off of 250 μm directly to the fragmentation and CO2-dosing steps, which is the detail a design-around has to clear.

US20240262743A1 — patent drawing 1US20240262743A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5232496AProcess for producing improved building material and product thereof149
2US4362679AMethod of casting concrete111
3US20070266906A1Concrete with a Low Cement Content83
4US6454632B1Method of hardening and polishing concrete floors, walls, and the like55
5US20160046532A1Retrieving aggregates and powdery mineral material from demolition waste47
6WO2014154741A1Retrieving aggregates and powdery mineral material from demolition waste46
7JP1990137782ACuring method for concrete part or concrete structure and apparatus therefor38
8US6155907AMethod for hardening and polishing concrete floors, walls, and the like37
9WO1979000473A1A method of casting concrete32
10EP0151164B1A method of accelerating the hardening of concrete24

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; they signal influence on later filers, not present-day importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Low-Carbon Cement & Concrete: Carbonated Concrete Curing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the field

Four read-outs from the assignee ranking, the filing trend and the classification split — useful for deciding who to watch and where filing pressure is lightest.

Leader concentration
46 vs 23
leader vs fifth-place filings

One filer well ahead of the pack

The leading assignee holds 46 records against 23 for the fifth-ranked filer, roughly double. Filing counts drop off quickly after the leader but the ranking still runs to 53 companies, meaning there is a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants rather than a tight oligopoly.

Based on the 53-company assignee ranking
Filing trajectory
-72%
2021 to 2024 change

A sharp pullback from the 2023 peak

Filings peaked at 49 in 2023 then dropped to 8 by 2024, continuing a decline that started from 29 in 2021. Because 2025-26 filings are still being published, this should be read as a real slowdown through 2024, not as proof the field has stalled since.

2021-2024 complete-year figures
Claim overlap
21.1%
of 185 records also in B28B

Curing claims increasingly touch shaping

Beyond the core C04B classification that covers essentially the whole dataset, a fifth of records also carry a B28B shaping-and-forming class, and smaller clusters sit in mixing, separation and scaffolding. That overlap is where curing-process claims and product-form claims are most likely to collide.

IPC subclass shares, 185-record base
Co-filing structure
23
strongest co-assignee pair count

A dense academic-industry cluster

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the three strongest pairs all sharing a count of 23 and centred on the same university-and-materials-company grouping. That points to a coordinated research programme rather than incidental co-filing.

Co-assignee pair analysis, 10 pairs total
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to low-carbon cement & concrete: carbonated concrete curing patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Where the academic-industry cluster concentrates
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Universite Toulouse III Paul SabatierEcole Normale Superieure de Cachan23
Universite Toulouse III Paul SabatierEcocem Materials Ltd23
Universite Toulouse III Paul SabatierInstitut National des Sciences Appliquees de Toulouse23
Ecole Normale Superieure de CachanEcocem Materials Ltd23
Ecole Normale Superieure de CachanInstitut National des Sciences Appliquees de Toulouse23
Ecocem Materials LtdInstitut National des Sciences Appliquees de Toulouse23
Universite Toulouse III Paul SabatierCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)21
Ecole Normale Superieure de CachanCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)21

The strongest co-assignee pairs all route through the same French university and materials-science partners, suggesting a single sustained research programme rather than scattered joint filings.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Low-Carbon Cement & Concrete: Carbonated Concrete Curing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to a concentrated leader, a fast-cooling filing curve through 2024, and claim overlap spreading into shaping and separation processes. The next step is usually to test a specific claim or filing strategy against this evidence.

Check freedom-to-operate before filing

Run a candidate claim against the most-cited records and the leader's portfolio to see whether the curing method, particle-size control or CO2-dosing step you plan to claim is already occupied.

Screen a claim in Eureka

Track the leader and the co-filing cluster

Set up ongoing monitoring on the top assignee and the academic-industry group behind the strongest co-assignee pairs, since new filings from either would signal where the field moves next.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Map the under-claimed branches

Separation processes, scaffolding and materials testing each sit under 6% of records — worth a closer look before assuming that space is defensible.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Low-Carbon Cement & Concrete: Carbonated Concrete Curing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about carbonated concrete curing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Low-Carbon Cement & Concrete: Carbonated Concrete Curing Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Low-Carbon Cement & Concrete: Carbonated Concrete Curing Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole low-carbon cement & concrete: carbonated concrete curing patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.