Book a demo

Low-Cost Carbon Fiber Precursor Patent Snapshot 2026

Low-Cost Carbon Fiber Precursor Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Low-Cost Carbon Fiber Precursor Patent Snapshot in 2026

This is a small, highly concentrated field with 9 patent families in scope and Ashland Inc holding a commanding position; filing activity peaked around 2017 and has remained sparse since. The dominant technical route centers on chemical filament and fiber features (D01F), with pitch-based precursors (C10C) as the second anchor.

9
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Ashland Inc leads a tightly held, niche corpus

Ashland Inc sits at the top of the applicant ranking with 7 patent records, followed by LG Chem Ltd with 5. The top five filers collectively account for 61% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, signaling that a small cluster of incumbents defines the competitive terrain.

The tier gap between the leader and the rest of the field is steep: no other applicant reaches Ashland’s count, and the majority of ranked players hold only one or two patent records each. This compression at the lower tiers suggests limited broad-based commercial investment.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Ashland Inc7
2LG Chem Ltd5
3Industrial Technology Research Institute3
4Amogreentech Co Ltd3
5INDAL TECH & EQUIP2
6Lee Wan-jin2
7University of Wyoming2
8Battelle Energy Alliance LLC2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
9Mitsui Mining Co Ltd1
10Northeast Electric Power University1
11Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology1
12Kawasaki Steel Corporation1
13Dow Corning Ltd1
14SABIC Global Technologies BV1
15Chonnam National University Industrial Foundation1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Ashland’s dual emphasis on tar-and-pitch chemistry (C10C) and chemical fiber features (D01F) implies a vertically integrated approach to precursor development, while challengers like LG Chem and the Industrial Technology Research Institute concentrate more narrowly on fiber processing and polymer routes.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and should be treated as under-counted; the apparent absence of records in 20242025 does not necessarily indicate a halt in activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2017 and the technology mix centers on fiber chemistry

The annual filing trend reveals a burst of activity around 2017 that faded sharply through the early 2020s, with only isolated filings in 2022 and 2023. The technology composition chart shows D01F (chemical filament and fiber features) as the visible branch, flanked by C10C (tar and pitch) and D06M (textile chemical treatment).

Annual filing trend

Five records were filed in 2017, dropping to two in 2018, then to zero for three consecutive years before isolated single-record activity in 2022 and 2023. The 2024–2025 zeros reflect publication lag and should not be read as confirmed inactivity. The overall picture is of a field that expanded sharply in 2017 and has not sustained that pace.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2017.52017220180201902020020211202212023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

D01F (chemical filament and fiber features) is visible in the branch mix, followed at a distance by C10C (tar and pitch) and D06M (textile chemical treatment). Polymer-related branches — C08L, C08F — and downstream application branches such as H01M (batteries) and H01G (capacitors) are each represented by only one or two records, indicating narrow but real interest in non-fiber end uses.

Technology compositionD01F · Chemical filament & fibre features leads with 32; C10C · Tar & pitch 8.D01F · Chemical filament…32C10C · Tar & pitch8D06M · Textile chemical …6C08L · Polymer compositi…3D01D · Man-made filament…3C01F · Alkaline-earth, A…2C08F · Addition polymers…2C22B · Metal extraction …2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US5429739APublished 1995-07-04

Pitch precursor production by distillation

Ashland OIL, INC. A CORP. Of Kentucky

An improved wiped film evaporator (WFE) process for removing low molecular weight species from a hydrocarbyl mixture is disclosed, wherein partial oxidation of a hydrocarbyl mixture precedes the WFE step. Faster rates of distillation are achieved without significant deterioration of hydrocarbyl product properties. Such products can include carbon fiber… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Apparatus and method for making carbon fibers68
2Metal oxide incorporated activated carbon nanofibe…49
3Preparation method of nano-porous carbon fibersthr…28
4Ablative and insulative structures and microcellul…26
5Apparatus and method for making carbon fibers20
6Preparation method of nano-porous carbon fibersthr…18
7Pitch precursor production by distillation18
8Carbon nanofiber composite having three layer stru…11

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Ashland Inc

Ashland Inc

Ashland Inc holds 7 patent records, the largest position in the corpus. Its technology emphasis spans C10C (tar and pitch) and D01F (chemical filament and fiber features) in equal measure, reflecting an integrated pitch-precursor strategy that covers both feedstock chemistry and the resulting fiber properties. No momentum trend data is available for Ashland beyond its established ranking position.

patent records: 7
Challenger · LG Chem Ltd

LG Chem Ltd

LG Chem Ltd holds 5 patent records and concentrates its filings on D01F (chemical filament and fiber features) and D06M (textile chemical treatment), suggesting a focus on surface and processing treatments rather than upstream feedstock chemistry. No momentum trend is recorded for LG Chem in the evidence, so trajectory relative to earlier periods is evidence pending.

patent records: 5
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Industrial Technology Research InstituteAmogreentech Co Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.