CO2 Refrigeration Cycle Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
A patent landscape review of CO2 refrigeration cycle and low-GWP refrigerant patents: filing trends 2015-2026, leading assignees, IPC technology composition, and where claim space remains open.
Filing growth = 2021 (22 records) → 2024 (42); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 955 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape maps 955 patent records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026 that address CO2 (R744) refrigeration cycles and adjacent low-global-warming-potential refrigerant work, drawn from a search string combining title/abstract hits on “CO2 Refrigeration Cycle” with claim-level language tying refrigeration-cycle terms to CO2 and low-GWP refrigerant phrasing. The scope spans compressor, condenser, evaporator and decompression-section hardware, refrigerant compositions, and the gas-liquefaction and separation processes that overlap with refrigeration-cycle claims. Filing counts for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, so the apparent recent dip understates real activity rather than signalling a slowdown.
Reading the data by patent family rather than raw document count would further flatten the effect of continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates, but even at the record level the picture is consistent: a small group of industrial refrigeration and HVAC manufacturers anchors the field, while a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants works around the edges in materials, separation processes and niche hardware.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 955-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how the records split across IPC subclasses.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Annual filings rose from 49 in 2017 to a peak of 82 in 2022. The 2021-to-2024 span shows the clearest sustained growth in the dataset, up 91% from 22 to 42 records; 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publication catches up with filing, so they should not be read as a falling trend.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
Technology composition by IPC subclass
F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps) touches 54.9% of the 955 records, well ahead of C09K (refrigerant materials, 15.6%) and F25J (gas liquefaction and separation, 15.0%). Smaller shares in F25D, B01D, F24F, F01K and F28D show the cycle's reach into adjacent cooling, separation and heat-exchange hardware. Because a record can carry several IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100% of the record total and should not be added together.
Shares are the percentage of the 955 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Low-GWP Refrigerants: CO2 Refrigeration Cycle Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about low-gwp refrigerants: co2 refrigeration cycle patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative and most-cited filings
Refrigeration cycle apparatus (US20220380648A1, Daikin Industries, 2022-12-01)
The apparatus runs a refrigeration cycle on a small-GWP refrigerant through a standard four-element circuit: compressor, condenser, decompressing section and evaporator. The claim scope centres on the refrigerant composition enclosed within that circuit rather than on novel hardware geometry.Abstract text reproduced from the published filing; reference numerals refer to the original figures.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20060197053A1 | Absorption cycle utilizing ionic liquid as working fluid | 129 |
| 2 | WO2010119265A1 | Heat transfer compositions | 95 |
| 3 | US20070204635A1 | Air Conditioning Apparatus | 81 |
| 4 | US20120126187A1 | Heat transfer compositions | 77 |
| 5 | US20140208797A1 | Natural Gas Liquefaction Process | 74 |
| 6 | US20060260312A1 | Method of creating liquid air products with direct compression wind turbine stations | 73 |
| 7 | US20120058032A1 | Removal of carbon dioxide from air | 65 |
| 8 | WO2010064005A1 | Heat transfer compositions | 65 |
| 9 | WO2003019085A1 | A vapour-compression-cycle device | 65 |
| 10 | US20050172654A1 | Modular refrigeration unit | 60 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for strategy
Four read-outs from the assignee ranking, filing trend and technology split that matter for where to file next and who to watch.
The leaderboard is real but not a wall
The top 5 assignees combine for 38.0% of all 955 records and the top 10 for 50.3%. That leaves roughly half of the field held by entities outside the ranked leaders, which is enough headroom for a well-drafted claim to find genuine white space rather than simply reading on incumbent art.
Momentum built steadily before the reporting lag
Filings nearly doubled between 2021 and 2024, the clearest complete-year growth signal in the dataset. The apparent tail-off in 2025-2026 is a publication-lag artefact, not evidence the field has cooled.
Hardware claims crowd the core subclass
More than half of all records touch F25B refrigeration and heat-pump hardware, three-and-a-half times the density of the next subclass, C09K refrigerant materials at 15.6%. New hardware claims in F25B face the densest prior art in the dataset; materials and gas-separation angles (C09K, F25J) carry comparatively more room.
Europe and the US lead filing venues, PCT a distant third
Europe (EPO) and the United States each host roughly a quarter of the tracked filings, with WIPO PCT, Germany, Canada and Austria trailing well behind. A filing strategy built only around US and EPO coverage would still miss meaningful activity routed through PCT and the smaller European offices.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to low-gwp refrigerants: co2 refrigeration cycle patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is defensive clearance, freedom-to-operate, or identifying acquisition targets.
Stress-test a hardware claim against F25B density
Before filing new refrigeration-cycle hardware claims, run a freedom-to-operate check against the F25B subclass specifically, since it carries more than half of all records in scope.
Run a claim check in EurekaTrack the co-assignee clusters
The strongest co-assignee pairs in this dataset point to specific internal inventor teams worth watching for follow-on filings in the same hardware and refrigerant-composition space.
Explore assignee networks in EurekaWatch the materials and separation branches
C09K and F25J carry meaningfully lower filing density than F25B, which is where a first-mover claim is more likely to clear existing art rather than crowd into it.
Map white space in EurekaCommon questions on CO2 refrigeration cycle patents
The assignee ranking for this dataset covers 100 companies, with the leader holding 133 of the 955 records in scope. The top 5 assignees combine for 38.0% of all records and the top 10 for 50.3%, so while there is a clear leading group, roughly half the field is held outside that group. This pattern is typical of an industrial hardware sector where a handful of established HVAC and refrigeration manufacturers file heavily but a long tail of smaller entrants still contributes meaningfully.
Filings rose from 49 records in 2017 to a peak of 82 in 2022, and the clearest complete-year growth window shows a 91% increase from 22 records in 2021 to 42 in 2024. The apparent decline in 2025 and 2026 is a reporting artefact: publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, so the most recent one to two years are always undercounted at the time of any snapshot. Read the trend through 2024 as the reliable signal, not the tail years.
F25B, covering refrigeration and heat pumps generally, touches 54.9% of the 955 records in this dataset, making it by far the most crowded subclass. C09K (refrigerant materials, 15.6%) and F25J (gas liquefaction and separation, 15.0%) follow at roughly a third of that density. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these percentages describe density relative to the full record count rather than shares of a single pie, and they signal where claim space is occupied rather than where the underlying technology is more advanced.
US20220380648A1, assigned to Daikin Industries and published in December 2022, claims a refrigeration cycle apparatus built around a standard compressor-condenser-decompression-evaporator circuit enclosing a small-GWP refrigerant. Its significance is less about novel hardware architecture and more about tying that conventional circuit topology to low-GWP refrigerant charge, which is the same claim pattern that recurs across much of the F25B-heavy portion of this dataset. Anyone drafting hardware claims in this space should check how closely a proposed circuit and refrigerant pairing tracks this structure.
The subclasses with lower filing density relative to F25B's 54.9%, namely C09K materials (15.6%), F25J gas separation (15.0%), and smaller categories like F28D heat-exchange apparatus (4.1%), represent comparatively less-claimed territory. Combined with the fact that roughly half of all 955 records sit outside the top 10 assignees' 50.3% share, there is real room for a well-targeted composition or separation-process claim to avoid the densest prior art. The safest approach is to treat F25B as occupied ground and look at how a refrigerant composition or gas-separation angle can be claimed independently of core cycle hardware.
Research Low-GWP Refrigerants: CO2 Refrigeration Cycle Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole low-gwp refrigerants: co2 refrigeration cycle patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.